imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

white themeblack themered themetheme help
About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
Features
latest news
best of news
syndication
commentary


KILLRADIO

VozMob

ABCF LA

A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List

LAAMN List




IMC Network:

Original Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
printable version - js reader version - view hidden posts - tags and related articles

The Usual Spin on JFK Assassination Unspun

by Rolodex Thursday, Nov. 20, 2003 at 8:58 PM

The Presstitutes and Media Whores of the "Mainstream" have a variety of tactics they use to support the party line and cut off rational exploration and conclusions from the available data. Here's one example of shooting holes in their crap.



11/22/1963







In the Sunday, November 16, 2003 issue of the Austin American-Statesman, there is a special section (consisting of two full pages) addressing the John F. Kennedy assassination. It is no better and no worse than most such retrospectives (and another is planned on network television, to coincide with the 40th anniversary), but it provides a good example of the kind of coverage the assassination typically receives.

The original link:

http://www.statesman.com/insight/content/auto/epaper/editions/sunday/insight_f34bd8f2b5c8411c0083.html

On the first page of the section, the Statesman places a graphic showing JFK’s head surrounded by other pictures representing various assassination "theories." Among the theories mentioned are: (1) UFO cover-up; (2) Joe DiMaggio arranged it; (3)LBJ did it; (4) Kennedy ordered it himself; and (5) Oswald was aiming at Connally, or Jackie, and missed. As so often happens, the editor decides to focus on several absurd theories rather than fairly examine the facts of the case. This has the effect of marginalizing those who maintain that the case is far from being closed. According to the Statesman, we should accept a priori that a lone gunman did it, or else we are kooks.

The main story, written by Patrick Beach, is titled "A conspiracy among us." It illustrates the argument that since humans are pattern-seeking animals, some humans make mistakes attempting to find patterns where they don’t exist. As a thesis goes, there’s nothing wrong with it. It is certainly possible that, given so much interest in one historical event, people are simply reading too much – or too little, as the case may be – into the situation. If this is the case, then there should be some instances in which some specific fact has been given an incorrect interpretation due to this ‘pattern-seeking.’ One expects, at the beginning of Mr. Beach’s article, that some of these examples will be explored during the course of the article.

Alas, none are found. He quotes Michael Shermer, the editor of Skeptic magazine and author of several books, regarding the "pattern-seeking" mentioned above. I admire Shermer’s work, having read three of his books, but the quotes given fail to address any of the physical evidence in the JFK case. He does give one theory of his own, however: "But, in fact, it makes more sense that a lone assassin could do it. It’s easier to hide in the nooks and crannies if you’re a nobody."

I want to look at Shermer’s statement for a moment. I may disagree with the premise that a Travis Bickle-type nutcase will find it easier to get to the President than a person who has monetary support from a federal agency or rogue nation, but let’s leave that aside for a moment. The important part of his quote is his emphasis on a nobody. Lee Harvey Oswald was hardly a nobody, and this is a matter of historical record. Oswald was a Marine who defected to the USSR, later returned to the States without any trouble from the federal government, was an FBI employee and a likely CIA asset, and then became involved in a political movement to free Cuba. Is this a "nobody?" And that is only the uncontroversial portion of his resumè. The fact that Shermer can make this argument reveals that not only is he unfamiliar with the assassination literature, he doesn't even know the basics.

Mr. Beach’s article continues along this vein, arguing that "a grandiose solution" is required to solve JFK’s murder, because people need life to remain coherent; a president murdered by a lone nutball just doesn’t make sense. After employing this argument to no great effect, the article discusses fictional books by Don DeLillo and James Ellroy. The author's point continues to be that the "lunatic fringe" are the only ones interested in JFK.

Mr. Beach writes: "There’s also an allure to conspiracy that’s at once comforting, empowering and thrilling. No wonder some people, in an impotent rage, fall for it like swooning schoolgirls: It’s one-stop shopping for those who ever felt their life’s progress impeded by an unseen hand." Besides the absurd prose, the author manages to make two ad hominem remarks – conspiracy theorists are "impotent" and "schoolgirls," and undoubtedly confused, given the oxymoronic combination. And one more, at the end of the paragraph: "If you’re never met one [a conspiracy theorist], you’ve never been to a gun show." Ah! People who believe in conspiracies are also crazy gun nuts who probably want to form some sort of impotent schoolgirl militia.

The article moves onto to another voice of authority, a Professor Kenneth Rahn. Dr. Rahn remarks that it is "...quick and easy to lay this blame on the decay of the educational system..." So now conspiracy theorists are uneducated, as well. He continues: "I really think it’s a pity that so many people find themselves unable to bring the proper skills and critical thinking to this whole thing." The professor, however, does not give an example of same. If he is referring to someone who believes Joe DiMaggio killed JFK, then he probably has a point. If he is, however, referring to the work of, say, Dr. James Fetzer in Murder in Dealey Plaza, then it’s hard to know what he means when he says "critical thinking." In what sense is accepting a status quo argument an example of critical thinking? Just as few people who attend church regularly know much about the actual historical development of what came to be called the Bible, few people who believe the lone-gunman theory have bothered to look at the facts. There is, of course, room for legitimate disagreement among those who have examined the case, but ad hominem remarks are not generally considered germane. Dr. Rahn isn’t finished, however; the article mentions that the good professor tells conspiracy theorists to "get a life" and that investigating the murder is "...one small step from UFOs."

Patrick Beach’s article is supplanted by a second article from Dr. Rahn. Dr. Rahn’s piece is titled "Chance events leave no room for conspiracy, experts argue." What follows is a remarkable bit of nonsense. Rahn’s point throughout is to say that there were so many chance events along the way to JFK’s murder that it is impossible that someone could have controlled it all from the start. As he states: "Unpredictable events occur every minute of every day, but we focus on the tiny fraction that yield spectacular results. We should not forget all the public events where presidents have not been shot, including Kennedy’s six previous motorcades on the same trip." He gives a description of the "chance events" that occurred for Jack Ruby to kill Oswald. I want to quote extensively here, so that the reader can get the full effect:

Ruby was drawn to Oswald when he decided to close his nightclub for the weekend because of the assassination. That threw his dancers out of work. One of them called him Sunday morning for for food and rent. Ruby went downtown to wire her the money...

Arriving just as a truck came up the ramp and distracted the guard, he ducked into the basement. When Oswald appeared a minute later, Ruby lunged forward and shot him with the pistol he routinely carried to protect the large amounts of cash he usually kept on his person (,000 that day).

Save for every event in these two unplanned series, Ruby could not have killed Oswald. Extraordinary sequences to be sure, but with no room for conspiracy.

I urge the reader to review this summary carefully. It is astonishing. Let’s try to work through this. Dr. Rahn writes that "Ruby was drawn to Oswald when..." he closed the nightclub. Please note that one does not follow from the other; how, precisely, was Ruby drawn to Oswald? In other words, why did Ruby kill Oswald? From this description, it appears the professor is drawing the conclusion that he killed him because the nightclub was closed. I don’t want to be unfair to the argument, so we’ll just say that he leaves it an open question.

So now Ruby goes downtown to wire money to one of his girls. The reason he was carrying a gun is because he always carried a gun when he carried around money. Dr. Rahn leaves unstated another potential possibility: call me kooky, but maybe Ruby went downtown to kill Oswald. Dr. Rahn then states that the "guard" was "distracted." If this is factually correct, then the professor will have to show me how he knows it is so. The guard in question, Officer Vaughn, testified to the Warren Commission that he had no idea how Ruby got into the basement. "I don’t have an excuse," he said. However, let us grant the point and let the guard be distracted. Ruby chooses this opportune moment to sneak in and kill Oswald, the last in a chain of what the author called "extraordinary sequences." Extraordinary, indeed; for it leaves open the essential question of why Ruby decided to kill Oswald.

It is amazing that Dr. Rahn is making this frankly absurd argument, and even more amazing that the Austin American-Statesman believes that anyone will buy it. If Dr. Rahn is correct, than the explanation for any event will always be an impossibly complicated chain of other events; the argument is reminiscent of fundamentalist Christians who argue that the eye is too complicated to evolve without help from God. In this case, however, he can only be right if humans are like natural events, helplessly drawn along to their fates. According to the author, Ruby’s murder of Oswald happened because the murderer just happened to be in the right place at the right time. An interesting perspective, to say the least. Some defense lawyer at some point has probably made the argument, but with (one would suppose) dubious results.

There is another, rather ironic result to Dr. Rahn’s analysis: It is resolutely theoretical in nature. He doesn’t examine any of the actual facts; he lists some facts, but without regard to the motivations behind them. What he is actually proclaiming here is a theory that events proceed in haphazard fashion, one that would make it impossible for any detective to ever catch a criminal. For example, take the statement of Officer Vaughn. The police officer had no idea how Jack Ruby got into the basement, although it was his specific function to keep people out, and -- lest anyone forget -- this was the location where the man accused of killing the President would be led. Under those circumstances, one might surmise that a police officer would be highly motivated to perform to his utmost.

And yet Jack Ruby got into that basement. It then turns out that Ruby was a big supporter of the Dallas police, and was well-known to them. In fact, the nightclub Ruby owned was a frequent cop hangout, and they were allowed free drinks as well as other benefits. According to Dr. Rahn, this potential lead – the possibility that maybe Officer Vaughn allowed Ruby in, because he knew him and was used to seeing him around – is trumped by sheer chance.

Dr. Rahn’s article continues with complaints that there are a great many conspiracy theories and of course they cannot all agree with each other. "Forty years of failed speculation are enough," he writes. "It is time to admit there was no conspiracy and there never was any serious evidence for it." He has presented no evidence for his claims, but never mind. The author is surely being disingenuous, for it is hard to believe that a professor emeritus at the University of Rhode Island could produce something like this, unless it is owing to the "decay of the educational system" he previously lamented.

With regard to serious examination of the facts, an interested reader would be well-served to pick up Mark Lane’s book Plausible Denial. It is an account of a defamation trial, Hunt vs. Liberty Lobby, in which Lane successfully defended a publishing house from E. Howard Hunt. Lane was able to get Hunt on the stand and introduce a great deal of evidence into the court record that points unambiguously to CIA involvement in the JFK assassination. No UFOs, no "military-industrial complex," no Nazis, no Joe DiMaggio. Just the facts. Another book to read, just for purposes of contrast, is Gerald Posner’s Case Closed, which comes to the conclusion that the Warren Commission was correct. The reader is invited to look at both books and judge for him- or herself who is trying to get at the truth and who is playing the tune called for by the piper. As Dr. Rahn points out, the assessment requires "proper skills" and "critical thinking."
Report this post as:

Local News

GUIDE TO REBEL CITY LOS ANGELES AVAILABLE A12 5:39PM

lausd whistle blower A10 11:58PM

Website Upgrade A10 3:02AM

Help KCET and UCLA identify 60s-70s Chicano images A04 1:02PM

UCLA Luskin: Casting Youth Justice in a Different Light A02 11:58AM

Change Links April 2018 A01 11:27AM

Nuclear Shutdown News March 2018 M31 6:57PM

Join The Protest Rally in Glendale on April 10, 2018! M29 7:00PM

Join The Protest Rally in Glendale on April 10, 2018! M29 6:38PM

Spring 2018 National Immigrant Solidarity Network News Alert! M19 2:02PM

Anti-Eviction Mapping Project Shows Shocking Eviction Trends in L.A. M16 5:40PM

Steve Mnuchin video at UCLA released M15 12:34AM

Actress and Philanthropist Tanna Frederick Hosts Project Save Our Surf Beach Clean Ups M06 12:10PM

After Being Told He's 'Full of Sh*t' at School Event, Mnuchin Demands UCLA Suppress Video M02 11:44AM

Resolution of the Rent Strike in Boyle Heights M01 6:28PM

What Big Brother Knows About You and What You Can Do About It M01 3:30PM

Step Up As LAPD Chief Charlie Beck Steps Down F14 2:44PM

Our House Grief Support Center Hosts 9th Annual Run For Hope, April 29 F13 12:51PM

Don’t let this LA County Probation Department overhaul proposal sit on the shelf F13 11:04AM

Echo Park Residents Sue LA Over Controversial Development F12 8:51AM

Former Signal Hill police officer pleads guilty in road-rage incident in Irvine F09 10:25PM

Calif. Police Accused of 'Collusion' With Neo-Nazis After Release of Court Documents F09 7:14PM

Center for the Study of Political Graphics exhibit on Police Abuse posters F07 9:50AM

City Agrees to Settle Lawsuit Claiming Pasadena Police Officer Had His Sister Falsely Arre F04 3:17PM

Professor's Study Highlights Health Risks of Urban Oil Drilling F04 12:42PM

Claims paid involving Pasadena Police Department 2014 to present F04 10:52AM

Pasadenans - get your license plate reader records from police F03 11:11PM

LA Times Homicide Report F03 1:57PM

More Local News...

Other/Breaking News

Doxa du lobby A25 2:03AM

Tech workers organize A24 6:24PM

Architect Stephen Francis Jones A24 3:01PM

UN Forum Wrestles with Economic Policies 10 Years After Financial Crisis Islands Call for A24 12:34PM

Xyloglossie attitudinale A23 8:07AM

Shadowgun Legends Hack and Cheats A23 7:24AM

What does the Quran Say About Islamic Dress?? A21 4:15PM

Biodiversité ou la nature privatisée A20 11:22AM

The Market is a Universal Totalitarian Religion A20 7:14AM

Book Available about Hispanics and US Civil War by National Park Service A19 5:52PM

The Shortwave Report 04/20/18 Listen Globally! A19 4:01PM

The Republican 'Prolife' Party Is the Party of War, Execution, and Bear Cub Murder A19 11:48AM

Neurogenèse involutive A18 9:21AM

Paraphysique de la dictature étatique A16 10:13AM

Book Review: "The New Bonapartists" A16 3:45AM

The West Must Take the First Steps to Russia A14 12:25PM

Théorie générale de la révolution ou hommage à feu Mikhaïl Bakounine A14 3:30AM

The Shortwave Report 04/13/18 Listen Globally! A12 3:50PM

“Lost in a Dream” Singing Competition Winner to Be Chosen on April 15 for ,000 Prize! A12 3:48PM

The World Dependent on Central Banks A12 4:43AM

Ohio Governor Race: Dennis Kucinich & Richard Cordray Run Against Mike DeWine A11 9:40PM

March 2018 Honduras Coup Again Update A10 10:52PM

Apologie du zadisme insurrectionnel A10 3:33PM

ICE contract with license plate reader company A10 1:14PM

Palimpseste sisyphéen A09 11:23PM

Black Portraiture(S) IV: The Color of Silence...Cuba No...Cambridge Yes A09 5:32AM

Prohibiting Micro-Second Betting on the Exchanges A09 4:18AM

Prosecutors treat Muslims harsher than non-Muslims for the same crimes A08 10:33PM

More Breaking News...
© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy