|
printable version
- js reader version
- view hidden posts
- tags and related articles
by Sheepdog
Sunday, Feb. 26, 2006 at 1:41 PM
What process are the overworked people at LA IMC using to hide and delete stuff?
Hidden Status ? Delete?
There has been an issue with me for some time and I have crystalized a few concerns regarding IMC security.
What event sequence initiates -hidden status/ delete- ?
In my opinion, some threads get hidden for unreasonable well, reasons.
Yes, I know we are whipping the IMC LA staff, free of charge, to be perfect and godlike in their selection process to suit all of our [ personal or corporate] needs; from the good bad and ugly readers and participants. But They have this :
Principles of Unity 1. We strive to provide an information infrastructure for people and opinions who do not have access to the airwaves, tools and resources of corporate media. This includes audio, video, photography, internet distribution and any other communication medium.
2. We support local, regional and global struggles against exploitation and oppression.
3. We function as a non-commercial, non-corporate, anti-capitalist collective. So that really means at least to me, is that all are encouraged, among other things, to participate in providing sourced or be prepared to provide sourced information relevant in deconstructing the lies that promote the exploitation and oppression that the ‘corporate and capitalist’ meddling which I believe is common criminality, brings into our lives. So now back to procedure.
Earlier johnk mentioned my suggestion about tagging the hidden status with the violation. Maybe the guidelines should be reviewed also. That could help the QC by providing feedback. It could also help flag errors. Thank you.
Report this post as:
LATEST COMMENTS ABOUT THIS ARTICLE
Listed below are the 10 latest comments of 24 posted about this article.
These comments are anonymously submitted by the website visitors.
TITLE |
AUTHOR |
DATE |
And, johnk... |
Nice but...? |
Monday, Mar. 06, 2006 at 5:43 PM |
it's easy to see |
Hex |
Monday, Mar. 06, 2006 at 6:10 PM |
actually, Whizz, my good ol Butt Buddy... |
S'not Hex |
Monday, Mar. 06, 2006 at 6:51 PM |
true to your affliction |
Hex |
Monday, Mar. 06, 2006 at 6:56 PM |
gentle virgin reader |
S'not Hex |
Monday, Mar. 06, 2006 at 7:05 PM |
oh, and to not be wary... |
S'not Hex |
Monday, Mar. 06, 2006 at 7:10 PM |
Oh and I made another mistake |
S'not Hex |
Monday, Mar. 06, 2006 at 7:12 PM |
Outrageous |
unbelievable |
Monday, Mar. 06, 2006 at 8:31 PM |
here you go snotty |
Hex |
Tuesday, Mar. 07, 2006 at 2:45 AM |
muckOmeter |
johnk |
Tuesday, Mar. 07, 2006 at 3:05 AM |
thanks as always, jornk |
S'bot Hex |
Tuesday, Mar. 07, 2006 at 7:08 AM |
Another Mistake I made |
S'not Hex |
Tuesday, Mar. 07, 2006 at 7:13 AM |
"S'not Hex" - aw look I've got a pet ! |
Hex |
Tuesday, Mar. 07, 2006 at 7:52 AM |
concerning hiding. |
sd |
Friday, May. 18, 2007 at 7:44 AM |
Please fix |
thanks in advance |
Wednesday, May. 23, 2007 at 6:15 AM |
have entered - double post |
sd |
Wednesday, May. 23, 2007 at 6:41 AM |
"Sometimes it takes awhile." |
I don't think that's the problem |
Wednesday, May. 23, 2007 at 7:00 AM |
It's gone now |
sd |
Wednesday, May. 23, 2007 at 7:06 AM |
Yeah, that's weird. |
thanks again |
Wednesday, May. 23, 2007 at 7:12 AM |
another typo |
sorry about that |
Wednesday, May. 23, 2007 at 9:26 PM |
please elaborate re. typo |
sd |
Thursday, May. 24, 2007 at 3:43 AM |
Sorry, I got the number wrong |
oops, I did it again |
Thursday, May. 24, 2007 at 8:20 AM |
another question for the editors |
sd |
Friday, May. 25, 2007 at 2:52 PM |
more changes |
sd |
Saturday, Jun. 30, 2007 at 7:15 AM |
|
|
|