No natural force is more destructive than earthquakes. The energy released by a magnitude 6.0 earthquake lasting 45 seconds, is several thousand times greater than a nuclear bomb. Furthermore, according to the USGS (united states geological survey), earthquake forecasting remains little more than an elusive goal. Sadly, many earthquakes strike locations where the population and government institutions have little or no capability to deal with the aftermath. Places like southern Iran and rural China.
Looked at from another perspective, an earthquake would make an ideal tool of destruction. Able to strike without warning, and appearing to be an act of nature, can you imagine any government or military organization that wouldn't want to add such an awesome capability to it's arsenal? But of course generating synthetic earthquakes is pure science fiction. Or is it?
See URL: http://www.geocities.com/electrogravitics/se.html
This science has been around for some time. Phase change by electroinduction and viceversa and expanding volumes and acoustic waves.
They don't even know where the remaining oil deposits are, let alone the exact mineral, fluid, solid, weight, volume, energy required to pinpoint an earthquake in an exact spot.
and reading a phase change with a charged wire requires you to know the vicinity of the change, or else you need the earth covered in household wire hooked up to car batteries on every south seas island. great work if you can get it, you know.
This science has been around for some time. Phase change by electroinduction and viceversa and expanding volumes and acoustic waves.
They don't even know where the remaining oil deposits are, let alone the exact mineral, fluid, solid, weight, volume, energy required to pinpoint an earthquake in an exact spot.
and reading a phase change with a charged wire requires you to know the vicinity of the change, or else you need the earth covered in household wire hooked up to car batteries on every south seas island. great work if you can get it, you know.