I guess this is good evidence that the police ARE corrupt and get special privilages and are not charged for crimes they commit.

http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/index.php?sty=70176

Scottsdale revisits policy of not ticketing officers
By Ray Stern, Tribune
July 23, 2006

Scottsdale made a deal with the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office and the Arizona Department of Public Safety in January to ignore their own speed violations snapped by the city’s pilot Loop 101 photo enforcement system.

The arrangement meant sheriff’s office and DPS vehicles exceeding the posted 65 mph speed limit on Loop 101 received a free pass, even though in some cases police officials admitted the speeding might not have been justified.

Some of the speeds recorded were significant, up to 117 mph.

Since the high-profile camera system was turned on Jan. 22, city records show that 16 emergency vehicles have been captured going 100 mph or more, mostly DPS and sheriff’s office patrol vehicles. No emergency lights could be seen on five of the vehicles.

Overall, the system caught 177 emergency vehicles going at least 11 mph over the 65 mph speed limit — mostly patrol cars and a few ambulances, officials said.

The city changed its policy after the Tribune filed a second public records request to view the pictures and data from those 16 cases, said Scottsdale police Sgt. Mark Clark.

“There was communication at the chief level that we’re going to be sending . . . notice of violations for the next several months,” Clark said. What DPS and the sheriff’s office does with those notices is up to them, he added.

Asked if the change in policy was related to the Tribune’s request, Clark said, “Absolutely.”

The camera enforcement program is scheduled to end in late October, when the city will evaluate whether the system reduced collisions or slowed down speeders.

The case of automated professional courtesy was a touchy one for police. The Tribune learned in February that some emergency vehicles were captured by the system going 100 mph or more. But the city did not release those photos after a request for all photos of vehicles caught going at those speeds. In March, city officials said they did not intend to release those photos.

The city did comply with another request made June 23 specifically for data concerning the 16 speeding emergency vehicles. Police blurred the faces of the officers, saying some of them could have been transferred to undercover work. [could have??? they either were transfered or they were not transfered! "could have" is a lame ass excuse to keep from publishing the crooked cops photo]

Clark said he notified the sheriff’s office and DPS of the public records request to Scottsdale in June, at which point sheriff’s Lt. Paul Chagolla asked for and received the unredacted face and license plate photos. DPS received unredacted citation information at the same time from Scottsdale, but did not request the face and plate photos, Clark said.

Chagolla and DPS public affairs personnel said last week they had not identified the officers in the photos.

Yet in a June 28 e-mail, sheriff’s Capt. Larry Black told Scottsdale police he was researching the status of the vehicles to determine what they were doing when they were caught by the cameras.

Black could not be reached for comment. Chagolla denied a request to interview Sheriff Joe Arpaio.

NOT SENDING VIOLATIONS ‘WRONG’

The arrangement not to send the violations was made when Scottsdale officials met with the two law enforcement agencies just before the enforcement system was turned on, Clark said. DPS and sheriff’s office representatives were asked what they wanted done with the recorded speed violations that would inevitably come up, he said.

“DPS and MCSO said they didn’t want to see them, and so we honored that,” Clark said.

The 16 emergency vehicles going 100 mph or more included five sheriff’s office vehicles, seven DPS patrol cars and one motorcycle, a Scottsdale police car, a Salt River Police Department motorcycle and an unmarked car from an unidentified law enforcement agency.

Those recorded violations were kept in-house by Redflex Traffic Systems, which operates the system for Scottsdale. On violation forms associated with the speeding vehicle, identifying information such as the license plate number was not typed in by Redflex as it is for other offending vehicles.

Clark said Scottsdale Police Chief Alan Rodbell realized not sending the violations to the sheriff’s office and DPS was “wrong” and that the policy needed to be changed. Rodbell did not respond to a request for comments.

Despite the change, notices — rather than citations — will be sent to the agencies, just as would be done for vehicles registered to corporations or rental car companies, Clark said. After that, the agencies can decide what to do, he said. [so cops don't get traffic tickets like the rest of us do?]

The sheriff’s office and DPS said last week that they will investigate the circumstances of each notice.

SPEED POLICIES

Scottsdale, like some other East Valley cities that have used photo radar vans on surface streets for years, maintains public credibility by not immediately dismissing photo citations that police acquire. Instead, every one is investigated and the officer receives a ticket if there is no justification for the speed, Clark said.

Two Scottsdale officers received photo citations last year for unjustified speeding, he said.

He added that discipline is possible for officers who rack up multiple unjustified photo citations or otherwise don’t follow policy.

It works the same in Mesa, said Sgt. Chuck Trapani. Though the law allows officers to speed during emergencies, red-light camera and photo speed violations are checked out.

“We pull up the officer’s history, I think it’s an hour before and hour after” the alleged violation, Trapani said. “If he was just going to lunch and runs a red light, he gets a ticket like anyone else.” [yea sure!!!!]

The deal to keep the sheriff’s office and DPS from getting speeding tickets went on even as the Scottsdale Police Department was arresting people accused of driving faster than 100 mph through the camera enforcement zone on Loop 101 between Shea Boulevard and Scottsdale Road.

In two cases in which people were arrested for going 110 mph, police said such speeds were unacceptable, and the drivers were later charged with reckless driving in addition to speeding. [and you can bet the cops WON'T be charged with reckless driving, or even speeding]

However, sometimes speeding by police is justified, and each agency has policies that dictate when it can occur.

“Sometimes they need to and do travel at speeds faster than the speed limit,” Chagolla said.

On April 2, a sheriff’s vehicle clocked at 110 mph was probably en route to a hostage situation, Chagolla said. And police believe that on April 5 and 9, sheriff’s vehicles clocked at 109 mph were en route to help retrieve bodies during a homicide investigation, Chagolla said. [hell the dead bodies may have run off if the cops didn't speed to get there]

Chagolla said no corresponding emergencies could be found for two sheriff’s vehicles among the 100-mph-plus speeders.

Scottsdale’s policy says that vehicles must have “extraordinary circumstances” for traveling more than 20 mph over the posted speed limit. Because of that, the department formally reprimanded the Scottsdale officer pictured in the group of 16 who was going 101 mph, even though the officer was en route to a call of a man with a gun in the Grayhawk community, Clark said.

That officer didn’t have his flashing lights on, either, though using emergency lights is discretionary, Clark said. Police have found that it is not necessarily safer to travel at high speeds with flashing lights because sometimes the cars ahead will slam on their brakes to slow down.

DPS policy prohibits officers from exceeding posted speed limits by 25 mph in rural areas and 10 mph in urban areas when responding to an emergency, said DPS Lt. Jeff King.

However, “if a car blows by you at 110, obviously you have to take action,” he said.

In those “proactive” circumstances, officers can go as fast as they deem reasonable and prudent.

“Everyone would drive 85-90 if our policy said we can’t drive over 85 mph,” he said.

Activating the emergency lights is discretionary, though it’s recommended when officers are speeding so the public knows the car is on official business, said DPS spokesman Rick Knight.

Asked if some of the DPS cars photographed with their flashing lights off may have been unjustified in their speeding, Knight said, “our guys are better than that.” [at least that is what they want the public to beleive]

However, he said all the pictures of speeding cars will be reviewed, and officers without just cause for violations may be subject to discipline. [notice that he said MAY be subject to discipline, which means they probably won't be subject to dicipline]

“We’re a professional agency,” Knight said. “If we find there are problems, we’ll definitely look into them.” [yea thats what they want the public to think! but don't hold your breath waiting for a cop to get a ticket for driving 100 mph]

- Tribune writer Mike Sakal contributed to this report.

Contact Ray Stern by email, or phone (480) 898-6405

The cops LIED in the article. They are required to use their lights when they are speeding.

http://www.azleg.state.az.us/FormatDocument.asp?inDoc=/ars/28/00624.htm&Title=28&DocType=ARS

28-624. Authorized emergency vehicles

A. If an authorized emergency vehicle is driven in response to an
emergency call, in pursuit of an actual or suspected violator of law
or in response to but not on return from a fire alarm, the driver may
exercise the privileges provided in this section subject to the
conditions stated in this section.

B. If the driver of an authorized emergency vehicle is operating at
least one lighted lamp displaying a red or red and blue light or lens
visible under normal atmospheric conditions from a distance of five
hundred feet to the front of the vehicle, the driver may:

1. Notwithstanding this chapter, park or stand.

2. Proceed past a red or stop signal or stop sign, but only after
slowing down as necessary for safe operation.

3. Exceed the prima facie speed limits if the driver does not
endanger life or property.

4. Disregard laws or rules governing the direction of movement or
turning in specified directions.

C. The exemptions authorized by this section for an authorized
emergency vehicle apply only if the driver of the vehicle while in
motion sounds an audible signal by bell, siren or exhaust whistle as
reasonably necessary and if the vehicle is equipped with at least one
lighted lamp displaying a red or red and blue light or lens visible
under normal atmospheric conditions from a distance of five hundred
feet to the front of the vehicle, except that an authorized emergency
vehicle operated as a police vehicle need not be equipped with or
display a red or red and blue light or lens visible from in front of
the vehicle.

D. This section does not relieve the driver of an authorized
emergency vehicle from the duty to drive with due regard for the
safety of all persons and does not protect the driver from the
consequences of the driver's reckless disregard for the safety of
others.

RickD who is not a cop posted this article on a cop list server he belongs to (he is a government bureaucrat - microbiologist - that works for Arizona Health Services). When I posted it there were about 30 comments from cops. Check it out at:

http://www.glocktalk.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=568006

Most of the pigs or LEO’s as they call themselves for Law Enforcement Officers think they have a god given right to do anything they want and that any private citizen or reporter who questions this right is a biased idiot who doesn’t understand the facts and is out to get cops.