Proof of the 911 COVERUP

1. Bush continued his vacation until the end of August, even after receiving a briefing Aug. 6 titled: Bin Laden Determined to Attack Inside the United States

2. Condi Rice received numerous warnings, 'spectacular' attack with 'hijacked airplanes', an 'inevitable threat' just 5 days before 911.

3. Listen to Condi Rice (mp3) describe her morning, when she heard of the 1st attack Condi thought: "What a terrible accident." She called Bush who also thought it was a terrible accident, then Condi went to a staff meeting. As 'National Security Advisor', when a plane hits the WTC, shouldn't she at least turn on the tv and see what's happening? She didn't.

4. Listen to Donald Rumsfeld (mp3) explain why he was not responsible 911 morning (Where were the fighter jets?) "Those were domestic airplanes.... which makes it a law enforcement issue." This excuse is so lame Rumsfeld could go down as the laughingstock of history, and he would if Bush didn't take the cake himself.

Lesson 1- How the media fools America: Rumsfeld is on live TV making up obviously bullsh*t answers... and 'respected journalist' Jim Lehrer doesn't bother to probe deeper, allowing Rummy off the hook. Rumsfeld is suggesting that the NYPD should have handled the two hi-jackings, and the $400 billion Defense Dept has nothing to do with hijacked airliners. W!T!F! A real journalist would have called Rumsfeld on this idiotic lie.
The newscasters tell us things we should be outraged about,
but since they don't seem to care, they're subtly telling you not to care either.

5. Watch George W. Bush on the morning of 911. Think about it- one month before Sept 11, George received that HUGE warning: Bin Laden Determined to Attack. When the 1st plane hits, George thinks it's a terrible accident and goes into the 2nd grade classroom for a photo op? Watch George in action, on the most fateful day in history, people are jumping out of 100th floor windows while George sits there smiling and chatting with the kids like he was on a picnic. Watch Andy Card come in and whisper in George's ear about tower #2, and see George remain seated and smiling for the cameras- for at least seven minutes after the second plane struck. How are these the actions of a brave and heroic leader? It is a sick joke.

If you still believe George's official storyline that, 'he didn't want to upset the children', then you are more delusional than George himself.

The actions of the Bush team on 911 morning are highly suspicious. Especially in light of how they used 911 to terrorize America (mp3) into accepting this global 'crusade' on terror. We know they lied about the war, it's time to look seriously at 911 and ask the pertinent questions.

"Ye shall know the truth
and the truth shall set you free."
- Jesus

Why was George allowed to appoint Philip Zelikow to direct the 911 Commission? Clinton did not appoint Kenneth Starr. The conflict of interest is so transparent the 911 Family Steering Committee has called for Zelikow's resignation. Zelikow's 'directions'- 10 minute limit/commissioner, Bush and Dick testify together, in private, no oath, no recordings, no transcript. This kind of deal, testifying together, has never happened before in history. There is no logical explanation other than they need to cover their asses. There is no doubt: They are hiding something.

Are we going to accept this obvious cover-up, or are we going to demand real answers?
If you still dont believe me, then believe Walter Cronkite (6) who agrees that Bushco is hiding something.

This is not about Democrats vs Republicans- that's the age old divide and conquer strategy. The 911 investigation is about truth and justice. Do you want to know the truth, or do you want to hear things that verify your version of reality? This is the time for some serious soul-searching... can you think for yourself or are you a blind follower?

****************

1. http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/03/29/1080412286089.html
2. http://www.guardian.co.uk/september11/story/0,11209,1188133,00.html
3. http://la.indymedia.org/uploads/condi-terrible_accident.mp3
4. http://la.indymedia.org/uploads/rummy-domestic1.mp3
5. http://www.thememoryhole.org/911/bush-911.htm
6. http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0411-01.htm

I believe this is undeniable proof of a 911 coverup. I'd love to hear anyone refute this, tell us there is no cover-up. Please be detailed, we need to hear your thoughts on all of these points.


ps- Every member of Congress is sworn to uphold the constitution, which includes being a check on the administrative branch. We need to demand more from our Congress, demand more from our media.

If they don't stand for truth and justice, they will be removed- period. That goes for the media as well- those are public airwaves they are broadcasting on, if they continue to conspire with Bush and the 911 coverup, their equipment will be confiscated and their right to broadcast on public airwaves will be pulled. We demand the return of true journalism to our airwaves, our Democracy is at stake.

error

error