Working on this new server in php7...
imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

white themeblack themered themetheme help
About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
Features
latest news
best of news
syndication
commentary


KILLRADIO

VozMob

ABCF LA

A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List

LAAMN List




IMC Network:

Original Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
printable version - js reader version - view hidden posts - tags and related articles


View article without comments

A Full Scale Invasion of Iran is the Only Option on the Table.

by Lloyd Hart Monday, Feb. 26, 2007 at 10:26 AM
dadapop@dadapop.com

A full-scale invasion of Iran is the only possible option for several simple reasons.

A Full Scale Invasion of Iran is the Only Option on the Table.

By Lloyd Hart

A full-scale invasion of Iran is the only possible option for several simple reasons. The first one that comes to mind is that, a full out invasion and occupation of Iran is the only way the U.S. can maintain absolute dominance of the region and its precious resource, light sweet crude oil. If Iran gets the bomb, the U.S. and Israel will have to settle for detente, negotiating every little detail of what happens in the entire geo-political structure of the Middle East with Iran and that of course means that Israel will finally have to settle a state of Israel and a state of Palestine along the 1967 lines. The U.S. absolutely does not want anything settled between the Palestinians and Israel as the conflict keeps tensions high in the region and allows the U.S. to capitalize on and create flashpoints. Most importantly however, is that if the U.S. were to strike at Iran's nuclear facilities in a so-called limited bombing engagement they would unleash a nuclear holocaust that could easily be on a scale of four or five Chernobyl's which besides killing millions over the next 10 to 20 years would make Iran impossible to occupy as U.S. forces would simply succumb to a radiation sickness that would make depleted uranium contamination from U.S ordinance look like a walk in the park.

And yes, the national security strategy of pre-emptive strikes is still in place and can be used exactly the same way it was used to invade Iraq. The Pentagon and the White House can simply bypass Congress and begin the invasion any time knowing full well that once the White House and the Pentagon have pulled the trigger that they have the elected Democrats in the House and Senate exactly where they had them when they invaded Iraq. In a position of having to support the troops in the field and feign resistance in the House and Senate with non-binding resolutions.

With the Europeans, Russians and Chinese effectively cowed and paralyzed in geopolitical and economic stasis the U.S. can do to Iran what it wishes to. At this point no Nation state will run to Iran's aid if an invasion takes place.

The U.S. probably has come to the conclusion that they can't push Iran off of the creation of a nuclear weapon. After all nuclear detente has worked in recent years for Pakistan, India and North Korea. Iran would be stupid not to arm itself with nuclear weapons especially after the U.S. succeeded in causing terrible damage to the Iranian people and their economy through its proxy war that Iraq provoked the Iranians into on behalf of the U.S. in the 1980's.

Whether the U.S. invades or just bullies Iran the Pentagon and the White House will do whatever it takes to maintain absolute dominance over the world supply of light sweet crude. The U.S. will not allow that supply of oil to be traded in any other currency other than U.S.. The U.S. will not allow the occupation of any of those nations or allow the governance of them by any other nation state other than the U.S. and their appointed puppets. This is why the U.S. is probably behind the creation of sectarian violence in Iraq for the simple reason that if there is no chaos in Iraq there is no reason for the U.S. to stay which leads us to, is the chaos that an invasion of Iran creates too much or just enough to justify the continuation of expanded boots on the ground.

The final thing to consider here, is whether or not Iran and the U.S. have made a deal to create the perception of ever increased tensions between the U.S. and Iran so that the Bush regime and the Pentagon are able to bully and scare the American public into believing that the U.S. is preparing to invade Iran distracting the American public for months and months from what is the continued institutional entrenchment of the American occupation in Iraq in the form of permanent U.S. military bases in the heart of the Middle East. There's always something thrown out in the public domain by the Pentagon or the White House of "look at this" "don't look at that" while the Pentagon budget continues to expand toward the 500 billion mark.

If the U.S. invades Iran a great deal of the Shia religious leadership in Iraq allied and supported financially by Iran will probably direct their gunman to start attacking U.S. forces in Iraq. Because of the size of the Shia population in Iraq, a pool from which the Shia religious leadership can draw fighters from on probably a very large scale, I am absolutely positive the generals and suits at the Pentagon and the White House have thought about the consequences of an invasion and occupation of Iran and the creation of a much larger regional war as a result. Whether or not this is what the Pentagon and the White House want, I don't know but I can say this, either way, a great deal many more people are going to die in the Middle East at hands of direct U.S. colonialism while the American public develops further eating disorders caused by their depression brought on by deep seated cowardice to do anything about it.

If it is an actual invasion of Iran or just P.R. to keep the tension running for the domestic audiences in America you can be absolutely sure that no one in America will do anything effective to stop it.

http://dadapop.com
The Feature Film "The Peace Movement"
http://alternativemediaproject.org/pmpurchase.html
Don't like Global Warming? Check out my latest song "Love or Hate".
http://myspace.com/lloydhart
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


Are you so sure?

by johnk Tuesday, Feb. 27, 2007 at 1:38 AM

I don't think invasion is the only answer. It's what some neocons in the AEI want to do. There's little public support for it right now. The main problem is probably the ongoing escalation to threaten an invasion.

The worst possible situation is that Bush will try to play politics, and invade Iran as a "going away present" to the Democrats, who would then have to campaign on "security", and would likely lose some seats, and maybe the presidency, to warhawks.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


Military Contingencies

by Lord Locksley Tuesday, Feb. 27, 2007 at 11:01 AM

The Pentagon has war gamed this problem from asshole to appetite over the last few years..and there are a number of potentially viable military scenarios...the most LIKELY is simply limited surgical air strikes from the 2 CVN battle groups deployed there supplemented by long range B-2 strikes...possibly from Diego Garcia.....dont need boots on the ground to neutralize Iran's incipient nuclear program......just strangle the baby in its cradle...Iran will survive quite nicely
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


"strangle the baby in its cradle"

by because the 'Lord' wants to Tuesday, Feb. 27, 2007 at 2:13 PM

I think the only baby in need of strangulation is well past due.
And everyone knows how 'Israel' feels about nuclear competition even for energy.
God forbid that 'Israel' abides by any inspection of their own renegade nukes.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


" doesn't have to abide "

by For Sure Tuesday, Feb. 27, 2007 at 3:56 PM

It seems that little Israel and its big nuclear arsenal were kept as a 'secret' in order to avoid any pressure to 'abide' while receiving all the aid it could while whining about being 'surrounded' when in fact, they have been a dire threat and a renegade with un-regulated uncounted and untracked nuclear packages. Some nerve they have to bitch about another nation's legal right to develop nuclear energy.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


speaking of having nukes

by NPT and Sanction Wednesday, Feb. 28, 2007 at 7:36 AM

NPT and Sanction
These dangerous zionists need to have to live up to the responsibility as well as the other terrorist nations with their nuclear weapons and have them monitored as any 'loose' nukes are the ultimate threat. Fortunately the NSA, NRO, DISC, DIA, and the CIA have the location of all the packages with active neutron emissions.
It's well past time to ban these obscene weapons world wide.
Unfortunately there are other less physically destructive but equally dire weapons on the shelf. I believe the main threat is biological.
anyway, as long as 'Israel' refuses to sign any kind of treaty to assure their neighbors, they have no talking room. Sanctions are in order.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy