Working on this new server in php7...
imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

white themeblack themered themetheme help
About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
Features
latest news
best of news
syndication
commentary


KILLRADIO

VozMob

ABCF LA

A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List

LAAMN List




IMC Network:

Original Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
printable version - js reader version - view hidden posts - tags and related articles


View article without comments

THE WORST KIND OF LIE

by JOHN CHUCKMAN Thursday, Jul. 10, 2003 at 1:50 AM

LYING MADE EASY...



THE WORST KIND OF LIE

John Chuckman

A few years sometimes make a big difference in human affairs. A few years ago an American President was put through the 18th century ordeal of impeachment, a vast, expensively-staged comic opera of white manes waving and grave baritones intoning, over a dribble on a dress and the lie he told to save himself embarrassment. Today we have a President who has hurled the world into two dirty, pointless wars after what undoubtedly qualifies as the longest sequence of public lies ever uttered in a free society, and yet in his homeland he remains popular and is collecting enough campaign cash to rival the Swiss bank balances of the Russian Mafia.

Leaders have always lied in times of war and when maneuvering for advantage in international affairs, American presidents, despite puffed-up claims to different moral standards, no less so than others. Usually the lies they tell are not understood until years later. The lies then often seem to become small, unimportant details in a history of big events. But Bush has lied daily, doing it so awkwardly at times that you might think everyone is aware of it, and it seems to make no difference to his political standing.

What will Bush do with all the cash he is hoarding for the next campaign? He will use it to practice the worst lying possible in a democratic society, lying that subverts the intent of democracy, replacing meaningful debate by the suggestions, half-truths, and staged images of advertising and marketing. Perhaps, I should correct that to the second-worst lying possible in a democratic society, for Bush, of course, entered office with the worst lying, claiming to have won an election he lost by any sensible reckoning.

Why are Americans not distressed at this? Because they live in an intense field, an electromagnetic haze, of marketing, advertising, and commercial propaganda twenty-four hours a day. Americans are so saturated with this stuff that they regard it as normal communication.

But it is not normal. It is deliberate and manipulative. At its very best, advertising is only ever half truth, telling a few favorable aspects of something that deserves greater scrutiny. At its worst, it is simply artful fraud and deception. But in no case is it truth or, perhaps better put since truth is a large and difficult idea, honest communication. Advertising, like its fraternal twin, propaganda, always has a purpose other than helping you understand something. This other purpose is its raison d'être. Advertising wants to separate you from your money or, in the case of politics, from your vote.

I've often chuckled over the way Americans used to get so upset over the idea of Communist propaganda. While Americans decried that propaganda, they themselves lived in a dense fog of advertising and propaganda. Only the American stuff isn't quite so obvious as the ponderous old Soviet stuff, at least to anyone immersed in it. It is far more artful and effective. That friendly well-known face on TV is speaking to me, being a friend to me in my isolation and loneliness, cares about me, why he's even recommending something good for me. What a nice man.

In America, wave on wave of these smiling frauds sell floor mops, breath mints, female hygiene, Christ, cancer treatment, hamburgers, and presidential candidates.

An interesting story from Maine, a place that prides itself on tourist billboards as having "Life the way it should be," shows, in another sphere of life, how people, responding to the intense environment of advertising and marketing, sometimes act with no examination of their actions. An otherwise very nice person was vigorously preaching one day some years ago to an associate at work about his not using a paper-recycling container in his office, an oversight that may have involved a few dozen sheets of paper in a week.

Now this "environmentally-concerned" preacher with her spouse had just built a large, brand-new house, a five-bedroom monster for two people with no children. And where did they build it? On the fringes of a suburban area that was already suffering from exactly the kind of hopeless sprawl afflicting every other part of the United States where life is not advertised as being "the way it should be." They built on a one-acre site along a tiny road on the edge of a forest. And how were they getting to work? Why, each drove his and her own gasoline-wasting, road-wasting, polluting SUV.

An acre of land, of course, required a large, polluting rider-mower just to keep the grass clipped. Their long driveway required lots of private plowing in the winter. The small road leading to it required the sprawled-out town to plow regularly for the benefit of a fairly small number of people. So too for garbage pick-up, and indeed for every other public service. And five bedrooms use a lot of heating oil and a lot of air-conditioning. If these people ever do have children, they will require bus service along thinly-populated roads.

But in their minds they are doing nothing irresponsible. It is that fellow at work who refuses to use a re-cycling box that is irresponsible. Of course the amount of environmental stress and strain caused by their choices is at least a hundred thousand times greater than that caused by the man without the box, but no real analysis takes place here. They are immersed in suggestions of their lifestyle having an almost quasi-sacred character to it, being fulfillment of that unexamined advertising slogan, "the American dream," and they equally are immersed in suggestions that things like recycling boxes in every office are very good things indeed.

I said this example was from another sphere of life, but really it isn't. The energy to do all the things necessary to support their sprawl-lifestyle, multiplied by tens of millions of other Americans just like them, has to come from somewhere. Like Iraq or Iran or Saudi Arabia. Pick your troubled part of the world and add the cost of America's belligerent policies to keep it in line. But Americans rarely see the results of these abhorrent policies, the mutilated children, for instance, of Iraq.

And the immense pollution generated by this lifestyle has to go somewhere, but who cares just so long as you don't see it piled up on your front lawn? It all gets taken away, to dumps, somewhere. And the smoke from the power generators? Well, they don't build those in areas like this. The green-house gases from burning all that gasoline and fuel oil and diesel truck fuel? The wind takes it off somewhere. The road salt. The insecticide. The weed killer. Well, they do their job and you don't see the mess.

And that is the answer that explains America's system of paid political lies: it does its job and you don't see the mess, at least if you are not looking, and most Americans aren't looking.











Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


couldn't have said it better

by mymicz Thursday, Jul. 10, 2003 at 6:42 AM

Great little piece
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


blather blather rant rant type.

by Eric Thursday, Jul. 10, 2003 at 6:45 AM

There is a difference between "lying" and "perjury". Apples and oranges. No comparison. This article was a waste of time writing and it is a waste of time reading.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


Prove that Bush lied.

by Go ahead. Prove it. Thursday, Jul. 10, 2003 at 6:48 AM

Just because WMD haven't been found doesn't mean there are not any. You haven't proved anything.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


^

by A THIRD GRADER Thursday, Jul. 10, 2003 at 6:50 AM

Just because Santa Clause hasn't been found doesn't mean he doesn't exist. I believe! I believe!

Gee, I like your (il)logic.

Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


exsistence is futile

by evane coyne maloney Thursday, Jul. 10, 2003 at 6:53 AM

Does Saddam Hussein exist? How about Osama bin Laden? Or Eric Rudolph?

Saddam and Osama must not exist. Why? Because they cannot be found. And, as we all know from witnessing the recent hyperventilation about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction, if something can't be found, it must not exist.

The case of serial bomber Eric Rudolph is trickier. He was missing for five years. If a few weeks of being unable to find weapons in Iraq is cited as evidence of their nonexistence, then surely five years was plenty of time to prove Rudolph wasn't real. But, like a miracle, the nonexistent man was discovered dumpster diving behind a supermarket.

Obviously, there's plenty of evidence supporting the existence of Saddam, Osama and Rudolph. If Saddam never existed, then how did all those body-doubles end up looking alike? Was it mere coincidence? Or were they modeling themselves after the Soup Nazi? And if Osama never existed, then who is that guy in all those video tapes? Did a member of ZZ-Top dye his beard, become bulimic and fall asleep on a tanning bed? And what about Rudolph? Those bombs didn't wire themselves.

Yet, because a cache of chemical or biological weapons hasn't yet been discovered in Iraq, we are now being told that they don't exist and that President Bush lied to us. Of course, the motivation of the accusers is suspect; they were willing to give U.N. inspectors an unlimited amount of time to find these weapons, but the U.S. doesn't even get a full two months.

Who's Lying?
When the U.N. inspectors left Iraq in 1998, a substantial stockpile of Iraqi weapons remained. This stockpile was no figment of faulty intelligence reports; it was catalogued in great detail by the United Nations. And, on January 27th of this year, Hans Blix reiterated the inventory of weapons that--after five years--Hussein still hadn't accounted for: 8,500 liters of anthrax, 1,000 tons of poison gas, 6,500 bombs capable of delivering chemical weapons, and "thousands" of poison gas rockets. Was Blix lying about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction?

On December 17, 1998, Bill Clinton launched a military strike against Iraq, saying the mission was "to attack Iraq's nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs." Was Clinton lying about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction?

In 1998, Senator Robert Byrd argued strongly for military action against Iraq, saying, "the administration needs to act sooner rather than later." Apparently, Byrd's sense of urgency was much more acute when a fellow Democrat occupied the White House; even though President Bush cited the same reasons as Clinton, Byrd accuses the Republican of lying.

Twelve Galaxies
If Bush did fabricate evidence of Saddam's weapons, he must have done so in the 1990s, before becoming president. What else could explain the prior involvement of Clinton, Blix, the U.N. inspectors and everyone else who "knew" about the Iraqi weapons program? Maybe they all hatched the scheme at a meeting of the Secret Government Where Jews And Space Aliens Control The Fate Of The World. Or, maybe President Bush planned it more recently. Yeah, post-September 11th hubris. But that would require Bush to travel back in time and brainwash all those people. It could happen...it's about as plausible as Saddam Hussein unilaterally disarming.

Forgive my skepticism, but much of the crowing seems like a cheap attempt to score political points against a President for whom some on the left wish nothing but disaster, even when it means the death of our own troops. After all, no number of jailed children, torture chambers, mass graves or women raped in front of their families is enough to convince the immobile pacifists that ridding Iraq of Saddam was worthy. Even if Iraq's arsenal were uncovered today, the gripes would just shift to another topic. Let's face it: those complaining the loudest about weapons of mass destruction weren't terribly concerned about them when Saddam Hussein was in power. But now--all of a sudden--time is of the essence. Now, two months is too long. What happened to the infinite patience, guys?

Ultimately, this war was a Rorschach test for the world. Some people simply believe that Saddam Hussein--trustworthy chap that he is--voluntarily disarmed while nobody was looking, and that President Bush lied to lead us to war. Frame the argument however you want, this fundamental division still underlies any discussion about the war: you either trust President Bush more than you trust Saddam Hussein, or you don't.

Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


^

by A THIRD GRADER Thursday, Jul. 10, 2003 at 6:56 AM

"Frame the argument however you want, this fundamental division still underlies any discussion about the war: you either trust President Bush more than you trust Saddam Hussein, or you don't."

I don't trust EITHER of them. Quit C&P'ing and go buy yourself some critical thinking skills. Idiot.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


yes your thoughts need to be on par with....

by fuck off Thursday, Jul. 10, 2003 at 7:10 AM

genious like"Just because Santa Clause hasn't been found doesn't mean he doesn't exist. I believe!" now thats some serious critical thought.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


"Quit C&P'ing"

by C&P for me Thursday, Jul. 10, 2003 at 7:10 AM

It's the most efficient way to deal with your tired, redundant, boring, shop-worn, cliche, disproven harangues.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


Just because

by Meyer London Thursday, Jul. 10, 2003 at 9:52 AM

Just because Bush does not appear to have a brain doesn't mean that there might not be some tiny collection of nerve ganglia deep inside his skull. Who can prove that he doesn't have this, even though it seems so unlikely. Remember, you cannot prove a negative.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


sphere

by circle Thursday, Jul. 10, 2003 at 9:54 AM

"THE WORST KIND OF LIE"

circle
circle going nowhere
circle stuck in neutral
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


"you cannot prove a negative."

by ganglia Thursday, Jul. 10, 2003 at 9:56 AM

Yes you can.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


In Bush's case,

by Meyer London Thursday, Jul. 10, 2003 at 10:25 AM

maybe you can prove a negative. There is no brain.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


Another thing....

by Meyer London Thursday, Jul. 10, 2003 at 10:29 AM

People like me are the smart ones. That's why we're in power, because we're so smart we've convinced the people that our political philosophy is the way to go.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


I'm in charge

by Weapons Master Thursday, Jul. 10, 2003 at 2:11 PM

Because I control the level of violence.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


sphere

by circle Friday, Jul. 11, 2003 at 7:02 AM

"It's the most efficient way to deal with your tired, redundant, boring, shop-worn, cliche, disproven harangues."

circle
circle going nowhere
circle stuck in neutral

Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy