Working on this new server in php7...
imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

white themeblack themered themetheme help
About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
Features
latest news
best of news
syndication
commentary


KILLRADIO

VozMob

ABCF LA

A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List

LAAMN List




IMC Network:

Original Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
printable version - js reader version - view hidden posts - tags and related articles


View article without comments

Most callers say president misled nation

by Scarecrow Monday, Jul. 21, 2003 at 5:22 PM

"I can fill your editorial pages with comments on 'who to believe' but will simplify my response to this week's Sound Off by borrowing a quote from Groucho Marx," she said. "'What are you going to believe, what we tell you or what you see with your own two eyes?'"


The Pharos-Tribune Online Edition
Sunday, July 20, 2003, 10:08:23 PM

Most callers say president misled nation
Sunday, July 20, 2003




By DAVE KITCHELL

Pharos-Tribune staff writer






Diane Kepner borrowed a line from a famous comedian to describe her thoughts on President George W. Bush and the American occupation of Iraq.

"I can fill your editorial pages with comments on 'who to believe' but will simplify my response to this week's Sound Off by borrowing a quote from Groucho Marx," she said. "'What are you going to believe, what we tell you or what you see with your own two eyes?'"

Based on what respondents to the Pharos-Tribune Sound Off line have either seen, heard or read, most say the president lied to the American people in his State of the Union Address this year when he emphasized the reasons for invading Iraq. Some even said Bush's speech misled the country so much, he should be impeached.

Bush supporters also made their thoughts known.

"No, I do not believe President Bush misled the people," said Elaine Hall of Logansport. "I believe he is a man of great principle and character."

Phillip Carmichael of Logansport said the Iraq invasion was the right thing to do.

"Misled or not, if we hadn't gone into Iraq, Iraq would have come into us. Saddam needed to be taken out."

Don Freehafer of Logansport said criticism of Bush is partisan wrangling.

"This whole thing is Democrat politics. Bush only repeated what he had been told was true and he thought it was true when he said it."

More callers did not agree, however.

"He most certainly did," said Dennis Kuritz of Logansport.

"The President has lied to us. (Secretary of Defense Don) Rumsfeld lied to us. (National Security Adviser Condoleeza) Rice has lied to us and so has (Secretary of State) Colin Powell. We have been deceived by lies before the war started right through the 18th of July."

Hank Easley said American forces should not have been sent to Iraq.

"I think the Bush Administration has misled the American people and we have no business over there. The rest of the world would not go over there and do anything, and they won't even help us now that they're taking potshots at our boys over there. These people have been fighting since the world began, and they'll still be fighting. They hate Americans. We've got no business over there. They talked about Hitler and Mussolini and Stalin wanting to fight the world. I don't know what they can call Bush. He's misleading the American people. I feel sorry for those guys over there. I really feel sorry for them."

William Lytle Sr. of Logansport also questions the validity of Bush's comments.

"I definitely think George Bush lied to the American people and I don't think he was the only one in the American government that did. Saddam Hussein didn't have any nuclear weapons or he would have used them when we first went in there."

Phillip Penn of Burrows was among callers who said Bush should be punished.

"My opinion is that President Bush misled the people. I think that he and Dick Cheney should both be impeached."

Rick Snay of Logansport was even more emphatic.

"President Bush lied. Let's get that straight. Let me repeat it. He lied. He shamelessly used people's paranoia about another terrorist attack so that he could support his Iraq habit. After what we impeached Bill Clinton for, if this does not result in an impeachment, there is no justice in this country. President Bush lied."

Mark Camp compared Bush's actions if he did lie to Bush's predecessor.

"President Bush has lied to the American people long enough. If the Congress can try to impeach Bill Clinton for an infidelity which he lied about, then Bush surely should be impeached for having American people killed for a war that is just for oil."

Mercedes Brugh of Logansport said the 16 words cited in the State of the Union address that is at the center of controversy are not the only misleading statements in the speech.

"There were more deceptions in the President's State of the Union address than the assertion that Iraq had a viable nuclear weapons program," she said. "Bush also linked Saddam to the 9/11 attacks. But no credible evidence has ever been presented linking Saddam to Sept. 11, and claims about an Al Qaeda cell operating in Iraq were never substantiated. The State Department, CIA, and other U.S. agencies repeatedly stated that there was no link between Iraq and Al Qaeda, and that Iraq was not engaging in terrorist attacks on the US. A few brave members of the intelligence community, both in the US and in Britain, complained that their work was being distorted to make the case for war. Yet Bush, in his State of the Union address, said that Saddam 'could provide one of his hidden weapons' to terrorists, and invited us to 'imagine those 19 hijackers ... armed by Saddam Hussein ..." President Bush's suggestion that Saddam would give precious military assets to a terrorist network beyond his control was never credible. Bush's 'selling of the war' included not only long-discredited 'intelligence' on a nuclear weapons program, but also a link between Saddam and 9/11 conjured out of thin air. America's fine sons and daughters, who are fighting in Iraq, deserve the truth."

Dave Kitchell may be contacted at 722-5000, Ext. 5150, or via e-mail at david.kitchell@pharostribune.com.


--end--

©2000 The Pharos-Tribune. A cnhi Newspaper
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


Only 16 Words.

by Scarecrow Monday, Jul. 21, 2003 at 5:23 PM

Only 10,000 Dead.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


The Pharos-Tribune

by Bush Admirer Monday, Jul. 21, 2003 at 5:31 PM

The Pharos-Tribune????

Hahahhahahha

How ridiculous and stupid to post a stupid article like this from a source no one ever heard of as if it was relevant to the debate.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


Call in shows

by Fan Monday, Jul. 21, 2003 at 5:41 PM

I listened to a call-in radio talk show today here in San Diego and 4 out of 5 callers think the Chargers will win the Super Bowl next year.

Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


Notice the usual disinfo tactic...

by Diogenes Monday, Jul. 21, 2003 at 6:17 PM

...when you cannot refute the article attack the messenger.

That even a Modest Daily gets a negative reaction to Bush Lies is significant.

The Tide is turning.

Keep pushing. Keep informing people.

The Tower of Bush will not topple easily but it will topple. The weight of the truth is too much for it to sustain.

BUSH LIED AND THOUSANDS DIED.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


amusing

by fresca Monday, Jul. 21, 2003 at 6:31 PM

"The Tide is turning. "

The tide turned when the arabs attcked us on 9-11.

Two minor military actions in an effort to defend ourselves.

What "tide" do you speak of?

Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


Let me guess...

by Diogenes Monday, Jul. 21, 2003 at 6:38 PM

...frescaw. You think Oblivion is a town in Kansas not your state of mind?
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


The Tide of Truth Against Numbskulls...

by mediawatcher Monday, Jul. 21, 2003 at 6:39 PM

TIME magazine, of all places, publishes a cover story called "Untruth and Consequences,"
questioning the Bush Administrations motivations against Iraq. Fuck 911! The end is coming
for the shitheads who have hijacked this country (Bush et. al.). The problem is that when
immature loser neo-cons see they've been had by their own demigod, they get all defensive and
shit and dig in their feet like nazis. Y'all some sad Americans, get a life and get a real president!

I'm actually waiting on some mature republicans to step up and admit they've been played
like a ho by their own pseudo-icon. The rest of you need to grow up and smell the petrol.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


uh,...

by fresca Monday, Jul. 21, 2003 at 6:50 PM

...disingenuous. I think you meant OBLIVIOUS as a modifier of "state of mind".

Anyway, I feel I'm safe in stating that denying the history of arab attacks on America over the last couple of decades, culminating in 9-11 sorta puts YOU in the OBLIVIOUS camp, doncha think?
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


The mis-usage...

by Diogenes Monday, Jul. 21, 2003 at 7:09 PM

...was intentional as it conveyed the point better.

P.S. You're not in Kansas anymore.

PPS. Hows Tel Aviv this morning?
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


mediawatcher

by just wondering Tuesday, Jul. 22, 2003 at 4:49 AM

Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


OneEyedMan

by KPC Tuesday, Jul. 22, 2003 at 12:55 PM

Time is a left-wing rag?

I guess you must think that Reader's Digest is a communist front...

...now you can stop wondering...it's not that you don't know where the political center is...it's just that you don't know your left from your right...or your ass from a hole in the ground for that matter....
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


KPC

by that's right! Tuesday, Jul. 22, 2003 at 3:12 PM

TIME is a left-wing rag. So is Newsweek, the NYT, the LA Times, ABC, NBC, CBS, PBS, NPR, CNN and a few others. When you're so far to the left that you actually believe that these listed above are right-wing, then you don't know where the political center is, and you demonstrated that quite well, thank you.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


makes sense

by Attila the Hun Tuesday, Jul. 22, 2003 at 3:16 PM

all you guys are left wing loonies.
Who left this blade of grass?
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


Almost correct

by Samspam Tuesday, Jul. 22, 2003 at 3:49 PM

But not right enough!
We should burn their presses and chain gun the copy boys.
Then go after that left leaning National Review who let
Ann Coulter go.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy