Location: Rep. Judy Chu's office at 527 S. Lake Street, Pasadena CA 91101

Last year, wildfires burned 9.3 million acres of land — the third-most since 1960 — and more than 4,400 structures.

State firefighters have responded to about twice the average number of wildfires so far this year – more than 1,100 in all – and it's only May. We have a long, hot summer ahead with dry conditions due to drought, with Los Angeles County having received only 25% of its normal rainfall.

There have been 1,569 wildfires in California so far this year. That is 85 percent more than average.

More than 40,000 acres have burned in California this month alone.

California spends $800 million on fighting wildfires each year and these events are projected to increase 50 percent across the United States under a changing climate, over 100 percent in areas of the West by 2050 as projected by some studies.

The 2009 Station Fire alone in the Angeles National Forest cost $95.5 million dollars to fight. The recent Springs Fire cost more than $10 million to fight, scorching 28,000 acres and burning 25 buildings while threatening nearly 4,000 homes.

Earlier this month, Gov. Jerry Brown said California would have to grow accustomed to more forest fires as a consequence of climate change.

Automatic, across-the-board spending cuts caused by Congressional inability to deal with the sequester is forcing the Agriculture Department to shed 500 firefighters and 50 engines — roughly a 5 percent decline for each category — when we actually need an INCREASE in resources that corresponds with the increasing number of fires that harm individual homeowners and businesses at a cost of billions to the state's economy.

Volunteers from Organizing For Action will be gathering at Rep. Chu's office on Wednesday morning after being addressed by climate change activists who will speak about the harm wildfires are doing to the economy of California and to request that Rep. Chu lead on climate change issues in Congress.


Wednesday, May 29 Schedule

10:00 – 10:30 Address by Climate Change Activists

10:30 – 11:00 Meet with representative of Dr. Chu's office

About Organizing for Action – San Gabriel Valley Chapter

The San Gabriel Valley Chapter of Organizing for Action is comprised of volunteers throughout Glendale, Pasadena and the San Gabriel Valley who are committed to moving the country forward on important issues which we have been organizing around and promoting. Most recently, hundreds of volunteers in nearly two dozen states have been gathering in backyards and living rooms to plan rallies, press conferences, and meetings with lawmakers—all aimed at changing the conversation on climate change, and encouraging individual members of Congress to act. In all, volunteers have already held 99 meetings in communities across the country, with more to come. When it comes to climate change, too many lawmakers refuse to accept the science—and the danger—we face. We can't make real progress on this issue until Congress is forced to acknowledge the problem, and in the coming weeks OFA volunteers are planning for some serious on-the-ground action to do just that.

We wouldn't be having these droughts if the assholes pushing this extortion racket for the IMF's carbon tax would cease using chemtrails and the HAARP system to alter the natural weather patteerns.

Mommy said that I should pray for the drowning polar bears, all of which will become extinct by the year 2050, according to our lord and saviour Al Gore.

Amen.

....polar bears are extremely adaptable....for the simple reason that they are clearly more intelligent than anAL GOREtentive

My teacher, who proudly wears the union label, said that polar bears drown because of "global warming", and I believe her!!!

And it's da Joooos fault!!!

Polar bears are not considered "highly adaptable". They are actually quite specialized predators with very specific requirements. If these food requirements are not met, they have the capacity to delay breeding and birth of cubs until more prosperous times come. Polar bears split off from Grizzly Bears some five million years ago, so they have experienced warm temperatures before (Pliocene, 3 million years ago), but polar bears have never experienced what we
are going into in the next fifty years. To suggest that bears will "do fine" in a rapidly super-warming climate is false, and needs to be called out. The arctic has already melted substantially, is currently melting more and will continue to accelerate its melting in the future. Polar bears have already reduced their number of offspring, in response to the lack of resources on which to sustain their young. This will devastate our conservation efforts, unless action is taken right now to limit discharge of greenhouse gases into the air.

Your assertions are based on the utterly unwarranted assumption that the Arctic is going to be completely ice free in the next 50 yrs....even the most zealous eco-nazi panty wetters aren't predicting that...not to mention the fact that the Arctic has not "melted substantially"...the extent of the winter ice pack was well within the historically observed range it has covered for the last 100 yrs or so....and if sunspot activity is any indicator at all...as it usually is...earth will actually be in a mild cooling cycle for the next 30 or 40 yrs....I need hardly add that the actual counted polar bear population is higher now than it has been since it was first enumerated about 50 yrs ago...maybe they know something you don't....they sure as hell know something anAL GOREtentive doesn't

The Sky is Falling, The Sky is Falling, climate started the wildfires and if we don't stop the heat from the Sun all will be lost. Ain't it kinda funny that there has been no warming for 15 years, but idiots like the OP continues to go chicken little on "climate change". what the fuck you gonna do now that it seems that cooling is the future of climate change???? Oh, holy Algore what the fuck, over!

"rapidly super-warming climate"

The cultists are to be pitied.

I want to halt the constant assault upon the environment by the Operation Cloverleaf ( chemtrails )and the HAARP systems that are screwing with our health, soil and weather.
Change and warming we can deal with as we have for untold thousands of years.
Assholes with advanced technology who are manipulating our atmosphere and weather, are another thing entirely.

..your boys are here

So where is the raw data to support this bogus chart?
***
Climategate U-turn: Astonishment as scientist at centre of global ...
www.dailymail.co.uk/ news/ article-1250872/ Climategate-U-turn-Astonishment-scientist-centre-global-warming-email -row-admits-data-organised.html
***
There are individuals which want to promote the global extortion racket to install a carbon tax for the IMF.
And 'hex' is one of them.

- of the UK’s Daily Mail is misleading the public — even after being slammed by top scientists in 2010 for falsely asserting “no global warming since 1995″ — see “Error-riddled articles and false statements destroy Daily Mail’s credibility.“

http://thinkprogress.org/romm/2010/02/15/205415/rosegate-dailymail-error-riddled-articles-misquote-credibility-science/



Rose has another willfully misleading piece, “Forget global warming – it’s Cycle 25 we need to worry about (and if NASA scientists are right the Thames will be freezing over again): Met Office releases new figures which show no warming in 15 years.”

“Willfully misleading” because the UK’s Met[eorological] Office, part of its Defence Ministry, has taken the unusual step of releasing a statement utterly debunking Rose’s assertions as “entirely misleading” — and pointing out that they spoke to Rose before the piece came out but he chose to ignore what they had to say.


http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/media/image/s/a/Decadal-average-temperatures-ls2.jpg


Climate Progress has debunked the “we’re not warming”

http://thinkprogress.org/romm/2012/01/29/413961/panic-attack-murdoch-wall-street-journal-finds-16-scientists-long-debunked-climate-lies/

myth umpteen times, most recently yesterday when 16 know-nothings with scientific degrees pushed a particularly laughable version of it in Murdoch’s Wall Street Journal of Lies.



Even so, I’m reposting the Met Office debunking

http://metofficenews.wordpress.com/2012/01/29/met-office-in-the-media-29-january-2012/

because they do a good job, have a great new chart people might like (above), and they repeat a low-ball estimate of warming this century that merits a response:


Today the Mail on Sunday published a story written by David Rose entitled “Forget global warming – it’s Cycle 25 we need to worry about”.

This article includes numerous errors in the reporting of published peer reviewed science undertaken by the Met Office Hadley Centre and for Mr. Rose to suggest that the latest global temperatures available show no warming in the last 15 years is entirely misleading.

Despite the Met Office having spoken to David Rose ahead of the publication of the story, he has chosen to not fully include the answers we gave him to questions around decadal projections produced by the Met Office or his belief that we have seen no warming since 1997.

For clarity I have included our full response to David Rose below:

A spokesman for the Met Office said: “The ten year projection remains groundbreaking science. The complete period for the original projection is not over yet and these projections are regularly updated to take account of the most recent data.
“The projections are probabilistic in nature, and no individual forecast should be taken in isolation. Instead, several decades of data will be needed to assess the robustness of the projections.

“However, what is absolutely clear is that we have continued to see a trend of warming, with the decade of 2000-2009 being clearly the warmest in the instrumental record going back to 1850. Depending on which temperature records you use, 2010 was the warmest year on record for NOAA NCDC and NASA GISS, and the second warmest on record in HadCRUT3.”



http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2012/01/30/414478/daily-mail-warming-human-emissions-dwarf-any-solar-changes/?mobile=nc

...hex posts a chart which originated with the Met Office to supposedly "prove" that "global warming" is a continuing threat....and then his entire last post trashes the same Met Office he got his little chart from...guess he thought nobody would notice that

the expose's are citing the met office's public refutation of your 'no global warming for 15 years' serial lying shill (with connections to fossil fuel think tanks - I didn't include those details) at the Daily Mail

the posted and now direct linked chart _completely refutes your position_

-throwing up a smoke screen and playing dumb, while expected, doesn't lend you any credibility.

Only a mental cripple or a pre-schooler believes in "global warming" and "drowning polar bears".

Trust Xenu. Volcanoes are to blame.

it's not about 'beliefs' - it's about HARD DATA

wheres yours ?

the principle of using evil to fight other evil is a known tactic and even if the messenger is unpopular ( blush ) the facts about the lost raw data and the involvement of compromised scientists through selective funding...
*+*

'Climategate' report - live blog | Environment | guardian.co.uk

www.guardian.co.uk/ environment/ blog/ 2010/ jul/ 07/ hacked-climate-science-emails-climate-change -
Jul 7, 2010 ... Hacked climate science emails : Porters Descending with Ice Core ... to prevent people they didn't like getting their raw temperature data. ... a distinction not lost on critics such as Climate Audit blogger .... another cover up to prolong the climate change scam which is kept going
+*+
... is kinda telling.
All this shit--storm of propaganda does, is reassert the myth that the data was there to support this failing thesis of 'warming' which has somehow morphed into 'change' [ well duh, because the Earth is cooling {
***
New Discovery: NASA Study Proves Carbon Dioxide Cools Atmosphere!
by H. Schreuder & J. O’Sullivan, http://principia-scientific.org/
A recent NASA report throws the space agency into conflict with its climatologists after new NASA measurements prove that carbon dioxide acts as a coolant in Earth’s atmosphere.
-
NASA’s Langley Research Center has collated data proving that “greenhouse gases” actually block up to 95 percent of harmful solar rays from reaching our planet, thus reducing the heating impact of the sun. The data was collected by Sounding of the Atmosphere using Broadband Emission Radiometry, (or SABER). SABER monitors infrared emissions from Earth’s upper atmosphere, in particular from carbon dioxide (CO2) and nitric oxide (NO), two substances thought to be playing a key role in the energy balance of air above our planet’s surface.
-
NASA’s Langley Research Center instruments show that the thermosphere not only received a whopping 26 billion kilowatt hours of energy from the sun during a recent burst of solar activity, but that in the upper atmospheric carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide molecules sent as much as 95% of that radiation straight back out into space.
-
The shock revelation starkly contradicts the core proposition of the so-called greenhouse gas theory which claims that more CO2 means more warming for our planet. However, this compelling new NASA data disproves that notion and is a huge embarrassment for NASA’s chief climatologist, Dr James Hansen and his team over at NASA’s GISS.
-
Already, the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has been in full retreat after having to concede a 17-year stall in global warming despite levels of atmopheric CO2 rising almost 40 percent in recent decades. The new SABER data now forms part of a real world double whammy against climatologists’ computer models that have always been programmed to show CO2 as a warming gas.
http://socioecohistory.wordpress.com/2013/04/23/new-discovery-nasa-study-proves-carbon-dioxide-cools-atmosphere-global-warming-is-a-hoax-carbon-dioxide-is-a-coolant/
***
shut down HAARP and Operation Clover leaf { I believe to be the real culprits in this time of drought and temp anomalies to say nothing of poisoning our collective air and soil ) and then we can talk about a life gas for plants...

Principia Scientific International (PSI) tries to pass itself off as a scientific organisation.

It isn’t.

It’s a UK based publicity business owned by shareholders.

It’s main commercial interest being the book “Slaying the Sky Dragon: Death of the Greenhouse Gas Theory”.

The book was written by oil industry funded Dr Timothy Ball, who also happens to be the Chair of PSI.

PSI was founded by the science and law teacher John O’Sullivan, who is acting as a paid consultant to Dr Ball in defending him against lawsuits brought against him by Dr Michael Mann and Dr Andrew Weaver.


As for the paper by Joseph E. Postma that you refer to.

Guess who published it?

No prizes for guessing that it was Principia Scientific International. Was it published as scientific research?

No, it was published for profit.


As for the actual paper itself, you’ve probably figured by now that it’s a load of rubbish. And you’d be right.

The whole paper is written on the assumption that greenhouse effect warms the Earth’s surface through back radiation. Not only would this contravene the laws of thermodynamics but that’s not remotely what the greenhouse theory says. And here you are asking who knows about the greenhouse effect. Clearly Joseph E. Postma doesn’t.

By applying exactly the same principles that Postma employs I have been able to ‘prove’ that the sky is blue as a consequence of gravity and that relativity is the reason that bats can navigate in the dark. Ignore everything that gets in your way and reinvent what remains and anything is possible.


The paper is so fundamentally flawed at even the most basic level, that nobody who understands the first thing about the greenhouse effect, or even physics in general, is going to be taken in by it. I’m sorry for the people who are hoodwinked by this pseudo scientific garbage.

Why, it's up your ass, shill boi.

Only a mental cripple or a pre-schooler believes in global warming after the data has been found to be purposely skewed many times, where the "data" has been cherry picked, etc.

Refresh my memory - what's the name of that college in England that's been in the middle of a shitstorm the last few years?

And where's the hard data that polar bears are drowning?

It's your move, imbecile, so make good use of it.

Why, it's up your ass, shill boi.

Only a mental cripple or a pre-schooler believes in global warming after the data has been found to be purposely skewed many times, where the "data" has been cherry picked, etc.

Refresh my memory - what's the name of that college in England that's been in the middle of a shitstorm the last few years?

And where's the hard data that polar bears are drowning?

It's your move, imbecile, so make good use of it.

so, when you have no facts, pound the table

The only thing that got pounded was you, Brainiac.

Of course, it's incredibly remote terrain, and many of the fires will burn out on their own as they're both hard to get to and not near anything but wild land.

oh wow ( yawn ) that sure is *proof* enough for me!
not
What part of weather warfare ( against Russia as well as all the other populations the IMF wants to extract a carbon tax from ) is so difficult to understand?

has all the proof you need

talk about strawmen... the on;ly card 'hex' has to play after not being able to address the Operation Cloverleaf and HAARP technology, except to direct the readership to a scrubbed website.
yawn

this thread isn't about haarp or 'cloverleaf'

The OP isn't nibbling your troll bait and neither am I..

I'm not here for you - note the size of the climate related pictures I've been posting - over 600 pixels

that means they're intended for the onion forum, where I have over 2,127 views now on this very subject

this place is dead dead deadski - and you're the main reason why

if the people in charge here fail to see any changes that should be made, I fail to see why I should invest my time or energy posting news that is never syndicated anyway. this is why I've stopped publishing here and now publish on the onion forum insted.

the "tipping point reached - GAME OVER" news was only to give the people here fair warning on whats unfolding - not you and not the other 2 trolls

- willfully ignorant serial liars posting the same fossil fuel talking point lies again & again

Go back to youtube, I’m sure there’s something entertaining for you there.

don't get many views there either I see, but at least you can pretend to be saying something important and disable comments treating it like a video blog, presenting the facade of credibility at least.

no such luck on here - we KNOW what you are

"where I have over 2,127 views now on this very subject"

Hundreds of flies feast on one turd, so what's your point, widdle pre-schooler?

- but you don't

still avoiding the very real programs afoot to alter the weather.
Oh no, anything but the deliberate assault upon our air and soil that those chemical lines in the sky represent [ Operation Cloverleaf } and the operation of the HAARP arrays to produce drought and freak weather.
Hex again resorts to stupid graphics. Its particular trademark. When it isn't playing the psychopathic twit, Yada.

Warned of what?

Give it your best shot, shill boi. Tell us what it is we need to fear.

And waste those carbon credits with your mindless Trekkie postings. We need the laughs.

and we say everything is fine

but


if everything's NOT fine, fossil fuel has NOTHING TO DO WITH IT

-our think tanks say so


that why, it's BAU -record profits as usual, and we don't need to change a thing.

don't change a thing - just blame it on someone ANYONE ELSE, even flake shit we make up as we go.

now, we've got premere programming to get back to (it tells us what to think)

this is one of my favorite albums, this track especially

the skill she shows is amazing

and this - dust

and crush also shows alot of skill

these all get regular airplay

on the onion forum. I have the same problem here (where I broadcast) endemic sexism, almost no female bands or vocalists are played here by the corporate media. I therefore play ALL female music, while also explicitly making fun of the stations that fail to. (as much as between each song)

what those stations DO do are 'babe pages', 'thong of the day', hooters, stipper bars and so on.

they use women extensively in, weather, ad-libs, stop sets, voice tracking, community affairs, and so on.

some of their station jingles are also highly sexist "if you like women", "if you like short shorts" (while men are sexually harrassing women in the background), if you like women mud wrestling, and so on.

..but they almost NEVER play any female bands or vocalists.

they sometimes include a token play of heart or joan jett every several hours _only when I make fun of them_ as above, but days can go by where no female bands or vocalists are played at all. especially on tuesday.


they call that 'classic rock' - I make fun of them and call it CRACKER ROT.

I have several clips that talk about cracker rot that I play just to make fun of them.



one more track - my favorite 'which side are you on'

As usual, the retreat into stupid graphics and reliance upon off topic stupidity reigns supreme.
The commons is under attack by technologies that cause freak weather and drought.
Under the name of 'climate change' ( global 'warming' is becoming embarrassing as mean temperatures, world wide, drop ) to promote a 'solution' that would tax the 'carbon footprint' humans create. A carbon tax that would give the IMF a funding source while also giving this enterprise a choke hold on fuel and food costs for population reduction.

Tipping point reached - GAME OVER 2143 Views

http://65bgvta7yos3sce5.onion.to/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=974

here is where I've posted the above links to :
http://65bgvta7yos3sce5.onion.to/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=1271

Isn't it funny that hex always references itself to provide a source?
Like anyone who has actually done some research into the subjects of /HAARP and Operation Cloverleaf

like devil vision and the thousands of spam posts that got you placed on the ignore list

as opposed to me -

no public website, no profit or business model, no blog, no youtube videos, no 'book', no fossil fuel talking points, no flake shit

A pre-schooler who shills for global warming thinks it reinforces its credibility with posting music files.

I'm laughing at you, schizophrenic boi.

'Devil Vision 'oh, that poster. I used to flag that guy a lot and now you're using him to paint a strawman of me. Ha ha ha
Is this more of your 'intel'? You know, Tweet, you get funnier every day. This 'Bill' guy is probably you!
( under yet another personality in its psychopathic retinue. )
Really are running on this one with the same tired bag of tricks.
The reader should look up
HAARP Operation Cloverleaf and weather war.

because the jokes on you

they are totally intended for another thread, subject and forum

damn I didn't even read what numbnuts said

prob fracking out again about his book

they banned you so you're butthurt over it and are here to force your book's contents in their face

thats what the flake shit insted of a name in the author field is all about too

you know that pretty well separates the trolls from the patrons right there - except for lord king god uncle tinny

but then again his name IS his only real point in being here - everything he posts is pasted direct from freeperland

See, the difference in my picture and those of the zit farmers is that mine is deadly accurate.

Waste some more carbon credits, fool.

I post the latest methane emissions data from as recently as only a few days ago

you post 8 year old shit that means nothing, solves nothing, says nothing, is nothing

like you

The image is just as pertinent today as it was the day I made it, and it slapped you into last year, widdle bedwetter.

Keep posting your music facturds, imbecile.

you think by using this old fossil fuel talking point, in a nation where we're all forced to use fossil fuels, we the victims are to blame, and as such any/all efforts made to transition away from fossil fuels to clean renewable energy, like Germany where they already get over 50 % of their electricity from solar & wind, is null & void simply because _you_ say so.

you've been a fool for years, and as the real world - weather events - geopolitical events - the capitalist world crumbles, you're looking more & more foolish with each passing day


now, I have community affairs to prepare, for THIS morning, not for 8 years ago ;)

If you're a "victim", then do something about it. Convert to solar. Or shut down, instead of being a hypocrite.

Or you can continue to be a helpless bedwetter.

wearing a different dress

you have no idea what I am or ain't doing, because I don't talk about it on here

it's not about the messenger anyway

the message is climate change is happening no matter how deeply you try to bury your head in the sand

and no matter who billy boy can cook up to blame it on other than exxon

both of these are out of touch with reality. I'm presenting overwhelming raw data direct from the methane areas along with the peer review of a large group of people all cross-checking the data

-if your only ability is spewing snark more power to you

I know exactly what you are and what you're doing. You're a pustule coated junior high imbecile who was muttering slogans like a robot, but was reduced to further idiotic babbling when an adult entered the room.

I've reviewed the data myself and agree with the group of people you see pictured above, several of which are professors BTW

what 'you're really doing' is insulting them and saying they're all completely wrong and you're completely right, as well as calling the field scientists, collecting the samples and taking the measurements, liars.

are you getting into a food fight again, Tweet; with Yada, your other personality?
Shut down HAARP and Operation Cloverleaf.
then you can wank about 'climate change'.

go on billy boy

take the leap - tell the thousands of dear gentle silent readers here, that the group of people pictured above are full of shit

that may be because all the clowns above are all receiving the funding from the same interested parties who want a carbon tax.
Or are you referring to the biggest buthole [ you ] from whence all the methane comes from...
The reader should really do their own digging.
Operation Cloverleaf
is a good start.

"what 'you're really doing' is insulting them and saying they're all completely wrong and you're completely right, as well as calling the field scientists, collecting the samples and taking the measurements, liars. "

They are liars. Scientists are bought and sold every day, as you pimple coated dweebs should remember from your anti-pharma sloganeering.

And consensus is not science. it takes only one man to be right and all the other imbeciles be wrong. Just ask Copernicus.

You're not defending your being just as horribly stupid as a medieval Catholic, are you?

thank you thats all I needed to know

so when scientists have data you don't like they're no longer scientists - they're 'leftists'

changing a matter of logic into a political smear

and the tenured and IPCC claims - you pulled out of your ass, again as a smear and to distract from where the REAL payrolling goes on - with big oil and the handful of shills they bought from the tobacco industry

it's weird - big oil spends huge amounts of money on PR firms (paid professional liars), and yet a person like Guy, who left the easy life of a college professor, because the college didn't like the data, the logic, the reality, of the recent measurements, and so struck out on his own, specifically rejecting money from TPTB

and yet out of all those PROVEN to be paid-by-exxon, professional liars to choose from, _he's_ the one you accuse of being corrupt

Actually, I pulled it from your braincase.

Everybody knows that global warming is a United Nations scam, and the "data" is bogus.

I've slapped you around quite a bit today, asswipe, and want to save more fun for another day.

And Sheepdog needs to get in a few swings too. He's actually doing a good job, but don't give him the big head, just some head.

Everybody knows that the dice are loaded
Everybody rolls with their fingers crossed
Everybody knows that the war is over
Everybody knows that the good guys lost
Everybody knows the fight is fixed
The poor stay poor and the rich get rich
That's how it goes

Everybody knows that the boat is sinkin'
Everybody knows that the captain lied
Everybody's got this broken feelin'
Like their momma or there dog just died
Everybody's hands are in their pockets
Everybody wants a box of chocolates
And a long stem rose

Everybody knows
Everybody knows
Everybody knows
That's how it goes
Everybody knows

Everybody knows
Everybody knows
That's the way it goes
Everybody knows

Everybody knows that it's now or never
Everybody knows that it's me or you
[ From: http://www.metrolyrics.com/everybody-knows-lyrics-concrete-blonde.html ]
Everybody knows that you live forever
When you had a line or two
Everybody knows the deal is rotten
Old Black Joe still pickin' cotton
For ribbons and bows

Everybody knows you love me baby
Everybody knows that you really do
Everybody knows that you been faithful
Give or take a night or two
Everybody knows you been discrete
So many people you had to meet
Without your clothes and everybody knows

Everybody knows
Everybody knows
That's the way it goes
Everybody knows

Everybody knows
Everybody knows
That's how it goes
And everybody knows

Everybody knows
Everybody knows
That's how it goes
And everybody knows

we do know that 'global warming' somehow morphed into 'climate change' when the raw data to support the hockey stick graph was 'lost'.
But the need for a crippling carbon tax remained. So we have Tweet defending this absurd thesis like a spoiled child defends its privileges.

Luntz championed switching from ‘global warming’ to ‘climate change’ in 2003. Scientists, environmentalists, progressives, and frankly the whole darn planet have always used both terms.

In a confidential 2003 memo :
http://www.politicalstrategy.org/archives/001330.php

Luntz asserted that the Administration and conservatives should stop using the term “global warming” because it was too frightening:

"It’s time for us to start talking about “climate change” instead of global warming and “conservation” instead of preservation. 1) “Climate change” is less frightening than “global warming”. As one focus group participant noted, climate change “sounds like you’re going from Pittsburgh to Fort Lauderdale.” While global warming has catastrophic connotations attached to it, climate change suggests a more controllable and less emotional challenge."

Media Matters has a new video out (by John Kerr) responding to the latest Faux News effort to push this phony conspiracy:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kBhDxjzvP6c

http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2010/12/22/207231/debunking-the-dumbest-denier-myth-climate-change-vs-global-warming/

The term “climate change” was used long before Luntz’s memo anyway, particularly in the scientific literature. For instance, a 1970 paper published in the prestigious journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences was titled “Carbon Dioxide and its Role in Climate Change”

I'm so impressed by yout references which only mean they are in on the funding...
let's see
***
The First Rule of Fighting Climate Change: Don't Talk About Climate ...
www.motherjones.com/ mojo/ 2010/ 01/ gop-pollster-luntz-tells-enviros-stop-talking-climate -
Jan 22, 2010 ... Republican pollster Frank Luntz—the brains behind Newt Gingrich's ... "The least important component of climate change is climate change." ...
*** good going, Tweet....
making yer point.

It only shows anyone the level of insider cronyism that runs this system.
One one you're batting for right now. Obsessing about a gas that plants live on, that have been at far higher levels while life flourished and in essence, doing work for the IMF under their desire for a carbon tax to control food and fuel prices as well as control entire societies. As Earth temperatures drop

http://www.economist.com/news/science-and-technology/21574461-climate-may-be-heating-up-less-response-greenhouse-gas-emissions
so do me a favor, piss off.

..you're completely full of shit


It only shows - all your talking points come directly from false noise


It only shows - no matter how many times your posted garbage is proven to be pasted right-wing talking points, you can never EVER admit you're wrong or made a mistake


-in fact why not just post some MORE fucking garbage and keep your fucking wing nut attention whore troll game going you god damed piece of shit

whoops now I'm starting to talk like I do on the onion forum..

Well, Tweet, I can't help being correct just as you can't help being an asshole.
With stupid graphs, pulled out yer ass and stupid graphics pulled out yer pea brain.
Off topic self promotion, over-spaced stupidity, strawmen and goat trails to avoid the same topic.
But just go on, and I'll just ask the reader to dig into search items
like
HAARP weather war
IMF carbon tax
and
Operation Cloverleaf
as you get as busy as a cat covering its own sh*t on a marble floor.

- there fixed that for you

you really can't remember which identity you're playing, can you? Tweet or Yada, and it shows.

" and stupid graphics pulled out yer pea brain. "

which are still a long way away from an on topic dissertation of the use of HAARP in conjunction with the high altitude arrays of chemtrails under the program of Operation Cloverleaf to alter the weather.
Fix *that*, Tweet.

Shill boi thinks that mentioning the spineless GOP will change things. And what's with "Faux News" and mentioning the gay crowd of Media Matters?

That more than shows us the mental development of the United Nations groupie that's spamming this place.

I tried to be nice to you and what did I get?

*snicker*

the readership can clearly see the Tweet [hex ]/Yada [smashy ] tag team-food fight that goes on to attempt to obfuscate the issues I've injected into this climate rant. It's also obvious that this one individual is part of an on going assault of this forum.
If you wish to see the results of this individual, together with a general sloth of the IMCs mentioned, just look at Cleveland, New Mexico, Arizona, and SF [ among others, without a doubt ]. Independent Media Centers I'm certain that it has had much pleasure in wrecking.
But, being a burnt out israeli spook, it suffers from years of its own mental toxic load.
cheers! ***
The arrays being layed by those unmarked jet aircraft serve as elements of a RF resonant field while the HAARP systems use them to manipulate the atmosphere in conjunction with other HAARP like sites located in other locations to produce standing wave effects and resonant harmonics at the low end of this technology.
They've had quite a few years and mass funding to develop this weapon system.

-randomly throwing handfuls of shit at the walls in hopes that some of it will stick

poor things

after the crushing defeat of mittens

mitten's boy rove tried to steal the election, thats why he was fracking out on false noise during election night

he kept trying & trying - tried about a hundred times

>bang< >bang< >bang< >bang<

it was funny as hell

Newly released emails show EPA director’s extensive use of fictional alter ego

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/jun/2/newly-released-emails-show-epa-directors-extensive/

Richard Windsor never existed at the EPA, but the agency awarded the fictional staffer’s email account certificates proving he had mastered all of the agency’s technology training — including declaring him a “scholar of ethical behavior,” according to documents disclosed late last week.

Windsor.Richard@epa.gov was the controversial email alias used by former Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lisa Jackson, who resigned earlier this year amid questions about whether her agency was complying with open-records laws....

****************************

Will this go through twice?

The revelation that even the head of the EPA is a charlatan seems to have shut up "both" Sheepdip and zit boi.

How interesting indeed.

But the very indymedia as a whole has never been quite what it projected itself. For example, they DO see your IP addresses, and nessie claimed they didn't. There's no possible way they can block you unless they can do what they claim they can't, which is they SEE you.

-flinging shit in hopes some will stick

matter of fact that's what the entire republican and especially teabaggers group is doing right now

they lost, lost badly despite the hundreds of millions poured into the election by billionaires, and the 're-grouping' thing isn't working out, so now they've gone back to what they do best, witch hunting, fake outrage about things that don't matter, and flinging shit in hope some will stick.

the silence you've been experiencing is the silence afforded trolls

funny little monkey, huh? We seem to have this duel freak playing with itself *again*....

"Climate Change" is like "hope & change* in which there is no meaning besides the "sloganeering" and numbly repeated quasi-science without any foundation that is rendered forth to attempt to quantify the myth to scare children and dupes.

How very interesting that "neither" appeared for over 24 hours after the news broke about the EPA faker.

Come on, zit grrrls, let's see some more of that "fighting" so that the indymedia will appear to have two colon cells still alive.

I thought I was being out of it until I see that *again* you're banging yourself and getting the spay all over...
Maybe to pull the usual sandbag shuffle to hide my interjection to cover it over with the antics of your typical off- topic self banging.
The climate myth is a hoax, a fraud, to install a carbon tax.

careful billy you'll get spittle all over yourself doing that

again, the stupid graphics in substitution for reason
what a surprise....
Tweet playing with itself.
while still defending the hoax of 'climate change'...with stupidly, of course.

The latest Chicken Little squat is climate CHAOS, you imbecile. Aren't you missing a golden opportunity to sow fear into the hearts of your fellow unbathed shitferbrains by not using it?

Don't they send you talking points anymore? Must you find out everything from me?

so keep driving, keep burning fossil fuels

then blame god, not yourself, when the earth shakes us off like a bad infection



so, you say 'Our Way of Life Is Non-Negotiable?'

well God just sent a tornado - to negotiate

(excerpt from last weeks show)

sure... play your self- fisting game. ha ha ha
then
Show me the time where 'greenhouse gasses' caused extinction.

so keep driving, keep burning fossil fuels

then blame god, not yourself, when the earth shakes us off like a bad infection



so, you say 'Our Way of Life Is Non-Negotiable?'

well God just sent a tornado - to negotiate

(excerpt from last weeks show)

notice the 32 minutes between them ?

- that's how long I waited for this website to respond after trying to post that

5 minutes
10 minutes
30 fucking minutes

who gives a damn except you?
All you're doing is sandbagging the question.
Where is the extinction event associated with greenhouse gas?
There isn't one.

-that's how I normally talk. hell that's the way I talk on air too.

I couldn't help but notice you seem to always be looking intently for any sign of discomfort, and then 'joyfully and gleefully' pounce upon it, seemingly gaining some kind of perverse pleasure at the thought of me being 'upset' - about anything, in any way.

weird



"The annoying thing about the media coverage of global warming is that all the major news outlets insist on providing equal time to the naysayers, when only 2% of climate scientists feel any doubt about AGW. It should, therefore, only provide 2% of the time to them.

According to the work of Powell, 99.87% versus 0.13%.

Global warming denialists make up only about 1 tenth of a percent, yet the corporate media gives them over 95 % of airtime.

But, as we all know, major ‘news’ outlets are merely propaganda machines for business as usual. They are dependent on the meltdown of the planet for their very existence, so cannot tell the truth."

I added :
And the teabaggers are at the very pinnacle of the psychosis of indifference and apathy for anything of real meaning or consequence.

I'm sorry did you say something :)

ha
"Global warming denialists make up only about 1 tenth of a percent, yet the corporate media gives them over 95 % of airtime."
offer of proof, Tweet, the media is hardly open to debate on this as you know well.
again
Where is the extinction event associated with greenhouse gasses?

http://desmogblog.com/media-matters-report-shows-network-tv-preference-anti-environment-guests

http://mediamatters.org/research/201106070010



Industrialism has just plain ruined some people.

Crippled them mentally and physically.

The lesson is very confused people with toxic strawmen haunting their brains become toxic personalities that will just distract everyone.


The comments section here is a sort of Land of the Lost.

People who are perpetually miffed that no half-decent blog will post their comments.

Backbiting snarkiness, nastyness, disrespect.

say it isn't so !

Now it's claiming to be a Dee and Jay.

If it was one, it couldn't talk straight for all the lisping.

"climate chaos" imbecile.

*snicker*

whats the matter - did linking to media matters set you off ?


wait a minute, do you believe I'm a pimply teenager? I noticed a couple of jibes along those lines. No, I more resemble Saint Nicholas. not that it matters.

but when snark is all you have..


and about bill's 'prickly question' -

"Questions that do not admit a scientific answer should not be assumed to be questions."

Aren't you tired of banging yourself in order to keep from answering the QUESTION?
Where is the extinction event associated with greenhouse gas level.
It doesn't matter which 'nic you use, either Tweet or Yada will do.
Because there isn't any.

You have your own obsessive agenda which has to prevail regardless of the evidence, it’s boring. Seems to me you just want to make controversy, to be the center of attention, I’ll leave you to it.

"can't be bothered"
Why not admit that you are unable to locate a geological era that demonstrates an extinction event that is associated with greenhouse gas levels?
It's funny watching your dual personality dodging this critical and fundamental question.
You have nothing.

as bait

you took it

- I knew you would be more interested in smearing them than the actual issue.

trolls always are

amid the food fight here, a question remains
where is the extinction level event that was caused by greenhouse gas?
there isn't any.

You're a liar. Your incredible lack of basic common knowledge of even the slime on your side has shamed you and you're trying to change your tune.

MASSIVE fail!

*snicker*

kinda funny watching the fisting Yada is giving itself as Tweet...
Where is the extinction event associated with any greenhouse gas level;?
haw haw
what an idiot.