We had a server outage, and we're rebuilding the site. Some of the site features won't work. Thank you for your patience.
imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

white themeblack themered themetheme help
About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
Features
latest news
best of news
syndication
commentary


KILLRADIO

VozMob

ABCF LA

A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List

LAAMN List




IMC Network:

Original Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
printable version - js reader version - view hidden posts - tags and related articles

View article without comments

Why Protest the Democrats?

by Sabrina Alonso Wednesday, Jun. 07, 2000 at 4:31 AM
grassrootsla@mailicty.com

.

The article can be added again.

In July thousands will protest the Republican convention in Philadelphia. And in August, thousands more will converge in Los Angeles to protest a party which has deceived and betrayed the American people. There are arguments for not protesting the Democrats, the strongest being the 68 argument. When violent clashes erupted at the democratic convention in Chicago, Nixon was placed into office the following year. Could we really imagine a world with another Bush in office? This is a very real threat. However, there comes a time to face facts.

The harsh reality is that we do not live in true a democracy- but rather a Democracy of illusion, of theatre. It is a democracy for the few, those who have the money and power to buy political campaigns, make contributions, form lobbies, and run the real government that is insidiously eroding our lives. The Democrats and Republicans are running a show, entertaining us all while real decisions are being made behind closed doors. Al Gore, for example has such strong ties to Occidental Petroleum, that he works vigorously to keep the issues of the U

Report this post as:

reasons to protest the democrats

by bob Tuesday, Jun. 06, 2000 at 3:53 PM
bodle@usc.edu

This article rocks. It is motivational and inspires appropriate disdain for the sham that is our democracy.

Bob

Report this post as:

Yawn!

by Stevo Tuesday, Jun. 06, 2000 at 11:49 PM
stevo@rightspin.com

Keep it up guys. Your more fun to watch than television.

Report this post as:

ruminations on protest, and spoiling the Dems

by Kirk Evans Friday, Jun. 09, 2000 at 2:02 AM
KirkEvans@netzero.net

One could hope that Stevo's thinking would be better than his spelling

(it's "You're" not "Your") but www.rightspin.com is typical simplistic

right wing "can't see beyond the end of your nose" stuff. More proof

that listening to Rush destroys brain cells, and hardly worth

commenting about.

What is worth discussing is whether protesting the Democrats and/or

voting Green is worth the risk of losing this election to the Republicans.

It depends on 1) how awful you think 4 years of Bush will be, 2) how

close the election will be between Bush and Gore (how much does

Gore have to lose), and 3) how good of a shot the Greens have at

winning the necessary votes to be deemed a "real" party by the Feds,

and therefore worthy of campaign cash in future elections (and of course,

whether such recognition and cash in itself would be a good thing).

It also depends on whether you think protests would do any good in the

sense of bringing the Dems back to a progressive agenda.

Report this post as:

who's going to win?..who cares?

by a.c. Friday, Jun. 09, 2000 at 1:49 PM
amerika

Personally, I feel that it makes virtually zero difference whether the democrats or republicans win the election. Both parties basically serve the same profit-driven agenda. Arguing about which of the two corporate dominated candidates would be worse, to me, is irrelevant. It would only shift attention and focus away from what is necessary to promote change. Failing to target BOTH parties and both conventions because some may dislike one candidate a little more/less than the other only helps to validate their corrupt, paid-off electoral system.

Frankly, I don't care which of these two pigs is going to win in November. Both parties are full of crap and will happily sell us out to their campaign contributors. It's important that we stand up to both the republican and democratic parties. Otherwise, their system itself goes unchallenged.

Both parties and their conventions are more than deserving of disobedience and disruptive protest.

Report this post as:

democratic party wrapping just got spoiled

by Sandra Clark Wednesday, Jun. 14, 2000 at 11:46 PM
foreverwildfree@juno.com

reading this article puts it all back into perspective...I work for a nonprofit that has close ties to another social change group that just endorsed Gore's campaign. It is all under the assumption that its better to have him than Bush, and Nader isn't about to make it, so--where to put the votes. But really, the Democratic Party scam is worse for liberals, moderates, whatever you call them for the sale of the big lie, and for buying us out for his crackpot environmentalism etc. The protests at the Democratic Convention in LA will be telling...in terms of who comes and who stays at home. I am young, I admit openly, and I'm still trying to figure this whole thing out. So many people feel alienated by the protests while so many others are just beginning to wake up. It is unfortunate that it still comes down to money, and the USA is the biggest Megamachine of all and its token green/brown/white/black/red/yellowbacks. time to break away -- I know where I'll be in Auguest

Report this post as:

ditto-head

by daniel Friday, Jun. 16, 2000 at 8:59 PM
djasper@twu.edu 940.391.5815

Ditto! It makes little or no difference which party gains control of the White House—regardless, it will be business as usual. Is it wise to protest the Democratic convention? You bet it is! They deserve to be protested even more than the Republican party. Malcom X once said that he preferred southern whites to the liberal northeastern whites because the southerners were upfront with their racism and that he at least knew where he, as a black man, stood with them. Likewise, the Republicans are only behaving like we expect Republicans to behave. They have always been upfront about their support for big business and moneyed interests. We've known for a long time where they stood in regard to our interests—on the other side of the fence. The Democrats

however are attempting to straddle the fence between our interests, their traditional voting base, and those of their corporate sponsors who are funding their campaigns. Clinton and Co. have taken what were once worker-friendly, women-friendly, minority-friendly Democratic values and re-packaged them into a new brand of corporate-friendly political product called a 'Nu Democrat'. But be warned ladies and gentlemen! A close read of the ingredients on the

back of this package and you will discover that this product is nothing but 'Republican Lite'. My suggestion for other disenfranchised Democrats? In August, go to L.A. and GET MEAN! In November, go to your polling place and VOTE GREEN!

Report this post as:

War is Columbia

by Getgo Friday, Jun. 23, 2000 at 12:16 PM
yousendme56@hotmail.com

The article sums up the plethora of issues that make protesting the Democrats worthwhile. However there is one issue - - a big one - - that many activists seem to underplay. The War in Columbia is mentioned briefly here: Gore's holdings in Occidental Petroleum, and his hypocritical stance. Lets be more blunt: it is directed against the insurgency and will escalate rapidly, as the Clinton promise of 1.6 billion in mostly military aid works through the Senate. Columbia is swarming with US agents, military advisors, training facilities, etc. More helicopters, radar, intelligence, etc. is about to be sent. Both parties agree on the package, so it's not even being debated in the campaign. The big media is onside as well. What a joke. The argument is between two competing lobbies: Bell vs. United Technologies, will it be Huey or Black Hawk helicopters? Which block of capital will get the go ahead to send their machines of death?

This issue, which is being debated in the Senate, but is very underplayed by the media, similarly lacks stature among activists. In my view, it should be front and centre, on the streets, in Philly and L.A.

Report this post as:

© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy