imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

white themeblack themered themetheme help
About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
latest news
best of news




A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List


IMC Network:

Original Cities africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
printable version - js reader version - view hidden posts - tags and related articles

Canada's Johnny Wizard VS. the demon antiChrist Our Mr. bush Jr.

by J. Wizard Sunday, Jan. 01, 2006 at 8:00 PM

Synopsis: I had been writing critically of the Bush Administration, when, the Secret Service top secretly requested I be arrested quietly for threatening the life of George W. Bush.

The awesome and amazing Johnny Wizard speaking nationally in America!

Demon liar George Bush Jr. spewing evil as Johnny's true enemy.


Synopsis: I had been writing critically of the Bush

Administration, when, the Secret Service top secretly

requested I be arrested quietly for threatening the life

of George W. Bush. They tentatively planned to have me

arrested under the Mental Health Act to avoid a public

criminal proceeding, but however during the process, I

managed to speak convincingly to the Honorable RCMP, and

the Secret Service, along with publicly speaking on local

Manitoba radio for no less than forty hours regarding Bush

in total, and was also well known throughout my community

involvement in live acting man theatrical productions I've

been a part of for more than a decade.


I am contacting you in hopes you will consider the threat of my false imprisonment here in Canada, an

issue that You will assist me in gaining a fair defense from.

I am welcoming Humanity to consider becoming involved in my case, to provide

myself advice on defensive measures unknown for my lack of experience on such legalities. Feel free to

contact us at your earliest convenience to inquire further with any questions not remedied by this e-mail,

or other obligations I must meet to insure our help on this serious criminal matter. Feel free to forward

or publish the affidavit and two motions present in this public notice.

These following two Motions and Affidavit I am sending you have been filed at the Court of Queen's

Bench here in Winnipeg, and also as Constitutional Challenges. I am hoping I can interest you

in realizing that this challenge is not only important to me as a free citizen, but also for

ourselves as the concerned world community.

[the motions and affidavit have also gone to federal offices (Constitutional challenges) and the Provincial]

Thanks for your consideration.


Canadian radio broadcast interview with the Wizard

/ / Sattler, as a result of ignoring reason and understanding,

went out and sacrificed all these marines that are now dead.

/ / So, here I will offer you something I created, a Johnny

Wizard pencil drawing in jpg format. Enjoy!

/ / Instead of murdering our own families as war criminals for bush

to pilfer the undefended wallets of our grandparents, why don't we

all smarten up, and just kill the unarrested demon bush instead as

something truly Patriotic?




I, Johnny Wizard, in the city of Winnipeg, Province of Manitoba



Pakistani ISI Director General Ahmad orders an aide to wire transfer about 0,000 to

hijacker Atta. Ahmad later resigns after the transfer is disclosed in India and confirmed

by the FBI. [Dawn, 10/8/01, Times of India, 10/9/01, Wall Street Journal, 10/10/01, AFP,

10/10/01] The individual who makes the wire transfer at Ahmad's direction is Saeed

Sheikh, later convinced for kidnapping and murdering reporter Daniel Pearl in February

2002. ABC News later reports, "federal authorities have told ABC News they've now

tracked more than 0,000 from banks in Pakistan to two banks in Florida to accounts

held by suspected hijack ringleader Mohamed Atta." [ABC News, 9/30/01] CNN also

reports the 0,000 transfer, and the New York Times specifies that it came in 2000.

[CNN, 10/1/01, CNN, 10/6/01, New York Times, 7/10/02] Ahmad's order must have

preceded June 2000, since that's when Atta and others started opening bank accounts and

receiving the money (9,910 is received by Atta and Marwan Alshehhi between June

19 and September 18). [MSNBC, 12/11/01]


On March 3, 2002, MSNBC's Jim Miklaszewski reported that he had received

anonymously, top secret presidential war strategy documents dated September 9th, 2001,

originating from Condolezza's office, outlining a strategy to invade Afghanistan premised

on blaming bin Laden a terrorist, but providing no evidence to back up the allegations,

thereby guaranteeing criminal invasion. Only workable if Laden pleads innocence to a

crime that hadn't yet taken place, a crime serious enough to "justify" sacrificing American

GIs truly for a liquefied natural gas pipe line for pension thieving Enron. ["The Dahbol

Working Group" and Bridas] Any evidence for any offense would have been sufficient to

have Muslim fundamentalists hand Laden immediately over, as they had offered [as others

of other nations had also] repeatedly during the Clinton years.

CBC and CNN have still, to this day, consciously refused to do any follow up on the

intelligence, deciding instead on behalf of dying people everywhere, our public

devolvement of a just society.


RTÉ News - US rejects Taliban bin Laden evidence calls

21 September 2001 17:41

The White House has rejected requests from Afghanistan's ruling Taliban for proof that

Osama bin Laden was responsible for last week's attacks. According to the US Secretary

of State, Colin Powell, the United States has enough evidence to try bin Laden in an

American court.

The US Government said there would be no negotiations.


[This following document was the official damning account]

Responsibility for the terrorist atrocities in the United States

4 October 2001

[This Internet Domain is Britain's Prime Minister's]

"This document does not purport to provide a prosecutable case against Usama Bin Laden

in a court of law."

The document doesn’t hold ANY case, as that was the strategy.... See?


Investigating the Investigation

After playing a tape of Cheney's statement, Russert asked Daschle, "Did the vice president

call you and urge you not to investigate the events of Sept. 11?" Daschle flatly

contradicted Cheney: "Yes, he did, Tim, on Jan. 24, and then on Jan. 28 the president

himself at one of our breakfast meetings repeated the request."

...."[T]hat request was made" by Cheney not only on Jan. 24 and by Mr. Bush four days

later, but "on other dates following" as well.

6. : FBI Called off Terror Investigations

Two veteran FBI investigators say they were ordered to stop investigations into a

suspected terror cell linked to Osama bin Laden's al Qaeda network and the Sept. 11


`You Will Not Open Criminal Investigations'


October 9 2001 - The Times of India

"While the Pakistani Inter Services Public Relations claimed that former ISI [the

"Pakistani CIA"] director-general Lt-Gen Mahmud Ahmad sought retirement after being

superseded on Monday, the truth is more shocking. Top sources confirmed here on

Tuesday that the general lost his job because of the "evidence" India produced to show his

links to one of the suicide bombers that wrecked the World Trade Center. The U.S.

authorities sought his removal after confirming the fact that 0,000 were wired to WTC

hijacker Mohammed Atta from Pakistan by Ahmad Umar Sheikh [Omar Saeed] at the

instance of General Mahmud [Ahmad]. Senior government sources have confirmed that

India contributed significantly to establishing the link between the money transfer and the

role played by the dismissed ISI chief. While they did not provide details, they said that

Indian inputs, including [Omar Saeed's] mobile phone number, helped the FBI in tracing

and establishing the link."


No evidence was brought against Laden for nine eleven, none. [So according to Bush's

official top secret Presidential directives] While Laden himself claimed he played no

part in 911. Still, to save the lives of third worlders on the brink of starvation, Laden

agreed to hand himself over, but Bush refused the offer, while CBC and CNN denied

to report on that fact for the behalf of now dying dismembered American GIs. Once the

indiscriminate bombing began, targeting almost every building in the country of

Afghanistan, Laden then claimed he had no choice but to fight back to defend US

innocent from the ungodly enemies of Creation/Freedom. Then the clear to all fake

video came out with an actor who's face wasn't even close to looking remotely like Laden,

but for almost the facial hair. [Bridge of the Jamaican actor's nose is HALF as long in

proportion to Laden’s for example, and surely frightfully shocking for some, the actor

doesn't even take blame for 911 either!] Photos comparing the two faces never aired on

CBC and CNN available in about twelve seconds with the power of the Internet.


former FBI deputy director and murder victim John O'Neill

"the main obstacles to investigating Islamic terrorism were U.S. oil corporate interests and

the role played by Saudi Arabia."


Alex Jones interviewing Former German Defense Minister Andreas Von Buelow

"Bush signed W199I months before 911 ordering the FBI not to stop Al-Qaeda. They

threatened to arrest FBI agent Robert Wright if he tells us what he knows."


Mr. Bush was quoted somewhere regarding Mr. Laden's guilt of complete innocence

with "We don't need any evidence, we know he's guilty."


" [FBI's] Edmonds concluded that documents clearly showed that the Sept. 11 hijackers

were in the country and plotting to use airplanes as missiles. She said documents also

included information relating to their financial activities. "


The honorable Argentinean oil company Bridas' relationship can not be understated

as the Bush Administration's primary motive on criminal invasion of Afghanistan to

save his biggest corporate backers, the American pension thieving Enron.

From "An American demands the truth from you" by Karl W. B. Schwarz

" I demand to know what energy companies were in that Cheney Energy Task Force

meeting and what discussions there were as to the steps that would be taken to remove the

Taliban and Bridas Corporation as the last remaining obstacle to the United States

controlling the Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline. I met that company in 1999 and have known

since then about the Bridas v Unocal, billion interference of contract lawsuit in US

District Court, Southern District of Texas. I also know about the Fifth Circuit Court of

Appeals decision on September 9, 2003 that upheld the Bridas 0 million arbitration

settlement and the March 22, 2004 denial of Writ of Certiorari at the United States

Supreme Court, Case 03-1018, Turkmenneft v Bridas."


From "Fresh Memories of War" by Kandea Mosley, The Ithaca Journal (New

York), 25 May 2002:

"We were told there were no friendly forces," said [Army Private Matt] Guckenheimer, an

assistant gunner with the 10th Mountain Division at Fort Drum. "If there was anybody

there, they were the enemy. We were told specifically that if there were women and

children to kill them."


Quote from "A Dossier on Civilian Victims of United States' Aerial Bombing of

Afghanistan: A Comprehensive Accounting"

by Professor Marc W. Herold Ph.D., M.B.A., B.Sc.

Departments of Economics and Women's Studies McConnell Hall

Whittemore School of Business & Economics University of New Hampshire

When U.S warplanes strafed [with AC-130 gunships] the farming village of Chowkar-

Karez, 25 miles north of Kandahar on October 22-23rd,killing at least 93 civilians, a

Pentagon official said, "the people there are dead because we wanted them dead." The

reason? They sympathized with the Taliban.1 When asked about the Chowkar incident,

Rumsfeld replied, "I cannot deal with that particular village."



"American troops today admitted they routinely gun down Iraqi civilians - some of whom

are entirely innocent.

And in an admission that directly contrasts with the line coming out from the Pentagon's

spin doctors Specialist Corporal Michael Richardson added: "There was no dilemma

when it came to shooting people who were not in uniform, I just pulled the trigger."

The Crown would argue this issue isn’t in her jurisdiction, however, it is in mine as a

expressive communicator fighting for freedom from real tyranny. An irrational tyranny

that only stands exercised by corporate "news bite" censorship, and false imprisonments.

An American Prosecutor put Sergeant Benderman in prison for refusing to kill God’s

children. Now, what do you really think America would do, if "they" knew that too?


Bush demands total impunity on the war crimes he is personally responsible for


"Marines said the men fired on them. A senior officer said they had no weapons, but that

with shots coming in the men were legitimate targets because they ran."


CAIR also wants the Pentagon to investigate a photograph circulating the Internet of two

Iraqi boys and a U.S. soldier. A smiling soldier stands besides the two boys who are

giving a "thumbs up" sign, as one of boys holds a sign written in English that reads, "Lcpl

Boudreaux killed my Dad, th[en] he knocked up my sister!"

(Link to photo:


Guardian Wednesday 7, 2001 - "FBI claims bin Laden inquiry was frustrated"

[this story was on Bush’s top secret W199i directive]

This information would take a well paid intelligence officer, or CBC reporter no more that

thirty seconds to look for follow ups. For, I know, the BBC did also a national news

report on it.


INTERVIEWER: Are you aware that this tank is contaminated with radiation?

SOLDIER: No, it isn't radioactive.

INTERVIEWER: But we have measured it.

SOLDIER: No, it isn't radioactive, not this tank.

"Basra is on a river," he noted. "A DU shell poisons the water in a river. It poisons the

grasses and the grains. It sinks into the ground and poisons the water table. When it gets

into the body, it does incredible damage. The combination of radioactivity and heavy

metal toxicity is such that it affects the DNA in such a way that you get genetic


[thousands of tons of measured radio-active toxic waste, heavy metals, oxidized to

microscopic particles as small as a tenth of a micron have been deposited in our airspace,

however, CBC and CNN have refused to inform ourselves on the scientifically measurable

extremely serious health concern issue..]


Justice Department lawyer John Yoo, "In the exercise of his plenary power to use military

force," Yoo insisted, "the President's decisions are for him alone and are unreviewable."

Yoo was also quoted recently on CBC national news report regarding the torturing of

innocent people to death, to state something like "President Bush doesn’t have to justify

his opinions to Canada or even to the United States for that matter."


The incriminating FBI email dated 22 May 2004, indicates that president Bush personally

signed off on certain interrogation techniques in an executive order."

(See original at


U.S. deserter 'didn't want to have to kill babies'

"Mr. House will argue that American soldiers are guilty of war crimes and that forcing

Mr. Hinzman to fight in Iraq would have made him a war criminal.

He will call as a witness former U.S. Marine Staff Sergeant Jimmy Massey, who is

expected to testify that he and other soldiers shot more than 30 unarmed Iraqis,

including women and a six-year-old child, at a U.S. military checkpoint."


that a clandestine military task force in Iraq was beating detainees, ordering Defense

Intelligence Agency debriefers out of the room during questioning, confiscating evidence

of the abuse and intimidating the debriefers when they complained."


A sacked CIA official is reportedly suing the agency for allegedly retaliating against him

for refusing to falsify his reports on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction to support the

White House's pre-war position.


``I was faced with being deployed to Iraq to do what the infantry does, kill people, and I

had no justification for doing so,'' he testified. ``This was a criminal war. Any act of

violence in an unjustified conflict is an atrocity.''


Williams's squad stopped a dump truck, and an Iraqi climbed out. "Light him up!" the

sergeant ordered, according to testimony, and the squad opened fire, killing the unarmed

man. Williams and a squadmate reportedly got into an argument over which of them had

scored Company C's first kill.


It gets worse. We already knew about the Franklin County, Ohio, precinct that tallied

4,258 votes for Bush when only 638 people had actually voted.


Israeli Soldiers Going In For The Kill: A 13 year old Palestinian [JEWISH] school girl is

about to die

"It's a little girl. She's running defensively eastwards, a girl of about 10. She's behind the

embankment, scared to death."

"Anyone who's mobile, moving in the zone, even if it's a three-year-old, needs to be



US forces unleashed more than 20 air strikes and some 60 artillery rounds on Monday,

said Major Todd Desgrosseilliers. [...] An AFP reporter in the Jolan district said one

building in every 10 had been flattened. As US-led troops closed in on the neighborhood

overnight, at least four 900-kilogram bombs were dropped in the city's northwest.

[destructive radius of a 900-kilogram bomb is half a kilometer, and all TRUE accounts

of death rates for Fallujah alone, a city where the population was forbidden to leave,

exceed two hundred thousand innocent souls.]


The Bush Administration

In rush to defend White House, Rice trips over own words

Friday, March 26 @ 10:12:40 EST

By Walter Pincus and Dana Milbank, San Francisco Chronicle

"Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage contradicted Rice's claim that the

White House had a strategy before Sept. 11 for military operations against al Qaeda and

the Taliban. The CIA contradicted Rice's earlier assertion that Bush had requested a CIA

briefing in the summer of 2001 because of elevated terrorist threats. And Rice's assertion

this week that Bush had told her on Sept. 16, 2001, that "Iraq is to the side" appeared to be

contradicted by an order signed by Bush on Sept. 17 directing the Pentagon to begin

planning military options for an invasion of Iraq."

[ And...]

"Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage contradicted Rice's claim that the White

House had a strategy before Sept. 11 for military operations against al Qaeda and the


This indicates that with the foreknowledge gained through prior experiences of Muslim

fundamentalists, such as the Taliban, being forbidden by their religion [Jihad] to persecute

the innocent, left the Bush Administration with only needing to do, and had officially

done, was to use no evidence to back up allegations to insure invasion plans, and as a

result, a deliberate treasonous criminal strategy to not follow the crime scene leads at the

real murder scene to nab to true evil doers. For otherwise - spoil the top secret plot.


Blix nor Elbaradei, nor Kofi, suggested, implied, or stated, that Iraq had failed to

comply with the newest U.N. resolution: 1441.

HANS BLIX: "And at this juncture, we are able to perform professional no-notice

inspections all over Iraq and to increase aerial surveillance..."

With complete, one hundred percent access to go where ever the Bush Administration

pleased without delay, left a situation of an unjust war only detrimental to an ability to

bring about any good or better thing. American soldiers are being sacrificed for no better

good or reason understood, for if progress will ever be made, it will be when they work to

bring about a political situation that was there in Iraq before the Bush Administration

starting murdering innocent people for nothing . Well, not completely, for Bremer shipped

19 billion to Greenspan early on, then, hundreds of millions were sent back.


Professor Steven E. Jones, a tenured BYU professor, went public several weeks ago after

releasing a 19 page academic paper, essentially showing how the laws of physics do not

support the WTC's freefall and, consequently, the official government story.

It should be known that World Trade Center Building Seven was not struck by an

airplane, yet fell exactly the same as the two towers.

Below both towers were found pools of molten steel, only creatable with the heating

by high explosives.

Excerpts from "Me, Art Bell, and 9-11 by Lisa Guliani"

The official version of the WTC collapses defy both Galileo's Law of Falling Bodies, and

also Isaac Newton's First Law of Motion.

..if we know that hydrocarbon fires can only reach a maximum temperature of 1517

degrees Fahrenheit, how could they possibly have melted this steel, when the melting

point of steel is 2,795 degrees and the boiling point of steel (when it becomes a molten

liquid) is 5,182 degrees Fahrenheit.

The existence of these burning pools of molten steel were confirmed by:

- Mark Lorieux of Controlled Demolition, Inc

- Peter Tully, President of Tully Construction

- and the American Free Press newspaper


"To be truthful about it, there was no way we could have got the public consent to have

suddenly launched a campaign on Afghanistan but for what happened on September 11..."

Tony Blair Speaking To House of Commons Liaison Committee


The Washington Post, 23 September 2001.

At American urging, Ahmed traveled ... to Kandahar, Afghanistan. There he delivered the

bluntest of demands. Turn over bin Laden without conditions, he told Taliban leader

Mohammad Omar, or face certain war with the United States and its allies.

Mahmoud's meetings on two separate missions with the Taliban were reported as a

"failure." Yet this "failure" to extradite Osama without providing a shred of eidence was

part of Washington's documented design, providing a pretext for a military intervention

which was already in the pipeline. If Osama had been extradited, the main justification for

waging a war "against international terrorism" would no longer hold. Nor would the ready

to go Patriot Act. Incidentally, when MSNBC contacted the Whitehouse regarding the top

secret invasion of Afghanistan plan, it was confessed that the plan had been "fully



"Why of course the people don't want war ... But after all it is the leaders of the country

who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along,

whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist

dictatorship ... Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the

leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and

denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger." --

Hermann Goering, Nazi leader, at the Nuremberg Trials after World War II


On the wall of the National Holocaust Museum: " Thou shall not be a victim, thou shall

not be a perpetrator, and thou shall not be a by-stander"

SWORN before me

in the City of Winnipeg,

Province of Manitoba,

[this affidavit was sworn in federally and provincially as a massive

Canadian Constitutional challenge]





For an Order of Production






This Notice of Motion regarding an Order of Production is to have disclosed to

the defense, the complete evidence without undue hindrance, evidence the Crown

holds against the accused as a member of our public. These following

arguments are the reasons why Justice must prevail in these proceedings:

Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms section 7. "No person shall be

deprived of life, liberty or security of the person except in accordance with

the principles of fundamental justice."

R. v. Stinchcombe "[...] counsel for the Crown is under a general duty to

disclose all relevant information."

In R. v. Stinchcombe, the Supreme Court of Canada held once again, as any

legitimate Court of any land would, that the accused in criminal cases has a

Constitutional right to full and complete disclosure of the Crown's case.

Yet, in the criminal case involving myself, the Crown's refusal to return my

legal property [such as including my actual expressions] is motivated by

contempt for fundamental justice - for true accountability - by intentionally

working to deceive our Courts through denying the evidence of one: the charge

against me is truly fraudulent under our law as it stands currently, and two:

that I don't already have the silent moral support of every honorable top

secret intelligence officer this world over.

Canada's "Commission of Inquiry into the Actions of Canadian Officials in

Relation to Maher Arar"

"The RCMP notes that because national security investigations are criminal

investigations, the possibility of judicial scrutiny always exists and the

presence of this possibility acts as an indirect accountability mechanism."

[Maher Arar was an innocent Canadian tortured and left for murdered by the

irrational as criminal pro-bush forces negatively influencing Canadian


Firstly, I, like any, need ready easy access to all the evidence the Crown

holds against myself, to indicate a possibly hidden motive behind her criminal

allegations. For it is in our authority as a free society that the Crown

holds any legitimacy.

It would be unfair for our Courts to side with the unjust Crown on not giving

me ready easy access to the evidence, but for only by hugely limiting degrees

that include costly bus rides, or as the seriously impractical, hundreds of

thousands of printed texts that would likely fill roomfuls.

I need to provide the evidence of my actual expressions to counter balance the

false interpretations the Crown alleges, when it comes to asking where

specifically the rights of a child are being compromised when she makes her

defined as sexually dysfunctional inferences. All the images on my computer,

deleted and otherwise, are not my expressions. Similarly, are all the written

texts on my computer those of words I hold to be my own personal philosophy.

As indicated by the Supreme Court of Canada's Sharpe case, a defense against

fraudulent accusations regarding the Rights of our children being compromised,

can be readily addressed early on by understanding the possession charge in

relative context to the personal life of the accused.

R. v. Sharpe

"Section 163.1(6) creates a further defence for material that serves an

"educational, scientific or medical purpose". This refers to the purpose the

material, viewed objectively, may serve, not the purpose for which the

possessor actually holds it."

So, purpose of digital media as determined illegal must therefore, be backed

firstly by criminal intent, for without any intent you have no purpose. A

defense is made available by the Sharpe decision on personalprofessional

conduct to indicate actual established purpose of accused to prevent blind

"overreaching". The Supreme Court of Canada's deep concerns of "overreaching"

are very much apparent in my particular criminal matter. Conduct of

individuals who have lost their purpose in Police keeping, who aren't being

managed to express through our Police actions, a public interest in where the

"offensable" images are coming from, or came, but instead, where it's all

going as potential new innocent porno victims with millions of dollars worth

of stuff they can get away stealing. [I've read porno cops in America

recently acquired 300,000 more American names of households to raid, off of

one single server found managed in violation, but have taken a pause before

then moving on to arrest anybody who has ever used the internet for whatever,

to consider, just what have we gotten ourselves into here.] See, perfectly

legal imagery can be made into illegal thoughts relatively quickly by the

weaker irrationals that exist within our police services. Where, to prove for

the record, a twenty two year old is only twelve, even when she has in her

possession all her proper paperwork, completed puberty, a living mother, a

popular working web site and historical documentations, is just foolishly

impossible. While at Your end Mr. Surfer Citizen, your demonized guilty,

until proven innocent of thinking their faulting criminal perceptions, they do

practically nothing to verify. Without needing to establish intent, they make

off like bandits. See, under a simple possession charge, there is no

allegations of intent to obtain or distribute something illegal, and likewise,

not found a responsible public's interest in seeking the means of which the

criminal content was as could be LEGALLY provided. The last thing we want in

our dying world is a setup where private legal businesses are selling,

promoting, and releasing content that only becomes illegal when the

exploitation unit comes into your home to steal your stuff by grossly

misunderstanding what the threat actually is.

By exercising our right to perceive representations of that which is made

freely available, is of in itself, important to the sociologist, psychologist,

concerned parent, and of course, the conceptualizing artist reflecting on our

shared reality.

My private and public expressions are more tuned to those who are personally

responsible in escaping arrest for running death squads against innocent

children in Afghanistan financed by the undefended as uniformed American tax

paying Public, [10th Mountain Division] a criminal enterprise still cashing in

on the rewards of bush's mass murder campaigns. Or, the dropping of cluster

dud land mines throughout residential school districts to murder our children

indiscriminately. Mercury tainted vaccines that for sure cause irreparable

damage to North American children, or as currently, about John DeCamp's just

released updated 2005 edition, about the secret White House-linked national

child sex-ring entitled "The Franklin Cover-up." However, the real motivating

factor [intent] in the Crown's purpose by attempting to pirate our public's

right to defend Ourselves judiciously, is more specifically because I

articulate the HONORABLE FBI's official publicly available findings on who

orchestrated, and funded the crimes of 911. Namely, Mr. Bush Jnr. along

with his business partner, the still escaping Lieutenant General Mahmoud


[University of Ottawa Professor Michel Chossudovsky, has researched the

Ahmad/Bush relationship as documented by CNN ABC et al, and can be quested for


The Crown to not fight on our behalf regarding this easily verifiable mass

murder issue, is indicative of an intention, to cast aside the concern of all

children who benefit from my communicating higher truths for the betterment of

the entire public body. I ask our Court, who, in Canada, informs our public

truthfully as I do, that the "scumbags" Canada's own General Hillier is

referring to get Canadian youths for sure killed over in his nationally

broadcasted barbaric adolescent bigotry, against all the INNOCENT students of

Afghanistan, is of a People who factually opened up schools for girls under

the Taliban's getting better through communicating leadership?, and who

outlawed Bush's heroin production, and the slavery and rape of women? Women

who were when working at the Taliban's newspaper, were not required to wear

burkas despite CBC's propaganda to the contrary? The Crown would suggest her

ignorance on such subjects is irrelevant to her case against me, for those

children's lives, and others like them, are not who she is working to protect.

So, where I demand is a crime against our real God occurring I ask the hiding

in darkness Crown to explain herself publicly in the light of these

proceedings to our Honorable Lord.

The Crown's case argues that a determined selection of legal images, can be

sited under a labeled classification of "collateral images", as somehow, unto

it's separated self, being an indicator, or summation of my unbridled

character. Therefor, to question such interpretations I need the luxury and

comforts of a stress free environment to ponder the significant meaning of

each of these collateral damages against ourselves as the innocent the Crown

argues for as a weapon of Justice. For, those personally responsible for

making repeatedly easily verifiable faulting expressions with the evidence the

Crown refuses to return to me as my legal property, are in all likelihood,

still blabbering corporately un-accosted, the completely blind support of

indiscriminate mass murder in thoughtless praise for war criminal traitor to

Humanity George Bush Jr., their supreme no nothing about squat leader. While

myself, am a well documented public defender of children's rights and a

studious observant researcher on media matters, who is schooled in the

field(s) of Psychology and Genetics, Sexuality and Religion, along with the

chaotic order to the indivisible nature of life ourselves. [And who when not

terribly busy building this needed defense against the Crown's alleged

criminality, still champion the written word for Justice being - US all as

treated fairly.]]

I also need to show, how I come to be in possession of another's expressions,

of some managed images, or some strewn texts.

It would be unfair for our Courts to side with the unjust Crown on not giving

me ready easy access to the evidence, but for only by hugely limiting degrees

that include costly bus rides, or as the seriously impractical, hundreds of

thousands of printed texts that would likely fill roomfuls. While sitting

just outside my police door, could be the public accuser who professes proudly

the deeply ignorant ungodly beliefs of cop killing and heroin dealing to push

US all over the top with Bush as it's global mastermind. Knowing such an

enemy of freedom who taunts all our judicial matters with true personal self

contempt, is there still escaping public ridicule, wearing our community's

Police Officer uniform, could create unto itself, an unneeded frustration on

my part, for, I am a honorable defender to all that is Just. A honorable

defender that is needing by threat of false imprisonment to concentrate on

Justice for just myself personally currently. As the Court well knows, a

bushite's favored public intent is well established by the evidence, as

documented truly criminal being the ungodly. [Hypnotized lawless through the

mechanics of suggestion I would diagnose for the don't know knowing any

better.] There exists no evidence against bin Laden for 911, nor, was any

factually alleged to exist, and despite what Bush broadcasts unchallenged

nationally on our airwaves privately, Saddam did actually let the inspectors

in to go where ever they wanted without delay. Furthermore, indiscriminately

murdering people with tens of thousands of cluster dud land mines, 9000

missiles targeting public infrastructure, many multiple 2000 pound bombs

containing radio-active toxic waste, along with the new and improved napalm

and phosphorous poison gas clouds all because we are in the approximate age

range of 15 to 55 is a for sure real war crime going unaddressed publicly by

the Crown, but not by myself. So, the Crown's interest is in jeopardizing the

lives of our children for sure by working to silence my extremely rare public

cries for true accountability here in Winnipeg.

I am sworn to protect all as indicated by my recorded actions and praised

world wide word. The National Supreme Court of Canada's Sharpe decision

allows this defense to be made on our behalf.

By Our Honorable Court's "Lord" siding to support claims made by my false

accusers - as the running definitive summation of what can be claimed as

"collateral images" - [legal relative media content present on my computer,]

while judging to refuse to have returned my therefore stolen legal property so

I can adequately prepare a counter defense against the Crown's confusions, is

nothing short of a crime in progress. At least it should be. By denying me

the evidence the Crown holds in contempt of our Court, would create an undue

hardship on my, seeking to illuminate the facts from our vantage points.

Having to travel back and forth across the city to view hundreds of thousands

of media messages pertinent to my case at hand, left denied search tools, and

a comfortable atmosphere, is unduly unfair for all concerned. Now, I know, I

have to deal personally with those who support such a criminal ungodly nature

when I have no choice to, but to have them located in the same listening

vicinity throughout all my inquiries on stolen legal media content, to spew

their boastful chauvinistic fascist state partiality of how great George W.

Bush is as their master thinking celebrated American Cop Killer, would leave

me unfairly tensioned. I need the meditative comforts of home study with good

coffee and private friends to ponder my adroit, to the point defense with the

evidence I demand the fair right to contend.

I hold children's rights paramount in the public defense stands I've made for

near a decade, and privately, I'm free to think my way on anything. The Crown

has no right to dictate what my private thoughts are, especially, if I'm not

granted to speak on her conclusions with the ready made evidence she don't

want me to have returned possession of. My legal property that the Crown's

crew has plans to sell! God, are you listening?

I need the luxury of computer processing that the Crown used to surmise her

relative faulting judgment of my worth to our society.

I need returned all my legal possessions, like my real expressions such as

public communications, to fairly challenge the Crown's refusal to consider

such objectiveness on who the one holding criminal intent actually is on this

serious matter. So therefore, the Crown's crew should not be allowed by our

law to sell my stolen property as they are planning, while surely as

sadomasochists, destroying a life time of my written works they know mean a

great deal to me personally. Wishing to deprive our rights as the community,

to be granted fair treatment in our Court systems of accountability, is surely

what will happen if our Honorable Judge does not Judge honorably against the

Crown and grant me the legal return of my stolen property. I need to

establish the mechanics of my specifically unique computer system, so I can

establish my fair defense made available by the Supreme Court of Canada's

Standing Sharpe decision.

The Court recognizes finding that all declared illegal possessions serve a

criminal purpose without any intent, unless found serving otherwise by made

available evidence from the defense. [ergo my Constitutional challenge]

Evidence of real purpose the Crown doesn't want to grant our Court, because

usually, guilty or innocent, they do sell everybody's stolen stuff actually.

And truly, the Crown has expressed no interest in assisting our Police

agencies in apprehending those known responsible by the evidence for first

degree mass murders. [Instead, pick on the helpless innocent little Jewish

man bearing a cross, as cowardly brown shirt jack boot nazi fascists under

Hitler would have too. [surprising for many, it is formally illegal to be

Jewish currently in God's Israel. As for the Crowns in my case, and the

Judge, well they seem to be not all that bad over all. [So far... But this

innocent people go to prison for speaking un-contended truths thing for me is

just some extreme to the core serious business of ours, and good or bad, the

Judges, and the Crowns, and the Police Officers have a paid job to do by

following the rules designed ultimately in purpose to protect both me and you.

So, can't we all just find a way to get our public news agencies to live up to

our responsibilities by recognizing standing laws not yet enforced against the

un-elected dictator, the monstrous war mongering American traitor criminal,

911's George Bush Jnr., instead of present company???]]]

I need returned my 37,333 [minus the contended for argument] images to

sensibly consider their feasibility to collectively represent the Crown's

faulting illogical argument in a brighter picture.

I need to show what I did with obtained media information on general terms by

mechanical processing through my very specific as unique operating systems,

and through my definitive writing on the very subject we are here considering.

I need operating script batch programs that do specific tasks regarding

general media managements.

I need to show how Usenet [early raw based sub-internet knowledge sharing

web communications system] is used, and how it was legally accessed by my

specific personal system, granting me, to be a part of one of the greatest

collected artistic expressions of the known world. And how, when using such

services, informations aren't found perceived until, at the very least, they

are already in one's possession, thereby making the Crown's standing

accusation absent criminal intent clearly unjust. [those responsible for

distribution/expression of actual for real illegal depictions are where the

infraction against the public's interest can be compromised, but the

exploitation units I'm aware of seem to have little of no financial interest

in recognizing such a wanting to lose their lucrative industry brokered

through what should be worked to be made into redundancy.]

I need returned possession of my computer content, to seek for indicative

examples of huge disparities with what is described with the Crown's own

relative definitions, and what my media machine actually contains regarding my

for real expressions. I need to reference my personal writings surmising the

faulting state of the child porn policing industry. To surmise grand totals,

as such the Crown's crew alleges of legal content she'll bemoan despairingly

of collateral damages against us as innocence. Knock knock knock.

If the Crown argues falsely that the evidence I request is irrelevant to her

criminal case, then what could the harm be honestly in showing the error of

her ways? If she argues it jeopardizes to expose the true criminality used to

try convicting me, an innocent honorable man in Our name, I would move that

the charge against me be stayed, my property returned, and the Courts help me

make a Constitutional challenge to the validity of the law, while

communicating also Your dissatisfaction in not having us heard speaking out

nationally for the truly Honorable FBI - against 911's true money man -

Lieutenant General Mahmoud Ahmad - getting away as bush's not so secret any

longer private business partner, escaping he is from the mass murder of

thousands of our good friends, the still left undefended corporate Americans.

I need to know what settings were set in place for the installed programs to

access the internet. And a whole bunch else besides.

In conclusion, I need to show where my outstanding character was at, by

indicating exactly what I spent my free time on, to illustrate for our Court,

my TRUE intent as motive on this matter.

Yours truly,






for the Crown to Stay Proceedings






The Validity of the Law

While true, to distribute material in an abusive form of sexually explicit

child pornography, can have a detrimental impact on the impressionable, being

in simple possession, does not connotate the same negative risk to the public

body. It is not a Freedom of Expression issue. All the pictures on my

computer, deleted and otherwise, are not my expressions. Nor, importantly,

can digital images be perceived, until, at least, they are already in your

possession. Under current law, as is in my case, you're already guilty on

nothing. So, if you should see something arguably imprisoning, you're too

late to point fingers elsewhere.

It's analogous to you sitting in your parked car with someone throwing through

the opened window, a closed paper bag of crack cocaine, followed behind by an

arresting police officer, who while cuffing you hears your plead that some

completely unknown person threw the innocuous unmarked bag through the window,

leaving the unjust officer of our law, to reply for the record "Yeah, I saw

the, left to go on his own "stranger" do it. And it's a crime in this country

don't you know to be found in simple possession? Now, where are the keys to

the trunk of this fancy car I'm planning to sell for a tidy profit crack head


The Crown appears under this law in my case to have no need to prove a

criminal intent to do her things.

See, under a simple possession charge, there is no allegations of intent to

obtain or distribute something illegal, and likewise, not found a responsible

public's interest in seeking the means of which the criminal content was as

could be LEGALLY distributed. The last thing we want in our dying world is a

setup where private legal businesses are selling, promoting, and releasing

content that only becomes illegal when the exploitation unit comes into your

home under false pretences to steal all your electronic stuff by grossly

misunderstanding what the threat actually is.

A digital image isn't possibly perceived until it is at least, already in your

possession. Making the standing law as it is interpreted by the faulting

Crown, unjust. No criminal intent is alleged by my sole possession charge,

but for by myself against the Crown's secret bushite crew for aiding and

abetting the crimes of first degree mass murder in New York City.

An infraction against the public's interest occurs when such materials are

expressed through distribution. Digital images of people posing as testaments

to the beauty of being human, are not the same as expressions of sexually

exploited children. Yet, from as near as I can tell, the threat of seriously

cruel and inhuman treatment against me with a five year prison sentence is

being made because the Crown has made included, condemnable interpretations of

the public's free expressions of youth and beauty. Again, not my own.

Leaving still no made interest in understanding where these prison term

perceptions, that are often admitted by the Crown's crew to be legal,

originated. If the Crown's case remains standing, why shouldn't we expect the

child exploitation units to then widely distribute as near as can be Barely

Legal materials in hopes to nab more of us as the fearful to be shamed as

criminal through threatened public Court proceedings regarding your alledged

deviant private sexual thoughts? Of legal images perceived as a god honest,

testimony of youth and beauty, being ourselves beautifully youthful, could

leave you too as depicted hiding some unknown something about your unseen

character. Or, an even worse madness, exploitation units distributing truly

illegal depictions, named maybe after car models, to see who could be made

found only in simple possession of the accusers relative perception?

For, if the internationally popular woman depicted was well over eighteen and

had her own legal website, don't matter for indictment, cause the expert of

expert experts they have in my case, a double full time professional computer

porno viewer, states with a complete straight face, the full figured pubic

wisped woman, he knows nothing of, is really only ten or twelve. You're for

sure either normal being human, or guilty of thinking their bad thoughts

punishable with real prison sentences. As a result of course, I'm now

demanded to divorce my life of other critically important responsibilities, to

prove my complete innocence on these deliberately planned top secret schemes,

they didn't want You, the public to know of. A near criminal attempt, (as

documented by the now disclosed once top secret warrant), to silence my cries

for the arrest of the publicly established factual 911 masterminds - Our Mr.

bush Jr., General Ahmad, rumsfeld, myers and cheney, along with almost the

entire senior staff of disclosed as flagrantly criminal propaganda

proliferators, The Office of Special Plans.

The Warrant details by exclusion, a deliberate top secret plan on the Crown's

part, a deviant anti-government plan to silence my calls for accountability

through my world wide public addresses on the FBI answers still surrounding

the murder of thousands of American Citizens. The Crown, as an attempt to

undermine Liberty by thwarting me off my one chosen career path of Universal

Speaker, and fictionalized demon slayer - leaves you instead, this quickly

passing opportunity to stand up for the rights of another being cheated for

real, and in so doing, we'll find together, that true freedom is justice for

US all. Law stands strong for good reason, so too, does tyranny rule by

censorship for false imprisonment. Do not allow my voice for freedom's reign

to be silenced unjustly, by those who would have us falsely believe, Bush

personally didn't do the crimes we all easily now know the evidence of.

An unjust Law enslaves all Religions, for reason is beautifully Just through

your will to conceive, that God's interests are as naturally too, your own

included. My commitments to equal rights for all have never changed, and

Humanity's true commitment to defend Iraqi children to the last cowardly

murderous thieving bushite enemy, will carry on, despite the corrupted Crown's

attempt to stop real Justice from continuing. When one views public

photographs of rumsfeld's un-arrested mercenary soldiers raping an Iraqi

woman, are our rights being further violated with every passing witness? How

about witnessing that Guantanamo's torture victim Moazzam Begg, was running a

girl's school program with his wife under the female loving Taliban? [You

know, Moazzam Begg, the one and same British Citizen depicted solely by heroin

pushing donald "sexy cluster dud land mine dropper" rumsfeld, as one of our

Lord's most dangerous criminals?]

The Crown alleges in truly contemptuous silence, she's not interested in

defending the rights of those children, or victims of mass murder, while

voicing publicly in Our Court, that I, am infringing on the rights of children

somewhere else because, even though no body is perceiving the data located

anywhere on my hard drive, it still magically constitutes a personal

violation, on its own by itself, of an unjust law that others have been

demonized, robbed, then falsely imprisoned on. This irrational demand on

behalf of the Crown to Your Court, where she states her private viewings do

not infringe on children's rights, while EVERYONE else's does somehow, even if

you didn't see at all the picture judged as the reflecting mind of a true

sexual deviant, is US ALL being the auto-guilty anyway, and not firstly

innocent as it should be. See, the Judge could say to a Jury, "Your job is

not to judge the injustice committed with these blind and broken laws, but

that solely, did Top Cop Johnny have this one single picture on his computer?,

and if he did, then the bushite liars who fight our systems of accountability

through Justice to further escape real rapists, torturers, and documented

treasonous war criminals like those who for sure committed 911, get to put him

in Our prison for half a decade."

However this issue requires much for further study. It turns out my two

primary accusing officers who deal with real sicko child porn every day full

time, also support death squads against innocent families in Afghanistan to

protect the demon lies of George W. Bush, and they'd almost tell the jury

that too as blind devote disciples of the self hating bushmob cabal of neo-con

peenackers, if the Crown wasn't there to forbid the truth from being spoken.

The two abusers, the two anti-cop officers of question, lied to me, then

censored my agreement they had their word on, then, attempted to twist my

comments into something clearly I didn't mean.. and that's not even the half

of it. So, don't tell me I'm being over critical of their naked wicked evil.

If an image was an offensive act witnessed, why then is it that a genuine

concern is not with a possible victim all the time? The shocker to the

uninitiated in the battles of good against evil in these child exploitation

units, is that rarely do they have a real monetary care to follow though with

the details. - "Oh, the girl is really a woman, and the web address on the

digital image is of a server acting completely within the confines of our law,

nudist campers are nudist campers, and as for the beautifully naked young girl

taking a bubble bath smiling, er.. I mean the one looking seductive...

drat." Examples: I have many texts willfully ignored by the Crown that

articulate irrational praise for one heinous crime against God or another of

the un-elected neocon war wankers, that I, as a human, certainly don't find

myself in automatic, no free thought agreement with., right? And my objective

as Human defender isn't to censor the known criminality of the, murder

innocent people for the war profiting bushmob liars, but to expose the true

injustice committed against our better selves - US all dying slavishly

censored through Our corporate international communication network of good old

ideas left long gone dead and buried. Hammurabi's Code of Law: it's first

sentence, of his first paragraph, the number one most important Law as

example. - Here's the translation - The public figure blaming someone else

for a capital offense, such as terrorist, who uses NO EVIDENCE for PROOF, to

murder in Your name as Citizen, is the FOR SURE ENEMY, always, EVERY TIME.

And in the next four thousand years that single law has timelessly stood

unbroken, not one person has been capable to declare a true, wanting


The corporate news mandate is to take You for granted - without any given say

so. Our sold as sworn public defenders, CBC, CNN, et al, hold no opinions of

our Humanity on the needless indiscriminate bombing of populated cities, the

torturing of men women and children by un-arrested as openly confessed

complete psychotics, the thieving of hundreds of billions from America and

Iraq, and as such, tyrannically support [don't call us, will call you] commi

censorship, all done in to assist the "escape" of those truly responsible for

the crimes of 911.

When the Crown argues that disturbing images simply in your possession

constitute an absolute evaluation of your punishable character, while

denyingforbidding a Court to know what you do in your life with our time is

faulted. I hold children's rights paramount in the public defense stands I've

made for near a decade, and privately, I'm free to think my way on anything.

The Crown has no right to dictate what my private thoughts are. This

insistence on behalf of the Crown on what we all perceive individually by

judgment is determined solely by media content - is a foolish falsehood

forwarded by Our Great Lord's, Supreme Court of Canada. Example: Does not

the public videos of rumsfeld's, defended from YOUR LAW bushite soldiers,

gunning down women and children running for their lives from a mosque, or

where hundreds of unarmed defenseless families are huddled together, then

bombed by a bushite enemy grunt, a grunt who on VIDEO TAPE, moans itself to

orgasm when they all die as the innocent murdered with "ah.. dude" just speak

for itself? Sure, the celebrating bushies repeatedly depicted have no honor,

or courage, only a fascistic hatred for their fellow man - openly thieves who

die without a fighting cause for Freedom, nor a true commitment to Law - but I

would ask if We had a voice to cry in Your Court, what do You see in this

corporate World that leaves my stand professionally unworthy for

deliberations? The Crown's concern remains silent on the DOCUMENTED and

easily verifiable murder issues, when she has her regular huddles with a local

corporate reporter, discussing on who, from the community, was in Our court

challenging, a sexually dysfunctional sadomasochistic label. For the Crown to

witness and know first hand of such barbaric criminality, such as the true

perpetrators of 9/11 found revealed by THE FBI stinger, along with the rest of

the evidence trail that all leads directly to the Whitehouse, is a Crown who

does not hold Canadian's freedom in check, or a care for our soldier aged sons

and daughters conflicting near death. But to side instead, as they are hiding

behind the honorable Crown's position, a small group of four or five dim

blips, attempting they are to silence these calls for real freedom for the

masses. I am a proud and honorable man who objects to furthering bush's war

crime aims with this lifeless corporate tyranny of enslavement through whoring

for the dark foreboding wills of Our Mr. bush Jr.. Censorship is the tool of

tyrants, while I beckon a new light for peace by communicating. Please, I beg

you, do not allow them to silence my objections to have us unjustly

imprisoning myself, while bringing great hardship to my immediate family by

denying the truth be spoken publicly in my defense on why I'm in the Court

room, and what is documented irrespective of their spin doctoring and label


Where is the violation of a child's rights, specifically, when the Crown's

crew gleefully ponder images she'll use to silence the words of Johnny Wizard

by prison sentence? Where? No, where?

Commanding our public indignation for those who disrespect human rights she

will use as her weapon, all the while, hidden from the jury, and the judge, a

secret contempt for thousands of innocent murder victims denied my

unchallenged demands for real Justice. No officer of our laws anywhere have

found fault with my PUBLIC summation, documented fully, on who, and how, 9/11

was truly orchestrated. A Crown stuck committed to global bushite tyranny Vs.

a Truth seeker of the highest order. Come to the trial! Tell your friends!

Tell your neighbors! The People vs. an overburdened unjust Crown, and a near

treasonous national security officer, who wrote in the original top secret

warrant nobody was suppose to see, it'd be so much easier to help bush escape

arrest by avoiding the public accountability process entirely. The once top

secret Johnny Wizard Warrant is freely available with most names being

detracted, to protect the innocent until proven guilty. A traitor to God and

Country the Crown and one National Security officer potentially is in this top

secret bush administration conspiracy endeavor, to serve by bushite criminal

decree up here in defenseless Canada. For as potential accessories to first

degree mass murder, they are stuck attempting to undermine Canada's National

Security Services, the FBI, the People, US, all to further unjustly sacrifice,

more of our uninformed sons and daughters for further bounty, as substantiated

real world criminal, bushite evils. I say no. Help me get public recognition

through talk radio, take a stand for your fellow man, and help a Jury in

Winnipeg learn of who I am, and why they are forbidden to know what's truly

going on, and you'll be helping yourself to a better future. My principle

allegations against George W. Bush require a qualified and adapt security

officer no more that forty three minutes to verify. Namely, bush's business

partner, General Ahmad funded 911's "mastermind" "ringleader" Atta, and was

also sent, the General was, from the Whitehouse on behalf of bush to the

Taliban stating, no evidence will be brought against Laden as the accused,

therefore an innocent man in Christ. And, that as MSNBC reported of the top

secret documents provided to th

Report this post as:

Demon Bush Lies

by J. Wizard Sunday, Jan. 01, 2006 at 8:00 PM

video: windows media at

Report this post as:


by J. Wizard Sunday, Jan. 01, 2006 at 8:00 PM

audio: MP3 at

Report this post as:


by J. Wizard Sunday, Jan. 01, 2006 at 8:00 PM

audio: MP3 at

Report this post as:

Local News


lausd whistle blower A10 11:58PM

Website Upgrade A10 3:02AM

Help KCET and UCLA identify 60s-70s Chicano images A04 1:02PM

UCLA Luskin: Casting Youth Justice in a Different Light A02 11:58AM

Change Links April 2018 A01 11:27AM

Nuclear Shutdown News March 2018 M31 6:57PM

Join The Protest Rally in Glendale on April 10, 2018! M29 7:00PM

Join The Protest Rally in Glendale on April 10, 2018! M29 6:38PM

Spring 2018 National Immigrant Solidarity Network News Alert! M19 2:02PM

Anti-Eviction Mapping Project Shows Shocking Eviction Trends in L.A. M16 5:40PM

Steve Mnuchin video at UCLA released M15 12:34AM

Actress and Philanthropist Tanna Frederick Hosts Project Save Our Surf Beach Clean Ups M06 12:10PM

After Being Told He's 'Full of Sh*t' at School Event, Mnuchin Demands UCLA Suppress Video M02 11:44AM

Resolution of the Rent Strike in Boyle Heights M01 6:28PM

What Big Brother Knows About You and What You Can Do About It M01 3:30PM

Step Up As LAPD Chief Charlie Beck Steps Down F14 2:44PM

Our House Grief Support Center Hosts 9th Annual Run For Hope, April 29 F13 12:51PM

Don’t let this LA County Probation Department overhaul proposal sit on the shelf F13 11:04AM

Echo Park Residents Sue LA Over Controversial Development F12 8:51AM

Former Signal Hill police officer pleads guilty in road-rage incident in Irvine F09 10:25PM

Calif. Police Accused of 'Collusion' With Neo-Nazis After Release of Court Documents F09 7:14PM

Center for the Study of Political Graphics exhibit on Police Abuse posters F07 9:50AM

City Agrees to Settle Lawsuit Claiming Pasadena Police Officer Had His Sister Falsely Arre F04 3:17PM

Professor's Study Highlights Health Risks of Urban Oil Drilling F04 12:42PM

Claims paid involving Pasadena Police Department 2014 to present F04 10:52AM

Pasadenans - get your license plate reader records from police F03 11:11PM

LA Times Homicide Report F03 1:57PM

More Local News...

Other/Breaking News

The Shortwave Report 04/27/18 Listen Globally! A26 4:03PM

Federal Bank Examiner FDIC recalls year long 1999 robbery in 2017 A26 3:24PM

Doxa du lobby A25 2:03AM

Tech workers organize A24 6:24PM

Architect Stephen Francis Jones A24 3:01PM

UN Forum Wrestles with Economic Policies 10 Years After Financial Crisis Islands Call for A24 12:34PM

Xyloglossie attitudinale A23 8:07AM

What does the Quran Say About Islamic Dress?? A21 4:15PM

Biodiversité ou la nature privatisée A20 11:22AM

The Market is a Universal Totalitarian Religion A20 7:14AM

Book Available about Hispanics and US Civil War by National Park Service A19 5:52PM

The Shortwave Report 04/20/18 Listen Globally! A19 4:01PM

The Republican 'Prolife' Party Is the Party of War, Execution, and Bear Cub Murder A19 11:48AM

Neurogenèse involutive A18 9:21AM

Paraphysique de la dictature étatique A16 10:13AM

Book Review: "The New Bonapartists" A16 3:45AM

The West Must Take the First Steps to Russia A14 12:25PM

Théorie générale de la révolution ou hommage à feu Mikhaïl Bakounine A14 3:30AM

The Shortwave Report 04/13/18 Listen Globally! A12 3:50PM

“Lost in a Dream” Singing Competition Winner to Be Chosen on April 15 for ,000 Prize! A12 3:48PM

The World Dependent on Central Banks A12 4:43AM

Ohio Governor Race: Dennis Kucinich & Richard Cordray Run Against Mike DeWine A11 9:40PM

March 2018 Honduras Coup Again Update A10 10:52PM

Apologie du zadisme insurrectionnel A10 3:33PM

ICE contract with license plate reader company A10 1:14PM

Palimpseste sisyphéen A09 11:23PM

Black Portraiture(S) IV: The Color of Silence...Cuba No...Cambridge Yes A09 5:32AM

Prohibiting Micro-Second Betting on the Exchanges A09 4:18AM

More Breaking News...
© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy