- js reader version
- view hidden posts
- tags and related articles
Sunday, Jul. 27, 2003 at 4:43 PM
You can't even give some people money without them complaining. Take these liberals for instance. Do you suppose they're crying because they're really upset, or is this just politics talking for them? I mean it's their money, right? Perhaps they should give the checks to charity? Perhaps they could endorse over their "ill gotten gains" to me? I'd be okay with that!
Child tax credit checks welcome, but some parents question wisdom of the payouts
DAVID CRARY, AP National Writer Saturday, July 26, 2003
(07-26) 12:43 PDT (AP) --
For millions of middle-class families, the check is in the mail -- $400, $800, perhaps more -- courtesy of Congress. Parents benefiting from the expanded child tax credit will welcome the cash, but some question the wisdom of such payouts at a time of deficits and cutbacks.
"I'd rather have the public services and the public schools have the money they need," said Jean Powers, 41, a mother of two from Beaverton, Ore. "I'm not happy with it."
Even more displeased are some of the low-income parents not receiving the checks -- notably those who earn less than roughly $26,000 and are excluded from the credit because they don't pay enough federal income tax.
"I'm very angry," said Linda Hayes, 40, an office manager in Grand Rapids, Mich. A single mother, she supports a 14-year-old son and 9-year-old daughter on a $23,000 salary.
"I'm tired of working hard and still not being able to provide properly for my children," she said. "I'm tired of having to choose canned vegetables instead of fresh ones. I feel I don't count, my kids don't count."
She said some better-off families might simply invest their payments; she would have used hers to get car repairs and corrective lens for her son, who lacks medical insurance.
The first round of rebate checks for the child tax credit were mailed out Friday, aimed primarily at families earning $26,000 to $110,000 with children under 17. Worth up to $400 per child, the checks are the result of a tax cut enacted in May.
"I'm happy to get money in the summer because money is tight," said Tom Franke, a high school teacher, swim coach and father of two from Maple Grove, Minn. But he questioned whether the credit made sense as the federal deficit grows.
"The government is cutting our funding to our schools, and that makes me a little bit nervous. We needed extra money to fund our war," he said. "There are better ways to spend this money."
Randi Born of Plymouth, Minn., said the checks will be welcome at a time when her two teenage sons are preparing to return to school
"It is just kind of like a little gift," said Born. "If I was good person I would donate it. But maybe what the government wants me to do is to spend it and stimulate the economy."
The rebate checks are to be mailed by Aug. 8 to more than 25 million taxpayers. Critics contend the program should be extended to 7 million more low-income households with about 12 million children.
Melinda Dutton, director of policy at the New York branch of the Children's Defense Fund, said the economic stimulus would be greater if the House of Representatives dropped its opposition to including those poor families.
"Nobody is more likely to put it right into the economy than low-income working families." she said. "They are struggling to pay for child care, rent, groceries."
That argument resonated with Anna Connor, a mother of two from Albany, N.Y.
"It's not going to make a big difference for me," she said of her expected check. "I feel bad for the people who need it and aren't going to get it."
"There are better ways to stimulate the economy," agreed Eileen Holand, a real estate agent and mother of three from New Richmond, Wis.
Joan Medlen of Portland, Ore., who has two children, was pleased to hear about the payment.
But with a teenager suffering from Down syndrome and autism, the money won't go far, Medlen said. Unlike some states, Oregon doesn't provide financial assistance to middle-class families that have children with disabilities.
"We put out significant money for skilled care for our child," she said. "Eight-hundred dollars, while helpful, doesn't even make a dent."
Curt Roseman, 32, of Cary, N.C., said the check for his two children would likely go into their college savings plan, not for a shopping spree.
"Not until I see the economy turn around a little more," said Roseman, a utility company employee. "Until people see unemployment rates go down, they're not going to spend discretionary cash."
Paul Lynch, 54, a parks worker in Cincinnati, said his check will go toward his 13-year-old son's tuition at a parochial school.
"It's useful," he said. "As far as stimulating the economy, I don't think so. They (Washington) have tried everything, and nothing seems to work."
But Toby Placencia, 45, of Vancouver, Wash., had no complaints and no quibbling. "Any time the government doesn't take more money, it's a good idea," he said.
Report this post as:
LATEST COMMENTS ABOUT THIS ARTICLE
Listed below are the 10 latest comments of 19 posted about this article.
These comments are anonymously submitted by the website visitors.
|Got the letter today.
||Sunday, Jul. 27, 2003 at 4:46 PM
||Sunday, Jul. 27, 2003 at 4:59 PM
|$23,000+ each of us in debt because of fascist oil war
||Sunday, Jul. 27, 2003 at 6:27 PM
||Sunday, Jul. 27, 2003 at 8:54 PM
||Monday, Jul. 28, 2003 at 2:26 AM
||Monday, Jul. 28, 2003 at 2:42 AM
||Monday, Jul. 28, 2003 at 6:17 AM
|Yep. What about luxury taxes too?
||K O B E SBM
||Monday, Jul. 28, 2003 at 10:21 AM
||Monday, Jul. 28, 2003 at 10:39 AM
|Don't get fooled by the numbers.
||The Rest of us
||Monday, Jul. 28, 2003 at 10:58 AM
||Monday, Jul. 28, 2003 at 3:04 PM
|Right ON! Look at the "once wealthy"
||K O B E SBM
||Tuesday, Jul. 29, 2003 at 4:05 AM
|I am laughing
||The rest of us
||Tuesday, Jul. 29, 2003 at 5:35 PM
|sounds like the ex-king of england
||Wednesday, Jul. 30, 2003 at 12:17 AM
||Wednesday, Jul. 30, 2003 at 1:37 AM
||Wednesday, Jul. 30, 2003 at 5:38 AM
|get one and stash it
||Wednesday, Jul. 30, 2003 at 6:39 AM
Woolsey Fire: Worst News of 2018?
Oppose Environmentally-Harmful Development
Oppose Environmentally-Harmful Development
OUR HOUSE Grief Support Center Presents Night for Hope
Marshall Tuck’s racist dog whistle
Marshall Tuck’s ethnocentrism contradicts Californian values
Debunking Some Anti-Prop 10 Propaganda
Why Should California Choose De Leon Over Feinstein?
Change Links September 2018 posted
More Scandals Rock Southern California Nuke Plant San Onofre
Site Outage Friday
Change Links August 2018
Setback for Developer of SC Farm Land
More problems at Shutdown San Onofre Nuke
Change Links 2018 July posted
More Pix: "Families Belong Together," Pasadena
"Families Belong Together" March, Pasadena
Short Report on the Families Belong Together Protest in Los Angeles
More Local News...
WILLIE BROWN, YOU TALK TOO MUCH
MR PUSH, WHERE IS YOUR WIFE?
Paraphysique du burnout post-démocratique
911 : establishment terror
Actor Patrick Kilpatrick Discusses and Signs his New Book Dying for Living
The Attack of Corporations and the Rich on the Rest of Society
VAN ATTACK HOAX
Mobile Royale Hack Online Generator - Get Unlimited Crystals
Unification, séparation et fragmentation
FAKE NEWS POR SOROS
Chemtrails and Prince
Wages For Housework
A Mistake: Jesse Jackson-Toyota deal-in Lexington -Ky is .8 billion over 10 years 2018
If Trump Declares a AantionalEmergency, He'll Be Breaking the Law
Jesse Jackson's Sneak Attck on Toyota Lexington Ky and it's workers 2018
Video: Chris Herdges in Eugene, 1 hr 24 min
Judge Delays Ruling on Puerto Rico Debt Deal White House Opposes Island's Food Assistance
Paraphysique de proxémie guerrière
More Breaking News...