w w w . h a a r e t z . c o m



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Last update - 07:17 09/07/2004

Court:

By Aluf Benn, Haaretz Correspondent

The International Court of Justice will rule on Friday that the separation fence contravenes international law, that it must be dismantled, and that compensation must be paid to the Palestinian owners of property confiscated for its construction, according to documents obtained by Haaretz.

The decision will be officially made public at 4 P.M. Friday under the heading, "Legal implications of the construction of the barrier in Palestinian occupied territory."

The court has ruled that on the basis of the material available to it, "[it] is not convinced that the specific course Israel has chosen for the wall was necessary to attain its security objectives." Fourteen votes favored the decision and the sole opponent was the American Judge, Thomas Buerghenthal.

It then says: "The wall, along the route chosen, and its associated regime, gravely infringe a number of rights of Palestinians residing in the territory occupied by Israel, and the infringements resulting from that route cannot be justified by military exigencies or by the requirements of national security or public order."

"The construction of such a wall accordingly constitutes breaches by Israel of its various obligations under the applicable international humanitarian law and human rights instruments."

In support of Judge Buergenthal's opposition, the Dutch Judge, Pieter Kooijmans, rejected the call for all countries to act against the project.

The Hague court ruled that it had jurisdiction to render an opinion on the issue of the fence. The justices conducted a lengthy analysis of the legal situation and of the history of the Israeli occupation in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. Parts of the fence constructed within the Green Line were not included in the court's decision.

Most of the justices believed that in building the fence, Israel violated international humanitarian law, by infringing on Palestinians' freedom of movement, freedom to seek employment, education and health. Israel violated international treaties it had signed which deal with these topics, the ruling states.

"Israel is bound to comply with its obligation to respect the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination and its obligations under international humanitarian law and international human rights law. Furthermore, it must ensure freedom of access to the Holy Places that came under its control," the justices wrote.

The International Court in the Dutch capital, The Hague, was asked to deliberate on the issue of the security fence by a United Nations General Assembly resolution of last December, and its decision will be presented to the world body.

Prior to the release of the decision, Israeli sources said they were unsure of the court's ruling. However, European sources said that on the basis of information available to them, the legal opinion would be "negative and critical" of Israel.

PA Chairman Yasser Arafat on Thursday said he had full confidence in the International Court. "I believe the court in the Hague is capable of stopping the construction of the fence that damages our people," he said in Ramallah.

For its part, the Defense Ministry has carried out changes on the official map delineating the route of the fence according to the ruling of the High Court of Justice. The changes run along the section of the fence northwest of Jerusalem, and in parts near Qalqilya, Modi'in and southeast of Jerusalem near Gush Etzion.

According to the map made public by the Ministry of Defense, there are many changes from the original route of the fence, and all are meant to alleviate the pressure on the Palestinian population in those areas.

However, the new map also shows the intention to build the fence around the Ariel salient, linking the largest settlement in the West Bank, with Karnei Shomron and Immanuel, to the Green Line.

Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization have prepared their public relations and diplomatic offensives in anticipation of the decision. The PLO representative in the United Nations, Nasser al-Qidwa, and diplomats from Arab countries at the UN, plan to request an emergency session of the General Assembly where the results of the court's decision will be presented.

It is expected that the Palestinians will seek operative application of the court's conclusions, in case Israel refuses to adopt the recommendations of the International Court.

Israel has already prepared its response, assuming that the court will be critical of Israel. Israel will seek to block the issue from reaching the Security Council, with the assistance of the United States. Israel is also hoping that most EU countries will not support the Palestinian move as they opposed bringing the matter before the ICJ.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/hasen/objects/pages/PrintArticleEn.jhtml?itemNo=449395

Just wondering when the Haque is going to rule that the "palestinians" must evolve up and away from their current status as followers of the barbaric and stoneage cult of death of islam?

islam is a plague.

Even fences aren't enough.

We have the Bomb, why don't we just use it?

Well, I am no fresca, but I agree there is a need for the fence. There is another reason why this fence will help if it is rerouted to the green line or some portion thereof. Once the two states are seperate, any attack or provocation from the Palestinians can lead to full on war which will allow the Israelis much more leeway to battle as it will no longer be a civil war but a war between two countries. Obviously the other stupid racist Arab countries will chime in and then we can take them all on with a bunch of bombs, hopefully not cluster bombs. This will serve as a deterrent from the Palestinian perspective. As a state, it cannot openly fire a first shot at Israel without being subject to a formal and less human rights oriented war. The same goes for Palestinians. On their side of the fence and under self rule they can welcome UN monitors and even a small UN force that can work as a buffer at the gates which Israel wouldn't have allowed. The sooner there are two states the better. The sooner the wall is built and the less damage done while it is built the better.

Some nation like Russia or China could do the world a big favor by giving the Israelis a 48 hour warning to get back from that wall and then blasting it to smithereens with non-nuclear missles and bombs - and a warning that it will be blasted again if rebuilt.

Israel should kill every last "palestinian" man, woman and child.

When the rest of the Middle East whines, Israel can then give them the finger and say, 'You didn't want them in your lands either. Leh dhof shluk kafu."