From The Global Satanic Government's (The CIA) 9-11 Attacks, which began the Post 9-11 War on Islam, to The Global Apostates of Hell From Langley, Virginia (The CIA) 2001 Anthrax Attacks it has become clear that Al Qaeda is not spelled Al Qaeda, but AL CIADA (English Translation "The CIA Duh"). From one Staged Terror Attack after the other, be it the Numeours Attacks on Mosques and Shrines in The Middle East, be it the Numerous attacks on Christians in The Middle East, be it the Post 9-11 False Flag 7-7 Attacks in London, Madrid Train Bombings in Spain, Mumbai Train Bombings in India, Failed Underwear Bombing Attempt on Airlines, to the Numerous Killings of Muslims in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iran, Iraq, Lebanon, Libya, etc. by these Satan Worshipers Pretending to be Muslims of The CIA's AL CIADA Branch, who are intentionally targeting Muslims in The CIA's Post 9-11 War on Islam, to The Numerous False Terror Alerts issued by The FBI (Faustian Beelzebub Inquisitors), USSA Homeland Insecurity, and Satanic News Services CNN NBC ABC CBS FOX BBC, it is becomming clear that Al Qaeda is the Choice word for AL CIADA (The CIA Duh) aka CIA Satan Worshipers posing as Muslims. Because, when your Wars are Wrecking World Economies and Killing Millions of Muslims at The Orders of The CIA, the only thing the Global Satan Worshipers have to sell is Fear. And of course by blaming the CIA's AL CIADA Numerous Murders of Muslims and Christians in The Middle East on Islam, when in fact it is the Work of Fanatical Satan Worshipers, they if nothing else manufacture their Pretext for their Continued Aerial Bombardments of Civilians in The Middle East, in order to rid the world of The AL CIADA Menace, which in The Global Satanic Cult is.

Though i do not understand all the word salad references to Satan (people can do evil acts on their own without any help from slandered horny pagan deities!), i agree with the general position of the article. Maybe i can help the author by organizing the concepts better.

The CIA benefits from an organization like al Queda because the ever increasing military escalation justifies their expanding budget. We can draw parallels between the "war on drugs" and the "war on terror" by looking at the financial beneficiaries of both these so-called "wars";

prison-industrial complex (drugs)

military-industrial complex (terror)

This includes military weapons contractors (Boeing, Lockheed Martin, etc...) and the specialists who make control weapons for CIA field agents (spyware, high tech sniper guns, unmanned drones, etc...). Without the ever lurking presence of al Queda behind every mountain, why would U.S. taxpayers continue to support these expenditures when we can barely feed ourselves at home??

Since Barack "Hope for Change" Obama resumed the reign of military terrorism abroad, we only have a smoother and more well spoken form of imperialist occupations in Iraq, Afghanistan and now Libya. (maybe Pakistan). Our military has so many fingers in the pie of the Middle East while people here cannot afford any more pie!!

So far Senator Ron Paul is the ONLY candidate who has expressed the desires to withdraw all foreign military occupations, in his words "To stop being the world's policeman." We're minding every else's business except our own!!

Senator Paul is also correct in his observations that our overseas military occupations are DIRECTLY linked with increasing recruitment into terrorist groups like al Queda.

Some additional references to al Queda;

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Thursday, October 21, 2010

American-born Al-Qaeda terror leader Anwar Al-Awlaki, who met with Pentagon officials months after 9/11, is by no means the only patsy handler the Central Intelligence Agency has used over the years to oversee false flag attacks in America and around the world. In fact, just about every major terror attack has been run by an operative with direct ties to the US military-industrial complex.

As we reported this morning, Awlaki, the man who helped plot the aborted Christmas Day bombing, the Fort Hood shooting, the Times Square bombing attempt, and who also preached to the alleged September 11 hijackers, dined at the Pentagon just months after 9/11 documents obtained by Fox News show.

Awlaki is just the latest in a long list of Al-Qaeda double agents whose activity proves that the terror organization is little more than a front for the Pentagon and the US war machine. Let’s take a look at just a handful of dozens of examples of terror masterminds working for intelligence agencies.

Emad A. Salem

The feds used FBI informant Emad A. Salem to run the first World Trade Center bombing back in 1993.

Before the attack, the FBI planted informant Salem within a radical Arab group in New York led by Ramzi Yousef. Salem was ordered to encourage the group to carry out a bombing targeting the World Trade Center’s twin towers. Under the illusion that the project was a sting operation, Salem asked the FBI for harmless dummy explosives which he would use to assemble the bomb and then pass on to the group. At this point the FBI cut Salem out of the loop and provided the group with real explosives, leading to the attack on February 26 that killed six and injured over a thousand people. The FBI’s failure to prevent the bombing was reported on by the New York Times in October 1993, as well as CBS News in the clip below.



Haroon Rashid Aswat

The alleged mastermind of the 7/7 bombings in London, Haroon Rashid Aswat, was also revealed to be an intelligence asset, in this case working for British MI6.

In July 2005, terror expert John Loftus told Fox News, “…back in the late 1990s, the leaders all worked for British intelligence in Kosovo. Believe it or not, British intelligence actually hired some Al-Qaeda guys to help defend the Muslim rights in Albania and in Kosovo. That’s when Al-Muhajiroun got started.”

Loftus said that British MI6 colluded to hide Aswat after the 7/7 bombings. Watch the clip below.



David Headley

The mastermind behind the Mumbai massacre was “an American secret agent who went rogue,” reported the London Times, referring to Washington-born David Headley, who was caught smuggling heroin but then given a job by the Drug Enforcement Agency and later went on to work for the CIA.

“The Indian media has raised the possibility that Mr Headley was being protected by his American handlers — a theory that experts say is credible,” reported the Times.

Headley was allowed to fly in and out of India as he scouted targets for the attack despite being “firmly on the radar of the US intelligence agencies.”



Prince Bandar “Bush”

Saudi Arabia’s former US envoy Prince Bandar bin Sultan bin Abdul Aziz, known as “Bandar Bush” for his close relationship with former President George W. Bush and his father, is another terror mastermind on the payroll of the US military-industrial complex. Bandar worked closely with CIA Director George Tenet, when he was Saudi Ambassador in Washington.

Bandar disappeared two years ago after it emerged that he had become the de facto leader of “Al-Qaeda in Iraq,” having been responsible for arming terrorist organizations in the Middle East. The man who George W. Bush reportedly consulted before the 2003 invasion of Iraq has trained, funded and equipped terrorists to kill US troops, providing the US government with the perfect justification to remain as an occupying force in the country.

Bandar also threatened Britain with “another 7/7″ and the loss of “British lives on British streets” if corruption investigations into Saudi arms deals were allowed to proceed. Prime Minister Tony Blair complied and quashed the inquiry.


Terrorist mastermind Prince Bandar “Bush” with his close friend George H.W. Bush.

Osama Bin Laden

Bin Laden himself was a known CIA asset stretching from the late 1970′s when he was armed and funded by the CIA through the Pakistani ISI to lead the Muslim mujahideen against the Soviets in Afghanistan.

After this, Bin Laden led Al-Qaeda to Bosnia shortly after the outbreak of war in 1992 to fight against Bosnian Serbs who were subsequently the target of NATO air strikes.

Shortly before the NATO bombing of Yugoslavia in 1999, Bin Laden and Al-Qaeda moved into Kosovo, Serbia’s southern province, to aid the Kosovo Liberation Army, the Albanian terrorist faction that was being supported by the U.S. and NATO in its terror campaign against Serbs in the region.

“The United States, which had originally trained the Afghan Arabs during the war in Afghanistan, supported them in Bosnia and then in Kosovo,” reported the National Post.

With the help of Bin Laden’s terror network, backed up by the U.S. and NATO, no less than 90% of Serbians were “ethnically cleansed” and forced to leave the region, while the international media played its role dutifully in portraying the Albanians as the “victims” of Serbian aggression.

Barely weeks before 9/11, former members of Al-Qaeda who had subsequently joined the Kosovo Liberation Army were airlifted out of Macedonia by U.S. paratroopers.

As former FBi translator Sibel Edmonds revealed, the US maintained “intimate relations” with Bin Laden, “all the way until that day of September 11.”

The “war on terror” is a fraud

While Homeland Security chief Janet Napolitano, FBI head Mueller and others ceaselessly fearmonger about domestic terrorists being an imminent threat, the federal government has a reliable menagerie of pocket Muslim radicals on which to call upon to radicalize followers into launching an attack on ‘the great satan’ whenever the political climate deems it necessary.

The fact that just about every major terror attack or aborted terror scare for decades has been run by people with direct ties to US intelligence renders the entire war on terror a complete fraud, and once again underscores the truth that the real terrorists reside a lot closer to home than caves in Central Asia or the Middle East."

*********************

http://www.infowars.com/al-qaeda-is-a-front-group-for-the-us-military-industrial-complex.html

correct address;

http://www.prisonplanet.com/al-qaeda-is-a-front-group-for-the-us-military-industrial-complex.html

IF AJ isn't your cup of tea, here's another site about the military-industrial complex benefitting from the so-called "war on terror";

"What is the Military-Industrial Complex?


The Military-Industrial Complex is a phrase used to signify a comfortable relationship between parties that are charged to manage wars (the military, the presidential administration and congress) and companies that produce weapons and equipment for war (industry). To put it simply, the Military-Industrial Complex is described as an all-too friendly relationship that may develop between defense contractors and government forces, where both sides receive what they are perceivably looking for: a successful military engagement for warplanners and financial profit for those manning the corporate boardrooms. It can be viewed as a “war for profit” theory.

The idea of war for profit is nothing new in the realm of human history and can be traced back centuries earlier where arms races and the power of navy ships ruled an empire’s reach. The arms race between the European powers of France, Spain and Britain could arguably be a primal version of today’s modern so-called military-industrial complex. The idea was that a country must build up and maintain a ready military - the largest in the world at that - to remain a world power. Centuries ago, such a military was necessitated to protect aggression from neighboring countries. These days, an invasion of the American homeland may seem ridiculous and contrary to the building of a global community founded in trust and respect. Others might argue differently.

In any case, the theory of a mutually beneficial relationship may not appear to be so far-fetched. It is no secret that the defense industry profits most when a nation commits to a lengthy war overseas. As any military will spare no expense for victory, it only makes sense to tap the resources of the defense industry to accomplish the mission. A sort of pseudo-world dominance through the basic form of imperialism can be seen to be just as important to a military force as is protecting one's homeland. The bottom line: war is good business for those invested in it - manufacturing, production, servicing, etc.. To the war-minded industry, a wartime economy is just as profitable as a solid growing one, where shells and ammunition take precedence over the production of peacetime light bulbs or pencils. One need only to peruse the list of manufacturers participating in production during the Second World War to see just how a wartime economy can alter a single factory.

The phrase Military-Industrial Complex was first utilized in an American report at the turn of the 20th Century. “Military-Industrial Complex” was later immortalized by outgoing United States President Dwight D. Eisenhower in his January 17, 1961 farewell address to the nation. In his speech, he cites the Military-Industrial Complex as a warning to the American people – to not let this establishment begin to dictate America’s actions at home or abroad. The original usage appeared in the form of Military-Industrial Congressional Complex but later removed.

This website exists to keep a record and tally of information that is publicly released by the United States Department of Defense. We do not claim that it is 100% accurate, as all information is never divulged from any one government source, yet it does cause one to ponder the issue. If you do believe in the Military-Industrial Complex, the sheer significance of such a relationship between our government and business is overwhelming."

http://www.militaryindustrialcomplex.com/what-is-the-military-industrial-complex.asp

How can we claim independence when so many of our human and financial resources are tied up and lost fighting never-ending wars??