Working on this new server in php7...
imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

white themeblack themered themetheme help
About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
Features
latest news
best of news
syndication
commentary


KILLRADIO

VozMob

ABCF LA

A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List

LAAMN List




IMC Network:

Original Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
printable version - js reader version - view hidden posts - tags and related articles

View article without comments

Vote NO on 69! - Protect your DNA

by protect my DNA Sunday, Oct. 10, 2004 at 6:50 PM
info@protectmydna.com 415-621-1192

Proposition 69 Expands California’s Convicted Felon DNA Database To Include Innocent People

Facts About Prop 69

Proposition 69 Expands California’s Convicted Felon DNA Database To Include Innocent People

California law already requires the collection, storage and testing of DNA from people convicted of serious and violent felonies, including kidnappers, rapists, murderers and child molesters.

Proposition 69 will expand California’s massive criminal DNA database to include:

* All adults arrested for any felony offense—even if they are never charged with a crime. Only one other state in the nation goes this far: Louisiana.



* Children who plead guilty, no contest or are adjudicated or convicted for any felony offense, including shoplifting or writing a bad check.



Innocent People Do Not Belong Trapped in a Massive Government Criminal Database!

* Each year in California, more than 50,000 felony arrests do not result in criminal charges. If you are arrested, Proposition 69 gives the government the power to take and store your DNA in a massive government criminal database.



* Proposition 69 equates arrest with guilt, and gives police, rather than judges and juries, the power to force you to provide the state with evidence.



* Proposition 69 will put the most personal, private information about you and your family at risk. DNA is more than a fingerprint. It exposes the most intimate details about you and your family, including your predisposition and carrier status for diseases such as Alzheimer’s, heart disease and cancer. Experts have documented hundreds of cases where people have lost their job or health insurance based on genetic predictions.



* DNA testing is not infallible. Innocent people have spent years in jail for crimes they didn’t commit as a result of botched DNA testing and interpretation.



* Innocent people trapped in this vast government database have to petition the court to get out. After petitioning the court, the Department of Justice (DOJ), and a prosecutor, and providing a certified copy of documents proving your innocence, Proposition 69 says the court can deny your request for removal and that decision is nonappealable.



* Proposition 69 will cost hundreds of millions of dollars to implement.



* Adding innocent people to California’s criminal DNA database is not going to make us safer.



Vote NO on Proposition 69. It goes too far and costs Californians too much.

For more information call: (415) 621-1192



http://www.votenoon69.com

Report this post as:

no appeals!

by sisyphus Monday, Oct. 11, 2004 at 3:00 PM

One of the most disturbing things about this proposition is the lack of an appeal process to have one's DNA record removed from the database. Even once a person is found not guilty they must request that the court (in which the hearing occurred) issue an order removing the information from the database. "The court has the discretion to grant or deny the request for expungement. The denial of a request for expungement is a nonappealable order and shall not be reviewed by petition or writ." (Sec 9, 4. c. 1). Does anyone really think the state won't abuse the right to keep DNA info on as many of us as possible (in case we might commit some crime in the future)? Pretty soon they'll be giving buccal swabs to first graders for safety reasons and the parents will comply (my parents had me fingerprinted as a child for anti-abduction purposes). Just one more step (see Patriot Act, TIA, CODIS, etc.) toward a complete record database on every citizen/resident. I can't believe that they are actually having us vote on this. Anyone who does vote for this is an idiot.

The full text of the proposition is reproduced from the voter guide here (pdf document): http://www.ss.ca.gov/elections/bp_nov04/prop_69_text_of_proposed_law.pdf

Report this post as:

© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy