"In ancient China, a new dynasty was accompanied by “the rectification of names”, a ceremony in which the erosion of meaning under the previous dynasty was cleared up and language and its subjects correlated again. It was like a debt jubilee, only for meaning.

This made Barack Obama’s first presidential campaign electrifying: he seemed like a man who called many things by their true names. Once elected, he sank into the stale, muffled, parallel-universe language of most politicians, and has remained there ever since. The far right has got as far as it has by mislabelling just about everything, while their fantasy version of economics keeps getting more fantastic. (Maybe there should be a rectification of numbers, too.)

Let’s rectify some names ourselves. We often speak as though the source of our problems is complex and even mysterious. I’m not sure it is. You can blame it all on greed: the refusal to do anything about climate change, the attempts by the .01% to destroy our democracy, the constant robbing of the poor, the war against most of what is beautiful on this Earth.

Calling lies “lies” and theft “theft” and violence “violence”, loudly, clearly and consistently, is a powerful aspect of political activism. Much of the work around human rights begins with accurately and aggressively reframing the status quo as an outrage. What protects an outrage are circumlocutions, and euphemisms. Change the language and you’ve begun to change the reality or at least to open the status quo to question. Here is Confucius on the rectification of names: “If language is not correct, then what is said is not what is meant; if what is said is not what is meant, then what must be done remains undone; if this remains undone, morals and art will deteriorate; if justice goes astray, the people will stand about in helpless confusion.”

to read Rebecca Solnit's article published in the English edition of Le Monde diplomatique November 2012, click on

http://mondediplo.com/2012/11/08us

the subject "about climate change" was never brought up in this linked analysis. It was a summery of neo-con military adventurism and very on point. It had nothing to do with anything "about climate change" as the author confabulated into the -Summary (Required)- publish entry.

Interesting that these little splinters of subjects "about climate change" keep popping up in this forum. Even when there was nothing about it to challenge in the referred article.
This is of course instructive to note, either the results of programming or deliberate intent to push the 'global warming' fraud in a cooling global environment.
The rabbit hole becomes an event horizon when you examine the threads that go into advanced HAARP and Operation Cloverleaf programs, IMF carbon taxes and huge profit motives to control weather and climate in controlled regions under these previously mentioned operations and technologies. .
But the propaganda as well as its promoters keep going and going and going....
There are unbelievable opportunities of command and control as well as commodities speculation insider knowledge, as an incentive for these programs to be in operation and it would be foolish as not to consider it to be the cause of the spate of murderous weather anomalies since the above mentioned programs were begun in the late 90s.

thank you for reading this.

You have the opportunity to address climate change denialism in the "New Research Links Climate Science Denial To Conspiracy Theories" thread - which is exactly what "HAARP and Operation Cloverleaf" are - conspiracy theories that have no scientific data to support them, which allow denialists to escape any personal responsibility, and which also backhandedly promotes your BS book.

- a weasel trying to profit off of disinformation, while avoiding facing the issue head on, because there your BS is contrasted starkly, by peer reviewed data from sites such as desmog blog and real climate.

It's easy to spot your work, just look at any published story with only 1 comment, that touches on the subject of climate change and without even bothering to read that 1 comment your attempt is exposed.

The reason why there's only 1 comment is because everyone grew tired of your trolling years ago, and no amount of peer reviewed data ever gets through to you.

At best you lay low for a while, then repeat the lies again. Now too ashamed to even stick to a nic which would lead to people like me exposing your lying ass easier/faster.

..and you wonder why IMC won't give you the time of day, and hides your attempts to publish your haarp BS (which is the only subject you're ever concerned with)

So much for global cooling ^


"June broke or tied 3,215 high-temperature records across the United States.

That followed the warmest May on record for the Northern Hemisphere – the 327th consecutive month in which the temperature of the entire globe exceeded the 20th-century average, the odds of which occurring by simple chance were 3.7 x 10-99, a number considerably larger than the number of stars in the universe."


So the chance that global warming denialists are right at this point (specifically the 'global cooling' claim made above) is less than 1 in 3.7E99 which is such a large number there's no name for it, and it can only be expressed in scientific notation.

and the previous 'stats' were from manipulated and 'lost' raw data from a self investigated cover-up. .

Climategate: They have lost the data upon which the theory of global warming was based ...

Nov 30, 2009 ... Climategate: They have lost the data upon which the theory of global warming is based. they knew it was lost years ago but failed to disclose it
http://www.beaufortobserver.net/Articles-c-2009-11-29-240479.112112_Climategate_They_have_lost_the_data_upon_which_the_theory_of_global_warming_is_based.html

I'm sure you can post some more debunked fossil fuel industry FUD to feel better.

Or at least some more NON-peer reviewed fake 'expert' falsified/cherry picked data..

anything to support the book sales

"It is difficult to get a troll to understand something when his book sales depend on him NOT understanding it"

this moron uses all the buzz phrases but can't back them up with verified readings.

Sorry Global Warming Alarmists, The Earth Is Cooling - Forbes

May 31, 2012 ... Natural climate cycles point to a decline in global temperatures over the next 10 years.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterferrara/2012/05/31/sorry-global-warming-alarmists-the-earth-is-cooling/

New Research Links Climate Science Denial To Conspiracy Theories

http://la.indymedia.org/news/2012/09/255845_comment.php


DeSmogBlog | Clearing the PR Pollution that Clouds Climate Science.

http://www.desmogblog.com/



Real Climate - Climate Science from climate scientists.

http://www.realclimate.org/

let's see here.
So much to say, so little motivation to do so.
Obviously this stand in for the banking interests ( as in the IMF who would collect a global carbon tax ) or the speculators who can predict weather anomalies or trends ( 'cause the weather control technology is in their hands ) to play the market accordingly, has a roll here at the IMC forum. Exactly like its former roll under the nic of 'hex'.
We should expect loads of off topic crap now from this freak, as well as its infantile over use of graphics, extra page eating spacing and meaningless pronouncements.
This together with the all too predictable accusations and from deep within its asshole, reason.
The usual israeli tactics we have come to know so well
over the unrelenting years.
But it's so much fun to make it go berserk and show itself as well as its 'cause' as the gibbering lunacy it always does.
As to the thread it started with its *other* personality, Yada the psychopath, I made one comment.
Funny how that thread went off into radiation reports and punch and judy "slurping" fights with itself to bump, bump,bump...its own thread.
Oh yes, the links this *tweet* provides are what? Super duper or something?
Speaking of links
HAARP + weather war
on any search engine.
for instance.
---
Is Global Warming being caused by HAARP and Related Weather ...

Jan 9, 2010 ... Weather modification and warfare are a reality. Climate Change theorists that stand to gain off of Climate Change regulation
http://current.com/community/91866204_is-global-warming-being-caused-by-haarp-and-related-weather-war-technologies.htm

The more outrageously wrong they are, the better the ratings, and the more the networks can charge for ads.

The only time pundits face any accountability, is when their ratings drop.

Their employers could care less if they're right or wrong, that's not part of their employment contract, nor is it part of the basic definition of a pundit.


The pundits on faux noise and shit channel exist to provide opinion, commentary, that makes their audience feel better about themselves, and their belief system such as it is.

The typical faux watcher or shit channel listener is not a bright person, he-she is an uninformed person, who has a set of strongly held personal beliefs, that have little if any basis in fact.

The job of the faux and shit channel pundits are to reinforce those strongly held fact-free personal beliefs.

That is all.

- the preceding rant, verbal spew and unfounded wank is brought to you by the dickweed we used to know and hide on a regular basis.-
---So in order to manipulate the targeted populations to influence their economy or squeeze commodity futures it becomes easy to 'make a killing' when you can predict the weather or even control it. ---
***
Let's see... ahhh here's a nice search term:
Global warming hoax
***
NASA Exposed Global Warming Hoax | CalWatchDog
Katy Grimes: Just as NASA was gaining some steam on blowing the cover off of the global warming hoax using real science,
-“When objective NASA satellite data, reported in a peer-reviewed scientific journal, show a ‘huge discrepancy’ between alarmist climate models and real-world facts, climate scientists, the media and our elected officials would be wise to take notice. Whether or not they do so will tell us a great deal about how honest the purveyors of global warming alarmism truly are,” wrote Taylor.
http://www.calwatchdog.com/2011/07/28/nasa-exposed-global-warming-hoax/

and when measurements don't support the beliefs, attack the scientists - thousands of them all over the world, using an army of fossil fuel funded PR products


..and couldn't help but notice


the name calling/personal attacks here, that always follow any mention of the book -


when you have the facts, pound them

but when you don't have facts, pound the table

since everyone is so interested...
HAARP Weather
---
Weather Control: HAARP

Weather Control: HAARP is a secret weapon used to achieve weather control and 'full-spectrum dominance.'
http://www.wanttoknow.info/war/haarp_weather_modification_electromagnetic_warfare_weapons

and delusions of - popularity :


"we used to know and hide on a regular basis"

"everyone is so interested..."

yes - that's why unless someone cares to refute you, all the threads staring you have only 1 comment - yours.

doing nothing important.. deluding yourself that you're popular, part of a "we", or that people are shivering in anticipation of your next bowel movement that passes for facts

I was :
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
radiation conversion data

One becquerel equals one nuclear disintegration per second.


1 microcurie (µCi) = 37 kilobecquerel (kBq) 37,000 CPS - 2,220,000 CPM

100 nanocuries (nCi) = 3,700 becquerel (Bq) 3,700 CPS - 222,000 CPM

10 nanocuries (nCi) = 370 becquerel (Bq) 370 CPS - 22,200 CPM

1 nanocurie (nCi) = 37 becquerel (Bq) 37 CPS - 2,220 CPM

100 picocurie (pCi) = 3.7 becquerel (mBq) 3.7 CPS - 222 CPM

10 picocurie (pCi) = .37 becquerel (mBq) .37 CPS - 22 CPM

1 picocurie (pCi) = .037 becquerel (mBq) .037 CPS - 2.2 CPM


Conversion Becquerel/Sievert and Sievert/Becquerel

1 Bq 60.CPM = 0.013 microsievert
10 Bq 600.CPM = 0.13 microsievert
100 Bq 6,000.CPM = 1.3 microsievert
1000 Bq 60,000.CPM = 13 microsievert
10,000 Bq 600,000.CPM = 130 microsievert
100,000 Bq 6,000,000.CPM = 1.3 millisievert - annual dose limit for the general public (11.41 CPM)


1 microsievert = 76.923 Beq


100 rem (rem) = 1 sievert (Sv)
10 rem (rem) = 100 millisievert (mSv)
1 rem (rem) = 10 millisievert (mSv)
100 millirem (mrem) = 1 millisievert (mSv)
10 millirem (mrem) = 100 microsievert (µSv)
1 millirem (mrem) = 10 microsievert (µSv)

The annual dose limit for the general public is 1mSv (0.1 rem). 100 millirem (mrem) = 1 millisievert (mSv)



31,536,000 seconds in a year
525,600 minutes in a year
8760 hours in a year

annual dose limit for the general public :

11.41 CPM - 0.1 rem - 1 in 16,000 risk of getting cancer per year (1 in 1600 - 10 years)

114 CPM = 1 rem 10 mSv per year - 1 in 1600 risk of getting cancer per year (1 in 160 - 10 years)

228 CPM = 2 rem 20 mSv per year - 1 in 800 risk of getting cancer per year (1 in 80 - 10 years)

500 CPM = 5 rem 50 mSv per year - 1 in 400 risk of getting cancer per year (1 in 40 - 10 years)

1,141 CPM = 10 rem per year - 1 in 200 risk of getting cancer per year (1 in 20 - 10 years, 1 in 10 - 20 years 1 in 5 - 40

years)


~ 2-3 rem per year now

50 mSv, 1 in 400 risk of getting cancer
200 mSv, 1 in 100 risk of developing cancer per year

A ‘radiation area’ is a zone where a dose rate of radiation area more than 0.05mSv/h (5mrem/h)

A ‘high-radiation area’ exposures of more than 1mSv/h (100mrem/h) are possible.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
before sticking my gamma/beta detector in the freezer to get as low a background reading as possible, since the radiation level here has finally fallen after being highly elevated for the past few weeks - too high to check low contamination levels (I don't have a lead shielded enclosure or a large tank of clean water, so the ice filled deep freeze is the next best thing)

getting used to ignoring the empty spew, useless pronouncements and other noise from our resident 'mr. whizzard'...
---
let's use a new search term
----
"Operation Cloverleaf" +HAARP
and see what comes up.
----
The Stealth Genocide Program - Review - Death In The Air

Aug 13, 2001... from aircraft; officially called "Operation Cloverleaf," according to government insiders) ... HAARP and atmospheric heating "experiments" ...
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_depopu31.htm

Global warming made Sandy directly and unmistakably worse, because of its contribution to sea level rise.

"It's the one thing that absolutely made the storm worse that you can't wiggle out of."


It takes a lot of heat to melt all that ice, man doesn't have any heat source that can even come close to melting it.

The suns heat is a constant - the balance of solar heat vs heat lost doesn't change as long as solar output remains the same.

- the ONLY variable that can melt all that ice is CO2 trapping it - the gigatons of CO2 fossil fuel has added.

No haarp or cloverleaf trick can generate the huge amount of heat it took to melt all that ice, it would require thousands of times more power than all the energy civilisation uses. There would have to be hundreds of thousands of huge power plants everywhere to generate this heat.

Only the heat trapping characteristics of CO2 can account for this..



end of story

-NASA researchers admit adding fake inches to sea level rises. Skeptics denounce desperate attempt to salvage government global warming policies.

In a disturbing development in the ongoing global warming fiasco the U.S. government-funded Sea Level Research Group has been given a green light from NASA to exaggerate sea level rises way above actual recorded measurements. The reason? So that policy makers can falsely blame humans for adding to natural rises in sea levels.-
http://co2insanity.com/2011/05/13/fake-sea-level-rise-approved-by-nasa-in-climate-fraud/

If one were to notice the regularity, the fervid defense by individuals like our unstable_tinker and the unelenting attempt to tuck the meme of "climate change" into what ever convenient vehicle these drones decide to hijack in order to complete the insertion of this parrot talk about CO2 'climate change / warming', carbon taxes etc. etc.
The author of this piece did this very insertion which had nothing to do whatsoever to the translated article it was supposed to be doing a synopsis on.
Another thing one might consider is the attack from our resident psycho-weasel on the critique I wrote upon this little piece of either drone programming or deliberate and dishonorable meme reinforcement.
And if this freak keeps talking about some 'book' [?], please don't buy, read or touch it even with long handled forceps.
Boycott the store.
Now, on the subject of this author's climate change confabulation, the ardent effort of *tweet* to support this fraud and the frequency of these pieces, point with neon lights to a continuing effort to yoke a carbon tax on the people.
---
oh, I almost forgot, another search term.
"weather control" +IMF
---
The most dangerous weapon is not nuclear, chemical or biological, it is the weather.

By LUIS MIRANDA | THE REAL AGENDA | AUGUST 20, 2012

The weather is changing and the effects of such change have been felt by millions already. But this drastic change in weather is not a result of anthropogenic activity as many would have you believe. It is the result of decades of open air tests by government and large corporations who hold the patents to carry out the largest experiment to change the amount of sun the planet receives, the amount of rain that falls over a determined area, where hurricanes and tornadoes form and where do they go to, among others.
http://real-agenda.com/2012/08/20/why-are-they-manipulating-the-weather/

SEA LEVEL DATA FACILITY

http://www.ioc-sealevelmonitoring.org/



Download Global Sea Level Observing System (GLOSS) data

http://www.gloss-sealevel.org/data/



Australian Baseline Sea Level Monitoring Project

http://www.bom.gov.au/oceanography/projects/abslmp/abslmp.shtml



Sea Level Data

http://www.nodc.noaa.gov/General/sealevel.html



Sea-level Rise :: CSIRO & ACECRC

http://www.cmar.csiro.au/sealevel/



Making Sea Level Measurements | Land Information New Zealand

http://www.linz.govt.nz/hydro/tidal-info/tidal-intro/making-sea-level-measurements



Global sea level change measured by TOPEX satellite (1992-2001), Jason-1 ( 2002-mid 2008) and Jason-2 (mid 2008-present)

http://www.columbia.edu/~mhs119/SeaLevel/



The international sea level data available at the British Oceanographic Data Centre (BODC)

https://www.bodc.ac.uk/data/online_delivery/international_sea_level/



Sea level measurement in Queensland (Maritime Safety Queensland)

http://www.msq.qld.gov.au/tides/sea-level-measurement-in-queensland.aspx



Sea Level | Climate Change | US EPA

http://epa.gov/climatechange/science/indicators/oceans/sea-level.html



Sea level networks

http://www.pol.ac.uk/ntslf/networks.html



Environment Agency - River and sea levels

We measure river and sea levels across England and Wales by collecting data from our monitoring stations along the rivers and the coast.

http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/homeandleisure/floods/riverlevels/default.aspx



Input data for validation diagnostics | ESA CCI sealevel website

http://www.esa-sealevel-cci.org/node/135



sea level measurement and analysis in the western indian ocean

http://www.gloss-sealevel.org/publications/documents/mauritius_2001.pdf



CeNCOOS - Sea Level Changes

http://www.cencoos.org/sections/news/sea_level.shtml




Satellite Measurements of Sea Level Change

http://earth.esa.int/workshops/venice06/participants/1092/paper_venice06.pdf



Sea-Level Rise for the Coasts of California, Oregon

http://dels.nas.edu/resources/static-assets/materials-based-on-reports/reports-in-brief/sea-level-rise-brief-final.pdf

don't put all your NASA eggs in one basket

stupid graphics as predicted proceeded with cooked data from discredited climate wanks.
So nice to know certain interests are so fixated on pushing a global warming fraud, it almost hurts.
another search term!
discredited climate science
---
Did Phil Jones Admit That There's No Global Warming?
The scientist in question is Professor Phil Jones, who is the head of the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia. ..
http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/did_phil_jones_admit_that_theres_no_global_warming/

- one posts links to peer reviewed hard data

- the other flings kook shit - and hopes some will stick

all the while ignoring every time he's proven wrong


peer reviewed or kook shit - you decide

- one spends his time helping others, for free

- the other spends his time helping himself, for profit


altruism or selfishness - you decide

The previous statement from our israeli freak and liar is unsupported, of course. I have nothing to sell but I sure do object to having a carbon tax for a non existent 'global warming' yoked on me. So should anyone but the mega-phonies who push or defend this open dirty secret. All *tweet* has to counter this are cooked data, false data and puffery.
As usual. Scroll back and see for yourself.

America is far more Progressive than you'd ever know watching or listening to the corporate media.


Obama won every swing state - Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Ohio, Nevada, Wisconsin, New Hampshire and Virgina.

Democrats gained seats in both the House - 6, and the Senate - 4, retaining control of the Senate.

They had 23 Senate seats to defend, while Republicans only had to defend 10.

Not only did they sweep all 23 Democratic races, but they picked up two more.

Maryland, Maine, and Washington all voted for Marriage Equality. Minnesota upheld their existing law.

Iowa judge David Wiggins, who upheld Marriage Equality in his state, won re-election, despite a concentrated effort to unseat him.


Sherrod Brown retained his Senate seat, despite being the most heavily targeted Democratic Senator in the country, by the Right Wing SuperPACs.


Wisconsin elected the nations' first openly gay Senator, Tammy Baldwin.

Tammy Duckworth took out deadbeat dad and all-around super-douchbag, Joe Walsh.

Washington State and Colorado decriminalized recreational Marijuana.

Massachusetts passed a law allowing medical Marijuana.


Democrats won Senate seats in deep red North Dakota and West Virginia.


New Hampshire has elected women to every seat - both Senate and both House seats.

The "Redefine Rape" guys, Todd Akin, Roscoe Bartlett, and Richard Mourdock, all lost - BIG.

Allen West is out.

Alan Grayson is back.


Elizabeth Warren chopped off scott brown's exposed wiener, with a tomahawk.

- while whooping.


The most women in the Senate ever - 18.

Missouri, Montana and West Virginia, elected Democratic governors.

Obama became the first Democrat since FDR to win two elections, with more than 50% of the popular vote.

He also won 70% of the Jewish vote, despite all the fear-mongering over Israhell.

And he won 73% of the Asian vote, and 71% of the Latino vote.

Democrats have won the popular vote in 5 of the past 6 presidential elections (2004 being the outlier.)



Republicans just didn't see it coming. Never straying outside the comfortable confines of their Bubble, when the final result in Ohio came down, Republicans were quite literally in total disbelief.

How could it be?

How could this country re-elect a Kenyan Muslim Socialist Atheist, that goes around apologizing for America, to a second term?

False noise questioned the Ohio result when first announced and refused to concede the race, which is the likely reason, mittens delayed two hours before finally conceding.


After being told for six months how close the race was, it turns out - No.

No it wasn't.

How big of a win was it?

In the end it wasn't even close.

President Obama won both the Electoral College AND the Popular Vote.

- and not just by a little, but by a lot.

126 Electoral votes, and nearly 3 Million Popular Votes.



This country is changing. People are progressing. I think most of it has to do with the fact that Republican supporters are dying off.

From pot to gay marriage, people are progressing, because the younger voters don't see it as a threat, like the old uniformed false noise viewers, and shit channel listeners.

The whole false Noise network looked like a televised Confederacy of Dunces, with racists, misogynists, xenophobes, and or homophobes.


And today's community affairs was brought to you by the letters, FUCK YOU, GOP.

I sure callled this individual out correctly.
"We should expect loads of off topic crap now from this freak, as well as its infantile over use of graphics, extra page eating spacing and meaningless pronouncements.
This together with the all too predictable accusations and from deep within its asshole, reason.
The usual israeli tactics we have come to know so well "
http://la.indymedia.org/news/2012/11/256909_comment.php#256920

back to a suject introduced by the original author"about climate change".
A carbon tax, no matter the term applied to it, is already planned to go to the IMF [ those wonderful individuals who have chained so many nations to a austerity hell of third world subjugation.]
It would mean higher fuel and food prices which would mean death to untold millions on the edge of survival [ useless eater problem solved ]
It would de-industrialize nations dependent upon exports or production, further reducing their already falling standard of living, as energy became a costly privilege. [ strong nation states able to resist corporate exploitation problem solved ]
Now since the original header by the auther of this piece chose to insert a non existent theme into the summery of the translated piece on neocon adventurism, we should ask ourselves a few questions as to why.
Was it a programmed parrot echo from the indoctrination of some drone about 'global warming' [ now repainted as 'climate change' in a cooling global environment ] or was it another deliberate propaganda piece as we have seen in an on going basis, not only on this IMC but others with dreary frequency.
Then we have the israeli weasel, *tweet*, who nearly tripped over itself to defend a now proven fraud. And is using all the noise it can generate as per my opening comment.
It already went through the standard lists of compromised science [ which I countered with primary links, see for yourself ] accusations of being someone who is receiving some kind of return for bringing up uncomfortable topics, use of appeal to authority, strawman and ad hominem attacks [ from the first comment it made ] and its self promotion as some kind of 'expert'.
It hasn't been able to address the incentive of this global weather war for the interests of political economic power or the actual technology which the government openly admits using.
It's attempt at dismissal is actual avoidance because it cannot refute the overwhelming logic of the Method Motive and Opportunity for weather manipulation. As I've elaborated to in previous comments which *tweet* needs to cover over with predictable noise and tainted [ meaning compromised ] reference sources. The 'climate scientists' who support the fraud because they are involved in the fraud themselves as I've also shown in previous links.
It isn't 'climate' anything, it's warfare to extort a source of funding [ wish *>I<* was receiving some compensation for this thankless civic duty ] in order to provide the IMF and its bloody NATO enforcement arm with established funding. The ability to control weather is also a huge speculative windfall for less than scrupulous corporation and banking interests. Don't even try to yoke me or mine with another tax on our very lives by blowing smoke up my ass "about climate change".

- maybe some weak pounding, not sure...

like I said earlier, it's kinda fun to watch this *tweet* go nuts right before your eyes as it retreats into the crazed safety of cartoons and meaningless pronouncements.
As it cannot address any of the points in the previous comment and as usual it must rely on 3rd grade responses.
---
economic +"weather war"
“Environmental warfare is defined as the intentional modification or manipulation of the natural ecology, such as climate and weather, earth systems such as the ionosphere, magnetosphere, tectonic plate system, and/or the triggering of seismic events (earthquakes) to cause intentional physical, economic, and psycho-social, and physical destruction to an intended target geophysical or population location, as part of strategic or tactical war.”
http://presscore.ca/nbg/index.php?entry=entry100813-075140

which are emotionally comforting

address the concept of peer reviewed, links to which I've provided already


here's the wingnut game :

1.) post kook shit
2.) ignore/dismiss any/all peer reviewed data, and actual measurements
3.) pound the table - fling personal insults - anything you think might stick
4.) post some more kook shit/post the same kook shit again

5.) claim no refuting peer reviewed data or measurements have been presented

- and therefore, the kook shit 'wins'


When really bad/obvious lies are exposed (like pretending only NASA is involved in sea level monitoring in order to FUD them) wait awhile/a few posts, then post the exact same kook shit/FUD again, as if the lie was never exposed.


rinse & repeat - this is the totality of the billder experience

well, since *tweet* has nothing [ see for yourself ] to counter with...
a new search term>
"climate fraud"
[ pretty good reference with the following links ]
-----
Scientist who said climate change sceptics had been proved wrong accused of hiding truth by colleague

The ‘irresistable’ story of Richard Muller

Muller is still rubbish

Climate change study forces sceptical scientists to change minds

New study shows half of the global warming in the USA is artificial

Hansen Is Wrong
https://antioligarch.wordpress.com/climate-fraud/

- if global warming is such an easy to see and obvious fraud, then why is an army of fossil fuel funded paid professional liars required to FAIL to get the public to go along with it ?


Majority of Americans Still 'Believe' in Global Warming | LiveScience

http://www.livescience.com/6567-majority-americans-global-warming.html


"86 percent of respondents said they wanted the federal government to limit the amount of air pollution businesses emit"



New Research Links Climate Science Denial To Conspiracy Theories

http://la.indymedia.org/news/2012/09/255845_comment.php



DeSmogBlog | Clearing the PR Pollution that Clouds Climate Science.

http://www.desmogblog.com/



Real Climate - Climate Science from climate scientists.

http://www.realclimate.org/

"why is an army of fossil fuel funded paid *professional liars* required to FAIL to get the public to go along with it "
who ever said they did? meaningless question because the 'fossil' fuel industries are looking to see even increased profits [ do you know about the "oil depletion 'allowance' subsidy the oil giants receive ] due to further subsidies and even further [ through the add on processing tax ] restricted distribution in a world of embarrassing surplus, to gouge the consumer with an extra tax layer passed down, of course, upon the final buyer as it always has.
In other words, they may not care.
---
“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. In their totality and in their interactions these phenomena do constitute a common threat with demands the solidarity of all peoples. But in designating them as the enemy, we fall into the trap about which we have already warned namely mistaking systems for causes. All these dangers are caused by human intervention and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome. The real enemy, then, is humanity itself.“
- “The First Global Revolution”, A Report by the Council of the Club of Rome by Alexander King and Bertrand Schneider 1991.
---

[*] look who's talking about liars...
let's see some of these Generals, Sargent etc. of this 'army 'fossil' fuel professional advocates.
Again, to remind the non weasel reader, the head of the freaking IPCC admitted to stuffing the turkey on this regard.
". Discredited Professor Phil Jones of CRU admitted to the BBC that there has been 'no statistically significant' temperature rise since 1995, "
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8511670.stm

Front Groups | PR Watch

http://www.prwatch.org/topics/public-relations/front-groups



Fossil Fuel-Funded Think Tank Promulgates “Study” Attacking Wind And Solar

"a growing echo chamber of fossil fuel-funded public relations infrastructure"

http://checksandbalancesproject.org/2012/02/17/fossil-fuel-funded-think-tank-promulgates-study-attacking-wind-and-solar/



Dirty Energy Industry Front Groups Launch Misleading PR Blitz

http://www.desmogblog.com/dirty-energy-industry-front-groups-launch-misleading-pr-blitz-against-president-obama



Australia's nuclear and fossil fuel front groups campaign against wind energy

http://nuclear-news.info/2012/07/21/australias-nuclear-and-fossil-fuel-front-groups-campaign-against-wind-energy/



US Chamber, Biggest Front Group for Fossil Fuel Industry

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/04/18/967986/-US-Chamber-Biggest-Front-Group-for-Fossil-Fuel-Industry-Has-No-Idea-What-s-

About-to-Hit-Them



Front groups | PolluterWatch

http://www.polluterwatch.com/category/freetagging/front-groups




SourceWatch

http://www.sourcewatch.org/



CoalSwarm

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Portal:Coal_Issues



Hurricane Sandy Endorses Obama: Storm Provides a Counter-Narrative to the Hundreds of Millions in Fossil Fuel Campaign

http://www.prwatch.org/node/11837

US Chamber, Biggest Front Group for Fossil Fuel Industry

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/04/18/967986/-US-Chamber-Biggest-Front-Group-for-Fossil-Fuel-Industry-Has-No-Idea-What-s-About-to-Hit-Them

there ^

wind energy is a failure counter cost boondoggle.
Apparently you don't get out much. The wind farms are costing more than the energy they make.
Coal plants have well developed scrubbers and supply about 80% of US power.
Enforcement is a problem due to insider deals like the BP blow-out.
There are real problems in the industry but a carbon tax is certainly not an answer.
Enforcement is.
'Global Warming' is a fraud, a red herring and a cover for "geo-engineering" as I've [ and a growing consensus of concerned scientists ] always maintained and the HAARP program in conjunction with Operation Cloverleaf are the prime suspects on the current spat of freak weather.
---
Don't see any mega threads here about HAARP causing Earthquakes ...
Any mention of it is immediately debunked or violently ridiculed. Why is that I wonder?
http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message1780017/pg1

oh wow, a blog forum even weirder than this one.
not a good sign. a copy error?
obvious mistake, try this one.

flaws behind the whole process.

The IPCC claims that it has thousands of scientists and almost as many reviewers of the scientists' work to produce their reports. There are two problems, however. In the scientific world I move in, "review" means that your work is scrutinised by several independent, anonymous reviewers chosen by the editor.

However, when I entered the IPCC world, the reviewers were there at the worktable, criticising our drafts, and finally meeting with all us co-ordinators and many of the IPCC functionaries in a draftfest.

The product was not reviewed in the accepted sense of the word — there was no independence of review, and the reviewers were anything but anonymous. The result is not scientific.
http://briefingroom.typepad.com/the_briefing_room/2009/12/ipcc-peer-review-tantamount-to-fraud-ipcc-official-admits.html

(from YESTERDAY :)

Germany producing too much power after turning off nuclear reactors?

Experts warn gas-driven plants are shutting down — Wind, solar, hydro prices are too low

http://www.dw.de/power-exports-peak-despite-nuclear-phase-out/a-16370444


and look, he's now quoting spam-like-productions :)

"Coal plants have well developed scrubbers and supply about 80% of US power."


Mercury contamination, mainly from coal plant emissions, pervasive in fish nationwide, USGS finds.

Contamination by mercury, a neurotoxin, was detected in EVERY FISH sampled in 291 streams across the country in a study released today by the U.S. Geological Survey.

http://water.usgs.gov/nawqa/mercury/

The main source to watersheds is mercury emitted to the atmosphere and deposited by precipitation. Coal-fired power plants are the largest source of mercury emissions in the United States – in addition, of course, to being the largest source of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions.


Study Reveals Mercury Contamination in Fish Nationwide


“This study shows just how widespread mercury pollution has become in our air, watersheds, and many of our fish in freshwater streams,” said Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar. “This science sends a clear message that our country must continue to confront pollution, restore our nation’s waterways, and protect the public from potential health dangers.”…

Mercury, a neurotoxin, is one of the most serious contaminants threatening our nation’s waters. The main source of mercury to natural waters is mercury that is emitted to the atmosphere and deposited onto watersheds by precipitation….

Coal-fired power plants are the largest source of mercury emissions in the United States….


Methlymercury is a neurotoxin, damaging the nerve systems of people and animals as it accumulates in the vital organs. It can cause severe birth defects, learning disabilities, memory loss and mental impairment, said Barbara Scudder, a hydrologist and the study’s lead scientist. Pregnant women are particularly vulnerable to passing mercury poisoning along to their unborn children.


Earlier this year, the Obama administration said it would begin crafting a new regulation to control mercury emissions from power plants after a federal appeals court threw out plans drafted by the Bush administration and favored by industry. The Bush rule would have allowed power plants to buy and sell pollution credits, instead of requiring each plant to install equipment to reduce mercury pollution.


..scrubbers they have refused to install

Health Impacts of Coal (with coal PSA at end).wv

New Report: Economic Analysis Reveals Wind Power ‘Worse Than a Mistake’
Posted on March 7, 2012 by Anthony Watts

Press release from The Global Warming Policy Foundation
Global Warming Policy Foundation

Image via Wikipedia

One of the UK’s leading energy and environment economists warns that wind power is an extraordinarily expensive and inefficient way of reducing CO2 emissions. In fact, there is a significant risk that annual CO2 emissions could be greater as a result of Britain’s flawed wind policies when compared with the option of investing in efficient and flexible gas combined cycle plants.

and when the facts fail you

haarp

The Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF) is a United Kingdom group opposing action to mitigate climate change.

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Global_Warming_Policy_Foundation



ExxonSecrets Factsheet: Global Warming Policy Foundation

http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/orgfactsheet.php?id=166



Anthony Watts - SourceWatch

http://sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Anthony_Watts

Willard Anthony Watts (Anthony Watts) is a blogger, weathercaster and non- scientist, paid AGW denier who runs the website wattsupwiththat.com

He does not have a university qualification and has no climate credentials other than being a radio weather announcer.

His website is parodied and debunked at the website wottsupwiththat.com Watts is on the payroll of the Heartland Institute, which itself is funded by polluting industries.


Heartland Institute

http://sourcewatch.org/index.php/Heartland_Institute



ExxonSecrets Factsheet: Heartland Institute

http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/orgfactsheet.php?id=41

And you mention that I am using biased sources?
After you list your 'global warming' alarmist sites?
ha
-----

Pre-2007: Global warming

Global warming has finally been explained: the Earth is getting hotter because the Sun is burning more brightly than at any time during the past 1,000 years, according to new research. A study by Swiss and German scientists suggests that increasing radiation from the sun is responsible for recent global climate changes. Dr Sami Solanki, the director of the renowned Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research in Gottingen, Germany, who led the research, said: "The Sun has been at its strongest over the past 60 years and may now be affecting global temperatures. [Telegraph 18/7/04]
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/globalwarming.html

The lack of warming for more than a decade—indeed, the smaller-than-predicted warming over the 22 years since the U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) began issuing projections—suggests that computer models have greatly exaggerated how much warming additional CO2 can cause. Faced with this embarrassment, those promoting alarm have shifted their drumbeat from warming to weather extremes, to enable anything unusual that happens in our chaotic climate to be ascribed to CO2.

The fact is that CO2 is not a pollutant. CO2 is a colorless and odorless gas, exhaled at high concentrations by each of us, and a key component of the biosphere's life cycle. Plants do so much better with more CO2 that greenhouse operators often increase the CO2 concentrations by factors of three or four to get better growth. This is no surprise since plants and animals evolved when CO2 concentrations were about 10 times larger than they are today. Better plant varieties, chemical fertilizers and agricultural management contributed to the great increase in agricultural yields of the past century, but part of the increase almost certainly came from additional CO2 in the atmosphere.

Enlarge Image
Lindzen
Lindzen
Corbis

Although the number of publicly dissenting scientists is growing, many young scientists furtively say that while they also have serious doubts about the global-warming message, they are afraid to speak up for fear of not being promoted—or worse. They have good reason to worry. In 2003, Dr. Chris de Freitas, the editor of the journal Climate Research, dared to publish a peer-reviewed article with the politically incorrect (but factually correct) conclusion that the recent warming is not unusual in the context of climate changes over the past thousand years. The international warming establishment quickly mounted a determined campaign to have Dr. de Freitas removed from his editorial job and fired from his university position. Fortunately, Dr. de Freitas was able to keep his university job.

haarp is the shelter of last resort from the fact storm

The GWPF webpage banner image sports a short-term (2001-2010) temperature graph (blue, left) giving the appearance that the world is not warming.



Compare the 10-year GWPF graph (blue) to the longer-term graphs to the right: 1979-2010 showing the true global warming signal[4] (with natural variability removed) and 1880-2010 (including natural variability).


http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Global_Warming_Policy_Foundation



"when caught lying, wait awhile, then lie again"

As you can see in the graph, solar output has NOT been trending upward ^



RealClimate: The lure of solar forcing

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2005/07/the-lure-of-solar-forcing/

(this fossil fuel talking point was debunked 7 years ago - third time on here with bill in the past few months)

"when caught lying, wait awhile, then lie again, AND AGAIN, AND AGAIN"

- from a Wall Street Journal opinion piece that claims there is no need to panic about global warming.



Other "scientists" who signed the article include Claude Allègre, J. Scott Armstrong, Roger Cohen, William Kininmonth, Jan Breslow, Richard Lindzen, James McGrath, Rodney Nichols, Burt Rutan, Harrison H. Schmitt, Nir Shaviv, Edward David, Michael Kelly, Henk Tennekes, and Antonino Zichichi.

Media Transparency reported on the Op-Ed, concluding that most of the scientists have never published articles in peer-reviewed journals on the subject of climate change. They also contacted economist William Nordhaus who had been cited by the article, and he said that the WSJ was guilty of a "Complete Mischaracterization Of My Work." [7]

Skeptical Science also looked into the signatories, and summarize how the list "only includes four scientists who have actually published climate research in peer-reviewed journals, and only two who have published climate research in the past three decades."


Also, almost half have received funding from oil companies and big industry.



http://www.desmogblog.com/william-happer






Panic Attack: Murdoch’s Wall Street Journal Finds 16 Scientists to Push Pollutocrat Agenda With Long-Debunked Climate Lies

http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2012/01/29/413961/panic-attack-murdoch-wall-street-journal-finds-16-scientists-long-debunked-climate-lies/



Then again, what do you expect from a list of 16 scientists that include:

Richard Lindzen, one of the most debunked climate scientists in the world (see Lindzen debunked again: New scientific study finds his paper downplaying dangers of human-caused warming is “seriously in error”: Trenberth: The flaws in Lindzen-Choi paper “have all the appearance of the authors having contrived to get the answer they got”). See also Kerry Emanuel slams media, asserts Lindzen charge in Boston Globe is “pure fabrication.”

William Happer, physicist, Chairman of the Board of a leading disinformer think-tank George Marshall Institute, heavily funded by Exxon Mobil and other anti-science funders.

Roger Cohen, Former manager for Strategic Planning and Programs ExxonMobil Corporation, now a George Marshall Institute ‘expert’.

Harrison H. Schmitt, geologist and astronaut, who believes enviros and climate scientists like Holdren are communists.





The Dimming Torch: Climate Skeptics Peddle Fallacies as Science

http://mattwion.blogspot.com/2012/02/wall-street-journal-denies-global.html



The lead name on this list, and ringleader of the pack of "concerned scientists," is one Claude Allegre a well-known fraud and hack who has published no peer reviewed papers refuting androgenic climate change.

http://mediamatters.org/research/201201300008?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+mediamatters%2Flatest+%28Media+Matters+-+Latest+Items%29&utm_content=Google+Reader

when through the entire list there, huh?
Stupid graphics, unnecessary page eating spacing, misrepresentation of posted articles and repeats of same as 'needed'.
Oh well, this is a propaganda war after all. With *tweet* acting as a stand in for the IMF and their carbon tax brainchild. As it fervently defends an admitted proven fraud of 'global warming'. By the directors themselves, scroll-up and see for yourself.
Oh, it can accuse me of 'selling a book'( which it says it knows all about but never even says what it's about) or being on the payroll of a oil / coal company ( no one gives me anything for this ) or even being someone called 'bill' ( aint me ) but the truth is I don't want to pay the IMF for anything and I want the UN to find some other source of funding under the direct consent of the people. Fat chance on that and good riddance.

***I want the chemtrails to stop poisoning the air water and soil.
I want the greedy bastards that direct the operations of HAARP to cease their weather and tectonic warfare against the people. Same with the criminal petroleum industry with their corrupt influence over the very regulators who are supposed to regulate them, the horrible coal interests and their mountaintop removal and the nuclear industry ( the Siamese twin of Weapons and Power) which is killing our DNA globally.

And I want the red herrings about 'global "climate change" or "warming" to cease to be a curtain to which the above interests hide behind while they continue their destructive practices in "business as usual".
***
---
HAARP politics weather
United States Secretary of Defense William Cohen apparently stated in a press briefing, while commenting on new technological threats possibly held by terrorist organizations: "Others are engaging in an eco-type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, (and) volcanoes remotely, using the use of electromagnetic waves."
One of the most damning statements in the document reveals an American refusal to account for itself regarding HAARP research:

“[The European Parliament]… regrets the repeated refusal of the United States Administration to send anyone in person to give evidence to the public hearing or any subsequent meeting held by its competent committee into the environmental and public risks connected with the high Frequency Active Auroral Research Project (HAARP) programme currently being funded in Alaska.”
http://news.exopoliticsinstitute.org/index.php/european-parliament-issues-warnings-on-haarp/
The assault on the US by Sandy and Katrina ( wonderful FEMA exercises ) should alert the people that this war, unlike the global temperature is heating up.

*[As a side note, why is this IMC having 'problems' allowing this ( me ) commenter to post in a timely fashion to the barrage from *tweet*, the unstable_tinker?
-Could not connect: No such file or directory-]

"why is this IMC having 'problems' allowing this ( me ) commenter to post"

As anyone can see, *tweet* really needs its cartoon reality.
For the serious reader
As you can see, when you rely on cooked data, discredited, self reviewed 'scientific' BS and stupidity it makes for weak propaganda.

We don't have a climate problem, we have an assault on the people by vested interests.
Which control dangerous technologies to extort a carbon tax paid to the IMF.
It's despicable and indefensible.

first you claim the earth is cooling

then right after, you claim the sun is causing the global warming

- the global warming you just denied was happening..

This one simply can't operate in the real world.
But it sure knows how to parrot talking points assisted by the infantile approach at *talking down* to the skeptic community.
Why is that?
Maybe it thinks that only the retarded will follow this *tweet* and its 'reason'.
It's not global warming or change but an assault upon the populations of Earth.
With HAARP and Operation Cloverleaf.
Oh, and BTW
Sure the sun *was* warming the Earth and now it's cycle is in waning.
[ and why is the math question changed right after *tweet* posts and tells you that three is the wrong answer to two plus one. ]
All sorts of shit happening here, as if *someone* wants to have a clear billboard to post this 'global climate BS' for an IMF carbon tax. Is a member of this IMC assisting *tweet* in its efforts? Shouldn't make it so obvious.

here's today's new jingle I just made this morning for 2 for tuesday in the REAL WORLD ^

one reason - PEER REVIEWED

The pere reviewed process was formated to approve the results already proposed to enhance the 'global warming' myth.
-flaws behind the whole process.

The IPCC claims that it has thousands of scientists and almost as many reviewers of the scientists' work to produce their reports. There are two problems, however. In the scientific world I move in, "review" means that your work is scrutinised by several independent, anonymous reviewers chosen by the editor.

However, when I entered the IPCC world, the reviewers were there at the worktable, criticising our drafts, and finally meeting with all us co-ordinators and many of the IPCC functionaries in a draftfest.

The product was not reviewed in the accepted sense of the word — there was no independence of review, and the reviewers were anything but anonymous. The result is not scientific.
http://briefingroom.typepad.com/the_briefing_room/2009/12/ipcc-peer-review-tantamount-to-fraud-ipcc-official-admits.html

where did I link to the IPCC or talk about carbon credits ?

What an idiot. I just reminded the reader that your "peer reviewed" 'climate change' BS was pure BS.
Can't you even remember what your previous post was about?
Too busy selecting a cartoon or graphic that will make up for your torn argument?
The 'climate change' or 'global warming' crap is merely a cover for a covert war of weather and economic assault to extort a carbon tax.

and bam - it magically becomes true

magical thinking

reality is whatever *he* says it is

nevermind the fossil fueled lies, the post any lie, even conflicting ones, logical fallacy

nevermind the army echo chamber of paid liars employed by exxon, the koch bothers

nothing matters except the emotionally comforting pretty lies that absolve all personal responsibility and allow the dirty energy profits to continue

-and don't worry at all about record heat/drought, or the worsening radiation from dirty energy

and swallow whole the hit pieces provided by dirty energy against solar/wind

and when measurements and events intrude upon this magic bubble, fling conspiracy kook shit and hope it blinds these imagined droves of readers that wait in rapture for his next earth shattering comment



- not a troll that is the only comment unless someone cares to refute the magical thinking


trembling in his bunker hiding from any involvement in the real world because he's being chased & tortured by mind beams (even entered a complaint about it) since he's the most special person in the world, holding the key to all truth

which the forces of evil (people who help others and take risks in real life, for example like broadcasting) are all secretly engaged in a world-wide conspiracy, along with IMC, in suppressing this crown jewel of greatness which means of course he is even more right


always right never wrong about anything, ever


perfect

What the hell was that meander through your own personal problems projected on the points brought up and as usual, avoided.
Seems like you need a rest, you *tweet*. Your over spaced and meaningless response about *my* projected problems had nothing what so ever to do with the following items.

The overwhelming incentive for weather control
The carbon tax that would go to the IMF
The technology admitted to be in use
The admitted fraud of cooked and lost raw data
The self 'peer' reviewed results to further the desired results
The admitted fraud of 'global warming'

Sure, there's a huge industry involved in this pretext to depopulate the Earth through increased food and fuel prices and its many adherents or / and agents need to make a living. Just not off my labor, if you please.
---
A review of “CASE ORANGE: Contrail Science, Its Impact on Climate and Weather Manipulation Programs Conducted by the United States and Its Allies”
http://coto2.wordpress.com/2010/07/28/case-orange-60-years-of-geoengineering-goes-into-hyperdrive-as-%E2%80%98plan-b%E2%80%99/

- well better get busy and post some more kook shit which magically makes you right

because you're always right

"a shit shoveling, gun polishing, bible thumping, pick up driving, five alarm chilli eating , tobacco chewing, moonshine brewing, swamp dwelling, cousin fucking, hog slopping redneck dipshit who's brain is nestled comfortably in the space between his ass cheeks."

Well, *tweet*, I wouldn't post what I thought was *wrong* unlike you who has no clue about what is *right and correct*.
I can't help being right and you can't help being *wrong*.
The incentive and technologies for weather control using HAARP and other technologies are there.
So is your whining, wank and spew about me being "right".
Wow!
Just as soon as *tweet* posted, the server went down!
@ 7:20
Does someone want to shut down this IMC or is some cosmic coincidence working here?

I will admit to being wrong! I made a mistake on the time the server went down! I must be human.
Unlike the dark networks with control dangerous technologies and have been inducing freak weather, droughts and other evil games with the HAARP and Operation Cloverleaf programs.

but that's not accurate

THIS is -

a rock polishing, fake arrowhead making, fake antique selling, fake book pasting, fake conspiracy posting, mind beam victim, which the whole world is secretly whispering in hushed voices about, to prevent the absolute jewel of truth from being told.. -



again and again and again and again and again

[ Dear readers, didn't I tell you that it wouldn't take very long for this individual to go unglued and dive off the board, so to speak, into a full blown gibbering breakdown?]
The cartoons, of course, were the beginning but this is just too precious!
---
HAARP is real 'global warming' is not.
As the proven fraud listed many times about the cooked and lost raw data, 'compromised science' and corrupted "peer review" process clearly show.

Now we also know the unstable_tinker, *tweet* is a lunatic It never takes very long to demonstrate this for even the most tolerant, non judgmental reader.

- that's where I spend most of my time and nearly all of my bandwidth

ordinary folks such as yourself don't have the will or slight aptitude required to be there

serves as a dandy filter which keeps people like you out..

this is light chit-chat compared to there (there's no censorship, no _screening_ of the posts there, no conversion of the pics, although you have to link to the pics not upload them. You can link to your hidden servers however and watch the pageloads directly without having to refresh the forum you linked them to. Also shows the view counts, and you can securely post using built in session ID insted of cookies like here, you can anonymously register a nic too, which keeps anyone else from spoofing it.)


you can post anything, say anything, share anything there


- this is a respectable place here, with an image to uphold..

Promoting yourself again? I guess that goes with all the rest of your BS.
But I guess when you run out of things to do, self gratification in the form of narcissism is some kind of relief from your other psychological problems.
Again, for the sane readership, we have the un-addressed items of Method Motive and Opportunity for not only weather control through dangerous, ecological damaging technologies, but the rabid response team used to obscure this program of IMF extortion and push the 'global warming' hoax. In the face of continuing revelations about the entire carbon tax scam and corruption in the pseudo science used to promote it.

I'm popular

really, I am !

Boy, you can feel the popping neurons from way over here!
What's a matter, *tweet*?
Retreating again into your little corner, going "la la la lala I can't heeeeeere you"...?
Oh well, they have to use who they're left with, even if it's burnt out, gibbering and psychopathic. Not a good mix for a propagandist as it turns out.
Again I would ask the reader [ the dear reader which puts up with this see-saw ] why the intense effort to introduce a global climate warming or change theme in an unending drive to appeal to a carbon tax?
If it isn't obvious we are being subjected to an assault by these forces which include weather manipulation, it wont make any difference. It's rather obvious.

it's so obvious, let me count the ways

I was wondering if *tweet* was going to produce yet another idiotic graphic to substitute for any intelligent rebuttal or comment.
What we have here is a failed but rabid attack weasel, running on MT.
Another question never answered is why was this theme of "climate change" even introduced into this article?