If before that the impenetrable net of the invert society was sluice on the subjects, Gramsci, locked up, could still dream to write "for the eternity", today this possibility is of the all exausted one. Who invoke the impartiality of the historian is foolish or, more probably, intelligent and integrated.

In order which reason, to the inside of this context, a autonomy struggle have to end to delegate the management of its memory to the delegated administrations of the memory? Obedient to the calculating reason, the last mobilitation of the sobjectivity self-conscious it cannot that fall in the flattering celebration of the enemy - placing its being be defeat, but, sure, with honor, to justification from the false objectivity of that it is. But also this last appearance of ancient rebelling sobjectivity cannot that to dissolve itself in the process of reification - chancing

in journalistic slogan, the past seems finally exorcised, changed in taboo, evoked why rests far away. Where it must remain. Nevertheless, this ritual hides a shadow. A ghost of something, than the existing it cannot resolve.

If it refuses that is dealt for necessary, the critical thought can only apply himself same, in its is given today, to already become. If they deny the given existing, the overwhelmed subjects can meet the won ones that they had the courage to will to win.

To trace of the complete correspondence between the breach, in the present, of and the interruption of the false ermenuetich of the past could, perhaps, give back finally the revolts to the rioters.

http://theoriacritica.blogspot.com

A Italian web site for theorical research