We had a server outage, and we're rebuilding the site. Some of the site features won't work. Thank you for your patience.
imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

white themeblack themered themetheme help
About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
latest news
best of news




A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List


IMC Network:

Original Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
printable version - js reader version - view hidden posts - tags and related articles

Good Girl Rice, Bad Boy Chavez?

by Ardaga C. Widor Wednesday, Feb. 22, 2006 at 3:25 AM

Ms. Rice calls for a United Front against Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez. Why? What ar the objectives behind such a move? We look at it from a both, Latin (in this case Brazilian) and U.S., American persepective.

So Ms. Rice and the White House posse suggested a United Front against evil Democracy eater Hugo Chavez. I heard it on the news.
Hmm. In order to understand this information, I first need to know what Washington (not only towards Latin America) stands for. And I need to know what Washington’s pragmatic understanding of Democracy is.
Let’s have Professor Noam Chomsky explain it to me humble Latin American childish mind.

“(…) the United States is as close to the ‘ideal case’ of state capitalist democracy as can be found.
The main designer (…) was an astute political thinker: James Madison, whose views largely prevailed. In the debates on the Constitution, Madison pointed out that if elections in England ‘were open to all classes of people, the property of landed proprietors would be insecure. An agrarian law would soon take place, ‘giving land to the landless. The Constitutional system must be designed to prevent such injustice and ‘secure the permanent interests of the country’, which are property rights.
Among Madisonian scholars, there is a consensus that ‘the Constitution was intrinsically an aristocratic document designed to check the democratic tendencies of the period,’ delivering power to a ‘better sort’ of people and excluding those who were not rich, well born, or prominent from exercising political power (lance Banning). The primary responsibility of government is ‘to protect the minority of the opulent against the majority,’ Madison declared. That has been the guiding principle of the democratic system from its origins until today. (…)
Madison foresaw that the threat of democracy was likely to become more severe over time because of the increase in ‘the proportion of those who will labor under all the hardships of life, and secretly sigh for a more equal distribution of its blessings.’ They might gain influence, Madison feared. He was concerned by the ‘symptoms of a leveling spirit’ that had already appeared, and warned ‘of the future danger’ if the right to vote would place ‘power over property in hands without a share in it.’ Those ‘without property, or the hope of acquiring it, cannot be expected to sympathize sufficiently with its rights,’ Madison explained. His solution was to keep political power in the hands of those who ‘come from and represent the wealth of the nation,’ the ‘more capable set of men,’ with the general public fragmented and disorganized. (…)
We learn a lot about ‘really existing democratic theory’ by seeing how this problem is perceived, particularly in secret internal documents, where leaders can be more frank and open. (…)
Latin American elites are ‘like children,’ Secretary of State John Foster Dulles informed the National Security Council, ‘with practically no capacity for self-government.’ Worse still, the United States is ‘hopelessly far behind the Soviets in developing controls over the minds and emotions of unsophisticated peoples.’ Dulles and Eisenhower expressed their concern over the Communist ‘ability to get control of mass movements,’ an ability that ‘we have no capacity to duplicate’: ‘The poor people are the ones they appeal to and they have always wanted to plunder the rich.’ (…)
In other words, we find it hard to induce people to accept our doctrine that the rich should plunder the poor, a public relations problem that had not yet been solved.
The Kennedy Administration faced the problem by shifting the mission of the Latin American military from ‘hemispheric defense’ to ‘internal security,’ a decision with fateful consequences, beginning with the brutal and murderous military coup in Brazil. The military had been seen by Washington as an ‘island of sanity’ in Brazil, and the coup was welcomed by Kennedy’s ambassador, Lincoln Gordon, as a ‘democratic rebellion,’ indeed ‘the single most decisive victory of freedom in the mid-twentieth century.’ A former Harvard University economist, Gordon added that this ‘victory of freedom’ – that is, the violent overthrow of parliamentary democracy – should ‘create a greatly improved climate for private investments, ‘giving some further insight into the operative meaning of the terms freedom and democracy.
Two years later Defense Secretary Robert McNamara informed his associates that (…) the Latin American military understand their tasks and are equipped to pursue them, thanks to Kennedy’s programs of military aid and training. These tasks include the overthrow of civilian governments ‘whenever, in the judgment of the military, the conduct of these leaders is injurious to the welfare of the nation.’ Such actions by the military are necessary in ‘the Latin American cultural environment,’ the Kennedy intellectuals explained. (…)
The pattern continues today. The champion human rights violator in the hemisphere is Colombia, also the leading recipient of U.S. military aid and training in recent years. The pretext is the ‘drug war,’ but that is ‘a myth,’ as regularly reported by major human rights groups, the church, and other who have investigated the shocking record of atrocities and the close links between the narcotraffickers, landowners, the military, and their paramilitary associates. State terror has devastated popular organizations and virtually destroyed the one independent political party by assassination of thousands of activists, including presidential candidates, mayors, and others. Nonetheless Colombia is hailed as a stable democracy, revealing again what is meant by ‘democracy.’ (…)”

Thank you Professor. I can see clearly now.
And you Ms. Rice and White House posses: sorry not to correspond to your stereotype of an easy to manipulate Latin American dumb kid. And, believe me, we’re working hard down here, at the grassroots that is, in order to get more Chaves and more Morales and – if necessary – even more Prestes and Guevaras to forge a United Front against your Democracy eating and cannibal system. By any means necessary, as Brother Malcolm advised.
I wonder, by the way, what decent and democratic U.S. citizen like Huey Newton and Bobby Seale had made of a snow white house sister like Condoleezza…

Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments

© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy