- js reader version
- view hidden posts
- tags and related articles
Friday, Mar. 08, 2019 at 6:35 PM
judas was a theocommunist fighter and no betrayer
CHAPTER 3 : LEVI THE SON OF ALPHAEUS
The parallel passage to the calling of matthew in mark occurs at 13:14 : except this time around matthew´s name is transmogrified into LEVI THE SON OF ALPHAEUS ! O wondrous harmony of the word of god !! And yet it comes as no suprise to us that judas be overwritten again, as levi :
levi comes from a hebrew root meaning to join, be attached, twine, but also borrow and lend as in hebrew lavah. Now all of these meanings apply perfectly to judas bar saba brother of james : because judas and james were most likely twins, as proved also by the thomas/dydimos overwrite of judas ; and because judas was the nazoraeans´ treasurer, the one who carried the money box, likely with the words gift of god/mattith yahu written on it, and as such he likely borrowed money for the community and lent money to the poor.
The name of judas´ father, alphaeus, is also associated with a james the son of alphaeus in gospel apostle lists, thus clinching the brotherly relation between judas and james.
As for alphaeus, he is hanan the hidden : ‘matthew’ 10:3 inserts in his lying listing of the alleged ’12 apostles’ a ‘iacob (james) son of alphaeus’, as if there were another james after the ‘son of zebedaeus’ of 10:2. But it’s, as usual, one and the same james, again doubled by wordplay for obfuscation purposes – government-terrorist disinformation trick. Now: alphaeus in greek is halphaios. It’s for instance the name of a greek river, not coincidentally. Because the word comes from semitic halbia, sumerian for ‘a kind of well’, in akkadian halpu:
greek H A L P H A I O S
sumerian H A L B I A
akkadian H A L P U
The -IOS in the greek is only a greek suffix or termination – irrevelant to the root of the word.
Who was ‘the well’, ‘the flood’, ‘the irrigator’? He was james’ father hanan the hidden, rainmaker. James himself had inherited the rainmaking magic, as eisenman pointed out based on early christian sources.
The dead sea scrolls are the famous ancient-jewish manuscripts mostly found in 1947. Eisenman dates most of them to the first century ce and convincingly argues for their belonging to the real early christians: our well-known fanatic fundamentalist zealot zionist violently antiroman jewish nationalists – whom eisenman, a jewish zionist fanatic himself, extolls as heroes. Now he teaches that the leader at qumran ( where the dead sea scrolls community lay) was called, among other sobriquets, ‘yoreh ha zedek’, hebrew for ‘fountain of righteousness’(james the brother of jesus, faber & faber 1997, p.853): I’ll add that james ‘tou halphaiou’ of matthew 10:3 is james son of the fountain (in which case the first founder and leader of the nasorayya would be his father hanan the hidden) or brother of the fountain (the greek genitive case may mean both; in the latter case the fountain of righteousness/ qumran leader would be john the baptist); james himself would become fountain/ qumran leader : ‘james the just’ became successor to john the baptist in 38 ce.
The ‘alphaeus’ (alphaeus is latin/ english for the original greek halphaios) of ‘matthew’ 10:3 never existed at all. It’s a lying doubling of the one and only james bar saba son of rainmaker/ fountain/well hanan the hidden. In other words, halphaios is a synonym to zebedee/ saba both words meaning rainmaker/ well/ fountain/ irrigator/ flood: real rainmakers (or at least believed to be such by their religious-fanatic followers) but also ‘fountains of righteousness’: the dead sea scrolls code name for the leader at qumran.
Semitic love of polysemantic wordplay is being used masterfully here by the gospel forgers: the fictional ‘alphaeus’ (in greek halphaios), who never existed at all, is a title that, beside meaning ‘well’, can also mean ‘white’. giovanni semerano in his latin dictionary (olschki 1994, reprinted 2007) teaches us well that the latin word ‘albus’, white comes from akkadian halpû, snow. Now our usual eisenman (James the brother of jesus, 1997, p. 311) states that james the brother of jesus wore… white linen clothes, ‘in consequence of his extreme holiness’! We can easily picture the entire bar saba family, a priestly/holy family, wearing white garments on an ordinary basis. Therefore ‘james the son (or ‘the brother’) of alphaeus’ is none other than the one and only james, son of the ‘white-clad’ hanan the hidden, and brother of the ‘white-clad’ judas, john, simon & jesus bar saba!
Of course the western readers of lying ‘matthew’, who had long since forgotten their semitic origins, would swallow the rewrite of the ‘white(-clad)’ james the just as ‘james the son (or brother)’ of the [non-existent!] ‘alphaeus’! Government-terrorist ‘creative rewriting’ of history hits a zenith here…Obviously the link to akkadian halpû=snow brings us back full circle to the other semantic layer of ‘haphaios’ as ‘well’ : the root is the same : it means water.
Let us dig deeper into all these wonderful semantic links for ‘halphaios’: it’s ‘the well’, it’s ‘the white’; but it’s also possibly ‘milk’: the very same root of latin albus, akkadian halpû, becomes in aramaic halab, milk: nothing better than commuting from semerano’s latin dictionary to eisenman’s james 326: early northern-syrian christians in the 2nd century ce were vegetarians, and one of their diet’s staples was indeed… milk! We can therefore easily picture james & his whole bar saba family as vegetarians and big milk drinkers – that is, each of them ‘halpahios’, ‘milk (drinker)’!
The whole truth about who the real early ‘christians’ really were is ‘hidden’, ‘embedded’ in that magic word, ‘halphaios’ (greek)/ ‘alphaeus’ (latin): james was halphaios in a special way, because he was ‘the well’, that is the ‘fountain of righteousness’ (yoreh ha zedek in hebrew), that is the ‘righteous teacher’ of the qumran/dead sea scrolls community; and he was ‘of halphaios’ too, as ‘matthew’ pathetically rewrites: not because his father or brother were called halphaios, but because his father, hanan the hidden, had been ‘the well’, the lider maximo at qumran before him, and so had james’ bro john the baptist (unless hanan the hidden and john the baptist are identical). After the death of james, his bro simon bar saba would succeed him as ‘the well’.
And james was ‘halphaios’ because he wore pure, holy white garments of linen, the color of snow.
And because he was a vegetarian who drank much milk.
James was ‘halphaios’ also because he was ‘the (righteous) teacher’ of qumran, and in hebrew ālăf= to teach.
But the evil liars who concocted ‘matthew’ 10:3 had been assigned to overwrite all this by creating a non-existent ‘alphaeus’ as father or brother of a non-existent 2nd james! The purpose of such a skilled rewrite was to make readers forget who these real early christians really were: religious fanatics, torah-keepers, who thought of themselves as holier and purer than the corrupt romans, whom they labored in vain to wipe off the face of the earth.
There is one more, all-important layer to halphaios: let us flash back to our starting point here: ‘matthew’ 10:3:
‘james the son (or brother) of alphaeus’.
Now if we take it to mean ‘son of alphaeus’, we can arrive at clinching the decoding of james’ and his brothers’ father’s real identity. Because halphaios can also mean, in its semitic original, ‘the hidden’. In akkadian for instance halāpu= to hide! The root is the same as in halphaios: *halp.
Therefore ‘james son of halphaios/alphaeus’ of ‘matthew’ 10:3 is also, quite literally ‘the son of (hanan) the hidden´ !
CHAPTER 4 : HANAN THE HIDDEN
I’m sure you’re wondering now why hanan the hidden was called ‘the hidden’: well, such a revolutionary, theocommunist guerrilla would have had all the reasons in the world to hide from the romans and their collaborator-jewish henchmen à la joseph flavius. The spirit and strategy of qumran (the dead sea scrolls community, the real early christians) was one of ‘secrecy’, as attested to by the scrolls. Again, no surprise here: the romans/herodians were out to hunt them down!
But : akkadian halāpu can also mean, more specifically, ‘to hide/cover one’s face’. In her book ‘the mandaeans of iraq and iran’, first edition 1937, lady e.s. drower published several pictures of these surviving ‘baptists’ or daily bathers, these middle-eastern ‘sabbas’: when baptizing others, the priest, dressed in white, has his head covered and also his mouth and all the lower half of his face: only nose, eyes and forehead remain uncovered. That is also why hanan was ‘the hidden’, if eisenman is right that the mandaeans still practice a baptism by full immersion in rivers, akin to john the baptist’s, whom they hold in high esteem - who was hanan´son, which is reflected in the mandaean sobriquet for john the bap´s father : abba SABA zacharias. John the bap was john bar saba.
‘James the son of alphaeus’ of ‘matthew’ 10:3 is the one and only james bar saba ‘the just’, ‘well’ and ‘son of the well’, ‘white-clad’, ‘milk’-drinking vegetarian, ‘teacher’ (of righteousness at qumran), and finally, ‘son of’ (hanan) ‘the hidden’ who ‘covered’ his head & face when baptizing and ‘hid’ from the evil romans/herodians who were after him, in a spirit of ‘secrecy’ typical of his religious community of theocommunist antiroman guerrillas at qumran, and elsewhere including jerusalem, galilee etc.
All of which just ‘had’ to be (re)written out of history by turning the title ‘halphaios’ into a non-existing father or brother of a non-existent 2nd james, duplicated to muddy the waters and divert readers from the one and only james bar saba called ‘the just’ for his extreme ‘righteousness’, of which he was ‘the fountain’ or ‘well’: halphaios.
And : he was ‘the son’ of halphaios too, in the sense of ‘the hidden’ here, because his father was hanan the hidden!
Let us also remind the reader that there is a tradition of occultation in certain strands of islam and alawitism, whereby a messiah or mahdi incarnates into a human being but does not reveal himself as messiah until the end times - a tradition that harked back to ancient jewish beliefs. Thus hanan might have been perceived as the hidden messiah too - just like his son john the baptist.
CHAPTER 5 : JUDAS THE TREASURER
Luke 5:27 too calls the tax-collector apostle LEVI.
Judas´ role as treasurer is borne out by the gospel of john : again wiki very well :
" According to the account in the Gospel of John, Judas carried the disciples' money bag or box (Greek: γλωσσόκομον, glōssokomon), but John's Gospel makes no mention of the thirty pieces of silver as a fee for betrayal. The evangelist comments in John 12:5-6 that Judas spoke fine words about giving money to the poor, but the reality was "not that he cared for the poor, but [that] he was a thief, and had the money box; and he used to take what was put in it." However, in John 13:27-30, when Judas left the gathering of Jesus and His disciples with betrayal in mind,]some [of the disciples] thought that Judas might have been leaving to buy supplies or on a charitable errand ."
Actually, john 12:1-8 evinces a genuine concern on judas´part for the poor and an antiluxury lifestyle : at bethania, at lazarus´ home, mary pulls out a lot of expensive ointment and rubs it on jesus´ feet and hair, prompting judas´ righteous indignation : " Why wasn´t this ointment sold for 300 denarii and the money given to the poor ? " - which is exactly what you would expect of a true christian . "Jesus" instead, selfishly replies : " Let her do what she´s doing, that it may serve me well for the day of my burial. You have the poor with you always, me instead, you do not have always."
It is precisely judas´ theocommunist attitude and deeds that get overwritten in the gospel lie as matthew or levi the tax collectors, that is capitalist pigs in the service of the evil empire of rome.
Judas is again, for the umpteenth time, multiplied and overwritten by lying acts of the apostles 4:36 as " joseph, nicked barnabas...a LEVITE " : now levites were working-class lower priests, and our judas might very well have been one of them like the rest of his brethren.
Therefore the overwrite LEVI for his name in mark and luke might also be concealing his priestly status. Anyway these overwrites are usually layered polysemantically, as we saw above for alphaeus, thus all of the denotations of levi - the twin, the borrower/lender/treasurer, the levite priest
are likely included in the overwrites matthew and levi.
Judas theocommunism, hero-status among the poor jewish masses of palestine and beyond, uncompromising anticapitalist and antiroman stance prompted the proroman new testament forgers to conceal his real identity by cloning him the most times of all other bar saba brothers, into following fictional characters :
1. thomas (matthew 10:3)
2. matthew ( ibidem )
3. thaddaeus ( " )
4. lebbaeus ( ibidem but in other manuscripts )
5. lebbaeus called thaddaeus (ibidem but in other manuscripts still )
6. thaddaeus called lebbaeus ( " " " " " " )
7. judas the zealot ( matthew 10:3 in certain latin and syriac translations)
8. judas iskariot (matthew 10:4)
9. judas of james ( ibidem but in one syriac version plus luke 6:16)
10. judas the scariot ( " in one greek manuscript and one latin translation)
11. judas of simon the iskariot (church father origen)
12. levi the son of alphaeus ( mark and luke above)
13. joseph barnabas the levite (acts 4:36 )
14. thomas ( mark 3:18 )
15. thomas called didymus (luke 6:15 in one greek manuscript, plus john 11:16 )
16. matthias ( acts 1:23,26 )
17. judas from karyot (one greek manuscript at john 14:22 )
18. judas the cananaean ( in 2 coptic translations ).
And I can only hope I am not overseeing any !!!! Yes I am : thaddaeus becomes theudas in acts...
19 overwrites to make sure the one and only juda bar saba iscariot , revolutionary, theocommunist antiroman and zionistic fighter, brother of james the just, john the baptist, simeon bar cleophas and jesus bar saba , would be deleted from the historical record and collective memory, by inverting him into a thief, a traitor and a hypocrite, and a proroman capitalist pig.
Report this post as: