|
printable version
- js reader version
- view hidden posts
- tags and related articles
View article without comments
by Lawrence Reyes
Saturday, Jan. 10, 2009 at 1:55 AM
A WELL FINANCED LIBERAL FACTION HAS BOUGHT CONTROL OF THE KPFK BOARD AND IS USING ITS POWER TO SHOCK THE NETWORK INTO ACCEPTING A SUB-PRIME LOAN ON THE KPFK BUILDING, AND TO PROMOTE CORPORATE UNDERWRITING OF WHICH WILL LEAD TO THE MAINSTREAMING OF
PACIFICA PROGRAMMING
 shockdoctrine.jpg, image/jpeg, 637x477
Secret Deals and Chicken Thieves: The Raid on KPFK
by Lawrence Reyes
Our station KPFK and the Pacifica Network are being primed for a take over by a collection of Non-Profiteers that was set in motion by the Committee To Strengthen KPFK. A simple google search will take you to Their website - which illegitimately uses the KPFK Call letters to induce listeners to fund there operations with a PayPal set up, even as the station and the Network struggle to sustain themselves in a time of crisis. Where is the Money going?
Some of us saw it coming. We were running as a loose coalition of candidates for seats on the board of the non-commercial station, and we couldn’t miss what was shaping up as we watched the “Committee To Strengthen KPFK” align itself with the International Center For Humanities to rake in donations to finance their campaigns for the KPFK local station board, even as they curried favor and allies from among and staff and Programmers to take over the board.
In so doing they introduced all of the unfairness and imbalance inherent in unregulated campaign financing into the local political culture – the fishbowl, really - of not- for-profit, progressive community radio.
Other candidates, no matter how qualified, well meaning, honest and experienced, stood no chance against the campaign juggernaut financed by the thousands of dollars the “Committee” used to buy the access to KPFK voter roles - roles that candidates without outside financing could not see or touch. The election was for sale. The list of voters was for rent, and, as always, those with the gold ruled the day.
We see it all of the time in other elections; this is how it comes to pass that the poor, the working class, people of color, and all of the other “Others” are “underrepresented” – disenfranchised is the word. I was one of those “Others.”
Unlike the Committee to Strengthen KPFK, my politics are not of the pro-Democratic Party, neo-liberal “light”, Euro-centric liberal variety. Like many – if not most – KPFK listeners, I’m one of the “dissenters.” Like most KPFK Listeners, I remain an outsider, against my will, and largely unrepresented in KPFK’s supposed “Representative Listener-Democracy.” The Committee to Strengthen KPFK took over the board in a rigged election – and it’s important to look at what they have come to represent. By now, the Committee and its allies on the Pacifica National Board have brought the network to a tipping point.
The future of KPFK and Pacifica as a voice of honest dissent and independent journalism is at stake. Even our flagship national programs - Democracy Now! and Free Speech Radio News have not been paid, and no one knows where the money has gone. In the meantime though, Grace Aaron, the de facto leader of the Committee, has been crying that Pacifica is on the verge of “bankruptcy.”
Without prior warning, out of the blue, it was revealed that a move was underway to put KPFK’s building up as collateral for a million dollar loan to cover the shortfall and avoid the non-existent “bankruptcy.” In the meantime, Aaron and her allies on the Pacifica National Board were angling to use the loan to hire an unqualified group of outside financial consultants- a group with no experience in radio- to overhaul the network and reorient its programming in order to “save” the network.
They also began to push what’s called “underwriting” - the non-commercial commercials that allows sponsors of programs to control programming content while maintaining the appearance – the illusion- of independence for the programming. Karl Rove and the people who have applied the “Shock Doctrine” to undermine and radically re-orient Third World economies and gain control of their direction could not have done a better job. KPFK and Pacifica really are in danger – of losing their role as an independent voice of truth with the freedom to dissent. If The Committee to Strengthen KPFK and its allies hold sway, the station and the network may no longer reign as what Amy Goodman calls “The Exception to the Rulers.” The dissenters to the Committee’s buy–out of the KPFK elections are few in number- but right now, we are all that stands in the way of another hijacking of the network and another betrayal of its purposes. Last time it happened thousands from across the nation organized a listener revolution to take back the network and establish the democracy that has now been betrayed. It’s time to do so again.
A KPFK listener - dissenter, Lawrence Reyes
I encourage all Concerned Listeners to attend the upcoming KPFK LSB Meeting on Saturday, January 10th, at 1P.M. at the Echo Park Methodist Church at 1226 N. Alvarado Street. for infogo to www.kpfk.org (click" LSB ") "Power Concedes Nothing and it then must be taken by Revolutionary means and for the good of the People:" Author unknown
Report this post as:
by susan2
Saturday, Jan. 10, 2009 at 3:57 AM
There is a ring of truth to this article.
It explains why the station and Lafferty have been so adament about shutting down the community web forums: they can't allow listeners to get together and talk about their station.
Report this post as:
by Watchale
Monday, Jan. 12, 2009 at 1:54 AM
I'm active in KPFK and Pacifica circles. What Lawrence Reyes says here is straight ahead truth. But the comment that tries to ride the coattails of this fine report do it a disservice by spreading baseless speculation. I don't know why she's going there. There is simply NO ONE involved in KPFK, on either side of the political divide Reyes describes, who _ever_ mentions the name of Jim Lafferty in relationship to any of the matters addressed above.
Please stop trolling.
Report this post as:
by Susan2
Monday, Jan. 12, 2009 at 3:56 AM
Watchale said:
>There is simply NO ONE involved in KPFK, . . .who _ever_ mentions the name of Jim Lafferty in relationship to any of the matters addressed above.
The "[people] involved in KPFK," the staff and the people who know of and who can find and get to meetings, including apparently watchale, have little concern for the web fora. Indeed those people would have their influence reduced if additional people raised their voices about KPFK and knew what was happening. Increased community participation has never been a goal of either side among the people included in that sentence.
The web fora allowed KPFK listeners to speak who could never get to meetings and for information about KPFK and Pacifica to spread among the general audience instead of being restricted to insiders. KPFK could turn its website into a major social activist networking site if it wanted to. Instead Lafferty shut down the fora.
Increased community participation should be a goal of KPFK.
It is another way to get people to participate in fund raising drives.
Report this post as:
by sidestepper
Wednesday, Jan. 14, 2009 at 3:19 PM
What wrong with this quoted from above =
"What Lawrence Reyes says here is straight ahead truth. But the comment that tries to ride the coattails of this fine report do it a disservice by spreading baseless speculation. I don't know why she's going there. " ?????
Who is naming / claiming Reyes as being" *absolutely truthful * "?
who is saying that anyone with another opinion is doing a "disservice" ? and is "spreading baseless speculation [by whose determination please ? ] "... who gets to decide what is baseless and baseful anyhow ? who is this know-it-all-truth guy anyhow ?
anyone saying anything other that what Reyes says is[obviously] only "baseless speculation" ?
a "fine report" by whose standards and who decides ? huh ? what makes it so "fine" anyhow ?
some of us are offended by those who like to claim the holier-then-them attitude and put anyone else who differs with them as "down" and use other implied insults to demean any 'other views' or those who voice those...
Defense and righteousness always needs to be SUSPECTED OF TRYING TO OWN THE TRUTH and be THE ONLY 'RIGHT' one and the sole authority.
Many of us differ...and have more than a RIGHT to DISSENT, to oppose, to QUESTION, to add on to, and more.....This writer wants to remove that priviledge that he also takes writing on Indymedia free space.
when the defendor above =writer says "I dont know what she is doing here ".... a good response is = she and I are answering back and putting our ideas into words for all Indymedia readers and KPFK people to read our views too. She can write as well as can He, no ?
Who gets to censor and determine what is published here ? This guy ?
there is not one authority, especially on this website, who can claim to be the ultimate best rightest one ?sorry. unbelievable. sounds like a one-upper type to me. demeaning another writer is a lack of respect and ignorance too.
Report this post as:
by Fredric L. Rice
Saturday, Jan. 17, 2009 at 12:59 PM
frice@skeptictank.org
Why the bloody fuck are there still people who listen to that radio station? You would think that intelligence would kick in and people would stop listening to it and stop trying to restore what it used to be.
www.crackpots.org/
Report this post as:
|