We had a server outage, and we're rebuilding the site. Some of the site features won't work. Thank you for your patience.
imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

white themeblack themered themetheme help
About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
latest news
best of news




A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List


IMC Network:

Original Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
printable version - js reader version - view hidden posts - tags and related articles

Dean! No, Kucinich! No, Clark!

by xyzzy Saturday, Sep. 20, 2003 at 5:21 AM

I feel compelled to interrupt this endless stream of electoral politics and inject a few words of reality into the debate.

Does anyone honestly think that if by some miracle Kucinich gets elected the system will actually allow him to put into practice even half of what he says he'll do? If Kucinich gets into office, he'll have had to sell out to get there, and once there, he'd be forced to sell out more. The seats of power corrupt whomever happens to sit in them.

I mean, first of all, we're talking about a brainwashed public that, thanks to an oligarchic media that's anything but a 'free press', half of which still claims that the Emperor is doing a 'good job' at governing, more than half of which thinks that Iraq and Saddam had something to do with the 9/11 attacks, a media that trivializes the Left while actively organizing pro-Establishment pro-war demonstrations.

Ah yes, the media. The big debate right now is whether to keep it as-is or to make it even more oligarchic; in other words the current totally unacceptable state of things that's helped foster the rise of American fascism is considered the bleeding LEFT (!) edge of what's politically possible by the system. Not to mention a political process that's so advertising-dependent that it forces all candidates to pander to the rich at $100 (or $1000) a plate fundraisers if they want a ghost of a chance of being viable.

When fascist propaganda machinery is considered the left edge of the politically possible, I don't think it should take an Einstein to conclude that the whole system ITSELF is fucked up and needs to be questioned.

Besides, just look at history. The Progressive Era (Socialist Party and IWW membership at all time highs), the New Deal (Communist Party growing by leaps and bounds), and the Civil Rights Acts (scads of radical energy in the '60s) didn't happen in a vacuum, and weren't put into law because of generosity. They happened in the background of growing discontent, manifesting itself as growing numbers of people seeing the system itself as the problem and becoming willing to step outside its bounds in seeking change.

Reforms are allowed to pass -- grudgingly -- by a ruling class that's starting to worry their corpses are about to become the latest fashion in lamp-post decorations. (Note to any po-po reading this about to put it in their domestic terrorism file: I said "that's starting to worry their corpses are about to become ..." not "whose corpses have just become ...". I'm discussing the fears of the ruling class, not advocating any concrete policy for confronting them. So there.)

And if the reforms succeed in buying off the radical movements that were responsible for prompting them, they'll be undermined or repealed. Clinton ended 'welfare as we know it', Bush is gutting EPA regulations, affirmative action is under attack everywhere, FDR's sops to the people on media ownership and fairness were long ago defined as unacceptably left-wing, etc.

In other words, there is no alternative to social revolution, and even what are trotted out as the gains of reformism are in fact the gains of revolutionaries.

Vote? Sure, definitely. Why voluntarily refuse a chance to have some influence (however limited) over the system just by blacking in some ovals and putting a stamp on an envelope. Bush is so abysmally bad that pretty much anybody else would be an improvement.

But don't get so caught up in this that you lose sight of the rest of the picture.

I now return you to our regularly-scheduled program of squabbles over which Democrat is best.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments

Listed below are the 10 latest comments of 2 posted about this article.
These comments are anonymously submitted by the website visitors.
yes vote. It puts you on jurys that bastard Sunday, Sep. 21, 2003 at 8:12 PM
Is Clark Winning? Ffutal Wednesday, Sep. 24, 2003 at 11:23 AM
© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy