J. David Horspool is a probate attorney doing business at 127 E. State Street in Redlands. His behavior in one particular case, the Conservatorship of (Dr.) Amalie Phelan (RIP 080974), now deceased, has evidenced a degree of corruption, gross manipulation of the legal system, and disregard for the well-being of a vulnerable and elderly woman that begs further scrutiny. I am requesting you read this documented report.

My mother, Dr. Amalie Phelan, first visited Attorney Horspool in the fall of 2001. My sister, Judith Phelan, had been residing with my widowed mother, and following the death of our father in 1997, had been stealing from the family estate, at one time valued at approximately $1 million dollars. In an effort to curtail the hemorrhaging of the estate by my sister, and reluctant to initiate criminal proceedings against her, my mother and I approached J. David Horspool, seeking a fiduciary to handle the funds of my mother, who was in her eighties.

Horspool stated he had knowledge of an excellent fiduciary, a Melodie Z. Scott, who is president of C.A.R.E, located at 25 E. State Street. At no time did he disclose that Scott was his established client, and had been so for many years.

In December of 2001 my mother and I met with Melodie Scott and Horspool. Scott expressed consternation at my sister's behavior, and stated she would "cut Judith off." Not wishing to leave her elder daughter destitute (Judith, though well-educated, is psychiatrically and physically disabled and does not work), my mother expressed her wish that Judith not be "cut off" but be granted adequate funds for her needs.

On December 2, 2001, my mother signed a document nominating Melodie Scott as conservator of her person and estate. In the Living Will set up by my parents in 1997 by Attorney Mark Anderson of Escondido, a conservator was named in advance should this prove necessary. An old family friend, James Henderson of Riverside, had been designated as "stand-by" should conservatorship prove necessary. He was also named successor trustee.

In light of the actions embarked on by Horspool and Scott against the best interests of Amalie and me, her signing the conservatorship nomination proved disastrous.
Almost immediately, Scott started funneling thousands of dollars a month to Judith. Scott placed aides in my mother's home, ostensibly to care for Amalie, although none were needed before. On several occasions she threatened to call the police on me when I came to visit Amalie. Very shortly, Amalie requested I find her an attorney to consult on this matter, as she was distressed by Scott's behavior.

The first week in March, 2002, my mother and I visited a probate attorney in Laguna Hills. Immediately, Scott stopped payment on my trust fund. As a result of her refusal to abide by the December 18, 2001 court order to distribute "up to $1500 a month" to me, I was later that year to lose my apartment and my car.

I ignored Scott's threats and continued my weekly visits to my mother. I noticed my mother's health was worsening. In June of 2002 I received a desperate phone call from Amalie. "I'm very ill and no one is paying attention to me,"she reported. I took immediate action.

At that time, both my sister and C.A.R.E. employee Linda Garcia were residing in my mother's home and being paid by Scott to care for Amalie.

I drove to Temecula, to find my mother too ill to walk unassisted. Immediately, I drove her to the Emergency Room at Rancho Springs Hospital in Murrieta. She was examined and admitted, and went into surgery, where a pacemaker was inserted to regulate her heartbeat.
On returning to her home, I examined my mother's medicine bottles. My mother had been a cardiac patient for some time. She had gone through two previous bypass surgeries, had a history of angina and was on cardiac medication. Indicated by full, undispensed pill bottles, there were at least two months of heart medicine which had been filled and withheld from my mother.

I called the police. Linda Garcia had already fled the scene, never to be seen by me again. When the police arrived, Judith went into her room and locked the door behind her.
The police counted the pills. Mrs. Scott called the house and told the reporting officers that I was crazy and to lock me up. Parenthetically, this is a tactic Scott has used before. In the case of Ann Cole, who went under the care of Mrs. Scott, there was a protective and concerned sister, as reported by Judy Lampuu, Ann's niece. As Ann's situation worsened and her sister attempted to intervene, Scott used the "crazy" appellation in order to thwart the protective efforts. Ann died quickly under Scott's care. "And she wasn't even in poor health," stated Lampuu in conversation in 2002.

When I received a copy of the police report several weeks later, the police had misreported the pill count. I contacted the Temecula Police Department immediately. I was told not to contact them again.

The situation worsened. Three days after my mother's hospitalization and surgery, Riverside Probate Judge Stephen Cunnison issued a Temporary Restraining Order against me, stating I was not to intervene in my mother's care. The declaration in support of the Restraining Order, concocted by Melodie Scott and David Horspool, is replete with lies. All the opinions they proffered in support of the TRO, certainly damning if true, omitted one basic fact--Amalie was immediately trundled into surgery to correct her failing heart.

At this point the story takes a shocking turn. The TRO came to hearing August 1st, 2002. I sat in the courtroom all morning, but there was no hearing on the TRO. In fact, Judge Stephen Cunnnison signed the order into permanency without granting me my legal right to a hearing, thus stripping me of my rights. Attachment A is the minute order signed by Cunnison that day. You will note that the minute order does not mention any parties present.

Jack Smith of West Hollywood accompanied me to court that morning. His letter-- detailing the actions of the Court are in Attachment B. This document substantiates what is revealed in examination of the minute order--that there was no hearing, and that I was stripped of my right to due process.

Family friend and journalist Patricia Lambert had flown in from Arizona to interview Amalie in the facility in which she had been placed. Lambert produced two reports (Attachments C and D) recording Amalie's wish to end the conservatorship and to restore her relationship with me, to whom Lambert referred as "Amalie's lifeline." Cunnison ignored the reports.
I had been granted permission by the Court to visit my mother "under supervision." On September 28, 2002, I handed Amalie a legal document to sign, prepared by Los Angeles Attorney Jeff Lustman (Attachments E and F). Probate Code 1863 delineates the legal right to a jury trial to determine the fate of the conservatorship. With a Judge issuing Restraining Orders for life saving efforts by a loving daughter, then depriving the restrained party to her legal right to a hearing, it was felt that Amalie would have a better chance with a jury than with this obviously corrupt judge.

Cunnison denied her request. His remarks to Attorney Lustman state that the request needs to be tendered by Amalie's own attorney. According to the Probate Code, this is simply untrue.

Cunnison then unleashed a second TRO against me. The declaration for this TRO, prepared by Attorney J. David Horspool, makes no attempt whatsoever to approximate reality.

I stood in front of the compromised Stephen Cunnison at this hearing, and informed him that he signed the first Restraining Order without a hearing. I asked him to recuse himself. He refused. I produced the Jack Smith letter and stated, for the record, that my mother had incurred surgery and a pacemaker as a result of my bringing her to the Emergency Room.
Cunnison shot me a dark look. "That was another matter," he said. He then cleared the courtroom. When the matter was finally dealt with, at the end of the day, I stood in a courtroom emptied of all possible witnesses.

"Restraining Order upheld," was all he said.

I walked out into the unrelenting sunlight of an October day, stained by contact with a darkness I could not comprehend.

The second RO, which is the final attachment in this report, prohibits me from contacting the police, the FBI, the CIA (??!!), Adult Protective Services or the Ombudsman's Office. Aside from the bizarre and irrelevant inclusion of the Central Intelligent (sic) Agency in the Restraining Order, I was effectively barred from contacting any agency which might assist in my mother's situation. And the fact remains that a judge cannot legally restrain a citizen from contacting law enforcement. This did not seem to bother Cunnison.

Months later, the source of the hemorrhaging of the estate by Judith surfaced. She had been forging my endorsement on checks made out to me by Amalie. Judith, who had studied calligraphy for many years, had been telling Amalie that I was in need of large sums of money, then forging my endorsement on these checks and depositing them into her Wells Fargo account. She had arranged joint signing on my mother's Bank of America and Washington Mutual accounts in order to facilitate her crimes.

When I contacted the Temecula Police Department to report this, Detective Dennis Winker cited the second RO and told me I was "not allowed" to contact him. "You'c better watch out," he warned me.

Due to this Restraining Order, I was not allowed to see Amalie again until February of 2004. Horspool and Scott's retaliation against me had decimated my income. I had lost my apartment, my car and one-third of my body weight, due to the lack of money for food. There was no longer even a remote possibility of hiring an attorney.

In 2004 I was granted permission to visit my mother several times. In late April, I was unable to reach her at the home in which Melodie Scott had placed her. I called Scott and Horspool to find out what had happened to her. They did not return my calls.

In late May, after dozens of calls to Scott and Horspool concerning the well-being of my mother, I finally reached case manager Christina Erickson at Scott's office. She informed me that my mother had passed away on May 4. She had died alone and had been buried without my notification.

Melodie Scott had gone to court in January of 2003 and secured the Power of Health Care Decisions over my mother. According to the will, this had been accorded to my sister Judith. I had beseeched my sister to go to court and to challenge this move by Scott. Judith refused.

Johanna Baker, the daughter-in-law of Dora Baker, who had also been under conservatorship with Melodie Scott (represented again by David Horspool) revealed to me in conversation in late 2002 that Scott had ordered a catheter removed from Dora Baker a week prior to what was ordered by the attending physician. As a result, Dora Baker died a premature and agonizing death.

"Her life was cut short," stated Johanna Baker.

I was contacted by a " Kathy Carroll, " who told me she had been a friend of one Freeland Allison, also under conservatorship with Melodie Scott. Carroll told me that Scott had placed her friend in a nursing home. When Carroll attempted to visit him at the home, Carroll reported to me that Scott threatened to "pull the note" on Carroll's property, which was held by Freeland Allison, and initiate foreclosure proceedings on Kathy Carroll's home.
Allison died shortly thereafter.

"I believe he died of a broken heart," said Kathy Carroll.

It is now too late for my mother. Hopefully, the details of this report will inform your passage through the perilous waters of Riverside Superior Probate Court. Judge William Sullivan was removed from the bench as the sitting probate judge several years back. It appears to be time for another, more extensive housecleaning.


Janet C. Phelan

This is not the first time I have heard horror stories about conservatorship. It is frightening to think that this is going on in the land of the free and the home of the brave.

When the court system has gone to the lengths it has in the Amalie Phelan case, not allowing her daughter to visit, to question the courts, and to get her mother the help she needed.............we are definitely dealing with a darkness that is truly frightening.

We can not allow this type of situation to continue. We need to get government, and corrupted court systems out of what I consider to be strictly a family affair.

My name isKenneth kehr,I was wondering if Melodie Scott is related to Robert Scott.Because I have had bad dealings with Robret Scott,in A malpractice suite.And have had problems with several other attourneys,judges,in the Riverside county probate court.The Riverside County Probate Court is corupt next week on the 14th,of November I wil be told that,1.the court will call A miss trial,or 2.find in favore of the trustee.Who has disqualified herself in her own decleration.My fate be decided next week.Please,email me.Kenneth Kehr

I have A sister who has altered multiple quit claims after quit claims were notarized to make my property part of A pourover will,of my fathers.Me and my father have the same name.When I purchased my home in 1998 their were several people involved in these transactions,wich several mistakes were made,do to the fact that,me,and my father have the same name,with witnesses present.several times my sister was informed about these facts.From June;10,1998 ,Till December,15,2003,My father never contested my ownership of my house/land for 6 1/2 years.My sister stalled the probate till August,15,2006.almost three years longer,and proceeded to shop for A court,she found one Riverside County Probate Court.Not in Los Angeles County Superior Court where the trustee domiciled.Not in Sanbernardino County Superior Court{VictorVille},where the properties are located.Not in Sanbernardino County Superior Court{VictorVille}where me,and my father domiciled.No,she filed A probate case,by using altered documents in A pourover will,In Riverside County Probate Court.The law states you can for no reason substitute Venue/jurisdiction,this court has ignored that.This was A civil matter to be heard by A jurry, filed in VictorVille In the County of SanBernardino Superior Court,By my father,prior to his death on december,15,2003,but my father did not,because he did not dispute my ownership,but if he did,I have A right to cross examine him.A probate Court prevents that right ! My sister has defrauded creditors to gain financialy,as a result with, me having the same name,credit card companies,have canceled my credit cards,because I would not pay my fathers debt.,they also used my personal information to report me to the credit boards.My fater had A court judgement against him,to pay.My sister refused to pay that,to gain financialy.Over the years me and my father had many ideals of how I could develope my property in 2001/2002 I decided to develope my home,and my property,my home would be increased in size from 900sq. ft.,to about 3000sq.ft.I also planned to build two more homes on my connecting property one about 4000sq.ft.,and the other about 5000sq.ft.so I refinanced my home to finance this project I started building in 2002,in April 2003 my father moved in with me,In 2001 I purchaced A mobile home for my father to put on my property so he could be independant,I financed all the cost out of my refinance money,I did alot for my father he paid me back some of my money but owed me several thousands of dollars,hard money was over 10,000.00,labor for 2 years would have been about 90,000.00.I pay about 25.00 dollars A month interest on the money I lent my father and will be paying that for the next thirty years.Before my father died in December 2003 I told him that because of the money he gave me to purchase my home/property 7,000.00,he would not have to pay me back over 10,000.00 dollars.When my father died.I atempted to correct the mailing address on my propertytaxes,and discovered all of my sisters deceipt she had gone on behind me,And my fathers back,my father had paid my property taxes on my property since 1998 as A favor to me,as I am on A fixed income.When the acts of my sister were discovered I told her I would right off my fathers debt.for what he did for me,she said that wasn't good enough,wich was a slap in the face.concidering I didn't have to give them anything for my property,even though my father owed me much more than he gave me.Thats not the end my sister went to an attorney,and Revalued my property at 14,000.00 dollars instead of the original 7,000.00 dollars.Just to keep peace,and reunite my family,I offered my sister formally to pay the 14,000.00 dollar value she put on my property,she refused the amount of the value she put on my property.I then realized that what ever price she put on my property,would never be excepted.now in less than one week my future will be decided by A judge who will not let me tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth.Both attorney's minnimizing my evidence leaving out any evidence that would discredit my sister other attorney has failed to provide discovery that is damaging to my sister,and also supress evidence to win by way of ambush.my attorney has not provided all evidence I have presented to him,my attorney has not interviewed my witnesses,and does not ask any important questions. all of the witnesses I have talked to,have great concern for my future,do to the inactions of my attorney.This court has done everything to keep this case in the Riverside County Court system,why to controll the outcome.This court has already reversed the meaning of the word hearsay,it now means everything me and my witnesses say,people directley involved,what they say is hearsay I need any Help to combat Evil Thanks !

Due to the misspelling of my name as Lampuu rather than the correct spelling of Lamppu, I never saw this article before. The part of the article that includes me is incorrect. I did have a great deal of trouble with the Professional Conservator, Melodie Scott, but I was misquoted here. Ms. Cole did suffer at her Mrs. Scott's hands and died prematurely. Ms. Cole's sister-in-law, my Aunt Lillian Drobaz and her husband, Mitchell Drobaz (Ms. Cole's brother) were caring for her very well before Ms. Cole was virtually kidnapped and placed under Mrs. Scott's control. Mrs. Scott accused Mitchell & Lillian Drobaz of abusing Ms. Cole, which was a complete fabrication.