Working on this new server in php7...
imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

white themeblack themered themetheme help
About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
Features
latest news
best of news
syndication
commentary


KILLRADIO

VozMob

ABCF LA

A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List

LAAMN List




IMC Network:

Original Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
printable version - js reader version - view hidden posts - tags and related articles

So, What are You going to Do?

by C/O Diogenes Sunday, Jun. 08, 2003 at 2:27 AM

Michael Rivero hits another Home Run with today's Commentary at WhatReallyHappened.com "We stand at a crossroads. The head-of-state of the most powerful nation on Earth has been caught justifying a war of conquest with fraud and deception. ..."

So, what are you going to do?

You cannot avoid it any longer. You cannot pretend it did not happen. You cannot wish it away. It's real.

The President of the United States lied to start a war.

Under our system of laws, only Congress has the authority to send our troops off to war. The 30 days granted to the President under the War Powers Act were long exhausted from the ongoing bombing raids in Iraq when Congress did pass a bill authorizing military intervention in Iraq shortly after 9-11. However, that bill authorized military force only under certain conditions. One of those conditions was that President Bush had to prove that Saddam Hussein was in violation of UN Resolution 1441 calling for the removal of all weapons of mass destruction.

So, prior to launching the invasion of Iraq, Bush stated to the Congress and to the world that he did have proof that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction. Not only did Bush make that claim, but so did Colin Powell. So did Tony Blair. And citing the authority previously granted to him by the Congress, Bush waged war on Iraq. And Iraq fell. Easily.

Too easily.

Unlike Desert Storm 1, there was no sky filled with fireworks-bright anti-aircraft fire to oppose the bombers over Baghdad. Iraq turned out not only to not be a threat to anyone else, it turned out not to be able to mount a serious defense against invasion.

Contrary to the assurances of Bush and Blair, there were no chemical or biological weapons used to defend Iraq even as it gasped its last breath as an independent sovereign nation. The only nuclear weapons used were the depleted uranium weapons showered all over Iraq by the invaders. Just as no weapons of mass destruction were found by the United Nations prior to the invasion, and no weapons of mass destruction were deployed during the invasion, no weapons of mass destruction have been discovered since the invasion. Every site claimed to harbor weapons of mass destruction turned out upon closer inspection to be harmless. Every piece of equipment loudly ballyhooed each morning as proof of Saddam's perfidy was inevitably proven benign by nightfall. Even the trailers, proclaimed to be mobile biological weapons labs (even though devoid of both germs, and the special handling equipment needed for such work) turned out to be industrial tools.  No weapons of mass destruction. No remains of weapons of mass destruction. Nothing. Saddam was not in defiance of UN Resolution 1441. Even the UN weapons team agrees on this. And if Iraq was not in defiance of UN Resolution 1441, then the Congressional authorization for military action in Iraq was not in effect. Bush did not have legal authority to invade. Bush misappropriated the US military, without congressional approval, for an illegal war. A criminal war.

I imagine that all those poor fools who stood besides Bush have to be feeling pretty stupid right now. Bush used them, just like Stalin used his "useful idiots", to serve his personal agenda. Fools and cowards; that is how history will remember those who fell for Bush's lies.

Of course, Bush had help with the lie. Cheney helped pressure the CIA to go along with the lie. Colin Powell spoke the lie to the United Nations, backed up by a 12 year-old stolen student thesis and outdated photographs, punctuated for drama with a glass vial of (we hope) talcum powder. Blair helped the lie. Clear Channel not only helped with the lie, it paid for the parties for the above-mentioned useful idiots. O'Reilly helped the lie. So did Rush. So did Savage. So did a lot of other people.  You know who you are.

The people of the United States were lied to in order to start a war. It doesn't matter what may be found or planted in Iraq from now on, the unquestionable fact is that at the time that Bush and Blair claimed to have proof of Iraq's WMDs, they did not. They had stolen student papers, outdated photos, talcum powder, and a lot of wishful thinking. They lied. Nothing can change that. Not only did they lie, but they did so intentionally and with premeditation. Cheney pressured the CIA to alter their report to support the claim of WMDs. Blair sent British Intelligence's report back for revisions at least once and possibly as many as six times.

So, what are you going to do?

Are you going to live in a nation governed by lies? Will you spend the rest of your life knowing your mind is being controlled by those who control what you know, who lie, conceal, spin, twist, and disinform so that you will come to the conclusions the liars want you to come to? Mind control isn't some science fiction machine, it is simply controlling the brain by controlling what it knows or believes. By lying.

Is a war necessary? How can you know that it is if you live under a government that lies?

Is the death of a politician really a suicide, or a "lone assassin"? How can you know that it is if you live under a government that lies?

Is the amendment that authorizes the income tax properly ratified? How can you know that it is if you live under a government that lies?

Are elections fair and honest? How can you know that they are if you live under a government that lies?

Are living conditions really better here than anywhere else on Earth? How can you know that they are if you live under a government that lies?

Were Arabs really behind 9-11? How can you know that they were if you live under a government that lies?

And you do. You do live under a government that lies to you. Bush just proved it.

So, what are you going to do?

We stand at a crossroads. The head-of-state of the most powerful nation on Earth has been caught justifying a war of conquest with fraud and deception. We, as the people of that nation, have a moral duty to remove that head-of-state, and indeed all who helped in that lie. We have a duty to leave a better government to our children than that which was left to us, and the very first thing we must do is remove government officials who would lie to us, and to our children, especially to send them off to die in wars.

The Constitution of the United States does not explicitly authorize the government to lie to the people. Check it yourself; it is not in there. And the Tenth Amendment prohibits the government from assuming that authority. Therefore, under the Constitution, every politician who lies acts unconstitutionally and illegally. When the lie becomes institutional, when the government leadership as a whole lies to the people, then the government itself is unconstitutional and illegal. A government that lies to the people breaks faith with the people. A government that lies to the people loses the moral right to rule.

Therefore, the Congress also stands at a crossroad. It cannot legitimize the lies of Bush without delegitimizing itself. Congress cannot pretend to trust a lying President and keep the trust of the voters and taxpayers. Congress cannot acquit the liars without incriminating themselves. But Congress are habitual liars themselves and often admire the skill with which other officials can lie to the people and be believed. They will need "encouragement" to do the right thing.

I know that you are all discouraged because the war in Iraq happened despite the huge peace demonstrations you all put together. But you need to take a deep breath and get ready to rock again. Those demonstrations you all did laid the foundation for what must be done now. Those demonstrations showed the rest of America and the world that there has always been doubt of the legitimacy of this war. No longer can the mainstream media pretend that opposition to the war and to Bush's lies comes from only a tiny minority, too small to matter. And the recent election results in other countries that saw pro-war candidates soundly defeated have sent a message to Capitol Hill that being pro-war is a serious liability going into 2004's election season. Vote-rigging can change a slim percentage but it cannot reverse a landslide.

So here is the call to phone, to keyboards, to FAX, and yes, to protest signs. Next week are the start of hearings into the lies about Iraqi WMDs. YOU need to let your congressmen know in no uncertain terms that they either get rid of the liars, or get a new job. Focus on the congressmen up for re-election in 2004 and let them know that how they deal with the liar in the White House will be the sole deciding factor in whether you will vote for them next election. Remind them of the pronounced anti-war trend sweeping elections world-wide.

Rest assured that the warhawks have their phone banks running full tilt boogie to try and get Dubya off of the hook. If you do not phone, FAX, or visit, Congress will abrogate its duty and write the liars who lied to start a war a get-out-of-jail free card.

It's up to you. History will judge our nation on what actions you take or do not take in the coming week.

Congressional contact info is at www.congress.org.

Report this post as:

LATEST COMMENTS ABOUT THIS ARTICLE
Listed below are the 10 latest comments of 71 posted about this article.
These comments are anonymously submitted by the website visitors.
TITLE AUTHOR DATE
The actions of the Bush Junta... Diogenes Sunday, Jun. 08, 2003 at 2:37 AM
please tell me fresca Sunday, Jun. 08, 2003 at 3:06 AM
Winston Scottie Sunday, Jun. 08, 2003 at 3:16 AM
another dime ¥*><å Sunday, Jun. 08, 2003 at 3:28 AM
nurenburg scottie Sunday, Jun. 08, 2003 at 3:41 AM
Learn your history simpleton fresca Sunday, Jun. 08, 2003 at 4:23 AM
agreed to no-fly zones Sheepdog Sunday, Jun. 08, 2003 at 7:58 AM
Revolution @ Sunday, Jun. 08, 2003 at 9:23 AM
Bush's Crimes @ Sunday, Jun. 08, 2003 at 9:27 AM
So, daveman Sunday, Jun. 08, 2003 at 10:14 AM
Post by "@" above Bush Admirer Sunday, Jun. 08, 2003 at 11:45 AM
Bush Admirerer lives in denial. @ Sunday, Jun. 08, 2003 at 11:54 AM
As I expected the shills have... Diogenes Sunday, Jun. 08, 2003 at 12:14 PM
More proof of their cowardice. @ Sunday, Jun. 08, 2003 at 12:28 PM
dio i gotta know nigga please Sunday, Jun. 08, 2003 at 3:35 PM
The only jerks receiving free meals are working for defense contractors. Anarchy Now! Sunday, Jun. 08, 2003 at 4:15 PM
enemies of mankind Sheepdog Sunday, Jun. 08, 2003 at 4:23 PM
uh Sheep my man fresca Sunday, Jun. 08, 2003 at 5:37 PM
and... fresca Sunday, Jun. 08, 2003 at 5:39 PM
cant figure out spaz quinbdeerius Sunday, Jun. 08, 2003 at 6:46 PM
frescaw engages in one of it's... Diogenes Sunday, Jun. 08, 2003 at 11:26 PM
WAVEMASTER BUSH LIED Monday, Jun. 09, 2003 at 2:16 AM
OneEyedMan KPC Monday, Jun. 09, 2003 at 3:56 AM
Impeachment time Bush Admirer Monday, Jun. 09, 2003 at 8:55 AM
You wanna impeach Bush? daveman Monday, Jun. 09, 2003 at 10:24 AM
They could probably get some votes Bush Admirer Monday, Jun. 09, 2003 at 10:44 AM
BA's right, gang. daveman Monday, Jun. 09, 2003 at 11:47 AM
Bush Asskisser... Diogenes Monday, Jun. 09, 2003 at 12:38 PM
Wrong again Diogenes (as usual) Bush Admirer Monday, Jun. 09, 2003 at 1:01 PM
Wrong Bush Admirer @ Monday, Jun. 09, 2003 at 1:09 PM
To Repeat Bush Admirer Monday, Jun. 09, 2003 at 1:16 PM
To Repeat Bush Admirer Monday, Jun. 09, 2003 at 1:16 PM
Our goal is no Government. @ Monday, Jun. 09, 2003 at 1:38 PM
Save yourself the bother and rent the movie Bush Admirer Monday, Jun. 09, 2003 at 2:44 PM
Of course not! Your... daveman Monday, Jun. 09, 2003 at 2:45 PM
How about... Diogenes Monday, Jun. 09, 2003 at 3:31 PM
Fat chance, Dio... daveman Monday, Jun. 09, 2003 at 3:57 PM
Good idea Dio Bush Admirer Monday, Jun. 09, 2003 at 4:13 PM
"bush admirer"="daveman"... equalizer Monday, Jun. 09, 2003 at 4:22 PM
"equalizer" = "idiot" daveman Monday, Jun. 09, 2003 at 4:34 PM
davemaisafool davemanisafool Monday, Jun. 09, 2003 at 4:37 PM
"equalizer" = "idiot" daveman Monday, Jun. 09, 2003 at 4:39 PM
How about we all go down to Computers NLA? Nemo Monday, Jun. 09, 2003 at 6:02 PM
Hey jackass fresca Monday, Jun. 09, 2003 at 6:37 PM
MWAHAHA Cough Monday, Jun. 09, 2003 at 8:39 PM
Cough KOBE SBM Wednesday, Jun. 11, 2003 at 4:02 PM
I Rule. KOBE SBM Wednesday, Jun. 11, 2003 at 5:18 PM
Steve, you have a zit on your nose. LMAO! Thursday, Jun. 12, 2003 at 4:08 AM
HOLD STILL!!!! Makeup artist Thursday, Jun. 12, 2003 at 4:25 AM
To the above poster KOBE SBM Friday, Jun. 13, 2003 at 1:24 PM
Decide to try an shut down... Diogenes Friday, Jun. 13, 2003 at 3:02 PM
that's a great idea Sheepdog Friday, Jun. 13, 2003 at 3:15 PM
fix it Sheepdog Friday, Jun. 13, 2003 at 4:23 PM
Something... Diogenes Friday, Jun. 13, 2003 at 10:58 PM
??? fresca Saturday, Jun. 14, 2003 at 2:15 AM
Sanity Ted Saturday, Jun. 14, 2003 at 3:40 AM
High Crimes and Misdeameanors of course. Diogenes Saturday, Jun. 14, 2003 at 4:29 AM
Die for your Government varukers Saturday, Jun. 14, 2003 at 7:44 AM
international law means shit Saturday, Jun. 14, 2003 at 10:54 AM
Logical Fallacy debate coach Saturday, Jun. 14, 2003 at 11:43 AM
Simple bullshit fresca Saturday, Jun. 14, 2003 at 12:29 PM
the turd in the punch bowl about fresca Saturday, Jun. 14, 2003 at 1:51 PM
.. .. Saturday, Jun. 14, 2003 at 2:11 PM
who won Average Person Saturday, Jun. 14, 2003 at 2:25 PM
Economics Ted Saturday, Jun. 14, 2003 at 2:49 PM
© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy