Working on this new server in php7...
imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

white themeblack themered themetheme help
About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
Features
latest news
best of news
syndication
commentary


KILLRADIO

VozMob

ABCF LA

A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List

LAAMN List




IMC Network:

Original Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
printable version - js reader version - view hidden posts - tags and related articles

Bush Bit in Ass by Lies

by Diogenes Friday, Jul. 11, 2003 at 7:11 AM

The Rats are deserting the sinking ship. Fed up with the Bush Junta's deadly lies the insider Bureaucrats are beginning to leak and speak.

http://www.atimes.com   
 
Middle East


Digging for dirt

By Jim Lobe




WASHINGTON - The administration of President George W Bush is finding itself increasingly beleaguered by growing charges by retired intelligence and foreign service officers that administration hawks exaggerated the threat posed by Iraq in order to press Washington into war.
The White House was forced to admit earlier this week that Bush's assertion during his State of the Union address in late January regarding Saddam Hussein's alleged attempts to buy uranium in Africa for a supposed nuclear arms program was based on flawed intelligence and should have been omitted from the speech.
But a growing number of lawmakers and independent analysts are suggesting that the uranium report - which was actually based on crudely forged documents supposedly provided by an Italian intelligence agency - may be just the tip of the iceberg of an effort by neo-conservative and right-wing hawks centered primarily in the Pentagon and around Vice President Dick Cheney to skew the intelligence to make their case for war.
"The Bush administration did not provide an accurate picture of the military threat with respect to Iraq," according to Gregory Thielmann, who served as the director of the Strategic, Proliferation and Military Affairs Office in the State Department's Bureau of Intelligence and Research (INR), until last September.
Contrary to the repeated assertion by Bush and other top officials, he said, "As of March, 2003, Iraq posed no major military threat to the United States," Thielmann, a 25-year foreign service veteran, told a standing-room only press conference at the National Press Club.
He added that the administration's public statements about Iraq's biological and chemical weapons capabilities, stockpile of Scud missiles, and ties to al-Qaeda were also misleading and often based on distortions of what the intelligence community itself was saying.
His charges and the growing attention being paid to them come on the heels of similar charges by another retired foreign service officer, ambassador Joseph Wilson, who had been sent by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) to Niger to check out the reports of Iraq's purchase of uranium "yellowcake".
In a television interview, Wilson, who was Washington's highest-ranking diplomat in Baghdad during the first Gulf War in 1991, said that he was stunned when Bush referred to it in his State of the Union address and concluded that its mention was part of a broader effort to influence public opinion. "It really comes down to the administration misrepresenting the facts on an issue that was a fundamental justification for going to war," he told the Washington Post. "It begs the question, what else are they lying about?"
These questions - which have been echoed by other retired intelligence officers, such as the CIA's former top counter-terrorism analyst, Vincent Cannistraro - are clearly beginning to worry the administration, particularly because of growing doubts as well about the duration and dangers posed by the US occupation of Iraq.
After the administration's assurances that US troops would be greeted by Iraqis as liberators, armed resistance to their presence appears to be rising steadily, with the US Central Command reporting an average of 13 armed attacks against forces each day. Some 30 US soldiers have been killed since May 1, when Bush declared the war over, and officials are actively studying the possibility of adding to the 145,000 troops there.
According to a new survey of public opinion released on Wednesday, just 23 percent of Americans say that the military effort in Iraq is going very well, down from 61 percent in late April. Doubts about the occupation naturally feed into concerns about how the US got there.
"If the American people conclude that American soldiers have died because the administration has lied, it will be extremely serious," according to Joseph Cirincione, an arms control specialist at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. "American public opinion is clearly shifting on this issue." He said that he didn't see how the Republicans and the administration could avert a major investigation.
Bush, who had hoped that his "victory lap" around sub-Saharan Africa this week would highlight his "compassionate conservatism" for the folks back home, has been dogged by questions from reporters about his State of the Union allegations since he arrived at his first stop in Senegal.
At a joint press conference with South African President Thabo Mbeki in Pretoria, he deflected a question about it. "There is no doubt in my mind that Saddam Hussein was a threat to the world peace and there is no doubt in my mind the United States along with our allies and friends did the right thing in removing him from power," he said, adding, "I'm confident that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction."
As several Democratic lawmakers called for a full-scale Congressional investigation, Pentagon chief Donald Rumsfeld was also asked at a hearing of the Senate Armed Services Committee whether the administration exaggerated the threat. "The coalition did not act in Iraq because we had discovered dramatic new evidence of Iraq's pursuit [of weapons of mass destruction, or WMD]," he said. "We acted because we saw the evidence in a dramatic new light - through the prism of our experience on 9-11 [September 11]."
But Rumsfeld's statement only raised new questions for analysts who have documented the administration's claims about Baghdad's WMD capabilities. Cirincione described Rumsfeld's latest assertion as "shocking". "Administration officials repeatedly said that they had new evidence [in the run-up to the war]."
Indeed, when he heard Bush's uranium reference, Thielmann said he "wondered what new evidence had come into the administration". But, when he realized that it was based on the already-discredited Niger report, he said he felt a "combination of surprise and disgust". "This administration has a faith-based attitude to intelligence," he said, which, simply stated, consisted of, "We know the answers. Give us the evidence the support those answers."
Thielmann was particularly dismissive of some Republican attempts to defend the administration. The Majority Leader of the House of Representatives, Tom DeLay, told reporters on Tuesday in response to the White House admission that the uranium story was false that it was "very easy to pick one little flaw here and one little flaw there". "A little flaw here, a little flaw there," said Thielmann, "and pretty soon you've fostered a fundamentally flawed view of reality".
Cirincione said that the administration's failure to find any evidence of WMD or Scud missiles despite scouring more than 200 priority sites over the past three months made it clear that the UN weapons inspectors, whose work was often mocked by administration officials, actually fulfilled their intended purpose quite well.
The administration, including even Secretary of State Colin Powell - who, according to Thielmann shielded INR from political influence - made increasingly specific claims about the intelligence it said it had about Iraq's WMD in the immediate approach to the war - in what Cirincione described as a "conscious effort to discredit the inspectors". "They had to eliminate the viable alternative to going to war," he said.
Thielmann said that in working-level discussions between analysts from different agencies, consensus about the intelligence would generally be achieved. But, as the analyses made their way to higher levels, the consensus would drop away, with the CIA and DIA tending to demur. "I can only assume this was in response to [political] pressure," he said.
(Inter Press Service)

 
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


LATEST COMMENTS ABOUT THIS ARTICLE
Listed below are the 10 latest comments of 84 posted about this article.
These comments are anonymously submitted by the website visitors.
TITLE AUTHOR DATE
Der Fuhrer has... Diogenes Friday, Jul. 11, 2003 at 7:13 AM
deserters Meyer London Friday, Jul. 11, 2003 at 8:37 AM
The Asia Times? Eric Friday, Jul. 11, 2003 at 8:42 AM
Trolls Troll Watcher Friday, Jul. 11, 2003 at 8:47 AM
News Break! this just in! Friday, Jul. 11, 2003 at 9:11 AM
news break Eric's pharmacist Friday, Jul. 11, 2003 at 10:04 AM
More of this, please Ziegler Friday, Jul. 11, 2003 at 3:06 PM
You don't like lies? James Osterberg Friday, Jul. 11, 2003 at 3:16 PM
and they said we were ineffective matt Friday, Jul. 11, 2003 at 4:39 PM
What the hell are you talking about? Iggy Friday, Jul. 11, 2003 at 4:58 PM
Notice Airic's standard... Diogenes Friday, Jul. 11, 2003 at 5:11 PM
i think err-ic Friday, Jul. 11, 2003 at 10:52 PM
sphere circle Saturday, Jul. 12, 2003 at 5:15 AM
sphere circle Saturday, Jul. 12, 2003 at 5:20 AM
Argument activist community Saturday, Jul. 12, 2003 at 5:29 AM
^ Eric Saturday, Jul. 12, 2003 at 5:30 AM
Eric activist community Saturday, Jul. 12, 2003 at 5:35 AM
^ Eric Saturday, Jul. 12, 2003 at 5:47 AM
^ ym Saturday, Jul. 12, 2003 at 5:57 AM
Iggy, Middle East Scholar Meyer London Saturday, Jul. 12, 2003 at 6:09 AM
Meyer :) Saturday, Jul. 12, 2003 at 6:15 AM
Good question, smiley. Eric Saturday, Jul. 12, 2003 at 6:58 AM
How about... Diogenes Saturday, Jul. 12, 2003 at 7:01 AM
Oh gee. The Constitution. Eric Saturday, Jul. 12, 2003 at 7:09 AM
Does the idea of actually... Diogenes Saturday, Jul. 12, 2003 at 7:11 AM
Depends. Which Constitution? Eric Saturday, Jul. 12, 2003 at 7:17 AM
Eric John Ashcroft Saturday, Jul. 12, 2003 at 7:20 AM
And well you should be frightened... Diogenes Saturday, Jul. 12, 2003 at 7:37 AM
sphere circle Saturday, Jul. 12, 2003 at 7:41 AM
If I'm a traitor. Eric Saturday, Jul. 12, 2003 at 7:46 AM
frescairic is going ever more... Diogenes Saturday, Jul. 12, 2003 at 7:47 AM
sphere circle Saturday, Jul. 12, 2003 at 7:49 AM
dio fresca Saturday, Jul. 12, 2003 at 7:49 AM
How charming. Diogenes Saturday, Jul. 12, 2003 at 7:54 AM
sphere circle Saturday, Jul. 12, 2003 at 7:55 AM
Eric Dr. Sigmund Fruit Saturday, Jul. 12, 2003 at 7:55 AM
and BTW... Eric Saturday, Jul. 12, 2003 at 7:56 AM
You run out of anything resembling... Diogenes Saturday, Jul. 12, 2003 at 7:58 AM
Yes. Eric Saturday, Jul. 12, 2003 at 7:59 AM
okay, now I'm curious Sheepdog Saturday, Jul. 12, 2003 at 8:04 AM
Eric notamole Saturday, Jul. 12, 2003 at 8:05 AM
What's wrong Airic... Diogenes Saturday, Jul. 12, 2003 at 8:05 AM
Well? Eric Saturday, Jul. 12, 2003 at 8:06 AM
Eric is a mole Eric is a mole Saturday, Jul. 12, 2003 at 8:10 AM
piss off shill Eric Saturday, Jul. 12, 2003 at 8:11 AM
sphere circle Saturday, Jul. 12, 2003 at 8:11 AM
pathetic ideologue Sheepdog Saturday, Jul. 12, 2003 at 8:14 AM
okay sheepskin rubber Eric Saturday, Jul. 12, 2003 at 8:14 AM
^ Exactly Saturday, Jul. 12, 2003 at 8:16 AM
I'm a designer Sheepdog Saturday, Jul. 12, 2003 at 8:19 AM
Actually Airic the term is... Diogenes Saturday, Jul. 12, 2003 at 8:20 AM
Of course he is fresca Saturday, Jul. 12, 2003 at 8:25 AM
Thank you sheepdog. Eric Saturday, Jul. 12, 2003 at 8:26 AM
sphere circle Saturday, Jul. 12, 2003 at 8:27 AM
also, thank you Fresca Eric Saturday, Jul. 12, 2003 at 8:28 AM
sphere circle Saturday, Jul. 12, 2003 at 8:31 AM
The shill is ERIC Eric is a shill Saturday, Jul. 12, 2003 at 8:33 AM
Logical Fallacy debate coach Saturday, Jul. 12, 2003 at 8:39 AM
^ Eric Saturday, Jul. 12, 2003 at 8:41 AM
solution Meyer London Saturday, Jul. 12, 2003 at 9:29 AM
Meyer fresca Saturday, Jul. 12, 2003 at 9:32 AM
fresca fresca Saturday, Jul. 12, 2003 at 9:36 AM
Sweet Eric Brian OConnor Saturday, Jul. 12, 2003 at 10:38 AM
Where Are We Now? peace movement Saturday, Jul. 12, 2003 at 10:42 AM
sphere circle Saturday, Jul. 12, 2003 at 10:44 AM
^ streeeeech Saturday, Jul. 12, 2003 at 11:11 AM
Psychic Dems Network Ffutal Saturday, Jul. 12, 2003 at 12:01 PM
ahhhh It's so clear now!!! Saturday, Jul. 12, 2003 at 3:04 PM
^ hey Saturday, Jul. 12, 2003 at 3:09 PM
Bush doesn't lie Bush Admirer Saturday, Jul. 12, 2003 at 3:48 PM
^ circle Sunday, Jul. 13, 2003 at 5:51 AM
Bush doesn't lie, Patriot Sunday, Jul. 13, 2003 at 6:23 PM
Bush Admirer Scottie Monday, Jul. 14, 2003 at 8:46 AM
BA Scottie Monday, Jul. 14, 2003 at 12:29 PM
Logical Fallacies debate coach Monday, Jul. 14, 2003 at 12:45 PM
© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy