- js reader version
- view hidden posts
- tags and related articles
by jubilee shine
Friday, Jun. 01, 2007 at 10:29 AM
it means 'no power'!
Civilians could help keep lawmen in line
If its only contribution were that of 'conscience of the community,' a commission would still be serving a purpose.
May 31, 2007
Los Angeles Times
You may remember a fellow named Rodney King. A parolee, he took cops on a high-speed chase in 1991 that led to his violent arrest, a couple of trials, riots in Los Angeles and upheaval within the LAPD.
You may not remember what happened to the Los Angeles Police Commission, which dived into the middle of the King aftermath and, to its surprise, found out it didn't have as much power as it thought.
A quick overview (oh, let's call it a cautionary tale) might be helpful, though, as the Orange County Board of Supervisors moves ahead in creating a civilian commission to review misconduct complaints against county law enforcement.
Count me as being in favor. I'm so in favor that I suggested in March 1991 that the county do it. Am I bothered that the board waited 16 years to act?
I pounded out that column right after the Rodney King incident went public. I argued that Orange County — then at 2.4 million people — was already urbanizing and that potential abuses by police or Sheriff's Department officers could benefit from citizen review.
The county population now exceeds 3 million, and while a county-created commission wouldn't have jurisdiction over all police departments, the Sheriff's Department polices a dozen cities and various unincorporated areas. Nobody is suggesting that Orange County is a den of police brutality, but the existence of a review board adds a layer of watchfulness that couldn't hurt.
This isn't just a feel-good issue. The details of determining how many members it should have, who they should be and what kind of authority they should have are big-ticket decisions.
Not surprisingly, neither Dist. Atty. Tony Rackauckas nor Sheriff Mike Carona likes the idea. Law enforcement never wants to be investigated by outsiders, because they're convinced nobody who hasn't been there should pass judgment on them. They don't even like it when courts do it, unless, of course, the courts happen to agree with them.
But they're right in asking for caution. Which brings us back to the Police Commission in Los Angeles in the aftermath of the King incident.
The commission put Police Chief Daryl Gates on paid administrative leave. The L.A. City Council upended that action and reinstated Gates. A court upheld the council's prerogative. Then, voters passed a charter amendment that gave the council greater authority over its commissions, including the Police Commission.
The commission's credibility took a hit. What did it in was a sense that it had become too much a part of the story, too controversial.
The conventional wisdom at the time was that the commission's misfires ended up hurting both itself and the department.
Perhaps that's what Carona and Rackauckas are worried about. If so, they're legitimate concerns.
The supervisors sound like they understand that. Unanimous in wanting the panel, they've given themselves two months to work out the details.
The impulse in some quarters will be to think big. That is, what's the point in having a review board if it doesn't have any authority?
I hear that, but a review board with credible and courageous members wouldn't be impotent. If its only contribution were that of "conscience of the community," the panel would still be serving a purpose.
Of course, the sheriff and D.A. would like nothing better than a commission that couldn't do anything. And, yes, it may be difficult to recruit members who felt they had no real authority.
But, like I said, there's no perception that law enforcement is running amok. What's needed is a stalwart commission unafraid to challenge or criticize law enforcement when necessary. It should focus on brutality or harassment allegations or, as in the case that spurred the current discussion, the death of an inmate in Sheriff Department custody.
If the commission's only "power" would be to point fingers or express outrage, there's nothing wrong with that. After all, the D.A. and the sheriff both are elected and react to public critique.
The way things stand now, the departments typically investigate themselves. We know how that works.
Give me a commission with heavyweights, give them access to police reports and turn them loose.
The sheriff and D.A. should have nothing to worry about. I'll repeat what I wrote in 1991 when I first trotted out the idea: In the best-case scenario, we'd have a civilian commission that never had to meet.
Dana Parsons' column appears Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays. He can be reached at (714) 966-7821 or at firstname.lastname@example.org. An archive of his recent columns is at http://www.latimes.com/parsons .
Report this post as:
Change Links September 2018 posted
More Scandals Rock Southern California Nuke Plant San Onofre
Site Outage Friday
Change Links August 2018
Setback for Developer of SC Farm Land
More problems at Shutdown San Onofre Nuke
Change Links 2018 July posted
More Pix: "Families Belong Together," Pasadena
"Families Belong Together" March, Pasadena
Short Report on the Families Belong Together Protest in Los Angeles
Summer 2018 National Immigrant Solidarity Network News Alert!
Watch the Debate: Excluded Candidates for Governor of California
Change Links June 2018 posted
The Montrose Peace Vigil at 12 Years
Unity Archive Project
Dianne Feinstein's Promotion of War, Secret Animal Abuse, Military Profiteering, Censorshi
CA Senate Bill 1303 would require an independent coroner rather than being part of police
Three years after OC snitch scandal, no charges filed against sheriffs deputies
California police agencies violate Brown Act (open meetings)
Insane Company Wants To Send Nuke Plant Waste To New Mexico
Change Links May 2018
Worker-Owned Car Wash on Vermont Closed
GUIDE TO REBEL CITY LOS ANGELES AVAILABLE
lausd whistle blower
Help KCET and UCLA identify 60s-70s Chicano images
UCLA Luskin: Casting Youth Justice in a Different Light
More Local News...
Irrémissible, l'inhumanité acquise en héritage
Addendum: Benjamin Tucker American Mutualist: Tucker Did Not Advocate Voting in Businesses
OUR HOUSE Grief Support Center Celebrates 25 Years with the House of Hope Gala
Against the Rent Madness and For a Nonprofit Orientation!
Cybermonde, cyberguerre, cyberespace, cyberterrorisme
Paraphysique de psychosomatique
Chuck Grassley: Women Abusing, Animal Murdering, Illegal War Supporting Criminal
Finance Capitalism and the Digital Economy
Muselières syndicales, muselières patronales
Jeff Bezos, Amazon, The Washington Post, Whole Foods, Etc
Why Choose Nut Milk Over Cows' Milk
Antrhopocène, le grand effondrement
The Dictatorship of Corporations
18 Lethal Consequences Of Hunting
Paraphysique de l'outplacement déontologue
Shopping du bashing
After Lehman Brothers, Experts Say Global Financial Crisis Can Happen Again
“Animaniacs in Concert!” Starring Voice Legend Rob Paulsen
Probabilités de fin d'humanité
Florida Area of Migrant Farmworkers Denied Right to Construct Health Clinic near NaplesCIW
Steer clear of work morality!
The Shortwave Report 09/07/18 Listen Globally!
August 2018 Honduras Coup update
Brett Kavanaugh Filled The 5th Circuit With Execution Judges
Augusta Georgia Woman Gets 5 Year Prison Sentence for Writing About Russians Crime Acts
Paraphysique de contextualité
Crisis Regulation in Global Capitalism
More Breaking News...