Working on this new server in php7...
imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

white themeblack themered themetheme help
About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
Features
latest news
best of news
syndication
commentary


KILLRADIO

VozMob

ABCF LA

A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List

LAAMN List




IMC Network:

Original Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
printable version - js reader version - view hidden posts - tags and related articles


View article without comments

Rosendahl’s Legacy: Gentrification and Sweeping the Homeless Out of Venice?

by Peggy Lee Kennedy Wednesday, Apr. 04, 2012 at 5:24 AM

Allegedly Progressive and openly Gay Los Angeles City Councilman Bill Rosendahl may go down in history as the most divisive leader Venice has ever had by continuously organizing with and siding with people who hate the poor and homeless people of Venice.

Rosendahl’s Legacy...
boardwalksign.jpg, image/jpeg, 1052x438

From the time Rosendahl came into office he has said compassionate things about standing on the side of the poor and the homeless, but he has worked with those in the community that simply think criminalizing and sweeping homeless people out of the community is the answer. The anti-homeless Oversized Vehicle law and Overnight Permit Parking law both were brought in by Rosendahl when he first came into office in 2005. Later, after losing twice at the California Coastal Commission on the [anti-vehicle housed] Overnight Permit Parking, he publicly said, “I wouldn’t want those people parking in front of my house.” This should have showed some of us how Rosendahl thinks about “those people.”

Truth be told – we should have known well before that comment was ever made how Rosendahl really feels about homeless people. Rosendahl was a Neighborhood Watch Block Captain and, in the affluent West Side of Los Angeles, this often means actively working with the LAPD and other homeowners to protect the neighborhood from suspicious Riff Raff (translation: poor, homeless, or people of color).

Quite organically, new stars are rising here in Venice calling on people of human compassion to stand up against the hate and lies spread about homeless people – a voice from the 99% asking for people to seek real solutions and stop the hate. Occupy Venice’s Deborah LaShever wrote an Open Letter to the Community which was printed on the front page of the April 2012 Free Venice Beachhead newspaper. (See http://freevenicebeachhead.wordpress.com/2012/04/01/an-open-letter-to-the-community/ ) Ms LaShever thinks homeless people are not just some scourge to remove from our community and wants to work on some real solutions.

Standing for the human and civil rights of homeless people should not have to mean LaShever falls victim to an organized and hateful wrath that has been nurtured here in Venice for years by the City. Unfortunately the old-timers all know once you take that stand for human and civil rights for homeless people, out comes the negativity and hate: Venice Stakeholders, YoVenice, Venice311, and much more may post lies and nasty hatemongering on the internet about you.

The city might pretend to listen to LaShever’s ideas, but then try to get her doing things to keep her busy on some committee while the city buys (or sells) more time for the gentrification to get stronger. Or they might outright sabotage her efforts by making her work with Mark Ryavec on any solution.

Our reality has been that the only possibly positive things the city can figure to do is issue a few section 8 vouchers placing people outside of our community in privatized slum lord owned cockroach filled apartments and maybe putting in a few shelter beds, which is not a solution. If you think shelters are – go sleep in one yourself and get back to me after. Until then just shut up.

Every expert of any merit knows that decent low cost housing with or near services (and tolerance with emergency help until then) are the answers. So why doesn’t the city and the county invest in a credible organization like Venice Community Housing to buy more apartments in the area and really housing people near services? I say we better brace ourselves for more criminalization hell, because it does not seem to be getting much better and the city or county refuse to spend money on the real solutions. Law enforcement and criminalization are their answers to homelessness.

I know I should act more optimistic, but history has made its mark. Rosendahl has had plenty opportunities to take serious political stands against the anti-homeless hate movement, but he just keeps playing us back and forth, grandstanding by falsely offering solutions he cannot create and ultimately taking sides with the hatemongers – which has caused a riff here in Venice between the haves and the have-nots like never before. And, not to mention, has encouraged a venomous amount of hatemongering never seen before in Venice.

A short list of Rosendahl’s anti-homeless record in Venice:
• Rosendahl moved two new anti-homeless laws through the City Council after he was first elected.
• Rosendahl helped form a task force used to tow, arrest, ticket, have pets impounded, and effectively torture over 200 homeless people living in vehicles out of Venice.
• Rosendahl said he would decriminalize living in a vehicle in places for homeless people. In fact he never found one parking spot for one person living in one vehicle near services in Venice.
• Rosendahl put up oversized vehicle signs all around in Venice to make it illegal to live in a vehicle and worked hand-in-hand with Mark Rayovak of the Venice Stakeholders, one of the most influential anti-homeless groups in Venice, on putting in street signs and advocating for permit parking to remove homeless people living in vehicles from Venice.
• Rosendahl used Venice surplus Property funds to pay for the anti-homeless street signs
• Rosendahl never put in place a well advertised safe parking program he promised to install in Venice and used Venice Surplus Property funds to pay for.
• Rosendahl is in favor of criminalizing street people if they will not enter into a shelter, even if it means abandoning a pet, or if they will not accept social services that cannot help them find affordable housing near Venice.
• Rosendahl lays silent while the LAPD uses ant-gay fundamentalist Christian Clergy in Venice in an attempt to relocate Venice street people to South Central LA.

Rosendahl is certainly not the worst mortal on the planet and he did not start gentrification in Venice, but he has actively worked with the anti-homeless criminalization gentrification machine in Venice since elected and has been part of a homeless slaughter like never before seen in Venice.

Maybe you say I am being harsh and I am making an unnecessary enemy. Rosendahl is good on some issues (like the post office) and he is just doing his job or just caught in the middle of a bad situation. Like the LAPD and the City Attorney’s office? Well I happen to believe they should all take a stand - we should all be standing together for Human Rights and defending the US Constitution. This is all we have people – plus trying to save our planet and working for peace on earth.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


More #$%^ about Rosendahl

by RP Friday, Apr. 06, 2012 at 9:21 AM

Besides what he's doing in Venice--which I find offensive, even though I don't live there--Councilman Rosendahl voted twice against the South Central Farmers in recent months, both as a member of City Council's Budget and Finance Committee on 10/24/11 and again a few weeks later at a City Council meeting. (These two events were covered here on LA IndyMedia and can be found in the Environment section. At first Rosendahl seemed like he might have been a breath of fresh air, but--surprise, surprise--he whores himself to developers just like the rest of them.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


Beautiful Sign

by nobody Saturday, Apr. 07, 2012 at 7:01 PM

I have no comment on the politics, but the lettering on the sign is very nice. It's so rare to see professionally hand-painted signs anymore.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


This is hatyou vilification against Rosendahl and why stay in Venice only?

by nobody else Tuesday, May. 15, 2012 at 12:32 PM

This well-written but hate-filled venomous article is trashing a person perhaps mostly because they have some civic power, that the writer envies and lacks.

The question many people ask :
"why Venice ?

Why do the homeless insist they deserve a street-spot in Venice ?

Why not elsewhere in Los Angeles ?

Why demand privileges in one locality and refuse to
elsewhere ?

Who said they dont have "services" all over the city, not at all limited to the LA beach area ?

Those who have-not always trash those who have-more because they like to do so, not because their arguments are so legitimate, logical, coherent, or valid, so is this one of those?

Is the person who is writing this article representing a group, a cohesive large number of people ? an individual, ? a family ?

or just themselves mainly ?

Who speaks for all those who hang around, leave, return, live outside houses or cars ?

Who takes that assumed title of "spokesperson" for so many ?

How many real live countable people are actually in this group this writer represents ?

A lot of mean words to say the home-without-people who prefer the fresh sea breezes of Venice should have whatever wherever they want it.

While some people all over the Los Angeles City, County and adjacent areas wonder why the Venice 'homeless' are more deserving or privileged than they are ?
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


This is hatyou vilification against Rosendahl and why stay in Venice only?

by nobody else Tuesday, May. 15, 2012 at 12:38 PM

This well-written but hate-filled venomous article is trashing a person perhaps mostly because they have some civic power, that the writer envies and lacks.

The question many people ask :
"why Venice ?

Why do the homeless insist they deserve a street-spot in Venice ?

Why not elsewhere in Los Angeles ?

Why demand privileges in one locality and refuse to
elsewhere ?

Who said they dont have "services" all over the city, not at all limited to the LA beach area ?

Those who have-not always trash those who have-more because they like to do so, not because their arguments are so legitimate, logical, coherent, or valid, so is this one of those?

Is the person who is writing this article representing a group, a cohesive large number of people ? an individual, ? a family ?

or just themselves mainly ?

Who speaks for all those who hang around, leave, return, live outside houses or cars ?

Who takes that assumed title of "spokesperson" for so many ?

How many real live countable people are actually in this group this writer represents ?

A lot of mean words to say the home-without-people who prefer the fresh sea breezes of Venice should have whatever wherever they want it.

While some people all over the Los Angeles City, County and adjacent areas wonder why the Venice 'homeless' are more deserving or privileged than they are ?
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy