|
printable version
- js reader version
- view hidden posts
- tags and related articles
by Sets
Friday, Jun. 02, 2006 at 9:25 AM
Finkelstein is usually very good on Zionism but he really misses the mark on the Neocons. In his criticism of the Mearsheimer/Walt "Israel Lobby" essay, Finkelstein argues that the neocons watch over the American empire, but do not identify with Israel’s interests. As Mearsheimer and Walt have pointed out, the neocons were the driving force for the American attack on Iraq.
Departing from Chomsky's head-in-the-sand approach, Finkelstein deals with the obvious fact that the neocons instigated the war on Iraq. But he denies that they are ideologically committed to Israel, arguing instead that they "watch over the U.S. 'national' interest, which is the source of their power and privilege." Finkelstein essentially agrees with the neoconservatives regarding their identification with American national interests, but he gives that connection a negative spin. He bases his claim about the neocons' lack of any real ideological support for Israel on the fact that the original neocons of the late 1960s had not previously evinced any strong support for Israel. And he goes so far as to compare them to the Jewish police during the Holocaust who served their Nazi German masters. "As psychological types, these newly-minted Lovers of Zion most resemble the Jewish police in the Warsaw ghetto," Finkelstein asserts.
That is a gratuitous and outrageous calumny for which there would seem to be no real evidence. For all intents and purposes the neocons have expressed and demonstrated support for Israel. Douglas Feith, who pushed the neocon war propaganda as the third-highest figure in the Defense Department during George W. Bush's first administration, has been closely associated with the right-wing Zionist group, the Zionist Organization of America. His father, Dalck Feith, while living in Poland during the 1930s, was active in Betar, the youth organization of the right-wing Revisionist Zionist movement founded by Vladimir (Ze'ev) Jabotinsky.
In 1997, Douglas Feith and his father were the guests of honor at the 100th anniversary dinner of the Zionist Organization of America, in New York City, and both were given significant awards. [3] Colonel Yigal Carmon, formerly of Israeli military intelligence, was a co-founder of the neocon think tank Middle East Media Research Institute (Memri) along with Israeli-born Meyrav Wurmser, who is the wife of David Wurmser, an important figure in the neocon American Enterprise Institute and the Bush II administration. With the beginning of the Gulf War of 1991, Norman Podhoretz actually went to live with his daughter in her home in Jerusalem in order to show his solidarity with Israel, which Saddam had threatened with a missile attack, actually carrying out his threat to a limited extent. [4]
Neocons have been involved in institutions that promote the interests of Jews and Israel — especially Commentary magazine, which is funded by the American Jewish Committee, and the Jewish Institute of National Security Affairs — demonstrating that Finkelstein's claim that neocons are lacking in their support of Israel is unknown to the pro-Israel financial backers of those entities.
Finkelstein's idea that neocons "watch over" American imperial interests makes one wonder why the many other establishment foreign-policy elements mentioned earlier in this essay were cool or opposed to the war on Iraq. Exactly who makes up the nebulous power elite that really determines the American imperial interest and to which the neocons report? If the neocons are responsible for watching over U.S. interests we may wonder why other parts of the neocon World War IV agenda for the Middle East — war on Iran and destabilization of Saudi Arabia — have not yet been adopted and why the neocons have often criticized actual U.S. foreign policy, especially during the Carter, Bush I, and Clinton administrations. What does this have to say for the actual foreign policy of those administrations? If the neocons "watch over" American imperial interests does that mean that those administrations did not pursue American imperial interests? But that would be impossible given Finkelstein's belief that the U.S. government always pursues those imperial interests. Finkelstein turns Occam's razor into a pretzel. A much simpler conclusion to draw is that the neocons' policy agenda differed from that of other dominant foreign-policy elites but that various factors, especially the trauma of 9/11, enabled their agenda to gain dominance, at least temporarily.
Go to www.thornwalker.com/ditch/snieg_mear_walt_2.htm
Report this post as:
LATEST COMMENTS ABOUT THIS ARTICLE
Listed below are the 10 latest comments of 44 posted about this article.
These comments are anonymously submitted by the website visitors.
TITLE |
AUTHOR |
DATE |
Neocons Don't Support Israel? |
Leonard Windsor, Esq. |
Friday, Jun. 02, 2006 at 4:57 PM |
I'll tell you what "chutzpah" is |
Scapegoated Jew |
Saturday, Jun. 03, 2006 at 12:43 AM |
Big Oil financed propaganda |
Sheepdog |
Saturday, Jun. 03, 2006 at 3:05 AM |
some few minutes later |
Sheepdog |
Saturday, Jun. 03, 2006 at 3:37 AM |
September 11 |
Tia |
Saturday, Jun. 03, 2006 at 4:44 AM |
pulling out all the stops |
Sheepdog |
Saturday, Jun. 03, 2006 at 5:00 AM |
Let's put this in the proper context |
Becky Johnson |
Saturday, Jun. 03, 2006 at 5:06 AM |
Regular Public Torah Readings |
Regular Public Torah Readings |
Saturday, Jun. 03, 2006 at 5:21 AM |
excuse me |
Sheepdog |
Saturday, Jun. 03, 2006 at 5:57 AM |
Questions |
Tia |
Saturday, Jun. 03, 2006 at 6:18 AM |
Bin Laden, damage to the US economy, and Iran |
Becky Johnson |
Saturday, Jun. 03, 2006 at 1:39 PM |
I had heard that Bin Laden dumped all his airline stock two weeks before the attack |
Sheepdog |
Saturday, Jun. 03, 2006 at 4:03 PM |
Project Mockingbecky |
Sheepdog |
Saturday, Jun. 03, 2006 at 4:10 PM |
Al Qaeda was involved in the 1993 WTC bombing too! |
Becky Johnson |
Sunday, Jun. 04, 2006 at 9:23 AM |
Project Mockingbecky |
Sheepdog |
Sunday, Jun. 04, 2006 at 11:34 AM |
Project Mockingbecky- |
Sheepdog |
Sunday, Jun. 04, 2006 at 4:58 PM |
Questions about Bush and Sept. 11th |
Becky Johnson |
Sunday, Jun. 04, 2006 at 7:19 PM |
Project Mockingbecky |
Sheepdog |
Sunday, Jun. 04, 2006 at 7:50 PM |
So we know who planned the attack, right? |
Becky Johnson |
Monday, Jun. 05, 2006 at 5:16 AM |
Project Mockingbecky |
Sheepdog |
Monday, Jun. 05, 2006 at 8:01 AM |
Not so Fast!! |
Becky Johnson |
Tuesday, Jun. 06, 2006 at 6:20 AM |
SchtarkerYid |
cross-indymedia spam attack? |
Tuesday, Jun. 06, 2006 at 12:31 PM |
ALL READERS: Hit OFF-TOPIC BUTTON |
for Bible Spammers |
Tuesday, Jun. 06, 2006 at 1:15 PM |
Project Mockingbecky |
Sheepdog |
Thursday, Jun. 08, 2006 at 3:39 AM |
You call that a credible source? |
Becky Johnson |
Thursday, Jun. 08, 2006 at 6:55 AM |
Project Mockingbecky |
Sheepdog |
Thursday, Jun. 08, 2006 at 11:11 AM |
Sheepdog's "credible" stories |
Becky Johnson |
Thursday, Jun. 08, 2006 at 2:48 PM |
Project Mockingbecky |
Sheepdog |
Thursday, Jun. 08, 2006 at 3:11 PM |
Nessiesque |
Scapegoated Jew |
Thursday, Jun. 08, 2006 at 4:11 PM |
well obviously, Dog was watching over |
Judasgoat's imp |
Thursday, Jun. 08, 2006 at 4:17 PM |
Your inability to deal with reality |
Scapegoated Jew |
Thursday, Jun. 08, 2006 at 5:30 PM |
Sheepdog's favored website is hoax-filled |
Becky Johnson |
Saturday, Jun. 10, 2006 at 7:06 AM |
Project Mockingbecky- WE NEED A RACIST REPORT BUTTON |
Sheepdog |
Saturday, Jun. 10, 2006 at 10:09 AM |
|
|
|