Ancient carved 'faces' found
By Dr David Whitehouse

BBC News Online science editor


A keen-eyed archaeologist claims to have found some of the oldest artwork ever - carved faces 200,000 years old.

The human images were found in 2001 by Pietro Gaietto on an expedition through the Borzonasca district of Italy.

He claims the rock has been sculpted into faces that look in opposite directions; one is bearded with what Gaietto calls an "expressive face".

If this is genuine, the artist would have been an extinct human species that died out about 150,000 years ago.


Cliff face

Local inhabitants say that prehistoric human faces are nothing new to the region and point to a rock cliff that they believe has been sculpted. They call it the Face of Borzone.

In 2001, in a pile of rubble collected for use as building material, Pietro Gaietto, from the Museum of the Origins of Man, saw something unusual in one particular head-sized rock.

"If I had not spotted it, it would have been covered in concrete and put into a wall," he told BBC News Online

Pietro Gaietto says it shows two heads, facing outwards and joined at the neck. One of the faces is bearded; the other is beardless.

Conceptual thought

"It has a very expressive face," he says. "The beardless face has two eyes, a mouth and a wide nose."


He says close inspection of the rock reveals that it has been carved and knocked into shape.

Gaietto believes the sculpture is 200,000 years old, and would have been used in rituals.

He says it would have been made by an extinct species of human called Homo erectus , of which there is evidence in the region.

Older still

Gaietto's claims are controversial because hominids such as Homo erectus are not thought to have been capable of the symbolic thought needed to create art.

The earliest examples of human artwork that scientists feel confident to describe as such are all less than 100,000 years old. The most notable items are probably the 70,000-year-old engraved ochre pieces found in the Blombos Cave of South Africa.

But there are items some researchers have claimed to be art that are even older than the faces of Borzonasca. The so-called Tan-Tan object unearthed in Morocco in 1999 is said to be a 400,000-year-old sculpted figurine.

Mainstream science, however, believes these items are not man-made at all. It argues the distinctive features have very probably been moulded by geological processes.


Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/hi/sci/tech/3197402.stm

Published: 2003/10/20 11:11:29 GMT

© BBC MMIII

"But there are items some researchers have claimed to be art that are even older than the faces of Borzonasca. The so-called Tan-Tan object unearthed in Morocco in 1999 is said to be a 400,000-year-old sculpted figurine.

Mainstream science, however, believes these items are not man-made at all. It argues the distinctive features have very probably been moulded by geological processes. "

To acknowledge intelligent human action prior to the "established theories" would be most inconvenient. The Scientific establishment might actually have to do Science and account for the new data in their cherished theories.

So, what actually happens is that inconvenient data is ignored - like anatomically modern human skeletons recovered from California Gold Mines following the Gold Rush of 1849. Univ. of Cal has the remains buried in their basement and don't want to talk about it. Why? The Rock Strata they were found in were MILLIONS of years old. Much much older than current theories allow for.

Thus works the Knowledge Filter of alleged Mainstream "Science".

I suspect that the people whose faces were carved 200,000 years ago had more advanced ideas than Bush, Schwartzenazi, Blair, and Margaret Thatcher. Probably they didn't let members of their tribe die of hunger or exposure in the name of the iron laws of the free market. Goes to show that history doesn't always advance in a straight line of progress and enlightenment.

hey, anomalous spectator. you raise an intriguing idea but i have never heard of this. could you tell me and the rest of the IMC community where to find out more about these university of california mystery skeletons?

Two references that pop to mind are:

1. Forbidden Anrchaeolgy by Thompson and Cremo Which is an exhaustively researched Scholarly Work or the abridged version "The Hidden HIstory of the Human Race.

2. David Hatcher Childress Mentions it in his book Lost Cities and Forgotten Civilizations of North America (The Title isn't exact but that should be enough to find it). This is real good read which is done as a bit of a travelogue and with the information as well.

There have been other articles and books which have mentioned this.

Or are they just crazy paperbacks in garish yellow?

They weren't written in little words so you wouldn't understand them.