Know how to tell the difference between the truth and lies of 9/11? If
they're talking about hijackers having done the dastardly deed, you know
they're part of the sinister coverup extravaganza, wittingly or not.

In order for the people of the world to be convinced that Islamic
hijackers were responsible for terrible tragedy of 9/11, we need to see
some evidence. Not hearsay, innuendo, aspersion or promises of evidence,
but real evidence.

Otherwise, the whole subject is rightly regarded as a ruse, a setup to
conceal the identities of the real culprits, the ones who sit smugly in
front of the TV cameras and plot their cynical war on terror -- otherwise
known as the war on the peoples of the world.

As President Bush continues to insist that his word be accepted as truth
on numerous questions, time after time his statements have been revealed
as blatant falsehoods. Yet he continues to repeat them, and the whorish
corporate media continues to accept them.

Why hasn't either the Bush administration or some element of law
enforcement in the United States issued a single solid piece of evidence
connecting the hijackers to the hijacked airplanes? Why don't the alleged
hijackers appear on the airport security videos? Why aren't there credit
card records of their ticket purchases?

Why did FBI director Robert Mueller say very publicly to the Commonwealth
Club of San Francisco that nothing on paper connected Arab terrorists to
9/11? I mean, two and half years have passed. And the feds produced 19
names within 72 hours of the disaster. Notice a mathematical inconsistency
here? All that has happened since is mere vigilante hysteria, hypothetical
scenarios trumpeted ad nauseum by America's notoriously brainwashed
biased press.

Seven or eight of the names on that original list have been found living
comfortably in other countries. Why hasn't the FBI made any attempt to
correct the errors made on that original list? See for yourself.
http://members.fortunecity.com/911/september-eleven/hijackers-alive.htm
and http://www.welfarestate.com/911/

And why, after much hullabaloo about Colin Powell using phony information
in his remarks to the United Nations about the reasons for war, hasn't the
U.S. government produced a single conclusive piece of evidence to back up
its claim that 9/11 was the work Osama bin Laden and other Islamic
terrorists? Not a single piece!

If you disagree, tell me what it is!

There's a simple answer to this, you know. It's because there isn't any
evidence. And why is that? Because those pseudo-Muslims revealed to be so
publicly incompetent at piloting jerkwater training planes had absolutely
zero chance of flying sophisticated jetliners into anything narrower than
the Grand Canyon, never mind executing tricky maneuvers with
extraordinarily complicated machinery.

The unknown men who played the roles of the so-called Arab terrorist
hijackers were really recruited by either American and/or Mossad
intelligence services in a scheme set up as a diversion to inflame dumb
Westerners against the Islamic world. The purpose was to divert the worlds
attention from the Gaza genocide and dispossession of the
Palestinians by blaming the attacks on Muslims.

But that was only half the objective. The other half was to enable our
despicable cabal of neocon gangbangers to fleece the American public with
an endless array of no-bid contracts to enrich the conscienceless
billionaires who are really driving the war machine.

You know how the Bushista American government uses anything for PR to
supposedly authenticate its own evil agenda. If they had any concrete

evidence against the hijackers if they even possessed all their correct
names we would have heard about it by now. There would be an avalanche of
TV shows about them, unlike that biased claptrap hate crime against
Muslims that appeared on NBC the other night.

After two and half years, with the whole world knowing that eight of the
19 names on the hijacker list are fraudulent, the FBI has made no attempt
to substitute new names. And why is that? Because the identities of the
hijackers were constructed with mostly stolen papers, for some of the
patsies designed to take the heat. In any case, and whoever they were,
there is no evidence they ever got on the planes.

But nothing. Instead we have one minor player convicted in Germany, then
the conviction was overturned, partly because Americans refused to help
with the prosecution.

We have the so-called 20th hijacker and assorted other preposterous
character actors languishing in jails on trumped up charges. We have
security camera film at the Pentagon, which surely reveal that no jetliner
hit that building, locked away in Ashcroft's vault under the phony aegis
of national security. We have all the rubble of the World Trade Center,
which surely would have revealed the use of micro-nuclear explosives
creating shattered beams in odd places, instantly carted away with no
forensic investigation. The seismographic record of the WTC's collapses
were looked at by trained experts. They analyzed the three seismic
peaks of the WTC1, WTC, and WTC7 collapses. All were characterized as
having the quick, short, sharp spike of a micro-nuclear explosion. WTC7,
you say? I though there were only two collapes. No. There were three. WTC7
collapsed in exactly the same fashion as WTC1 and WTC2 though 7 hours
later without any plane hitting it! Further damning, we have transcripts
but no recordings of these phony cellphone calls, some from people who may
not have even existed!

And we have the famous standdown, in which America's air defenses suddenly
evaporated the only time in our history this has happened.

We have Marvin Bush sitting suspiciously on the board of directors of the
security company that had the contract for the Twin Towers.

We have Larry Silverstein, who conveniently leased and insured the towers
shortly before the big hits, telling officials to "pull" a relatively
intact tower, which then fell identically to the two structures that were
struck by airplanes, creating the impression that that's the way all three
came down.

We have billions of dollars of windfall profits made by savvy investors in
the days before 9/11, and an FBI investigation that insists nothing was
amiss with these spectacular deals. Of course, we don't get the details.
Only "assurances" that the trades were not suspicious, despite patterns
and results that were unprecedented in the entire history of financial
trading.

We have reports from firemen of explosions at the base of the Twin Towers
BEFORE they fell, and the seismographic evidence to back up these
assertions.

We have leader after leader saying they didn't know such a thing could
happen when the government had been studying the problem for ten years. It
had held at least two major drills simulating such a possibility.

And we have a president sitting in a ghetto classroom in Florida, at
possibily the most pivotal moment in American history, pretending to read
a book that he was holding upside down.

Perhaps most tellingly of all, we have the tragic tale of John ONeill,
rabidly honest FBI investigator, prevented from following his leads about
Osama bin Laden because of the danger he would have discovered the links
from Afghanistan back to CIA headquarters. Just review the way he was
prevented from conducting his probe of the Cole bombing, and prevented by
digging into other leads by the same guys namely insiders Louis Freeh and
Thomas Picard who prevented significant reports from other FBI agents
from seeing the light of day.

So, how does all that make you regard the supposedly impartial government
panel investigating these matters? When they talk about Presidential Daily
Briefings months before the event, or chitchat with presidential flunkies
who leak out these pseudorevelations about this and that tidbit of
essentially trivial information. And especially when they talk about the
dastardly hijackers (without being able to name them) as if there is no
question of their guilt. Talk about your misleading urban legends! This
one is the champ.

Well, no sense feigning surprise. We knew this commission was a set-up
from the get-go. Recycled Watergate investigators, even. Part of the same
bunch that has run the country and covered up everything for the past 30
years or more.

Surely you didn't expect a real investigation. Thomas Kean declared at the
outset of his hearings that Osama bin Laden was guilty. End of discussion.
As soon as he made that statement, there was no way the hearings could be
legitimate.

Asserting that genuine Arab hijackers did not carry out the attacks of
9/11 requires analysis of two concomitant categories: the history of
American (and Mossad) involvement (and subterfuge) with Arab
terrorists, and methods of remote control of aircraft, or other means of
piloting the aircraft.

The remote control aspect continues to be a bone of contention among
legitimate pilots, with some asserting only real pilots could have made
such extemporaneous maneuvers and others insisting only remote control
could have accomplished such a feat. An interesting new perspective on
this debate can be found here:
http://joevialls.altermedia.info/wtc/radiocontrol.html

A third natural area of study in this regard would be the intimate
histories of those whom officials claim to be the hijackers, including
putting the microscope on their behavior in the days and weeks before the
tragedy.

Many researchers claim the name al-Qaeda was made up in middle 90s by a
variety of American functionaries (one of them being none other than
Richard Clarke) as an all-purpose villain the U.S. could blame as a
convenient reason for its military adventurism. And a group of Israeli
provocateurs was recently discovered trying to create their own faux
version of al-Qaeda in the Palistinian territories.

How many more hints do you need? The absence of any relevant arrests or
discovery of any clues to the hierarchy of this supposedly worldwide
terror group should tell you a lot.

Al-Qaeda doesnt exist except for when they want it to, to blame for any
sort of strategic terror they have created themselves for some political
reason, like influencing the elections in Spain. Hah, that one really
backfired.

Why havent American intelligence operatives gone to these foreign
countries to interview these named hijackers who turned out to be alive?
Simple. Because they knew the list was fiction in the first place, and the
Arab-types who have been named as terror gurus are mostly their own
employees, or people who have been set up by them.

It is a celebrated fact that Mohammed Atta and some of his friends were
seen in nightclubs in the hours before 9/11, certainly a fact that argues
against them being able to carry out their supposed missions because they
were motivated by Islamic religious zeal. So their appearance in strip
clubs blows the whole story that they were devout Muslims giving their
lives to Allah. Devout Muslims don't drink, never mind cavort with
strippers.

If we knew who the hijackers were, we'd know their names, wouldn't we? Or
is it now worth bombing other nations and murdering thousands of innocent
people because we say we know who the hijackers were, even though we don't
know their names? It is the great shame of the American people that they
have approved of the murders of thousands of people because of that
blatant lie.

Many of the men who were fingered as 9/11 hijackers received preferential
treatment from American immigration officials when it came to entering and
leaving the U.S. on numerous occasions. Many of these same names
reportedly trained at various U.S. military installations.

What has resulted after two and a half years of work by Americas crack
intelligence agencies, besides the persecution of Muslims throughout the
world?

Well, hundreds of innocent people have been unjustly imprisoned and
tortured at Guantanamo. All of them innocent, hapless dupes rounded up in
a Rumsfeld-ordered dragnet in Pakistan after U.S. planes had
(inadvertently or otherwise) allowed the Taliban fighters to escape with
the Pakistani army from Afghanistan.

Two pathetic flunkies have been arrested and held without due process. One
of them, the notoriously pathetic shoe bomber who was obviously a deranged
personality and not a member of any terror network, was ceremoniously
sentenced to life in prison.

Other than that, no al-Qaeda kingpins have been even named, never mind
apprehended. No clue about how the 9/11 attacks were engineered has ever
emerged. This is simply not consistent with being able to name all 19
hijackers the day after the attacks. It is a case of pretending you have
all of the information instantly, and then pretending you no information
for the next two years. What a smell!

This means two things: that the list of 19 names was a total fabrication,
and that the worldwide terror network called al-Qaeda is also a total
fabrication, the wet dream brainchild of the CIA and the Mossad to be
trotted out as an excuse for a whole string of terror attacks -- Madrid,
Bali, Riyadh, Istanbul, etc. -- that were really carried out by the CIA
and the Mossad themselves, cleverly involving designated patsies to give
the operations a suitably foreign flavor.

Al-Qaeda does not exist except as a bogeyman invented by Western powers to
justify their evil agenda. There were no hijackers flying those planes on
9/11. And honest FBI agents have been prevented from publicizing that fact.

If you disagree, prove it! The world knows you can't, though the high-tech
mass murder by the United States spreads around the world because of this
falsified version of events.

History will show -- and the public will soon realize -- that those who
are telling these lies not only allowed 9/11 to happen, but planned it for
their own personal advantage.

The only question that remains is will the American public awaken to this
murderous, treasonous scam before the perpetrators achieve their objective
and bury the whole planet in the flames of their insane perfidy.

Just remember. If they're talking about the hijackers, they're part of the
coverup, whether they know it or not.

Much more productive would be analyzing the tiny hole in the Pentagon, how
the ejected material in the WTC photos prove there were unexplained
explosions, or how those emotional cellphone calls could not possibly have
been made as government flunkies have presented them.

But you wont hear the official 9/11 commissioners talking about any of
that, because they are definitely part of the coverup. You can obviously
tell, because they keep talking about the hijackers.


Other than a general alert to citizens of the world about the basic lies
that continue to underlie all political debate in the United States at
this time, there is another, more pressing reason to discuss and
contemplate all these matters at this time.

On Tuesday, April 20, and Wednesday, April 28, the U.S. Supreme Court will
hear arguments on the power claimed by the President to designate people
as "enemy combatants" and have them incarcerated by the military
indefinitely, without charges, and without access to the court
system--solely on his say-so.

As my friend Alvin notes, This is a critical moment in United States
history.

How the court rules on these cases will determine the type of country we
will be living in. We urge those of you who can to be present outside the
Supreme Court on these dates, said Alvin. For more information please see
http://www.nlg.org/eccases/

It is one thing to realize all law enforcement and defense strategies in
America in 2004 have become lies.

It is quite another to incorporate those lies into the law itself, and
that is about to happen next week.

The decision expected will make a time of darkness grow even darker, and
practically guarantee that freedom and justice for all is now an outmoded
phrase that has been conveniently discarded by the evil robots who now
control the lives of every person on earth.





John Kaminski is the author of Americas Autopsy Report, a collection of
his Internet essays seen on hundreds of websites around the world, and
also The Day America Died: Why You Shouldn't Believe the Official Story of
What Happened on September 11, 2001, a [6 dollar] 48-page booklet written
for those who insist on believing the government's version
of events. For more information about both, go to
http://www.johnkaminski.com/

Buy bulk, buy cheaper. Send to friends.

So you know, of course, that believing this simply means you're nuts, right.

-the use of micro nukes but everything else makes sense. And is supported.

So you categorically don't believe in any of the video or audio confessions of Bin Laden or his henchmen.?
You categorically deny the existence (requiring the massive concious involvement of RELATIVES of slain passengers) of numerous cell phone calls (which have been proven possible by even con theory sites) identifying the hijackers as arabs?
You categorically deny the existence of videotape of Atta at the boarding gate?

You absolutely believe that the ENTIRE congress and virtually every branch of government and the ARmed forces are directly involved but not a single person has broken the silence?

That's ALOT to deny just to defend a group who has pretty much cornered the market on these sorts of terrorist attacks.

It's just inconceivable that 19 arab hijackers attacked us on 9-11 huh?

Just asking?

Having read this thing in it's entirety I'm having a hard time honestly believing it's not just a parody.

This thing is literally chock full with the most absurd assertions and classic con theory riffs. "The Mossad did it". "Micro Nuclear Bombs". The entirely debunked stock trading myths. The "secret" film that shows that the Pentagon wasn't hit by a jet.

It just goes on and on. It's just one unfounded and utterly unverified delusion after another.

I really don't know if this guy is a complete nut or a brilliant comic.

you mean the few frames showing nothing but a blur of something out of view hitting the pentagon or all of the ones that were confiscated by the FBI? Be specific.

Bill Maher's a dork but he got this one right:

"Conspiracies? Folks, the government can't even deliver the mail."

and I have never had any problems with the US Mail. You have some issues you need to deal with. All I get is general ignorance and hostility from you in a kind of spray with out a lot of support besides your bloated sense of self importance.. You may quote me .

Then you will be able to make more sense.

"you mean the few frames showing nothing but a blur of something out of view hitting the pentagon or all of the ones that were confiscated by the FBI? Be specific."

I'm not the one throwing around "secret film "theories without any even attempt at verification. That the pentagon was hit by something other than a jet and "all the films" of it were confiscated is one of the more tinfoil hat worthy fantasies around.

Please tell me,. after you answer the original questions, just how it is that you and only a couple other people on earth (who all seem to frequent the same webservers coincidentally enough) have this wealth of knowledge and proof of such a MASSIVE conspiracy and subsequent coverup that has manged to dupe the entire planet.

That is of course what you're actually saying here.

Delusions of Grandeur?

you must be refering to Wanker. Talk together, leave me out of it.

it's my own fault the subnormals pronounce "Walker" as "wanker."

I've doled out one too many side kicks to their tender black-lit skulls.

It was either Wanker or Spouge.

Okay your questions.


Q 1. ".So you categorically don't believe in any of the video or audio confessions of Bin Laden or his henchmen.?"

... I don't. Here's why. These tapes you keep bringing up were supplied by our intelligence agencies and found to be scissors and paste jobs while his in person interview with the BBC previous to these 'discoveries' was a refutation of the crimes.

=Usama bin Laden Says the Al-Qa'idah Group
had Nothing to Do with the 11 September Attacks
Interview published in newspaper Ummat
Karachi, 2001-09-28-
http://www.serendipity.li/wot/obl_int.htm


Q 2." It's just inconceivable that 19 arab hijackers attacked us on 9-11 huh?"

Not really. What is inconceivable is the lack of creditable evidence. Sorry, interviews at Ramadon under full moons that don't occur at that time during periods of saturation bombing along with magic passports also 'found' intact after surviving total destruction of the plane carrying them and the immediate 'knowledge' of the identity of the perps within hours of the event are unbelievable. Particularly when ( if you did read the article) the FBI admits, they have no admissible evidence to link the 19 reported hijackers.

The postal service in this country is really good. Things get cross country in a few days, and locally, it's usually next-day.

My main gripe is the amount of junk mail. I toss out around five pounds a week. It's all so wasteful. They should just email me a list of offers that I'm not going to look at, and then distribute the $10 they save to the various people who would have been preparing the mailing.

why don't you get a return to sender rubber stamp and give them a taste?

There is evidence. You just ignored it. They have a video of Osama Bin Laden admitting to setting up the tragedy. Your proffesionalism just makes you look like a fool. You're one of those normal stupid people that somehow has gotten his word out into the world, yet is only using that power to make an absolute fool of themselves. Skepticism has not got anyone anywhere but into arguments.

TVBAM: "They have a video of Osama Bin Laden admitting to setting up the tragedy"

Oh, you mean the "confession" by the fat moon-faced "Osama" pictured above?

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/osamatape.html

You were saying something about skepticism? Oh and something else about "normal stupid people"?

TVBAM: "Nobody would have done that for any other reason besides the fact that the people who did it were terrorists and did it for religious beliefs."

"For religious beliefs?" You think that's the only reason for terrorism? The US government has been the number one sponsor of international terrorism for the past 50 years, hands down. Most of the goons doing the dirty deeds have been *political* fanatics, not religious

TVBAM: "The government wouldn't blow up two buildings to attack a man that should've been taken down anyway"

ha ha ha ha! You're so incredibly fucking STYOOOPID!! Are you 12 years old? Or are you senile?

They did it because they needed a new Emmanuel Goldstein with which to keep idiots like you berserk to support global conquest. See page 51 of PNAC's Rebuilding America's Defenses; the part about "a new Pearl Harbor." Communism worked GREAT for 40 years keeping idiots like you gaga for worldwide mass-murder, but then the Soviet Union had to go and screw it up by collapsing in 1989-91, so they had to come up with a new Master Excuse