Israel is a failed terrorist state.

Let’s face it, we made a mistake.

We Europeans created the state of Israel after the second world war.

With German efficiency we had burned to death 6,000,000 of the cream of our citizens.

The remainder (who can’t have been the sharpest tools in the box, as the best were dead) were allowed to go to Palestine to keep an eye on our oil supplies from the Middle East.

This lot have been terrorizing the area since they got there. Ethnic cleansing, murder, torture, rape have been the order of the day.

The Jews had lived peacefully in the Middle East for thousands of years ( in the Crusades they fought with the Muslims in Jerusalem and were slaughtered with them) yet this lot go in and it’s continuous war.

If The Israelis of today pull back to the ‘67 lines and compensate the ethnically cleansed they can live in peace.

Do they want to?

No chance.

These psychopaths want war and mayhem.

For some reason they think that attacking Syria and Iran will help them out.

Psychotic delusions.

Even if they nuke both countries they will be in a worse position than when they started.

They got the dumb Yanks and Brits to invade Iraq and look at it now.

We should deal with Israel the same way as we dealt with Afghanistan.

Send in the B52s and do a Torra Bora on the kip.

It is a failed terrorist state and has caused us (Europeans) nothing but grief.

It is really true that Israel has become so much like the Nazis that they claim to hate it is so sad.

http://www.zombietime.com/israeli_consulate_protest_july_13_2006/

The pro-Israel supporter were 6 deep across the sidewalk, for an entire city block.

At least when CM and I misbehave, we are amusing. You are just gross. It will take more practice until you can work up to our level. But you can do it. I know you have it in you.

Once upon a time, the elder Bush threatened to cut funding to Israel, and Israel backed off. That president understood who was the dog, and who was the tail.

"Once upon a time, the elder Bush threatened to cut funding to Israel, and Israel backed off. belch fart"

This time Israel is with its back against the wall due to Hizballah's constant arming over the past decade. Hizballah may still have missiles that can reach Tel-Aviv (though the IDF has destroyed at least some of these during the first day of the counter attack). Ministers in the last govt. meeting were reported to muse that "if we are to continue having a state and living here, we must go all the way this time". Israel knows that Iran could become nuclear in a few years time and wouldn't be able to conduct this sort of operation under such circumstances. Israel therefore has a precious window of opportunity to cruch Hizballah as a military factor in the Lebanese arena.

Yeah! Goddamn right!

Careful though. Last time Israel got this unpopular over here, the WTC towers went boom-boom in a black op and then --- wow, loogathat -- it was like Israel's reputation rebooted all the way back to 'fresh start.'

Wudn't dat a freaky coinkydink?

Benyamin Netanyahu, obviously jubilant over the attack, speaking to NYT reporter James Bennett:
"Oh, it's very good! (whoop! fuck! shit!)
uh, I mean, uh ...
well, uh, not very good, but, uh, it will generate
immediate sympathy [for Israel]. (Hey Bennett, I'll buy you a night with the best whore in Tel Aviv if you don't quote that. Aw, c'mon!)"

I'm expecting an "Al Qaeda" suitcase nuke this time, probably on some secondary city. They can't do New York this way. It would kill too many of the Chosen Race. This they would actually find morally abhorrent. Let's see, which medium-size US city has the least number of Jews...? I bet it'll be in the South. They hate the South anyway (it's another of their 10,000 Never Forgive, Never Forget hate objects). Biloxi, Gulfport, and Memphis all seem likely

Keep this in mind when it goes down. Remember you saw it here first

Racism is "the belief that one 'racial group' is inferior to another and the practices of the dominant group to maintain the inferior position of the dominated group. Often defined as a combination of power, prejudice and discrimination."

This is how the British Library defines racism on its Web site. The above definition hardly deviates from the essence of almost all definitions of the ominous concept. And, indeed, the concept is being fully utilized with Israel's onslaught against the Palestinians, and the international community and media's mild, if not accommodating response to the onslaught.

The capture of Israeli soldier, Gilad Shalit is an act of self-defense. According to international law and the Geneva Conventions, he can be considered a prisoner of war, but not according to CNN, Fox News and the increasingly spineless BBC, which presents the soldier as a victim, who was "kidnapped" by Palestinian "militants" who are "affiliated" with the Hamas government.

By not challenging the Israeli narrative in any meaningful way, the uncritical media has become a tool in the hands of Israel's war strategists and their eternal concoctions.

Consider this example. An Israeli military commander tells a BBC correspondent dispatched to the border area between Israel and Gaza, that Israel intends on opening the border for "as long as it takes" to offset the humanitarian crisis developing in Gaza. The Israeli Army representative in a barefaced lie declares that the border has always been open, despite the perpetual Palestinian threat on the state of Israel. The BBC correspondent thanks him and signs off.

Is it possible that the BBC is unaware of the fact that Gaza has been under a strict military siege since Hamas' democratic advent to power through the January 2006 elections? Could it be that the Western media has missed the dozens of shocking reports that have warned that the Israeli siege -- which began months before the capture of Shalit -- was soon to create chaos and panic among the already malnourished Palestinians in Gaza? Did they all miss statements by top Israeli officials vowing to carry on with the siege until the outset of Hamas?

Some reporters misrepresent facts out of ignorance, not by design. But if that indeed was the case, then how can one excuse the fact that the same media that coined the term "kidnapping" to describe the action of the Palestinian fighters who captured Shalit refused to use the same association to describe the kidnapping of most of the elected Palestinian Cabinet, mostly academics with no connection to any militant wing?

More
http://counterpunch.com/baroud07142006.html