Working on this new server in php7...
imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

white themeblack themered themetheme help
About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
Features
latest news
best of news
syndication
commentary


KILLRADIO

VozMob

ABCF LA

A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List

LAAMN List




IMC Network:

Original Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
printable version - js reader version - view hidden posts - tags and related articles

View article without comments

Are Liberals Killing the Study of History?

by Sterling Rome Friday, Jun. 04, 2004 at 9:53 PM



A 2001 Colonial Williamsburg Foundation study revealed that a quarter of American teenagers didn't know what Independence Day is supposed to celebrate.

These same teens didn't know who fought in the Civil War, and couldn't even name the three branches of their government. Rather than confront the actual problem, let's imagine some of the stupefying excuses we are likely to hear regarding this study:

Maybe questions about American history are "culturally biased?" Perhaps the test didn't factor in the importance of self-esteem? Perchance, the concept of asking student's questions and expecting them to recite the answers isn't progressive? Why can't teenagers be tested on things they care about; like Playstation or Brittany Spears? Isn't American history just an invention of the "patriarchy" to hide their guilt anyway?

Don't laugh. These questions have all been asked before, and the folks that ask them do so with a straight face.

In a continuing effort to discredit or minimalize inconvenient facts that obstruct their world view, many "progressives" have embraced revisionist history. It is not enough to shape the politics of today; they also must erase any knowledge of the past that might not correspond with their current argument.

The results of the Colonial Williamsburg Foundation study simply reflect the effectiveness of attacking history. If we cannot actually get students to study history, then we can at least dumb down instruction to the point that people won't know anything anyway.

In either case, the outcome is a dependent people who willingly submit to an all-wise, all-powerful government of elites whose assertions go unchallenged.

Revisionist history in arcane publications or remote debating societies is a danger to no one in particular, but when the teaching of history is watered down to the point of obsolescence, teenagers get their history from only one source - the establishment media.

Although there are many wonderful and expert sources for accurate historical information in our society (like the library!), the establishment media does little to offset the growing trend of disregarding our past.

For every 'History Channel' there are ten channels devoted to music videos or celebrity gossip. For every thousand who deem a series like "The American President" entertainment, there are millions who deem Oliver Stone's film "JFK" a documentary.

The crux of the dilemma over teaching, understanding, and honoring history is the inherent difference between liberal and conservative.

Many conservatives have great regard for history as a guide and as an indication of what to expect from the future, while many liberals have a utopian view of society that requires a suspension of disbelief in order to be seen as practical.

Because much of current liberal politics is built on theory rather than practice, history can be an awful inconvenience.

So-called 'Progressives' can ill afford an electorate versed in political and cultural history, so their only option is to debunk historical truths that contradict them, or to argue that history is always relative to interpretation.

Herein lies the real danger to society as a whole. Questioning history in an effort to uncover the truth is healthy. Refuting a truth (regardless of its validity) because it doesn't support a political theory is the death-knell of liberty.

My good friend Joe teaches history at a public school in Pennsylvania. Joe tells me he is constantly frustrated by the paltry amount of time history receives in the modern curriculum. He is not only asked to teach history to his students, he is asked to find a way to make them understand why it is important to know in the first place.

Since our progressive society has emboldened our children to deem themselves worthy of deciding what they need to be taught, history doesn't stand a chance.

Not knowing where society has been, or what earlier generations have had to suffer through leads to the next generation being both overly self-righteous and virtually incapable of respect.

A further side effect is the current deification of the "self" - as young people come to believe that nothing can be more important than their own selfish whims and desires.

Ignorance to the importance of history, and thus the importance of liberal democracy, is a fairly good explanation as to why voter turnout in our nation continues to fall, and why so many of our disassociated youth do not even recognize the hypocrisy of, for example, protesting against global trade - and then buying a Japanese video game.

If our society forgets the sacrifices that led to our founding, to our Constitution, to our Union, and to our dominant role in the world, then it will soon be as if none of those sacrifices were ever made.

Even those citizens who so openly revile our country have cause to fear such an occurrence, for when freedom is lost, it is lost even to those who rebuke it.

Report this post as:

OneEyedMan

by KPC Friday, Jun. 04, 2004 at 10:03 PM
KPC

"Don't laugh. "



...what the fuck else is it any good for?

Report this post as:

Throw the kids into the army or jail ... or factories

by American Enterprise Institute Friday, Jun. 04, 2004 at 10:19 PM

Throw the kids into ...
burns.jpgaiuqzt.jpg, image/jpeg, 64x106

Report this post as:

Challenge to Debate: 'JFK' Is Real History, Though Incomplete

by Carolina Friday, Jun. 04, 2004 at 11:48 PM

Stone's "JFK" was indeed an accurate docu-drama, as of its date in 1991, as to the Kennedy assassination .

Evidence that has been accumulated since then confirms and expands on what Stone filmed.

Most pertinently, John Armstrong 's "Harvey & Lee" www.jfkresearch.com/armstrong/ ** proves that there were TWO Oswalds in Dealey Plaza, that the real Oswald shot Dallas Police Officer Tippit, while the imposter "Harvey" was already at the Texas theatre, and that "Marguerite" Oswald, the alleged mother was also an imposter [with a CD rom of photos to prove it.]

I CHALLENGE THIS AUTHOR TO REVEAL HIS E-MAIL SO WE CAN DEBATE THE JFK CONSPIRACY FACT IN FULL.

CAROLINA

Report this post as:

Please explain

by Sheepdog Saturday, Jun. 05, 2004 at 12:00 AM

" "progressives" have embraced revisionist history"

This is the second time this phrase has been used today. Without support.

Do you mean uncovering suppressed history?

Report this post as:

leftists LOVE history

by more rational Saturday, Jun. 05, 2004 at 5:13 PM

Get a half dozen leftists into a room, and eventually, the talk will turn to history. Debates ensue, egos are bruised, etc.

They just happen to be interested in a different view of history, from the perspective of the common man, rather than the kings and generals. Everyone has a copy of Zinn's People's History of the United States.

So, this argument that liberals are killing the study of history is absurd.

The main thing killing ths study of history, and education in general, is the systemic under-education of the poor. Schools in poor and working class areas aren't as good as those that educate the future middle managers and factory owners.

Even the nice schools aren't that good, because those who know history are less likely to repeat it, and a great part of American history is about war, conquest, rape, imperialism, and other relatively unpleasant un-democratic behaviors.

The best schools actually do teach these horrors, to show the future ruling class that power wielded unwisely leads to abuse, and that can lead to popular revolt. If they didn't do this, the future rulers would become fascistic tyrants, and cruel despots.

Report this post as:

© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy