Why is Indymedia intervening in KPFK

by KPFK listener and volunteer • Monday, Nov. 12, 2007 at 3:13 PM

Indymebia should not be trying to influence the KPFK elections. Leslie Radford's front page article is full of distortion and lies - and, guess what, she's a candidate. This is interference

It is highly unethical that Los Angeles Indymedia has decided to influence the KPFK Local Station Elections by posting a rant by one the candidates on its front page. To correct the injustice, Indymedia should now allow all of the other candidates the same opportunity. Short of that, Ms Radford should be disqualified.

What did Radford say that was wrong?

I noticed myself the problem about Ian Masters volunteer running as a listner sponsor and I got one of the slick slate mailers. That by itself raises questions of who is financing it and why.

Much of what is in the post I have observed myself.

Will someone identify the alleged falsehoods in the post.

Ian Masters is an Australian racist masquerading as yet another white westside entirely hopeless and useless Democrat.

Hes not a liberal, he just plays one on the radio.

Hes the number one candidate for whos most likely at KPFK to be taking money from the CIA.

Youre gonna quote that ego-centric midget who cares more about how his hair looks on the radio then about the good of the station?

F*ck what he thinks or says! He doesnt even take listener calls anymore cause hes afraid of what theyll say.

What a jerk!

Your comment was just that, a comment. Comments belong to the bottom of an article. Articles go on the newswire.

Your comment was copied and pasted with Leslie Radford's article on the same day. Please check it for yourself.

Candidates often publish criticisms on other candidates. It is up to you to bring out your own arguments.

Thank you for posting.