imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

white themeblack themered themetheme help
About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
Features
latest news
best of news
syndication
commentary


KILLRADIO

VozMob

ABCF LA

A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List

LAAMN List




IMC Network:

Original Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
printable version - js reader version - view hidden posts - tags and related articles

The US / Colombia Plot Against Venezuela

by JAMES PETRAS Thursday, Jan. 27, 2005 at 10:16 AM

A major diplomatic and political conflict has exploded between Colombia and Venezuela after the revelation of a Colombian overnment covert operation in Venezuela, involving the recruitment of Venezuelan military and security officers in the kidnapping of a Colombian leftist leader.

~~~~~ At the end of this article is an announcement of

a city-wide planning meeting to mobilize to defend

Venezuela. U.S. intervention against Venezuela is

escalating. Please see the announcement at the end of

the Petras article and please attend the planning

meeting... don white CISPES-LA~~~~~~





January 25, 2005

The Granda Kidnapping Explodes

The US / Colombia Plot Against Venezuela

By JAMES PETRAS

A major diplomatic and political conflict has exploded

between Colombia and Venezuela after the revelation of

a Colombian government covert operation in Venezuela,

involving the recruitment of Venezuelan military and

security officers in the kidnapping of a Colombian

leftist leader. Following an investigation by the

Venezuelan Ministry of Interior and reports and

testimony from journalists and other knowledgeable

political observers it was determined that the highest

echelons of the Colombian government, including

President Uribe, planned and executed this onslaught

on Venezuelan sovereignty.

Once direct Colombian involvement was established, the

Venezuelan government demanded a public apology from

the Colombian government while seeking a diplomatic

solution by blaming Colombian Presidential advisers.

The Colombian regime took the offensive, launching an

aggressive defense of its involvement in the violation

of Venezuelan sovereignty and, beyond that, seeking to

establish in advance, under the rationale of "national

security" the legitimacy of future acts of aggression.

As a result President Chavez has recalled the

Venezuelan Ambassador from Bogota, suspended all

state-to-state commercial and political agreements

pending an official state apology. In response the US

Government gave unconditional support to Colombian

violation of Venezuelan sovereignty and urged the

Uribe regime to push the conflict further. What began

as a diplomatic conflict over a specific incident has

turned into a major, defining crises in US and Latin

American political relations with potentially

explosive military, economic and political

consequences for the entire region.

In justifying the kidnapping of Rodrigo Granda, the

Colombian leftist leader, the Uribe regime has

promulgated a new foreign policy doctrine which echoes

that of the Bush Administration: the right of

unilateral intervention in any country in which the

Colombian government perceives or claims is harboring

or providing refuge to political adversaries (which

the regime labels as "terrorists") which might

threaten the security of the state. The Uribe doctrine

of unilateral intervention echoes the preventive war

speech, enunciated in late 2001 by President Bush.

Clearly Uribe's action and pronouncement is profoundly

influenced by the dominance that Washington exercises

over the Uribe regime's policies through its extended

billion dollar military aid program and deep

penetration of the entire political-defense apparatus.

Uribe's offensive military doctrine involves several

major policy propositions:

1.) The right to violate any country's sovereignty,

including the use of force and violence, directly or

in cooperation with local mercenaries.

2.) The right to recruit and subvert military and

security officials to serve the interests of the

Colombian state.

3.) The right to allocate funds to bounty hunters or

"third parties" to engage in illegal violent acts

within a target country.

4.) The assertion of the supremacy of Colombian laws,

decrees and policies over and against the sovereign

laws of the intervened country.

The Uribe doctrine clearly echoes Washington's global

pronouncements. While the immediate point of

aggression involves Colombia's relations to Venezuela,

the Uribe doctrine lays the basis for unilateral

military intervention anywhere in the hemisphere.

Uribe's doctrine is a threat to sovereignty of any

country in the hemisphere: its intervention in

Venezuela and the justification provides a precedent

for future aggression.

Colombia's adoption and implementation of the

extraterritorial policy as part of its strategy of

unilateral intervention is not coincidental, as the

Colombian security forces have been trained and

advised by US and Israeli secret agencies. More

directly, through its billion dollar military aid

program Washington is in a command-and-control

position within all sectors of the Colombian state and

thus able to determine the security doctrine of the

Uribe regime. More important Uribe has been a

long-time, large-scale practitioner of death squad

politics prior to his ascendancy to the Presidency and

prior to receiving large scale US aid. By borrowing

the Bush Doctrine from his patron-state, Uribe has

internationalized the terror practices which he has

pursued for the past 20 years within Colombia.

Prior to the recent spate of high profile trans-border

kidnapping (Trinidad in Ecuador, Granda in Venezuela),

the Uribe regime has engaged in frequent

interventions, kidnapping and assassinating popular

leaders and soldiers from bordering countries, and

providing material and political support to would-be

'golpistas', especially in Venezuela. Dozens of

Colombian refugees fleeing marauding death squads have

been pursued into Venezuela and killed or kidnapped

over the past three years by Colombian paramilitary

and security forces. Six Venezuelan soldiers were

killed by Colombian security forces in an

"unexplained" incident. More recently, in 2004, over

130 Colombian paramilitary forces and other irregulars

were infiltrated into Venezuela to engage in terrorist

violence ­ to trigger action by Venezuelan-US

coup-makers. Shortly thereafter Colombian security

forces and the US CIA intervened in Ecuador to kidnap

a former peace negotiator of the FARC, Colombia's

major guerrilla group.

What is new and more ominous is that the Uribe

regime's de facto policy of extra-territoriality has

been converted into a de jure strategic doctrine of

unilateral military intervention. Colombia no longer

pretends to be engaged in a "covert" selective policy

of violating other countries sovereignty but has

publicly declared the supremacy of its laws and the

right to apply them anywhere in the world where it

unilaterally declares its case for national security.

Colombia's gross violations of Venezuelan and

Ecuadorian sovereignty is a policy clearly endorsed

and dictated at the highest levels of the Colombian

state ­ exclusively the prerogative of President Uribe

­ and endorsed at the highest level of the US

government by its principal diplomatic spokesperson in

Colombia, Ambassador Woods ("We endorse Uribe's action

100%"). The 'Granda incident' is not simply an

isolated diplomatic incident which can be resolved

through good faith bilateral negotiations. The

kidnapping is part of a larger strategy involving

preparations ­ ideological, political and military ­

for a large-scale, political-military confrontation

with Venezuela.

The enunciation and practice of the Uribe Doctrine has

several purposes. One is in line with US and Colombian

elite policy: To overthrow the Chavez regime. Chavez

opposes the US wars in Iraq and Afghanistan as well as

its plans to invade Iran. In Latin America, Chavez

opposes the US-dominated Free Trade of the Americas

Pact. Secondly the Uribe doctrine seeks to destroy

Cuban-Venezuelan trade ties, in order to undermine the

Cuban revolutionary government. Thirdly the Uribe

doctrine is aimed at maintaining Venezuela as an

exclusive oil exporter to the US ­ at a time when the

Chavez government has signed trade agreements to

diversify its oil markets to China and elsewhere.

Fourthly, and most probably most important from the

strict perspective of the Uribe regime's survival, the

Colombian government is profoundly disturbed by the

positive social impact which the Chavez welfare

policies have on the majority of Colombians living in

poverty, especially his newly announced agrarian

reform, and his defense of national public enterprises

(especially the state petroleum company) within the

framework of free and democratic institutions. Uribe's

austerity policies, his military and paramilitary

forces displacement of three million peasants, his

promotion of greater and greater concentration of

wealth and the slashing of social services, and worse,

the systematic long-term large-scale violations of

human and democratic rights stand in polar opposition

to Venezuela under President Chavez which provides a

viable, accessible and visible alternative easily

understood by vast numbers of Colombians who migrate

to Venezuela. By intervening in Venezuela, by

supporting US and its local coup-makers, Uribe hopes

to undercut the political appeal of revolutionary

politics, whether it takes the form of electoral,

guerrilla and /or social movements.

The most immediate purpose of the Uribe doctrine is to

defeat the 20,000 person guerrilla armies which

control or influence half of Colombia's territory. The

purpose of the recent interventions is to pressure

neighboring governments to ally themselves with the

Colombian death-squads in a regional campaign to

resolve the Colombian elites internal problems ­ i.e.

the decimation of the opposition to US regional

domination. The bombastic "anti-terror" international

propaganda campaign of the Uribe regime is an

admission of the failure of its internal

counter-insurgency campaign. Uribe's accusations that

the Venezuelan State is "protecting" or "providing

sanctuary to terrorists" is patently false. Uribe

provides no systematic evidence. The real purpose is

to blackmail the Venezuelan state ­ or its most

malleable sectors ­ into abdicating their role as a

neutral peace mediators and submitting to the dictates

of the Colombian-US security apparatus.

The Uribe regime has been widely recognized as one of

the worst practitioners of state terrorism in the

world.

Tens of thousands of peasants, social and human rights

activists, trade unionists and journalists have been

murdered by the security forces ­ the military

directly, or via the state financed paramilitary

groups. Every day of every year, scores of peasants

and critics of the regime are slaughtered. State

terror is the defining characteristic of the Uribe

regime and its US military advisory and military

mission.

Uribe who sends 130 paramilitary forces to terrorize

Venezuela, supports a failed violent coup and then

provides asylum and material support to the exiled

senior members of the coup and who blatantly bribes

Venezuelan soldiers to betray their country to

perpetuate a kidnapping, accuses Chavez of harboring

terrorists and calls for an "international conference"

on "terrorism". Uribe's purpose in calling for a

regional conference is not to discuss the state

terrorism which is endemic to and embedded in his

regime (with US backing), but to justify the Uribe

doctrine of unilateral intervention and to mobilize

other regional US clients in support of its internal

war and to pressure the Chavez regime to subordinate

itself to Colombia's security doctrine.

Chavez has recognized the growing security threat

posed by the kidnapping and has terminated

state-to-state economic and military projects and

recalled his ambassador from Bogotá. He has proposed

to Uribe a bi-lateral meeting of heads of state to

resolve differences with regard to the kidnapping and

related incidents. But no amount of diplomatic

maneuvering on the part of Venezuela's foreign

ministry nor aggressive propaganda campaign by the

Colombian security state can obviate the fact that the

Colombian state is bent on a course of direct military

confrontation with Venezuela.

Implication of Uribe Doctrine

The political and military implications of the Uribe

Doctrine are an extreme departure from the recognized

norms of international law and closely approximate the

belligerent practices of imperial satraps. If all

countries were the apply the Uribe Doctrine we would

face a world of constant wars, conquests and prolonged

liberation struggles throughout Latin America.

Explicit in the Uribe Doctrine's claim to militarily

intervene across national borders is a state of

permanent belligerency. This policy means that every

Latin American country must limit its sovereignty

according to the Colombian definitions of "national

security". This is clearly unacceptable to any

independent country, like Venezuela, though the

Gutierrez regime in Ecuador has accepted the role of a

"second level client" , of the Uribe regime which in

turn is a client of the US.

Equally serious, the Uribe Doctrine rejects recognized

frontiers, meaning that it arrogates to itself the

right to cross national boundaries at will without

consulting the countries whose borders it violates. It

is a short step from not recognizing borders and

national boundaries to annexing adjacent regions for

"security" or economic reasons. Colombia has in the

recent past (1992) nearly provoked a major war by

sending its warships into Venezuelan waters. Uribe's

notion of an international ideological war without

frontiers is an exact replica of the Bush imperial

project, translated into the Andean region. Clearly

Uribe aspires to play a sub-imperial role in the

Northern region of South America under US tutelage.

The Uribe Doctrine stands as a stark rejection of all

United Nation's principles and in violation of

international law-which, however, has already been

weakened by the acquiescence of most of the major

Latin American countries in the US-led invasion of

Haiti, the kidnapping of its elected leader (President

Bertrand Aristide) and the presence of Latin American

colonial occupation forces on the island.

The Colombian threat to Venezuela's sovereignty has

been taken by Venezuela's rightwing opposition as a

welcome intervention. This was manifest in the

Congressional debates following the kidnapping of

Granda when opposition members of congress condemned

the Venezuelan government's defense of national

sovereignty and justified Uribe's intervention in

Venezuela.

Washington has provided more military aid to Colombia

than all the rest of Latin America combined, and only

second to Israel in the world. The US strategy

revolves around defeating the guerrilla movement as a

first step toward consolidating power in the Andean

region and the upper Amazon basin. Once secured this

region would become a springboard toward invading and

taking over Venezuela and its oil fields. The US,

through Uribe, has tripled the size of the Colombian

armed forces over the past few years to over 267,000

troops. It has vastly increased its aerial firepower

(combat helicopters and fighter planes) and provided

the most advanced technological weaponry to detect and

track guerrilla movements. Yet the strategy, while

massacring thousands of peasant sympathizers and

displacing millions of others, has failed to gain any

strategic military advantage over the guerrillas. As

long as the Colombian regime is tied down by the

guerrilla resistance, it can only play a limited role

in any military invasion of Venezuela. For Uribe to

engage in a US-sponsored invasion of Venezuela is a

very risky proposition, opening a large swathe of

territory for a guerrilla offensive

The kidnapping of Granda is only the "dress rehearsal"

of a larger project of escalating provocations to test

the loyalty, discipline and effectiveness of the

Venezuelan security system. Washington is probing to

see how far it can push Venezuela in surrendering its

sovereignty and control over its borders.

Uribe and Washington's effort to drive a wedge between

the popular resistance in Colombia and the Chavez

government by using the "terrorist issue" as a

political club has, in part, backfired , arousing a

potent undercurrent of nationalist sentiment in

Venezuela, while seriously jeopardizing important

sectors of the Colombian economy, including elite

classes which normally back Uribe.

Washington and Uribe's proposal for an international

conference to discuss the issue of terror is based on

their knowledge that most of the Latin American

regimes today are eager to serve US interests. During

the previous period of sustained economic and

political warfare against the elected Chavez

government by the authoritarian right, Brazil's Celso

Amorin organized a group of countries calling

themselves "The Friends of Venezuela" made up of

hostile neo-liberal Ibero-Americans leaders, including

ex-Presidents Aznar of Spain and Bush of the US (who

both supported the failed military coup), Fox of

Mexico and Lagos of Chile (notorious free marketers)

and, of course, Brazil which gave equal political

standing to the Venezuelan rightwing opposition as to

the elected government. Chavez rightly rejected the

mediation of such "friends".

Today Lula offers his services once again to "mediate"

between an international aggressor and a sovereign

country. Except for Cuba, not a single Latin American

client regime has condemned Uribe's aggression or,

worse, spoken out clearly in opposition to his

doctrine of extra-territoriality. President Chavez is

clearly aware of the pitfalls of meeting in an

"international summit" dominated by hostile

neo-liberal, pro-empire regimes that have already

accepted and submitted to the Bush-Uribe

anti-terrorist doctrine.

Chavez is absolutely correct to counterpoise the

notion of a bilateral forum in which the focus is on

Colombia's intervention, where the issues of Uribe's

policy of state terrorism could become part of the

public debate on "terrorism". Of course, Washington

will "advise" Uribe to refuse. Chavez could then

advise his foreign minister to take the matter to the

UN General Assembly as a matter of urgent importance

of peace, security and national sovereignty. Chavez

has already retaliated to continued US overt

aggression by signing oil export and investment

agreements with China, Russia, Latin America and

Europe. Shutting off imports of Colombian agricultural

imports could stimulate a more intensified effort to

promote local agricultural production, push for a more

expeditious agrarian reform and greater public

investment in local food production.

The kidnapping of Granda and the subverting of a few

Venezuelan officials can serve as a wake-up call for

the Venezuelan leadership to the real threats to

national sovereignty which emanate from the US-backed

Uribe doctrine. The threat is real, it is systemic and

it is immediate. President Uribe has the backing of an

imperial power but Chavez has the backing of the

overwhelming majority of Venezuelans and the fact that

they will be willing to fight to defend their land,

their government and their right to live as a

sovereign people. The question of Venezuelan

sovereignty is now not simply a question of diplomatic

maneuvers but of organizing the mass of the

Venezuelans into becoming a military deterrent to any

armed aggression.

James Petras, a former Professor of Sociology at

Binghamton University, New York, owns a 50 year

membership in the class struggle, is an adviser to the

landless and jobless in brazil and argentina and is

co-author of Globalization Unmasked (Zed). He can be

reached at: jpetras@binghamton.edu





> ====DEFEND HUGO CHAVEZ!===DEFEND VENEZUELA!====

> =====DEFEND THE BOLIVARIAN REVOLUATION OF

> VENEZUELA!=

>

> A city-wide planning meeting will be held to

> organize a mass mobilization to support the people

> and

> the government of Venezuela. All are welcome! This

> is a critical moment in the history of the

> Bolivarian

> Revolution of Venezuela!

>

> When? Thursday, February 3, 2005 --- 7:00 p.m.

> Where? Echo Park United Methodist Church

> 1226 North Alvarado at the corner of Alvarado

> and Resevoir.... one long block north of the corner

> of

> Alvarado and Sunset on Alvarado.

> ~~~~ Please recruit trusted individuals and groups

> to

> be a part of this planning~~~~~~~~ Venezuela is

> under

> attack and U.S. intervention is escalating.~~~~~



=====

CISPES

Committee In Solidarity With The People of El Salvador

8124 West 3rd Street L.A. Ca. 90048

323-852-0721

Founded: 1980 - 23 Years of Solidarity

Report this post as:

Local News

GUIDE TO REBEL CITY LOS ANGELES AVAILABLE A12 5:39PM

lausd whistle blower A10 11:58PM

Website Upgrade A10 3:02AM

Help KCET and UCLA identify 60s-70s Chicano images A04 1:02PM

UCLA Luskin: Casting Youth Justice in a Different Light A02 11:58AM

Change Links April 2018 A01 11:27AM

Nuclear Shutdown News March 2018 M31 6:57PM

Join The Protest Rally in Glendale on April 10, 2018! M29 7:00PM

Join The Protest Rally in Glendale on April 10, 2018! M29 6:38PM

Spring 2018 National Immigrant Solidarity Network News Alert! M19 2:02PM

Anti-Eviction Mapping Project Shows Shocking Eviction Trends in L.A. M16 5:40PM

Steve Mnuchin video at UCLA released M15 12:34AM

Actress and Philanthropist Tanna Frederick Hosts Project Save Our Surf Beach Clean Ups M06 12:10PM

After Being Told He's 'Full of Sh*t' at School Event, Mnuchin Demands UCLA Suppress Video M02 11:44AM

Resolution of the Rent Strike in Boyle Heights M01 6:28PM

What Big Brother Knows About You and What You Can Do About It M01 3:30PM

Step Up As LAPD Chief Charlie Beck Steps Down F14 2:44PM

Our House Grief Support Center Hosts 9th Annual Run For Hope, April 29 F13 12:51PM

Don’t let this LA County Probation Department overhaul proposal sit on the shelf F13 11:04AM

Echo Park Residents Sue LA Over Controversial Development F12 8:51AM

Former Signal Hill police officer pleads guilty in road-rage incident in Irvine F09 10:25PM

Calif. Police Accused of 'Collusion' With Neo-Nazis After Release of Court Documents F09 7:14PM

Center for the Study of Political Graphics exhibit on Police Abuse posters F07 9:50AM

City Agrees to Settle Lawsuit Claiming Pasadena Police Officer Had His Sister Falsely Arre F04 3:17PM

Professor's Study Highlights Health Risks of Urban Oil Drilling F04 12:42PM

Claims paid involving Pasadena Police Department 2014 to present F04 10:52AM

Pasadenans - get your license plate reader records from police F03 11:11PM

LA Times Homicide Report F03 1:57PM

More Local News...

Other/Breaking News

Neurogenèse involutive A18 9:21AM

Paraphysique de la dictature étatique A16 10:13AM

Book Review: "The New Bonapartists" A16 3:45AM

The West Must Take the First Steps to Russia A14 12:25PM

Théorie générale de la révolution ou hommage à feu Mikhaïl Bakounine A14 3:30AM

The Shortwave Report 04/13/18 Listen Globally! A12 3:50PM

“Lost in a Dream” Singing Competition Winner to Be Chosen on April 15 for ,000 Prize! A12 3:48PM

The World Dependent on Central Banks A12 4:43AM

Ohio Governor Race: Dennis Kucinich & Richard Cordray Run Against Mike DeWine A11 9:40PM

March 2018 Honduras Coup Again Update A10 10:52PM

Apologie du zadisme insurrectionnel A10 3:33PM

ICE contract with license plate reader company A10 1:14PM

Palimpseste sisyphéen A09 11:23PM

Black Portraiture(S) IV: The Color of Silence...Cuba No...Cambridge Yes A09 5:32AM

Prohibiting Micro-Second Betting on the Exchanges A09 4:18AM

Prosecutors treat Muslims harsher than non-Muslims for the same crimes A08 10:33PM

Amy Goodman interview on cell phone safety A08 10:29PM

Mesa, Arizona police officer kills unarmed white man A08 9:50PM

Israeli leaders should be prosecuted for war crimes A08 9:48PM

Paraphysique de l'autorité A08 12:11AM

Two Podcasts on fbi corruption A06 10:13PM

Fbi assassins assault & try to kill DAVID ATKINS A06 7:29PM

EPA Head Scott Pruitt: Of Cages And Sirens A06 2:15PM

The Shortwave Report 04/06/18 Listen Globally! A05 4:25PM

Nicaraguas Conflic with native Peoples on the Caribbean Coast Near Bluefields in Decade80 A05 12:14PM

Millions Boycott The Sponsors Of Laura Ingraham A05 11:36AM

THE CONSERVATIVE THREAT A05 6:51AM

The US, the Dollar, IS and Saudi Arabia A05 3:34AM

More Breaking News...
© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy