Working on this new server in php7...
imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

white themeblack themered themetheme help
About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
Features
latest news
best of news
syndication
commentary


KILLRADIO

VozMob

ABCF LA

A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List

LAAMN List




IMC Network:

Original Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
printable version - js reader version - view hidden posts - tags and related articles


View article without comments

Nobody Wants Saddam Back

by Amir Taheri Wednesday, Jul. 23, 2003 at 3:37 AM

Nobody wants Saddam back (except perhaps Matt, Diogenes, X, Meyer, and Sheepdog). The author is an Iranian journalist and author of 10 books on the Middle East and Islam. 

"The Iraqi Intifada!" This is the cover story offered by Al- Watan Al-Arabi, a pro- Saddam Hussein weekly published in Paris. It finds an echo in the latest issue of America's Time magazine, which paints a bleak prospect for the newly liberated country. The daily Al Quds, another pro-Saddam paper, quotes from The Washington Post in support of its claim that "a popular war of resistance" is growing in Iraq. Some newspapers in the United States, Britain and "old Europe" go further by claiming that Iraq has become a "quagmire" or "another Vietnam." The Parisian daily Le Monde prefers the term "engrenage," which is both more chic and French.

This chorus wants us to believe that most Iraqis regret the ancien regime, and are ready to kill and die to expel their liberators.
 
Sorry, guys, this is not the case.

Neither the wishful thinking of part of the Arab media, long in the pay of Saddam, nor the visceral dislike of part of the Western media for George W. Bush and Tony Blair changes the facts on the ground in Iraq.

ONE fact is that a visitor to Iraq these days never finds anyone who wants Saddam back.

There are many complaints, mostly in Baghdad, about lack of security and power cuts. There is anxiety about the future at a time that middle-class unemployment is estimated at 40 percent. Iraqis also wonder why it is that the coalition does not communicate with them more effectively. That does not mean that there is popular support for violent action against the coalition.

Another fact is that the violence we have witnessed, especially against American troops, in the past six weeks is limited to less than 1 percent of the Iraqi territory, in the so-called "Sunni Triangle," which includes parts of Baghdad.

Elsewhere, the coalition presence is either accepted as a fact of life or welcomed. On the 4th of July some shops and private homes in various parts of Iraq, including the Kurdish areas and cities in the Shiite heartland, put up the star-spangled flag as a show of gratitude to the United States.

"We see our liberation as the start of a friendship with the U.S. and the U.K. that should last a thousand years," says Khalid Kishtaini, one of Iraq's leading novelists. "The U.S. and the U.K. showed that a friend in need is a friend indeed. Nothing can change that."

In the early days of the liberation, some mosque preachers tested the waters by speaking against "occupation." They soon realized that their congregations had a different idea. Today, the main theme in sermons at the mosques is about a partnership between the Iraqi people and the coalition to rebuild the war-shattered country and put it on the path of democracy.

Even the radical Shiite cleric Muqtada Sadr now says that "some good" could come out of the coalition's presence in Iraq. "The coalition must help us stabilize the situation," he says. "The healing period that we need would not be possible if we are suddenly left alone."

Yet another fact is that all 67 of Iraq's cities and 85 percent of the smaller towns now have fully functioning municipalities. Several ministries, including that of health and education, have also managed to get parts of their operations going again. The petroleum industry, too, is being revived with plans to produce up to 2.8 million barrels of crude oil a day before the year is out.

To be sure, life in Iraq today is no bed of roses. But don't forget that this is an immediate post-war situation. There is no famine - in fact, the bazaars are more replenished with food than ever since the late 1970s - while food prices, having jumped in the first weeks after liberation, are now lower than they were in the last years of Saddam's rule.

MOST hospitals are functioning again with essential medical supplies trickling in for the first time since 1999. Also, some 85 percent of primary and secondary schools and all but two of the nation's universities have reopened with a full turnout of pupils and teachers.

The difference is that there no longer are any mukahebrat (secret police) agents roaming the campuses and sitting at the back of classrooms to make sure lecturers and students do not discuss forbidden topics. Nor are the students required to start every day with a solemn oath of allegiance to the dictator.

There has been no mass exodus anywhere in Iraq. On the contrary, many Iraqis, driven out of their homes by Saddam, are returning to their towns and villages.

Their return has given the building industry, moribund in the last years of Saddam, a boost. Iraqi exiles and refugees abroad are also coming home, many from Iran and Turkey. Last month alone the Iranian Red Crescent recorded the repatriation of more than 10,000 Iraqis, mostly Kurds and Shiites.

In Iraq today there are no "displaced persons," no uprooted communities and no long lines of war victims in search of a safe haven.

FOR the first time in almost 50 years there are also no political prisoners, no executions, no torture and no limit on freedom of expression. Iraq today is the only Muslim country where all shades of opinion - from the extremist Islamists of the Hezbollah to Stalinists, and passing by liberals, socialists, Arab nationalists and moderate Islamists - have full freedom to compete in an open market of ideas. Better still, all are now represented in the newly created Governing Assembly (Majlis al-Hukum). Iraq is also the only Muslim country where more than 100 newspapers and weeklies, representing all shades of opinion, appear without a police permit and are subjected to no censorship.

Much is made of power cuts, especially in Baghdad. But this is partly due to a 30 percent seasonal increase in demand because of air-conditioning use in temperatures that reach 115 degrees. In other cities - for example, Basra - the country's second-most populous urban center, more electricity is used than at any time under Saddam Hussein.

A stroll in the open-air book markets of the Rashid Street reveals that thousands of books, blacklisted and banned under Saddam Hussein, are now available for sale. Among the banned authors were almost all of Iraq's best writers and poets, whom many young Iraqis discover for the first time. Stalls, offering video and audiotapes for sale, are appearing in Baghdad and other major cities, again giving Iraqis access to a forbidden cultural universe.

The flower stalls along the Tigris are also making a comeback.

"Business is good," says Hashem Yassin, one florist. "In the past, we sold a lot of flowers for funerals and placement on tombs. Now we sell for weddings, birthday parties and gifts of friendship."

The free-market economy is making its first inroads into Iraq's socialistic system in a number of small ways. Hundreds of hawkers are offering a variety of imported goods and making brisk business by selling soft drinks, often bottled in Iran, and biscuits and chewing gums from Turkey.

Some teahouses, in competition to attract clients, offer satellite television as an additional attraction. Every evening people pack the teahouses to watch, and zap and discuss, what they have seen in an atmosphere of freedom unknown under Saddam. It may be hard for Westerners to understand the Iraqis' exhilaration at being able to watch television of their choice.

But this is a country where, under Saddam, people could be condemned as spies and hanged for owning a satellite dish.

Another symbol of newly won freedom is the multiplication of cellular and satellite phones. Most belong to returning exiles. But their appearance is reassuring to many Iraqis. Under Saddam, their illegal possession could carry the death penalty.

The portrayal of Baghdad as an oriental version of the Far West in Hollywood Westerns misses the point. It ignores the fact that life is creeping back to normal, that weddings, always popular in summer, are being celebrated again, often with traditional tribal ostentation. The first rock concert since the war, offered by a boys' band, has already taken place, and Iraq's National Football (soccer) Squad has resumed training under a German coach.

THERE are two Iraqs today: One as portrayed by those in America and Europe who wish to use it as a means of damaging Bush and Blair, and the other as it really exists, home to 24 million people with many hopes and aspirations and, naturally, some anxiety about the future.

"After we have aired our grievances we remember the essential point: Saddam is gone," says Mohsen Saleh, a geologist in Baghdad. "A man who is cured of cancer does not complain about a common cold."
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


Hey, Amir...

by Hormoz Wednesday, Jul. 23, 2003 at 4:40 AM

... isn't there a cia-funded satellite propaganda show you should be attending? By the way, say hi to Richard Perle next time you are at a Benador and Associates meeting.

LA indymedia: I thought you were going to shut-up this professional liar with a filthy mouth called Bush Admirer. Shutting-up a person who is paid to spread confusion and lies is not censorship--it's public service.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


Geeez

by Sheepdog Wednesday, Jul. 23, 2003 at 4:46 AM

This is a funny thread.
Only the uninformed would buy it. After the CIA installed Saddam and gave lists of leftists for him to massacre, he was their boy. Then he did the unforgivable. He tried to obtain more control of the countries oil revenues.
Never mind the murders or torture, our support was undiminished until this CIA puppet decided to cut the strings. This is a story written in the blood
and misery of the Iraqi people. By the way, where is that guy?
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


yukIII

by twisted echo Wednesday, Jul. 23, 2003 at 6:05 AM

Let's be honest Bush Admirer. Your real problem with the above post by Sheepdog is that you are unable
to refute any of it.

Despite the fact that you don't like it, it's all true. And truth is the spotlight that
dittoheads like you can't really hide from
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


^

by twisted echo Wednesday, Jul. 23, 2003 at 6:09 AM

This is all I have. I am a liberal.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


BANG BANG

by good shot Wednesday, Jul. 23, 2003 at 6:36 AM

Uday and Qusay be dead.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


Where This Guy is Coming From

by Meyer London Wednesday, Jul. 23, 2003 at 1:51 PM

Taheri is a well-to-do Iranian and a stooge of the CIA and the US State Department. He constantly defends the Bush Administration in publications like the Wall Street Journal and National Review Online. He is an enemy of anyone in the Middle East who resists US imperialism. Of course, anyone is free to believe that Iraqi flower vendors told him that now they sell flowers for weddings and other cheerful events, whereas before the US invaders came they only sold them for the funerals of those executed by the Iraqi government. Notice how he mentions that Iraq attacked Iran, but omits the little detail that this happened with the encouragement of the United States.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


This is the stuff that doesn't make headlines

by Josef Wednesday, Jul. 23, 2003 at 3:54 PM

the left-wing press would rather whip up fears of a 'groundswell of support for guerilla attacks' when the reality is far less sensational.

Good to hear that progress is being made. President Bush is truly a visionary.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


well

by fresca Wednesday, Jul. 23, 2003 at 4:44 PM

What did you expect BA. The article is simply stating the obvious.

Notice that meyer's only recourse was to give into the reflex of trying to fabricate, yet another halfbaked conspiracy theory.

Eventually, every thread leads down this lonely road.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


My delusions

by Josef Thursday, Jul. 24, 2003 at 3:50 AM

Yes, I actually believe that the media is liberal. I also believe in God, Santa Claus, and the Tooth Fairy. I'm a conservative.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


saddam=bush

by saddam=bush Thursday, Jul. 24, 2003 at 5:29 AM

we can't know if these alleged antius attacks in iraq are real or spin,but we do know whom they benefit:

the bush thugs who make zillions every day from oil/reconstruction/logistics deals and who would run out of excuses to stay on in iraq were it not for these alleged attacks and the alleged saddam behind them.

no authentic resistance in history ever surfaced without big-power backup:

vietnam had russia and china,the italian partisans had us/GB.

but these alleged iraqis have noone but...bush:

gettin'the drift?

Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


Credibility of pro-US Iranian

by Meyer London Thursday, Jul. 24, 2003 at 5:54 AM

Well, Bush Admirer, I guess you think we have to take this fellow's word for things like the flower stall story or the new atmosphere of "freedom" (at a time when the US military is censoring and closing down newspapers). A little knowledge of this clown's background may help us decide whether taking his word for what is going on in Iraq is a good idea.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


You're right

by fresca Thursday, Jul. 24, 2003 at 6:13 AM

"who would run out of excuses to stay on in iraq were it not for these alleged attacks "

You know what? You are absolutely right.

I say we get EVERY one of our guys out of Iraq immediately. Every one of them. Every soldier. Every adviser. Every engineer. Everyone.

NOW.

TODAY.

And let the fine folk of Iraq rebuild that beautiful paradise by themselves, on their own dime without any of our fascist interuption.

Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


wow!fresca is right!

by wow! fresca is right! Thursday, Jul. 24, 2003 at 6:23 AM

wow! 913 fresca is right! miracle!!
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


^

by wow! fresca is right! Thursday, Jul. 24, 2003 at 6:26 AM

Then again, I would know "right" if it came up to me and bit me on my vaseline lubricated ass.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy