|
printable version
- js reader version
- view hidden posts
- tags and related articles
View article without comments
by waterdancer
Tuesday, Feb. 03, 2004 at 9:13 AM
pente_player@yahoo.com
A new report reveals there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Bush-appointed weapons inspector, Dr. David Kay, testifying before the U.S. Senate said everyone in Washington was wrong, but Dennis Kucinich was right. He has consistently said there was no evidence of WMDs in Iraq. For more information see: MS-Word
| pdf
A new report reveals there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Bush-appointed weapons inspector, Dr. David Kay, testifying before the U.S. Senate said everyone in Washington was wrong, but Dennis Kucinich was right. He has consistently said there was no evidence of WMDs in Iraq. For more information see: MS-Word
| pdf
Report this post as:
by Ben
Tuesday, Feb. 03, 2004 at 4:27 PM
Funny....there were more than just Dennis claiming HE was right about the fact that there were no weapons of mass destruction (errr...mass deception).
Report this post as:
by Meyer London
Tuesday, Feb. 03, 2004 at 9:25 PM
Even Bush is now hinting that he knows there are no wmds. Who knows, maybe some day even the cheetos crowd will see th light. Nah, nothing that extreme ever happens.
Report this post as:
by fresca
Tuesday, Feb. 03, 2004 at 10:40 PM
Which WMD (no "s" ) do you speak of.
Certainly we've found tons of WMD of the armed male Islamist variety.
The most barbaric of all WMD.
Report this post as:
by johnk
Wednesday, Feb. 04, 2004 at 2:25 AM
I don't see why DJK should get credit for this. A lot of people before him were saying this.
There were WMDs in Iraq. In Baghdad, in fact. We sent them there, via air, and they exploded, killing a lot of people.
Report this post as:
by fresca
Wednesday, Feb. 04, 2004 at 2:49 AM
"killing a lot of people."
We didn't in fact kill that many people. Certainly many fewer than were dying regularly under sadam.
The good news is that we're now killing the real WMD as soon as we can unearth the filthy creatures.
By the way, any word on when we're going into Syria?
Report this post as:
by Sheepdog
Wednesday, Feb. 04, 2004 at 3:26 AM
If you're coming too, don't you think we should put wheels on your iron lung first?
Report this post as:
by fresca
Wednesday, Feb. 04, 2004 at 4:38 AM
C'mon old man, surely you don't mean that.
Hey ! What's that!
Quick sheep..grab your ruger...I think someone's trespassin' on your land!
Report this post as:
by Sheepdog
Wednesday, Feb. 04, 2004 at 3:54 PM
Their metallurgy is superior to the other well known manufactures.
However they don't put the machining in that Mossberg, Smith & Wesson or Browning does so you trade off smooth trigger pull or accuracy for the more robust design.
The .223 is a well over rated round.
Stop watching reruns of the A Team.
Report this post as:
by fresca
Wednesday, Feb. 04, 2004 at 5:33 PM
Perhaps you're correct.
It is however, the round of the mini-14
Report this post as:
by Sheepdog
Wednesday, Feb. 04, 2004 at 7:37 PM
much too large for you to hold with your teeth.
Try a 10-22, it's more your speed.
I have a maxi-14
Report this post as:
|