U.S. Sees Al-Qaeda Everywhere

Analysis by Ritt Goldstein

http://www.ipsnews.net/interna.asp?idnews=22445

In an apparent attempt to downplay the internal Iraqi dynamics sparking ongoing attacks, the Bush administration has been blaming al-Qaeda for much of the violence.

STOCKHOLM, Feb 17 (IPS) - In an apparent attempt to downplay the internal Iraqi dynamics sparking ongoing attacks, the Bush administration has been blaming al-Qaeda for much of the violence.

Key in this effort has been the portrayal of the ultra-orthodox Kurdish group Ansar al Islam and its alleged leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi.

The Bush administration and some of its allies accuse Ansar, long at odds with the secular, western-oriented Kurdish groups allied with the coalition, of close links with al-Qaeda. Zarqawi is seen as the man behind most terror plots that are publicised. But 'facts' keep changing.

According to U.S. Administration pronouncements, Zarqawi was first a ”close associate of bin Laden”. His relationship to bin Laden became ”uncertain” before he was back to being a ”close associate” of bin Laden.

An official U.S. statement declaring Ansar a terrorist group claimed that Zarqawi was a ”senior al Qaeda operative”, but later he was only ”suspected” of being some kind of affiliate. Until two weeks ago he was considered the leader of Ansar al Islam. Now he is thought to be heading a Jordanian extremist group called al Tawhid, and only linked to al-Qaeda and other groups.

The 'facts' vary with the political imperatives of the moment. The Bush administration badly needs to deflect attention from Saddam's much-alleged, but never found weapons of mass destruction (WMD).

Last winter Zarqawi was supposedly working with explosives and deadly toxins at a terror camp in north-east Iraq. U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell warned the United Nations Security Council of the dangers he posed in a presentation in February last year.

Powell claimed Zarqawi and Ansar al Islam were Saddam Hussein's link to al- Qaeda. The ”evidence” behind Powell's assertions proved as empty as that on WMDs.

Powell provided a satellite picture of the alleged terror camp. A number of journalists went immediately to the place but found only a radio station and living areas.

Powell said Ansar had cyanide gas, VX nerve gas and the toxin ricin. The U.S. claimed at first to have found ”evidence of chemical weapons production” after it attacked Ansar camps along with Kurdish forces in March 2003 last year. The claim later proved unfounded.

In October last year former Powell aide Greg Thielmann revealed that Powell had misinformed Americans during his testimony.

The United States doubled the bounty on Zarqawi last week to ten million dollars, calling him the mastermind behind a blueprint for terror in Iraq. The U.S. decision came after coalition forces claimed to have found a letter Zarqawi is said to have written to bin Laden. ”We believe the report and document are credible,” said Gen. Mark Kimmitt from the U.S. forces.

Zarqawi tells bin Laden in the alleged letter that al-Qaeda would be welcome in Iraq. But several questions have been raised about the letter. Foremost, if al- Qaeda was already present in Iraq as alleged so often before, why would Zarqawi need to invite it. The Washington Post notes that there has been no independent verification of the document's authenticity.

U.S. forces blamed al-Qaeda and Ansar for the suicide bombings that killed more than 100 people including several Kurdish leaders in the northern Iraqi town Arbil Feb. 1. Two days later Jaish Ansar al Sunna, a resistance group based in the Sunni triangle that had warned people aiding the occupation, claimed responsibility for the Arbil blasts.

Coalition forces then said Jaish was related to al-Qaeda and Ansar, another attempt to blur distinctions among groups resisting U.S. occupation of Iraq.

In blaming al-Qaeda and Ansar, the United States and its allies have sought effectively to legitimise the presentation Powell made to the Security Council a year ago. If public perceptions of the Ansar threat were to grow, the invasion of Iraq would be seen as more legitimate.

U.S. officials have again pointed to al-Qaeda and foreign terrorists as the leading suspects behind recent attacks. On Tuesday last week a bomber killed 53 at a police recruitment centre in Iskandariyah south of Baghdad. The next day another bomber claimed 47 at an army recruitment centre in Baghdad. On Saturday a rebel assault routed security forces in Fallujah, killing at least twenty.

But it is widely acknowledged that there are few foreigners among the thousands arrested by coalition forces.

The Iraqi police have corrected their initial statement that ”foreigners” were behind the assault in Fallujah Saturday. The Associated Press noted that ”U..S. and Iraqi officials have made conflicting reports on who carried out the attack.” U.S. officials insist the attack was carried out by non-Iraqis.

Foreigners had been blamed in the car bombing that killed Shia leader Ayatollah Mohammed Bakr al-Hakim and many of his followers in August last year. Nothing ever came of that allegation. (END)

Dipshit, have you less intelligence than a common garden snail. One would think so after reading your diatribe.

9/11 was a serious event.

Americans want their government to react strongly when something like that happens.

GWB and his people have done so.

They haven't been completely fu__ed up like the all time worst President in American History (can you say Bill C?).

Geez, get over it, get real.

Ron

Yes, it's true, De Nial is more than just a river in Egypt, and flag-waving, GWB loving morons never cease proving it.

While it's unfair of me to criticize the intellectually and emotionally challenged, those who can't handle that most difficult of medications known as truth, get real. 11 September was indeed serious, and it's been seriously used as a ploy to scare the beejeebees out of too many for too long.

Rather than clinging desperately to pseudo-patriotic illusions, perhaps asking why the forthcoming Intel review is needed, and why the Bushies have a history of exaggerating threats to manipulate people into doing what they want, might just be a good idea.

Of course, I won't say Goebbels would be proud of so much of the spin that so many have bought into, but he would. And if you're thinking that the threat of al Qaeda hasn't been manipulated by Bush & Co, don't get sad, just get a good doctor - maybe you can be helped.