|
printable version
- js reader version
- view hidden posts
- tags and related articles
View article without comments
by David Attanasio
Saturday, Aug. 16, 2003 at 5:30 PM
dattan01@ucla.edu
On Sunday, August 10 at about 6:30 pm, Police Officer Alma Andrade fatally shot Yousuf Mollah after responding to a complaint. Five days later, the community of which Mullah was a part demanded answers as to the necessity and justice of his death.
On Sunday at about 6:30 pm, Police Officer Alma Andrade fatally shot Yousuf Mollah. Andrade, 29, and her partner had responded to a call that about a man exposing himself who had been identified as Mollah, a man known to the police to be mentally ill. According to the police, when they knocked on the door of Mollah’s apartment, Mollah came into the hallway hold a 13-inch kitchen knife. After drawing her weapon and ordering Mollah to drop his knife, Andrade claims Mollah lunged at her and her partner with the knife, forcing her to react with deadly force.
After Andrade shot him a single time in the stomach, Mollah fell to the floor and crawled back into his apartment. About 9:30 that night, LAPD officers fired tear gas into the apartment, broke the door, and entered the apartment, to find that Mollah had died of his wound.
On August 15, 2003, members of the Los Angeles Bangladeshi community gathered outside the Parker Center headquarters of the Los Angeles Police Department to protest the shooting of Yousuf Mollah. The rally began at 2 pm with a group of 40 people marching on the sidewalk in front of the Parker Center, carrying signs bearing messages such as “Justice for Yousef” and “Stop Police Brutality” while angrily yelling a number of different messages.
Organizers said that the protest was an effort to force an independent investigation into the shooting and subsequent death of Mollah, since they believe the LAPD incapable of an unbiased investigation. They criticized the entire handling of the situation, particularly the extreme rapidity with which Office Andrade resorted to lethal force and the lack of medical care for Mollah until 10 pm that night, three and a half hours after he was shot and after he was already dead.
Additionally, the organizers criticized the initial police response to the complaint about Mollah, as the police did not properly approach the situation given that they knew from previous reports that Mollah had a history of mental illness. Given that help had been sought for Mollah through the LAPD Systemwide Mental Assessment Team, the officers responding to the complaint should have been aware that Mollah suffered from mental illness and been prepared to deal with the situation appropriately.
According to the organizers, this was another instance where the LAPD officers were willing to use excessive force, a circumstance that has historically been very frequent with LAPD officers. The organizers also commented that this was not the only fatal shooting by LAPD officers that week; there were two others including another one the same day.
The brother of Mollah, Mizan Rahaman, who shared the apartment with Mollah, reported that he was deeply suspicious of the officer’s analysis of the danger Yousef posed. When Rahaman returned to his apartment at 2 am the night of the shooting, he found burnt food in pans on the stove, suggesting that Mollah may have been in the process of cooking dinner when he was shot. Furthermore, Rahaman said neighbors report having heard the police knocking on the door followed within five seconds by a gunshot. Rahaman says that the neighbors did not hear either of the police officers order Mollah to drop the knife.
Both Rahaman and the protest organizers assert that while Mollah may have been wielding a knife, this did not necessitate or justify lethal force on the part of the police. Furthermore, the leaders emphasize that timely intervention, even after Mollah was shot, could have saved his life; there was no reason why the police should have waited three and a half hours to enter his apartment. Instead of taking Mollah into custody and seeing to his proper medical care, Andrade and her partner called for SWAT, which shot tear gas into the apartment at 9:30 pm and entered at 10 pm.
After the initial march in front of the Parker Center police headquarters, a number of speakers briefly addressed the crowd through a PA system, and issued their demands for an independent inquiry into the matter. They also promised that the issue would not be dropped and that they would continue their efforts for justice until it had been obtained. By the end of the speeches, the crowd had grown from about 40 to almost 80, who then resumed the march. The protest dissolved around 3:15, but with promises by the participants not to let the issue drop.
Report this post as:
by police brutality victim #1209571975
Monday, Aug. 18, 2003 at 1:10 PM
"Organizers say they believe the LAPD is incapable of an unbiased investigation."
Same goes for any police department in the USA...
Report this post as:
by Kristen Perry
Tuesday, Aug. 19, 2003 at 8:41 AM
It's like having the IDF to investigate the murder of Rachel Corrie, and expecting justice.
Report this post as:
by cujo
Wednesday, Aug. 20, 2003 at 9:54 AM
....does anyone really care? This guy was showing his cock to children. You may wish for him to have a long and fruitful life of attempting to have sex with children but I am just happy to have one less scumbag.
Report this post as:
by PB
Wednesday, Aug. 20, 2003 at 3:47 PM
No, I don't think so. Jail killer cops.
Report this post as:
by ...*gross!*
Wednesday, Aug. 20, 2003 at 3:51 PM
ever notice how cops on the street always stand as though they were the "embodiment of everything it means to be a real man"?
these words are a friend of mines and they are so true. just look how they stand next time you see 'em. it's really gross.
- sorry - i guess there are people who really find that very attractive..
(hahahaha)
Report this post as:
by 4yrold
Thursday, Aug. 21, 2003 at 8:49 AM
Report this post as:
by Pat
Friday, Aug. 22, 2003 at 8:44 AM
Great article, Dave. This is outrageous.
Report this post as:
by please help
Saturday, Aug. 23, 2003 at 6:56 AM
I am currently involved in a very similar situation and thankfully i wasn't shot. I was minding my own business, showing my cock to various neighborhood children, when one of their parents started yelling at me. I ran to my apartment because i was hungey and wanted to start cooking dinner. As I was cooking the lapd knocked on the door identifying themselves as police and ordering me to come out. So I went to the door where the police were with a knife in my hand because remember i was cooking. If I was taking a shit and heard the doorbell I would answer the door with my pants around my ankles and shitty TP in my hand instead of finishing up. Then they beat me up cause I wouldn't drop the knife. Do you believe that? I just want to have sex with your kids not get beaten up. please help me i need a protest.
Report this post as:
by Joe
Tuesday, Sep. 09, 2003 at 3:09 PM
This is so ridiculous, people are screaming police brutality left and right. I agree that occasionally there are a few bad cops out there but for the most part they are just doing their jobs, the good cops outweigh the bad cops by far. We also have thugs and gang mambers that harrass and kill innocent kids and adults and when they get arrested for this they scream police brutality. Personally I think these lowlife gang members and child molestors desrve to be brutalized among other things. Remember also when you threaten a cop with a weapon then he has every right to shoot you.
Report this post as:
by Joe
Monday, Oct. 13, 2003 at 2:54 AM
The article contains quite a few discrepencies. For starters, the shooting occured on July 27 and not in August. Second the victim's cousing and not brother, was not inside the apartment complex but down the street calling the police fearing for his own life. The suspect was naked chasing the young girls in the apartment complex and not cooking like the article indicated. The suspect walked out of his apartment complex with a knife after indicating to residents that he was upset and that he was going to kill someone..
The article does not indicate that the suspect was under the influence of PCP. It's important to note how biased the article was and how the story was poorly written. No one bother to research the suspect's background. As usual, the public believes that law enforcement agencies and police officers know everything about a call and suspect before they approach. Trade places and leave your comfortable homes and face the dangers that officers confront daily..
Report this post as:
|