|
printable version
- js reader version
- view hidden posts
- tags and related articles
View article without comments
by Susan Webb
Saturday, Jan. 24, 2004 at 5:29 PM
pww@pww.org 212-924-2523 235 W 23st., NYC 10011
MUMBAI, India – On the sidewalk of a busy Mumbai street, two tiny children and their baby brother, clad only in a shirt, sit in a patch of dirt, directly in front of a cell phone store.
MUMBAI, India – On the sidewalk of a busy Mumbai street, two tiny children and their baby brother, clad only in a shirt, sit in a patch of dirt, directly in front of a cell phone store. Further along, in the dirt strip dividing the traffic lanes, families squat under tiny scraps of cloth propped up on sticks, some cooking over little fires, as streams of cars, taxis, motorbikes, trucks and buses roar by spewing exhaust in every direction.
These scenes of shocking poverty, amidst the machinery of global technology, fueled the passion of 100,000 people from around the globe who gathered at the fourth World Social Forum here Jan. 16-21 under the slogan, “Another World is Possible.”
A rainbow of the world’s people converged in this teeming commercial city to protest the growing inequality between rich and poor and to reject the Bush administration’s policies of preemptive war and imperialist occupation. In addition, they were protesting the “neoliberal” corporate globalization that is destroying jobs, communities, culture and the environment around the world.
In a vast fairgrounds, throngs of people from every corner of India, with most women in brightly colored saris, mingled with crowds from throughout Asia and many from Europe and the Americas. From morning to night, cultural performances, exhibits and food stalls invited participants to broaden their understanding of India and other Asian countries and enjoy tasty Indian food.
Meanwhile, in cavernous halls and small tents, some 1,200 seminars and discussions dealt with a huge array of topics – among them the impact of globalization on labor, building the global antiwar movement, rights of indigenous people, problems of caste and communalism, poverty, child labor, women’s rights, control of water and socialism today.
Globalization has increased economic, cultural and social insecurity in the world, Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz told a Globalization, Economic and Social Security conference attended by several thousand participants. Stiglitz, a Clinton economic advisor who quit his job at the World Bank in disagreement with its policies, assailed globalization and the free trade agenda for focusing on narrow and false definitions of economic growth and failing to promote reduction of poverty.
Noted Indian economist Prabhat Patnaik said globalization has meant that countries like India are forced to change priorities from labor to capital, small capital to large capital, and now from national capital to global multinational finance capital.
“You can’t have fair trade in a world with unequal power relations,” he said. Capitalism inherently means unequal distribution of power. “It’s necessary to change the configuration of power in the world.”
At a panel sponsored by the newly formed Vietnam Association for Victims of Agent Orange/Dioxin, victims of Agent Orange, which the U.S. military sprayed over 12 percent of South Vietnam during the Vietnam War, gave moving testimony of the continuing price Vietnam is paying in human and financial terms, nearly 30 years after the war ended.
“Bush could not find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq,” said Tran Dac Loi, leader of the Vietnamese delegation, “but there is a truth that the U.S. government has tried to hide for 30 years – the U.S. use of chemical weapons in Vietnam. We are presenting this story here for the first time.”
The panelists described the severe birth defects, mental retardation, multiple miscarriages, cancers, and other illnesses that Agent Orange continues to inflict on successive generations of Vietnamese. The association is launching what it hopes will be an international campaign pressing the U.S. government and corporations that manufactured Agent Orange to compensate the victims.
From the audience, Amarjeet Kaur, secretary of the All India Trade Union Congress, declared, “The time has come for this campaign, especially after Iraq, with U.S. imperialism threatening countries in the name of weapons of mass destruction. We should expose this.”
Chicago Alderman Joe Moore attended both the World Social Forum and the World Parliamentarians’ Forum, a gathering of elected officials, mostly members of parliament, from around the world, which took place here a few days earlier. Moore and New York City Council member Bill Perkins were here under the auspices of Cities for Peace.
Moore said he was glad to have been able to show the world parliamentarians that “not everyone in the U.S. agrees with Bush’s policies – a lot want regime change in the U.S.”
As crowds swirled along a walkway at the World Social Forum, Moore told the World, “It’s amazing that people from literally every continent are here on a mission of standing up for peace, human dignity, fair trade. They don’t like the direction the major nations are taking. They want to look beyond color and religion for a better direction.”
The author can be reached at suewebb@pww.org.
click here for Spanish text
Originally published by the People’s Weekly World
www.pww.org
Report this post as:
by C. Arthur
Saturday, Jan. 24, 2004 at 6:37 PM
That people who lived through the 20th century can even utter the word "socialism" without puking. These are people who saw all the misery perpetrated in the name of socialism, the poverty, the torture, the mass executions, the famines, the oppression, the imperialism which reigned in the Soviet Union and still reigns in China, Cuba, Vietnam, North Korea, etc.
Socialism means poverty, stagnation, oppression. It has been an utter failure everywhere it has been tried.
Until you face that fact, you are dead from the neck up.
Report this post as:
by 000
Saturday, Jan. 24, 2004 at 7:51 PM
You could really say the same for "capitalism" if you look back at the 20th century: Vietnam, Central and South America, Indonesia, Africa, etc, all victims of the West's drive for domination, where millions died.
However, more to the point, none of the examples you raised were technically socialism, nor do we live in a strict capitalist society which any business executive can tell you. The word socialism was used by authoritarian state capitalist systems in order to justify their dungeons. I would not defend any of the regimes you listed above, but to describe them as socialist is ridiculous.
Now, that doesn't mean that the system we live under, which is a modified version of state supported capitalism (real capitalism without state intervention would destroy itself which honest economists will acknowledge) is somehow therefore justifiable in terms of wealth distribution. Under the banner of capitalism, billions around the world suffer extreme forms of oppression and poverty.
We should not be too simplistic about the terms "socialism" or "capitalism". What matters are the concrete details of the issues at hand; namely, poverty, education, health care, housing, wealth, etc, etc. From an analysis of these areas, we can honestly asses the success of any system. And by those standards, the current "vision" of the west is a complete disaster.
000
www.zmag.org
Report this post as:
by C. Arthur
Saturday, Jan. 24, 2004 at 10:47 PM
The USSR wasn't "true" socialism and that's why it was a humanitarian and economic nightmare.
Same with all the other Eastern block countries.
Same with China.
Same with Cuba.
Same with Vietnam.
Same with North Korea.
Same with Zimambwe.
I say they are all exactly what you get with socialism: oppression and poverty.
But, accepting your position, socialism is the Loch Ness monster: it only exists in the imagination of a few kooks.
Report this post as:
by Yup
Sunday, Jan. 25, 2004 at 12:45 AM
when the capitalists run into trouble, it's then socialism as the public pays to subsidies or bailout the foundering or frauded capitalistic venture. I call it theft.
Report this post as:
by Barney
Sunday, Jan. 25, 2004 at 1:54 AM
When will they e-e-ever learn?
Report this post as:
|