We had a server outage, and we're rebuilding the site. Some of the site features won't work. Thank you for your patience.
imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

white themeblack themered themetheme help
About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
Features
latest news
best of news
syndication
commentary


KILLRADIO

VozMob

ABCF LA

A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List

LAAMN List




IMC Network:

Original Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
printable version - js reader version - view hidden posts - tags and related articles

Will S.1959 be used to restrict U.S. Citizens traveling in their own Country?

by Don Scott Monday, Jan. 07, 2008 at 4:06 PM

Government officials have called lawful protesters potential terrorists and a threat to national security. Will protestors be able to fly after the Senate passes S.1959? The Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act."

S.1959 will create a powerful new government commission that will investigate and report to the U.S. Government which Americans and organizations are idealistically based toward Violence, might or do support "Violent Radicalization; or Homegrown Terrorism.

S.1959 vaguely defines "homegrown terrorism" as "any planned act" that might use force to promote or accomplish a "political or social objective." No actual force need occur. The government need only allege that an individual or organization thought about using force. Any individual donating money to or attending a planned anti-war rally or political meeting could be charged with attempting to coerce the government or its people. Should this new federal commission become corrupt, it could be used to target and legally eliminate any person or group that supports a cause opposed by the government. The Nazis used similar commissions to crush political dissent and stop free association. Except this time it will not be the German SS beating civil liberties to the curb, it will be American S.1959 Storm Troopers attacking our democracy.

Senate bill 1959 begs the question does the U.S. Government have reason to fear the American People? S.1959 will create a powerful commission that can charge lawful U.S. Citizens with "Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism because they attended a planned lawful activity, even when no violence occurred. Similar laws were enacted by Hitlers 1933 Discriminatory Decrees. Under S.1959, U.S. Citizens exercising their Constitutional Right to free associationand are then named by the new commission will like Citizens in Hitlers Germany, start out guilty, when accused by the Government.

Should You Be On A Government Watch List?
Compare S.1959 provisions with the guidelines found in the new Domestic Secure Flight Program which you can access below: Read how the government can prohibit U.S. Citizens from domestic air travel.

Currently, International air carriers are responsible for checking passengers against government watch lists. That will change in 2008.
Subsequently in 2008, under the Federal Governments Secure Flight Program the Government will begin not allowing U.S. Citizens on domestic flights until the government has prescreened a passengers information against government Watch Lists. On its facethat sounds great. Everyone wants safe air travel. The Government states, Watch Lists will be used to identify individuals who may pose a known or suspected threat to aviation or national security. But what does that mean? May pose a suspected threatto national security? U.S. Government officials have called protesters potential terrorists and a threat to national security. The words May pose a suspected threat are so vague one cant help wonder if that might apply to individuals wanting to fly to an anti-war or environmental protest. You can read about the Government Watch Lists in the Secure Flight Program at:
http://www.tsa.gov/what_we_do/layers/secureflight/index.shtm
The Governments new Domestic Secure Flight Program never defines what may pose means when they state, may pose a suspected threat to national security.

So what happens after the Senate passes S.1959? Will the Domestic Secure Flight Program Watch Lists include lawful U.S. Citizens, protestors and union demonstrators named by S.1959s new Commission as may pose a suspected threat to national security? Americans need to find out before S.1959 is passed by the Senatewhat Constitutionally protected activities may pose a suspected threat to National Security according to the Federal new Domestic Secure Flight Program. Imagine thousands of lawful U.S. Activists be prohibited from traveling (flying) because they were named by a government commission operating under the "The Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act" S.1959.

DHS TRIP provides a single portal for travelers to seek redress for adverse screening experiences and to resolve possible watch list misidentification issues. www.dhs.gov/trip
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy