9/11 ACTION: Respond to AP/ABC slap at 9/11 truth mvmt. ASAP, AND FORWARD ON !!! URGE ALL YOU KNOW TO:

A) Email the below message to ABC, AP, and other media
(emails below). It is good to cc some CC or other
media when you email AP and ABC, so they know that
other media see what they are up to.
B) After emailing the below message to the Media Email
Addresses at the bottom, then forward this ENTIRE 9/11
Action Email on to all you know.

WE ARE WINNING. WE CAN DO THIS. PUSH !! PUSH !!
PUSH !!

THE MESSAGE TO SEND OUT ( to media emails at bottom):

Dear ABC News and Associated Press,

In the Aug. 6 AP article, "9/ 11 Conspiracy Theorists
Thriving" reprinted on abcnews.go.com THERE ARE SOME
PROBLEMS WITH YOUR COVERAGE.
http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=2279963
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/S/SEPT_11_CONSPIRACIES?SITE=KTVK&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT


Below are identified three of those problems.

1) -------------------------------------------
For example, in the 3rd paragraph you state:

< that believes widely discredited ideas about what
happened on Sept. 11, 2001, persists and even
thrives.>>

PROBLEM: the term "widely discredited" is a laughable
slap at the 9/11 truth movement given the breaking
news of:

-- Wednesday, August 2, 2006 WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A
member of the 9/11 commission said Wednesday that
panel members so distrusted testimony from Pentagon
officials that they referred their concerns to the
Pentagon's inspector general. "We were extremely
frustrated with the false statements we were getting,"
Roemer told CNN. "We were not sure of the intent,
whether it was to deceive the commission or merely
part of the fumbling bureaucracy."

THE 9/11 TRUTH MOVEMENT was raising hell when
testimony to the 9/11 Commission by the FAA and DOD
conflicted, and the 9/11 truth community demanded
answers THEN. Where was the media, who should have
been demanding answers THEN?

-- On C-SPAN's "Theories of 9/11", Steven Jones of BYU
Physics Dept. announced that THERMATE traces were
found on WTC debris in analysis of the debris. Two
independantly obtained samples BOTH contained
thermate. As your article states, thermate is a
patented explosive used for controlled demolition.
HAS AP OR ABC OR ANY MEDIA HAD ANY TRACES ANALYZED?
IF NOT, WHY NOT?
IF SO, AND YOU FOUND THERMATE, WHY ISN'T THIS A 6 INCH
HEADLINE, AND NIGHTLY NEWS HEADLINE?

2) -------------------------------------------
In the 6th paragraph you state:

< University of Minnesota Duluth, who maintains, among
other claims, that some of the hijackers are still
alive. >>

PROBLEM:
Your statement leaves readers to believe that ONLY
Fetzer believes this.

See BBC's article of Sunday, 23 September, 2001, 12:30
GMT 13:30 UK
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/1559151.stm

"Hijack 'suspects' alive and well
Another of the men named by the FBI as a hijacker in
the suicide attacks on Washington and New York has
turned up alive and well.

The identities of four of the 19 suspects accused of
having carried out the attacks are now in doubt.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/1559151.stm

WHY HAVE ABC AND AP NOT LOOKED INTO THIS HUGELY
IMPORTANT STORY, AND DONE THEIR DUTY TO INFORM THEIR
READERS AND VIEWERS, AND ALSO TO DIG DEEPER INTO WHAT
THIS MASSIVE DISCREPANCY IN THE OFFICIAL VERSION OF
9/11 PORTENDS FOR ALL THE REST OF THEIR "THEORY" ??


3) -------------------------------------------
In your article's 9th paragraph you state:

< mainstream scientists, won't debate conspiracy
theorists, saying they don't want to lend them
unwarranted credibility.>>

PROBLEM:
The "official story" that 19 ragtag hijackers who
could barely fly Cessnas, flying commercial jet liners
with expert precision many experienced pilots say they
couldn't accomplish, and fooling the US Air Force,
NORAD, and the FAA so that in one and a half hours of
flying these hijacked planes over some of the world's
most protected airspace . . . with not one, not one .
. . Air Force interceptor jet arriving until too late,
and completely obliterating the first three steel
reinforced skyscrapers in building engineering history
with jet fuel (which doesn't approach the temperature
required to melt steel) . . . IS A CONSPIRACY THEORY.
IT'S AN OFFICIAL CONSPIRACY THEORY.

By the way, one of those buildings was not hit by a
plane, so when your article says the buildings were
brought down by jet fuel, while ignoring building 7's
fall . . . is shoddy journalism at best, and a cover
up at worst.

As the truth continues to unfold, media should and
must be held accountable for the horrid job they've
done reporting on 9/11, but worse for their obvious
attempts to obstruct public knowledge of crucial
facts.

Warm regards, and FOR GODSAKE, DO YOUR HOMEWORK in the
future. You are supposed to be a professional media.

9/11 truth seeker, and faithful citizen

=======================================
MEDIA EMAILS TO SEND ABOVE MESSAGE TO:
=======================================
ABC NEWS CONTACTS:
support@abcnews.go.com
http://abc.go.com/site/contactus.html?cat=Good%20Morning%20America

ASSOCIATED PRESS CONTACT:
info@ap.org

OTHER MEDIA, VILLAGE VOICE,
editor@villagevoice.com, thecity@nytimes.com,
letters@newsday.com

NBC & MSNBC:
Imus@msnbc.com, AbramsReport@msnbc.com,
Hardball@msnbc.com, TheNews@msnbc.com,
MSNBCInvestigates@msnbc.com, Headliners@msnbc.com,
Today@NBC.com, weekendtoday@nbc.com, Nightly@NBC.com,
Dateline@NBC.com, MTP@NBC.com, letters@MSNBC.com,
World@MSNBC.com, WebEditors@newsweek.com,
Letters@newsweek.com, Editors@newsweek.com

BBC RADIO CONTACTS:
leanne.pilkington@bbc.co.uk, steve.becker@bbc.co.uk,
d.blackledge.sj@stonyhurst.ac.uk,
alison.butterworth@bbc.co.uk, phil.cunliffe@bbc.co.uk,
brett.davison@bbc.co.uk, joe@joefishcountry.com,
gary.hickson@bbc.co.uk, gerald.jackson@bbc.co.uk,
graham.liver@bbc.co.uk, sally.naden@bbc.co.uk,
dave.swanton@salesharks.co.uk, mike.west@bbc.co.uk,
joe.wilson.01@bbc.co.uk, radio.leeds@bbc.co.uk,
john.ryan@bbc.co.uk, radioleicester@bbc.co.uk,
radio.lincolnshire@bbc.co.uk, yourlondon@bbc.co.uk,
admin@bigl.co.uk, studio@bigl.co.uk,
info@londonturkishradio.org, lyric@rte.ie,
livewire@uea.ac.uk

SALON.COM CONTACTS:
dtalbot@salon.com, modonnell@salon.com,
rocallahan@salon.com, kamiya@salon.com,
scottr@salon.com, lauram@salon.com, ruth@salon.com,
bwyman@salon.com, jstark@salon.com,
szacharek@salon.com, lauram@salon.com,
shansen@salon.com, jsweeney@salon.com,
janelle@salon.com, jwalsh@salon.com, ayork@salon.com,
kaufman@salon.com, klauerman@salon.com,
jtapper@salon.com, dcruickshank@salon.com,
ccolin@salon.com, areiter@salon.com, kcroft@salon.com,
aleonard@salon.com, km@salon.com, boehlert@salon.com,
dcave@salon.com, tennis@salon.com, max@salon.com,
ec@salon.com, gwilliams@salon.com, marybeth@well.com,
cdb@salon.com, kathyb@salon.com, tkgray@salon.com,
bob@salon.com, jormerod@salon.com, ben@salon.com,
dominic@salon.com, jill@salon.com, hcurran@salon.com,
acrew@salon.com, mbarron@salon.com,
mhirshoren@salon.com, lk@salon.com, lford@salon.com,
lkallis@salon.com, akumar@salon.com, tomf@salon.com,
priscilla@salon.com, phurley@salon.com,
jbarbeau@salon.com, malcantara@salon.com,
rocallahan@salon.com, conrad@salon.com,
ejeung@salon.com, plesniak@salon.com,
jjones@salon.com, anash@salon.com