Working on this new server in php7...
imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

white themeblack themered themetheme help
About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
Features
latest news
best of news
syndication
commentary


KILLRADIO

VozMob

ABCF LA

A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List

LAAMN List




IMC Network:

Original Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
printable version - js reader version - view hidden posts - tags and related articles


View article without comments

Bob Avakian on Richard Pryor

by duko Tuesday, Dec. 13, 2005 at 1:58 AM

Recently I was reading reports of police assaults on Black people and of Black people fighting against the police in Memphis and Miami. This called to mind a story I was told a while back. A rookie cop was riding in his police car with his veteran partner when a report came in that there was a Black man in the vicinity with a gun. As their car screeched around the corner, a young Black man suddenly appeared sprinting up an alley--into a dead end. "Shoot him!", the older cop screamed, "Go on, shoot him-- it's free!" "It's free!" Think about that for a second. "It's free!" In other words, here's a chance that gets a pig to sweating and salivating with anticipation--a chance to "kill a nigger" with the already provided cover that a Black man--a Black man, any Black man--was reported in the area with a gun. This is an opportunity too good to pass up: "Go on, shoot him--it's free!"

Richard Pryor Routines...or Why Pigs Are Pigs

By Bob Avakian

Revolutionary Worker #928, October 19, 1997

The following is an excerpt from "Hill Street Bullshit, Richard Pryor Routines, and the Real Deal" by Bob Avakian, Chairman of the RCP. The complete essay, written in 1983, is in the book, Reflections, Sketches & Provocations by Bob Avakian.

Recently I was reading reports of police assaults on Black people and of Black people fighting against the police in Memphis and Miami. This called to mind a story I was told a while back. A rookie cop was riding in his police car with his veteran partner when a report came in that there was a Black man in the vicinity with a gun. As their car screeched around the corner, a young Black man suddenly appeared sprinting up an alley--into a dead end. "Shoot him!", the older cop screamed, "Go on, shoot him-- it's free!"

"It's free!" Think about that for a second. "It's free!" In other words, here's a chance that gets a pig to sweating and salivating with anticipation--a chance to "kill a nigger" with the already provided cover that a Black man--a Black man, any Black man--was reported in the area with a gun. This is an opportunity too good to pass up: "Go on, shoot him--it's free!"

Well, in this case, the rookie was not ready for that--perhaps he was one of those rare ones who joins a police force actually believing the "serve and protect" bullshit--and that particular Black man did not die that day. But one of the most telling things about this whole incident is the fallout from it: The rookie cop had to resign. If he wasn't ready and willing--if he didn't have the proper attitude to do what his veteran partner was calling for, what came naturally to the seasoned "peace officer," what any pig in his place and in a pig's right mind would do--then there was no place for him on the force. It was he, the rookie who hadn't learned, and couldn't learn it seems, what it's all about--it was he who was the outcast and felt he had to resign.

Pigs are pigs. Of course, that's an image, a symbol--in the most literal sense they are human beings, but they are human beings with a murderer's mentality, sanctioned, disciplined, unleashed by the ruling class of society to keep the oppressed in line, through terror whenever necessary and as the "bottom line," as they like to say. Terror against the oppressed is even a special reward for "carrying out the dangerous and thankless duty" of being the "thin blue line" between "civilization on the one side and anarchy and lawlessness on the other." Think about it once again: Terror against the oppressed is not just part of the job, it's also a reward. That is one of the deeper meanings of the story at the start: "Go on, shoot him--it's free!"

Maybe some liberals (of the "left" or "right") will object that these stories I've recounted are after all only stories, and even if we allow that they themselves are true stories, still they are only a few cases--the famous "isolated incidents" perhaps. Well, anyone who still really thinks that, or says it, has got to answer one basic question about the following Richard Pryor routine:

"Cops put a hurtin' on your ass, man, you know. They really degrade you. White folks don't believe that shit, don't believe cops degrade;--`Ah, come on, those beatings, those people were resisting arrest. I'm tired of this harassment of police officers.' Cause the police live in your neighborhood, see, and you be knowin' 'em as Officer Timpson. `Hello Officer Timpson, going bowling tonight? Yes, uh, nice Pinto you have, ha, ha, ha.' Niggers* don't know 'em like that. See, white folks get a ticket, they pull over, `Hey, Officer, yes, glad to be of help, here you go.' A nigger got to be talkin' 'bout `I AM REACH-ING INTO MY POCK-ET FOR MY LICENSE--'cause I don't wanna be no motherfuckin' accident!'

"Police degrade you. I don't know, you know, it's often you wonder why a nigger don't go completely mad. No, you do. You get your shit together, you work all week, right, then you get dressed--maybe say a cat make $125 a week, get $80 if he lucky, right, and he go out, get clean, be drivin' with his old lady, goin' out to a club, and the police pull over, `Get outta the car, there was a robbery--nigger look just like you. Alright, put your hands up, take your pants down, spread your cheeks!' Now, what nigger feel like havin' fun after that? `No, let's just go home, baby.' You go home and beat your kids and shit--you gonna take that shit out on somebody." from That Nigger's* Crazy, 1974

The question is this: Why, at the crucial points of this routine, does Pryor's audience erupt in tense, knowing laughter, coupled with prolonged applause? Can it be for any other reason than the fact that Pryor has indeed captured and concentrated--with humor, higher than life, as art should be, but the stone truth, all too true, at the same time--a situation that is typical for the masses of Black people in the U.S.? Something which, if it has not happened directly to them (and the odds are pretty good that it has), is subject to happen to them tomorrow, or the next day, and has already happened to a relative or friend. To anyone who wants to defend the police, to say nothing of prettifying them, showing them as just ordinary human beings, etc., etc., ad nauseam; and even anyone who wants to raise pious doubts and petty amendments about calling them what they are, without reservation or apology; you can't get around this question: you have to confront it straight up. And don't tell me Pryor's audiences aren't a fair representation: The response will always be the same from any audience that includes a significant number of the masses of Black people, or other oppressed masses (as, in fact, is the case with the audience for Pryor's live performances).

A relevant fact here, drawn directly from "real life." I read in a recent RW, the report about the announcement by the Los Angeles District Attorney that--once again--no charges would be brought against the two pigs who beat and choked a 28- year-old Black man, Larry Morris, to death without any justification, even according to the authorities. The RW article went on to expose that "This is just the latest in more than 200 `investigations' of police murders [that is, murders of people by police] since the forming of the D.A.'s `Operation Rollout.' This program has so far endorsed the police's right to kill every time." And after everything else, we're still bound to hear from some quarters how this is just Los Angeles, where the police are known to be particularly brutal etc., etc. This really shouldn't have to be answered, but it does, so let me answer it by turning again to a Richard Pryor routine, this one from the same performance, in Washington, D.C. in 1978, as the one cited at the start of this article:

"Police in L.A., man, they got a chokehold they use on motherfuckers. Do they do it here, do they choke you to death? (Voices from the audience, many voices from the audience: `Yeah!') That's some weird shit. Cause I didn't know it was a death penalty to have a parking ticket."

But for the masses of Black people in this "great land of freedom and justice for all" it can be--and it has been for hundreds, at least, every year. Of course, this kind of freedom and justice is not reserved for Black people alone in the U.S., though they are special "beneficiaries" of it. It also lashes out and ensnares millions of the masses of other oppressed nationalities, immigrants (so-called "legal" as well as so-called "illegal") and in general those who are without wealth and therefore without power, including many white people, for whom Officer Timpson is hardly a friend, either.

In short, the armed force of the bourgeois state exists for the purpose of suppressing, by force and arms, the proletariat and all those who would step out of line and challenge this "great way of life" founded on robbery and murder, not only within the U.S. itself but throughout the world. And that, simply, is why pigs are pigs, and will always be pigs--until systems that need such pigs are abolished from the earth. A hard truth--but a liberating truth.

* This material is reproduced here as it was performed by Richard Pryor at the time, including the use of the word "nigger"; this is for the sake of accuracy and not out of any disrespect for his feeling, after a trip to Africa, that he should no longer use the word "nigger" because it is dehumanizing.

Send us your comments.

This article is posted in English and Spanish on Revolution Online
http://revcom.us
Write: Box 3486, Merchandise Mart, Chicago, IL 60654
Phone: 773-227-4066 Fax: 773-227-4497

Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


The RCP Suppoorted the Los Angles Riots and other Terrorism

by Z Tuesday, Dec. 13, 2005 at 4:34 PM

*The RCP called the Los Angeles Riots of 1992 "a beautiful civic action"

*The RCP supported the violence of Sendero Luminoso a violent communist group that killed nearly 30,000 Quechua, campesinos and government officials, including chopping people to death with machetes.

*The RCP, in its publications said that they would reeducate homosexuals.

*the RCP supports Mao and the Gang of 4. While Mao ordered the Great Leap Forward which killed between 16 million and 80 million rural Chinese peasants, he also started the falesly named Cultural Revolution which the Gang of 4 continued. Estimates vary on the number of dead but almost all voices condemn this 10 year period from 1966-1976. Mao's wife was one of the leaders of the Gang of 4.

*Police violence is wrong and must be punished, but keep in mind that police help guard abortion clinics as well as other duties.

*The RCP falesly claims the Dali Lama is a slave naster and goes on to support the invasion of Tibet by the Chinese People's Liberation Army.

Do not get involved with the RCP! They are also agaisnt anarchists and Ralph Nader!
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


Avakian

by Tramp Tuesday, Dec. 13, 2005 at 5:31 PM

No one gives a crap was juvenile sewage like Bob Avakaian thinks about anything. Bob only mouths off to hear himself.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


Richard and Bob are both comedians

by :-) Tuesday, Dec. 13, 2005 at 5:41 PM

but only one of them is funny.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


Why is the Level of IMC Debate So Low?

by Linda Flores Tuesday, Dec. 20, 2005 at 4:45 AM
comolaflores@yahoo.com

Dear Z,

You Post Accusations Without Proof!

You Accuse a Group of Supporting Terrorism, A Serious Accusation in Post-9/11 America!

You Invent and Slander!

... but seriously, folks, I go to a lot of IMC comment threads and there are all kinds of personal attacks (really low-level and petty, too) and half-truths mixed in with prejudices mixed in with actual legitimate criticisms and true stuff that occasionally appears.
Even when people don't pull that, their attempts at debate have no content to them at all.
And then there are the inventions.
I won't go into all of them, because it legitimizes them -- I'll just say that if you can't provide actual proof of them, you don't have any right to make them.
The RCP has criticized the wrong position that it used to hold on homosexuality, in quite a few places. But even when they still held this wrong position, it never included anything like "re-educating" -- and party spokespeople have said, in interviews, that things like that, that smack of "bedroom police", are actually opposed to what the RCP is about. It was still wrong, but go looking for calls to "re-educate" or anything like it, and you'll come up empty.
But you knew that -- that's why you didn't bother to provide proof.
Neither has anything the RCP has ever written, or said, "oppose anarchists" -- though you can find a lot of writings that have criticisms of anarchism as a political line and strategy that can actually represent a liberating way out of what we live under. If you can't tell the difference, that's not very good.

Oh, but wait -- the RCP opposes Nader? Oh my god -- quick, cancel my subscription right now!


There are a few accusations, though, that don't need refuting -- because anyone who reads Revolution newspaper, formerly known as the Revolutionary Worker (clearly no one on this board) would know that they are true.
For example, the RCP upheld the L.A. rebellion in '92, and proudly.
And they also fight for people to look at the history of the brutal repression under the Dalai Lama that many people see as enlightened and egalitarian.

And .....

Accusations of "cult" can only be made by those who have not read any stuff by Avakian, since one of the things he emphases for his readers is the danger of turning science into dogma, the danger of a rigid and mechanical method, and the need for a society where debate and dissent are fostered and promoted. This isn't lip service, it's an integral part of the method he's promoting.
Now, does "Bob Avakian is a dummy" sound like part of an environment where actual discussion is occurring? Let alone the shameful way that Z repeats anti-communist slander without even attempting to verify it. Do you use this method with every topic, or is it just when dealing with communism? It should give you pause that the loudest and most insistent purveyor of anti-communism are the rulers of this system - the most unrepentant capitalists ever. Do you think that WMDs are the only thing they've lied to you about?

Seriously, people -- it's one thing to get into a disagreement about what you read here. I've seen comment forums go hundreds of posts long on all kinds of questions of theory, including debate on all kinds of isms versus each other, which strategy will liberate us, etc etc.

Fuck, say what you disagree with about what this artice is saying --
"But for the masses of Black people in this "great land of freedom and justice for all" it can be--and it has been for hundreds, at least, every year. Of course, this kind of freedom and justice is not reserved for Black people alone in the U.S., though they are special "beneficiaries" of it. It also lashes out and ensnares millions of the masses of other oppressed nationalities, immigrants (so-called "legal" as well as so-called "illegal") and in general those who are without wealth and therefore without power, including many white people, for whom Officer Timpson is hardly a friend, either."

(Z does, in defending cops by saying they also defend abortion clinics. I got a response to this:
a) They very often do not -- as I'm sure people working clinic defense will tell you, and as I personally have observed; and
b) That's like saying that, yeah, slavemasters oppressed their slaves, but they also fed them. I think we can figure out how to defend clinics without relying on brutal oppressors to do it.

See, that's actual debate! Try it -- it's necessary if we want to move forward and maybe even find the truth sometimes.

Now, can anyone here even get out of the 3rd grade long enough to do that?

-- Linda Flores
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


Hold on

by fresca Tuesday, Dec. 20, 2005 at 7:39 AM

Do any serious people actually listen to much less follow this ridiculous character Avakian?

Is he even for real or just some lame parody.

And what's with the "chairman" deal? Chairman of what exactly?

I can't believe there are people around who actually still call themselves communists.

it's just plain silly.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


communism

by Worker Tuesday, Dec. 20, 2005 at 3:38 PM

I think the control of the means of production by the work force is a valid concept. That's at the heart of communism. This, to capitalist sectors, is
a deadly idea.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


maybe

by fresca Tuesday, Dec. 20, 2005 at 4:25 PM

"I think the control of the means of production by the work force is a valid concept. "

Except that it hasn't and can't happen over any meaningful length of time.

Capitol or management ALWAYS rises up. It's simple human nature.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


human nature

by Worker Tuesday, Dec. 20, 2005 at 4:50 PM

Yes there are people who have that urge to covet rather than share, steal, rather than earn and lie rather than tell the truth. It is a social disease. Human culture can shift its priorities and treat these maladies through cultural accommodation. We have changed a bit from monkeys I hope.
A rule of law rather than a rule by royal classes is a good beginning. The workforce is the blood and bones of the people. We have little need of these parasites.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


Communist Tapeworms

by Tramp Tuesday, Dec. 20, 2005 at 8:10 PM

You said: "Yes there are people who have that urge to covet rather than share, steal, rather than earn and lie rather than tell the truth. It is a social disease. Human culture can shift its priorities and treat these maladies through cultural accommodation. We have changed a bit from monkeys I hope. A rule of law rather than a rule by royal classes is a good beginning. The workforce is the blood and bones of the people. We have little need of these parasites."


What a load of juvenile dog squeeze. You maliciously assume that those who are in management, or rise to management (or worse yet, OWNERSHIP) of a production resource are by default thieves and liars. That's an incorrect assumption because there are plenty of counter examples. It's also fed by a cynical and immature sense of 'class warfare' and petty victimhood.

Achievers exist, whether you like it or not. If you aren't an achiever it's fair to say that in most cases your own decision making process kept you where you are. Many people are actually programmed for failure. In any event, those who succeed (the people you refer to as "parasites") add to the economy and the value of their society. Acievement is not a "social disease' and only a mental leper would believe that. Those who do not achieve depend on those who do... THEY are the real parasites.

"cultural accomodation"... Go ahead and tell everyone what you really mean... violent overthrow of achievers by a mob of functionally illiterate miscreants.

Communists are pathetic.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


slow down

by Worker Tuesday, Dec. 20, 2005 at 10:01 PM

"-Acievement [sic] is not a "social disease' and only a mental leper would believe that. Those who do not achieve depend on those who do... THEY are the real parasites. "
Come now 'Tramp' I was talking about lying ,thieving, and greedy people and a return to rule of law. Your getting way ahead of me.
We can resort to violent over throw after all other options are closed.

Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


Worker

by Tramp Tuesday, Dec. 20, 2005 at 10:06 PM

"a return to rule of law" ... That's funny. Not sure if you've noticed but we already have laws that govern business and its conduct. Tens of thousands of them. There are hordes of government employees enforcing them every day.

"Your getting way ahead of me. " ... Correct. Capitalism has always been way ahead of Communism.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


nope I haven't noticed

by Worker Tuesday, Dec. 20, 2005 at 10:19 PM

if laws were enforced the entire Bush family would be wearing jump suits.
Starting with Prescot Bush and his Union bank operations during the great patriotic war and then the Bush family during BCCI. And then the S & L rip off.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


Worker

by Tramp Wednesday, Dec. 21, 2005 at 7:49 PM

Maybe you should be in a jumpsuit... for sedition.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


"for sedition"

by Proud Seditionist Wednesday, Dec. 21, 2005 at 7:58 PM

Maybe the seditionists have something here.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


re: human nature

by johnk Wednesday, Dec. 21, 2005 at 8:21 PM

re: human nature...
chaco10.jpg, image/jpeg, 472x319

There's not much "human nature" in capitalism. Capitalism, particularly this industrial form of capitalism we know today, is a very recent development.

"Human nature" goes back for hundreds of thousands of years, to the earliest humans, but, industrial capitalism goes back only decades to the mid 1800s, maybe back to the 1600s if you stretch the definition to include mercantile capitalism.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


re: Achievers

by johnk Wednesday, Dec. 21, 2005 at 8:39 PM

From the Big Lebowski, a very funny movie:

Lebowski: "I hope that my wife will someday learn to live on her allowance, which is ample, but if she doesn't, sir, that will be her problem, not mine, just as your rug is your problem, just as every bum's lot in life is his own responsibility regardless of whom he chooses to blame. I didn't blame anyone for the loss of my legs, some chinaman in Korea took them from me but I went out and achieved anyway. I can't solve your problems, sir, only you can."

Later.... "It's funny. I can look back on a life of achievement, on challenges met, competitors bested, obstacles overcome. I've accomplished more than most men, and without the use of my legs. What. . . What makes a man, Mr. Lebowski?"

Of course, it turns out that the big Lebowski is a fraud, living off his wife's wealth and administering the Foundation.

Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


johnk

by Tramp Wednesday, Dec. 21, 2005 at 9:55 PM

Hilarious! Your only counter argument is a fictional scenario in a Hollywood movie?

Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


better than yours

by knew it Wednesday, Dec. 21, 2005 at 10:04 PM

Certainly better than assigning terms like sedition to people who want rule of law.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


"knew it" doesn't know Jack..

by Tramp Wednesday, Dec. 21, 2005 at 11:55 PM

Give it a rest, loser. The Left is EXPERT at assigning lables to people.


We already have the rule of law. Just because you haven't been able to string up George Bush from a tree doesn't mean we don't have rule of law. It's petty and stupid to suggest that.

Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


"We already have the rule of law"

by Tramp is ill informed Thursday, Dec. 22, 2005 at 12:11 AM

You most likely mean law enforcement, not rule of law. A distinction apparently lost on 'Tramp' as the previous posts refer.
'
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


Cosmic idiot learns how to type

by Tramp Thursday, Dec. 22, 2005 at 1:11 AM

Bull cookies... Our government leadership, Congress, etc... is constrained in their actions by law. That is the rule of law. Likewise, the actions of citizens are also constrained by law. Happy now?

Now, other than playing one sentence word games, does your life here have a point? Or do you just want to blather about how much you hate the president?
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


well not exactly

by Trampunisms Thursday, Dec. 22, 2005 at 1:18 AM

I mean like where is the law enforcement to such things like the release of the Cuban 5?
The lawyers who can now see the Gitmo detainees. Just to name a few.
You obviously have some kind of double vision between rule of law and the selective use of law enforcement.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


Tramp, please

by johnk Thursday, Dec. 22, 2005 at 8:46 AM

I can go for thousands upon thousands of words on your rhetoric. I just don't have the time lately. If you want an argument, search for johnk, read a few dozen posts, and get real angry. It's almost as good as getting a fresh dose of my bile. Have a lousy day, tramp.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


johnk

by Tramp Thursday, Dec. 22, 2005 at 7:51 PM

"bile".... Accurate description of your drivel.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


Back to my original point

by johnk Thursday, Dec. 22, 2005 at 10:25 PM

The point of my quotes from The Big Lebowsky were to demonstrae.... oh, why even explain it. Tramp's arguments are his regurgitations of someone else's vomit. "Achievers"... That's lingo from the 1980s. That vomit he's barfing back up, isn't even fresh vomit.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


johnk

by Tramp Thursday, Dec. 22, 2005 at 11:34 PM

Yeah... you're right... "achievers".. what a dated concept! Who needs achievers in a Marxist society!
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


"Achievers" in Marxism

by johnk Friday, Dec. 23, 2005 at 10:40 AM

I think in the communist utopia, people are supposed to be free to achieve their maximum potential, because their basic needs are satisfied with a minimal amount of collective effort. That's the theory, at least.

In your rhetoric, however, "achievement" implies financial gains. An "achiever" is someone who has achieved some measure of wealth. Whether they achieved their personal goals, or fulfilled their "calling" is secondary to making money.

At best, self-fulfillment becomes a privilege available only to those who have achieved some measure of wealth, so they can "buy their freedom" to do something outside of the sphere of the market. Everyone else is "stuck" working too many hours for low wages, or working instead of raising kids, or scrambling for work due to layoffs or unemployment.

When countries switch from socialistic to capitalist, at least in Europe, the number of hours people work increases. People have less free time. They have more consumer options. That seems to be the common trade-off.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


johnk

by Tramp Friday, Dec. 23, 2005 at 4:54 PM

You incorrectly assume that by 'achievement' I referred specifically to financial success. In fact, if you reread my original posting, you'll see that I specifically referred to people who rise to management (or even ownership) positions. This has less to do with wealth that it has to do with setting goals and succeeding.The fact is that the vast majority of managers and business owners are NOT wealthy.

Marxism effectively squelches competition, thereby removing much of the motivation for becoming a manager and all of the motivation to own a business. Economically, Marxism is not about individual achievement (nor philosophically even about the individual). Socialism is about collectives and groups, not empowerment and building opportunity. Ultimately it never fails to end in anything but a Welfare State with enormous control over individual liberty.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


Socialism

by johnk Friday, Dec. 23, 2005 at 11:03 PM

See, you took it right back to the issue of business.

Under a socialist system, you do have less business, but it's not like people stop operating businesses. Even in the USSR, there were small businesses that operated in the black market.

As for management, socialist bureacracy encourages people to become "managers" of some kind of other. That was their standard of "achievement" -- to become some kind of official, or a big shot in the Party. I imagine it is the same kind of person who succeeds in that environment who succeeds in a large multinational corporation.

I don't really see a big difference between loyalty to The Party and loyalty to a big company and loyalty to their respective systems.

Likewise, if you're not inclined to be in the big system, what does it really matter if the big system is capitalist or socialist? Under capitalism, if you own a little business, you don't criticise people in power, because that can screw up business. Under socialism, if you own a little black market operation, you don't criticize the power openly, because some suckup toadie might call the cops.

The systems, as they exist, aren't that different.

Under socialism, you work hard probably for the government, and the state taxes you a lot, and then you get "free" health care, which you obviously were taxed for. Under capitalism, you work hard, and the insurance company charges you up the wazoo, and when you think you're going to get health care, you have to pay, again, for a lawyer to sue the damned company so you can get that "free" health care.

Under socialism, it's hard to buy a house, or really to even own anything more than a little plot of land with a house on it, but you can get a little apartment, even if you are very very poor. Under capitalism, you're free to put yourself into debt with a bank for $500,000 for a 1,200 square foot house... or $250,000 for a 1,200 ft double wide shack. Or you move into a tiny trailer, and maybe put an American flag on your window. "Freedom." LOLz.

Under socialism, poor people complain about being poor and unable to get anything nice to buy. Under capitalism, everyone complains about the poor person who is sleeping on the sidewalk and begging for money. The poor people worry about becoming that person.

Under socialism, you have a very boring life with little risk. Under capitalism, you get to experience the excitement of unemployment or losing your pension.

Here's my quote about the welfare state: "the welfare state is the only state worth having."
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


Cartoon

by johnk Saturday, Dec. 24, 2005 at 12:18 AM

Cartoon...
icon_the_boss.gif, image/gif, 236x81

Related to above.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy