We had a server outage, and we're rebuilding the site. Some of the site features won't work. Thank you for your patience.
imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

white themeblack themered themetheme help
About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
Features
latest news
best of news
syndication
commentary


KILLRADIO

VozMob

ABCF LA

A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List

LAAMN List




IMC Network:

Original Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
printable version - js reader version - view hidden posts - tags and related articles

Critique of Marianne Williamson at Occupy LA

by wildgift Saturday, Oct. 22, 2011 at 1:48 AM

A critique of a small part of Williamson's speech regarding capitalism.

Last week, a popular New Age author, Marianne Williamson addressed Occupy LA.  Normally, I ignore New Agers, but this one is trying to establish a Department of Peace.  That was enough to get me to watch her video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EZPna2RfXzE

Part way through, though, I was starting to get irritated. She didn't hone in on the point, and just seemed to be talking a lot without saying anything.  Then at the end, she said that capitalism is morally and ethically neutral.  I blew my top.

I happen to belive that capitalism is amoral and encourages greed.  I don't think it's ethically neutral either.

Then she said that a fruit stand is capitalism.  That was the last straw.  That's why you're reading this now.

The definition of capitalism from dictionary.com is:

An economic system in which the means of production and distribution are privately or corporately owned and development is proportionate to the accumulation and reinvestment of profits gained in a free market.

This is a good definition of capitalism.  Let's break it apart:

An economic system in which the means of production and distribution are privately or corporately owned

In a capitalist system, the means of production are land, factories, offices, tools, computers, etc.  They're privately or corporate owned, meaning that they belong to individuals or to corporations. A corporation is a specific type of  organization that operates a business.  The key point is that the businesses are private property.

The businesses don't belong to the state, and they don't belong to the workers.

Second, the definition states:

development is proportionate to the accumulation and reinvestment of profits gained in a free market.

This isn't quite right.  The word "free" should be removed, because all capitalist markets are regulated, and there are some people who would say these markets aren't really "free".  But, within a typically regulated market in the US, it's pretty "free" - the rules are the same for everyone, and barriers to entry aren't too rigged.

In a capitalist market, development is related to accumulating and reinvesting profits.  This is the main quality of a capitalist system, as distinguished from other systems -- it's that money is invested into businesses, profits are taken, and then the money is re-invested into businesses.

More importantly, the amount of money you can get affects the amount of business you can conduct, and the amount of profit you can gain.  So people with more money are better able to succeed economically in a capitalist system.

To illustrate this, consider two businesses: a fruit stand, and a supermarket.

Starting a fruit stand requires very little money up-front.  Even a laborer could save the money required to open a fruit stand. 

A supermarket requires a lot of money, and would  require a bank loan, investors, or an extremely wealthy owner.

A fruit stand can be operated by one person when it opens.  It may take a while for business to get going, but the ongoing expense is only one person, the owner.

A supermarket requires a large staff.  It may take a long time for business to start making money.  During this time, the expenses are high.  Staffers need to get paid.  A lot of food can go to waste if the power bill isn't paid.  Then there's the mortgage on the half-city-block worth of land.

When a business lacks enough cash to operate at a loss for a while, it's said to be undercapitalized.  An undercapitalized business will fail for lack of cash.

It's possible is that the fruit stand, if successful, will find competition from a new supermarket nearby.  In this situation, the fruit stand can be crushed - and the banks won't help keep the business afloat, because the supermarket is likely to permanently harm the fruit stand's profits.  Investors may even give loans to the supermarket, in the hope that the fruit stand is crushed and the supermarket can have a monopoly on selling fruit.

In a capitalist system, the amount of capital you can amass matters.  So, in a capitalist system, you need credit, banks, bankers, and investors.  These banks and bankers become extremely important because they become experts at investing in businesses.

Capitalism is not "neutral" as Williamson asserted.  Indeed, it's not only biased, but it virtually requires banks and capital to seek to invest in capital-intensive firms that can compete with, take over, or destroy undercapitalized small businesses.

There's more to capitalism than what's described above, but they're beyond the scope of this argument.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


LATEST COMMENTS ABOUT THIS ARTICLE
Listed below are the 10 latest comments of 7 posted about this article.
These comments are anonymously submitted by the website visitors.
TITLE AUTHOR DATE
Mr John Schaefer Tuesday, Oct. 25, 2011 at 1:45 PM
Capitalism (and the Market) are not Neutral wildgift Saturday, Nov. 12, 2011 at 9:23 PM
smores anyone? to: wildgift Sunday, Nov. 13, 2011 at 11:27 AM
i repeat wildgift Sunday, Nov. 13, 2011 at 3:00 PM
point made - no direction this is not capitalism Sunday, Nov. 13, 2011 at 3:47 PM
ok, let's get concrete wildgift Monday, Nov. 14, 2011 at 7:29 PM
thoughts on a revolution Adolf Fister Tuesday, Nov. 15, 2011 at 6:02 AM
© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy