|
printable version
- js reader version
- view hidden posts
- tags and related articles
View article without comments
by x
Sunday, Nov. 02, 2003 at 9:04 AM
ABC poll suggests Bush will lose election
iraq.gifzmqqe6.gif, image/png, 221x183
It's not the current numbers that count. It's the direction of the curve. If this trend continues, Bush will NOT be re-elected.
Report this post as:
by Wavemaster
Sunday, Nov. 02, 2003 at 10:10 AM
Bush admirer you'd better put the crack pipe down and take a look at reality. First of all Arnold ran as the anti establishment canidate, the outsider not owned by special interests. Bush is the incombent, and like Bill Simon or anybody else who runs as a conservative republican, will never be elected in the state of California. Next, Bushes economic policies of tax cuts for the rich have been a disaster for the country, racking up deficates that our grandchildren will be stuck with. This is why the democratic nominies have suddenly got balls and are finally starting act like democrates instead of republican light. This president will be remembered for a disasterous war, loosing jobs, and lieing to the American people. Like Arnold and Jessie, Howard Dean will be the anti establishment president running against the incumbendt and will capture the youth, women and minority vote.
Report this post as:
by adrian more
Sunday, Nov. 02, 2003 at 11:28 AM
bush did not win the 2000 election.
he stole it thanx to roll scrubbing by his little bro and to diebold voting machine tampering.
the computerized voting system is a fraud.
and the diebold pigs are on bush's side.
Report this post as:
by Wavemaster
Sunday, Nov. 02, 2003 at 12:33 PM
Wrong again BA, Dean is not a "dangerous radical" He's just a guy that is not afraid to say what he believes instead of reading a script written by advisers or checking with his political advisers. Dean will not really cut defense enough and he's really a fiscal conservativ who will balance the budget. . The differecence between Dean and Bush is that instead of giving tax cuts to the rich, Dean want's everybody to have health insurance. Personally I think Dennis Kuicenich is the only canidate that will make a difference in Washington because of his soulutions on Health Care and Trade. He wants to have a single payer system to get rid of the HMO'S which is the only way to reduce health care, and he wants to get rid of unfair trade agrements which are the main cause of our jobs going overseas. Bush is a puppet on a string, a figure head to relate to the average American; Joe Sixpack or the so called Nascar Dads. Like the Wizard of Oz the emperor has no clothes, and the people now know who's really behind the curtain, its Carl Rove! and the other Neocons who are just pigs at the trough robbing the poor to give to the rich. People relate to Dean because they trust him!. Bush is flying around the country via Joe Tax payer on Airforce One going from one $2,000 a plate dinner to the next getting checks from millionairs. http://www.deanforamerica.com Dean on the other hand has a vibrant grass roots campaign never before witnessed in history. He 's getting $75.00 from average college student or Joe Union Worker.
Report this post as:
by x
Sunday, Nov. 02, 2003 at 3:48 PM
casualty.gif, image/png, 216x173
error
Report this post as:
by OzzyTeppics
Monday, Nov. 03, 2003 at 1:08 AM
A little niave on your part as it doesn't matter what the vote is, Bush/Cheney will just reinstall themselves, use a "Red" alert or a "terrorist" attack or thier supreme court and Cheney is president for life.
Correct hierarchy: Cheney is/will be president and Bush is/will be court jester/campaign fund shill.
Report this post as:
by adrian more
Monday, Nov. 03, 2003 at 7:09 AM
>>Giving people back their own money by reducing their taxes>>:
yeah,everybody's.
but bush reduces only the rich man's.
Report this post as:
by Tax Ax
Tuesday, Nov. 04, 2003 at 8:38 AM
Absolutely the so called income tax is collected to redistribute to others and industry that don't deserve it...here is the link to the republished article that was first published in the January, 1946, issue of a periodical named American Affairs.
The title of the article is "TAXES FOR REVENUE ARE OBSOLETE" by Beardsley Ruml (former) Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
home.hiwaay.net/~becraft/RUMLTAXES.html
Report this post as:
by political pol
Tuesday, Nov. 04, 2003 at 10:11 AM
Tax cuts have been greatest percentage-wise for the poor and middle class. The lowest rate went from 15% to 10%, a reduction of one-third. The tax cuts for the hightest bracket, which has yet to be fully implemented, will only reduce the top rate from 39% to 36%.
Dean will not carry the South. His big government, cradle to grave, cut the military budget non-sense won't play in the South and in many mid-Western and Western states. Any candidate must carry a majority of the South to become President.
Report this post as:
|