|
printable version
- js reader version
- view hidden posts
- tags and related articles
View article without comments
by JBR Smallweed
Wednesday, Oct. 15, 2003 at 5:08 PM
Dinosaurs that have been carbon dated give an age of only a few thousand years.
Evolution is only a theory. The Bible is God's PROOF that the Earth was made by Him just over 6000 years ago.
www.angelfire.com/mi/dinosaurs/behemoth.html
Report this post as:
by Rex
Thursday, Oct. 16, 2003 at 2:49 PM
Carbon dating, see??
The bible is just jewish folklore.
Report this post as:
by Chris
Friday, Oct. 17, 2003 at 1:21 PM
"Carbon dating, see?? The bible is just jewish folklore."
Why do you have so much faith in carbon dating technology? Do you really know enough chemistry and physics to absolutely know its strengths and limitations?
Report this post as:
by Sheepdog
Friday, Oct. 17, 2003 at 4:53 PM
Plus chemistry, geology and a few other hard sciences. What's your excuse?
Report this post as:
by Chris
Saturday, Oct. 18, 2003 at 5:14 AM
Sheepdog, Without referencing a source, give us a protocol for determining the age of a bone with carbon dating technology and describe how the device works.
That's right, I knew you couldn't.
Report this post as:
by Sheepdog
Saturday, Oct. 18, 2003 at 5:45 AM
Okay Chris ( I feel like I'm explaining things to my kid) C14 is a naturally occurring isotope of carbon with a given half life.
During the life of a animal it incorporates a percentage of this isotope into the tissues. Since the isotope has this constant decay rate, the amount of this C14 still emitting is a time scale to the period when the tissue was still alive and ingesting the isotope. Do you want to know what an isotope is??
Report this post as:
by Chris
Saturday, Oct. 18, 2003 at 6:00 AM
I asked for an experimental protocol and an explanation of how the machine works. Not a junior high level explanation of what an isotope is.
Report this post as:
by Sheepdog
Saturday, Oct. 18, 2003 at 6:04 AM
I thought I was using terms you wold understand. Apparently not. You want to know about background radiation levels and controlled test environment protocols?
Report this post as:
by Chris
Saturday, Oct. 18, 2003 at 6:14 AM
I didn't realize my request was so cryptic.
Protocol is defined as "The plan for a course of medical treatment or for a scientific experiment."
No cheating. That's right. I knew you couldn't.
Report this post as:
by Sheepdog
Saturday, Oct. 18, 2003 at 6:17 AM
I've gone down this path before. Are you telling me that standard C14 dating protocols are wrong? Quit squirming.
Report this post as:
by Chris
Saturday, Oct. 18, 2003 at 6:42 AM
"Are you telling me that standard C14 dating protocols are wrong?"
Not at all. Just proving that your knowledge of carbon dating is based on faith -- with no depth to your understanding.
"Quit squirming."
Who's squirming?
Report this post as:
by Sheepdog
Saturday, Oct. 18, 2003 at 6:47 AM
I also know that you are attempting to quibble about the meaning of meaning. Even geological evidence shows that dnosaurs were older than your Christian record, but
go for it, bible boy.
Report this post as:
by Chris
Saturday, Oct. 18, 2003 at 7:00 AM
I'm not a believer. Nor do I believe that dinosaurs walked with man. What gave you that idea?
I was just showing that faith is not limited to religion.
For the record, I'm a scientist (biologist).
Report this post as:
by Sheepdog
Saturday, Oct. 18, 2003 at 7:06 AM
Okay Mr. Science. Isn't there a process called peer review? That seems a fair substitute for faith.
Report this post as:
by Chris
Saturday, Oct. 18, 2003 at 7:17 AM
Why would you support the overwhelming peer reviewed evidence for carbon dating when you don't support the overwhelming peer-reviewed evidence displaying the innocuousness of depleted uranium munitions?
Report this post as:
by Sheepdog
Saturday, Oct. 18, 2003 at 10:24 AM
'overwhelming peer-reviewed evidence' - of DU? So now you are saying that peer reviewed studies of the effects of DU are in agreement to it's less than harmful effects? Please. Do me a favor.
Report this post as:
by Nuria
Sunday, Oct. 19, 2003 at 10:19 AM
THE BIBLE IS THE WORD OF GOD REVEALED TO MAN IT IS GODS PROOF THAT HE MADE THE WORLD IN SIX DAYS.
WOULDNT YOU RATHER BELEIVE GOD THANA BUNCH OF CRAZY SCIENTISTS?
Report this post as:
by Sheepdog
Sunday, Oct. 19, 2003 at 10:20 AM
please don't use a computer and badmouth sciene at the same time. It shows stupidity even with the cap lock on.
Report this post as:
by Aletta
Sunday, Oct. 19, 2003 at 1:34 PM
The Bible was written a full 200 years after Christ (if he even existed) died and is nothing more than heresay and folklore.
It is a silly book that can be read to support almost any position.
Report this post as:
by a friend of a friend of_____
Sunday, Oct. 19, 2003 at 1:54 PM
j.chirac, koffen anon, irans mullahs, chinese commies, southamerican socialists, castro, jesse jackson, european classism/socialism,
Report this post as:
|