With no other than the mass media repeat 1-sided stories of eliciting pity and alliance with the few women - who CHOSE to insult, bash, ridicule, and hate via what they want to call "music" as "punk" [genre can mean anything can be heard and claimed as music here ] looks like a PR move more than a ‘riot’ ....

so they dont win points nor pity.

That these people chose to openly internationally display their gross moves and bad sounds in a site they knew was being dis-respectful-of-many-others easily leads to prison and punishment.

Bad taste. Not worth watching if it did not 'make it in the news'. Poor presentations performances surely elicit some punishment.

From the first 'news' story these attention-seeking young and inexperienced people wanted media celebrity and they made only very generalized minimal political statements...and still are limited in their explanations of what they do or want to do to improve their country.

to hate/rebel against a ‘top man’ in any govt is an easy move that gives little information or understanding of these women’s political / religious views or intentions.

To want to topple a Top of any thing is just a way to get their own ATTENTION – including by any other nation-state that agrees that the current regime should be replaced with one they too would prefer.

the we-hate-Putin or hate-Bush or hate-Mozadek or hate-Morsi or Sisi or hate anyone - any man who has gained [however they did it ] power of being on top of a nation's wealth, military and resources...

to hate and say so is a common daily quickie – this can be shouted out anywhere easily and doesn’t say much.

The usual I-hate-Him or I-Want-Him-Instead is just a blurting of simplistic wanting …whatever. There have been no further “riot”ious political alliances that have been much written about.

But these pussied up women - who are: yes, pretty enough to elicit lots of media pictures and thus some sympathy for their youth, their hair, their clean white skin and their now timid looks.

But how much has anyone actually learned of their other-political-acts or religious-beliefs or even any other work they have done to produce a better world, there ?

to go to a place considered ‘sacred’ by anyone else and act stupid or silly and insure that media has taken enough videos to insure CELEBRITY STATUS no matter what else happens…that is not usually a political act but a promotional one, and the Madonna and other star-allied agreements with them adds to everyone’s PR platform.

No pity, no sympathy, no understanding and no agreement that exhibitionistic act – of youngsters going to a famous anciently honored holy church – and their intending to there insult anyone else who prays there.

[Just imagine doing this act to a native-american or muslim or jewish or Vatican place of ‘worship’ ? wow, what kind of reaction would there be, but Catholic or Orthodox Christian ? That is apparently acceptable - to those who are mostly Protestant, as in USA.

This clearly is narcissistic play-acting to enhance their pussies’ images and meanwhile demean and desecrate any othe people’s beliefs, which sounds more like a selfish and self-serving act.

Disrespecting others to gain attention and fame is the name of the game anyhow, here and there. Using others honor and spaces to rebel and prove that damage and destruction are so much easier to do than any positive constructive acts – political – dissenting – or religious.

To disagree with the Russian religious people and their governmental leader is acceptable, of course. But to USE THE OTHERS FAME AND HONOR and position to gain attention, internationally [as they intended and succeeded ] is not.

and please ! no more stupid pictures of women who cant dance, cant make music, but can only shout and show their crotches....to attract attention perhaps ?