Monday 5 May 2003

WASHINGTON - The Bush administration and the nation's intelligence agencies are blocking the release of sensitive information about the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, delaying publication of a 900-page congressional report on how the terrorist assault happened.

Intelligence officials insist the information must be kept secret for national security reasons. But some of the information is already broadly available on the Internet or has been revealed in interim reports on the investigation, leading to charges that the administration is simply trying to avoid enshrining embarrassing details in the report.

Disputed information includes a well publicized warning from an FBI agent that al-Qaida supporters might be training in U.S. flight schools and the names of the president and his national security adviser as people who may have received warnings that a terrorist attack was possible before Sept. 11, one official said.

"We're trying to keep in this report some matters that have been talked about in public, discussed in newspapers, and not to do that, flies in the face of common sense," Rep. Porter Goss, chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said Monday.

"The White House is continuing a trend of presenting obstacles to us rather than cooperating with us," said Tim Roemer, a former House member who participated in the congressional inquiry and is now a member of the independent commission investigating Sept. 11.

Goss, a Florida Republican, and Sen. Bob Graham, a Florida Democrat who headed the Senate Intelligence Committee last year, co-chaired a joint investigation over 10 months that detailed security lapses, bad communication and missed clues by the CIA and FBI that preceded the Sept. 11 attacks.

In December, the joint inquiry produced a summary of findings and recommendations on how to improve intelligence, but the complete report was withheld so agencies could review and declassify some portions of it.

Graham, who will officially announce his presidential campaign Tuesday, has said he thinks much of the delay is because agencies and the administration want to avoid embarrassment, not for valid national security reasons.

Goss, Graham and staff director Eleanor Hill had hoped to release the final report by February or March. Now they are hoping to release it Memorial Day, Goss said.

"I'm very frustrated this has taken this long," said Goss, a retired CIA officer with close ties to the administration. "There's a tendency for every executive to keep matters closed up, but most of what's in dispute should be made public."

Hill said she could not discuss the specifics of the information in dispute, but said a working group of intelligence officials objected to including some testimony from public hearings last fall and some data in her interim reports.

"Maybe they didn't realize it had already been made public, but we see no reason to keep it out of the report," said Hill, a former Pentagon inspector general.

An intelligence official familiar with the review process said on condition of anonymity Monday that "the process has taken time because many portions of the report need to remain classified to protect sources and methods."

The official would not comment on specific issues in the report, and said "we hope to complete the process by the end of this month."

But an official familiar with the report said one topic of disagreement was the so-called Phoenix memo of July 2001, in which an FBI agent warned his supervisors that Osama bin Laden's followers might be enrolling in U.S. flight schools.

The joint inquiry, in a Sept. 24 staff report, included portions of the memo and summarized how it was handled and ignored by FBI officials. Most of the memo is on several Internet sites. Now intelligence officials want to block releasing excerpts of the memo.

Sen. Richard Shelby of Alabama, the ranking Republican on the Senate committee during the investigation, said: "The memo should be declassified except for portions that might compromise an ongoing investigation."

The Bush administration also consistently have fought identifying top officials, including the president and national security adviser Condoleezza Rice, who may have received warnings in 2001 that bin Laden's network planned to hijack commercial aircraft.

As a result, the report includes vague references to "senior administration officials."

"We fought that argument (to name officials) and lost," said Goss. "There's a history in these types of reports, going back many presidencies, that you do not mention the president of the United States, period."

Goss said there was "no cover-up of vital information" and predicted the final report will include some embarrassing details but "no 'gotcha' material about any administration."

Roemer, an Indiana Democrat, said he sees a pattern of "overclassification" by an administration unwilling to disclose information and agencies that reflexively fight disclosure.

When Roemer recently tried to read transcripts of closed-door interviews from last year's probe, the Justice Department blocked him, citing possible executive privilege.

Bush officials relented after Roemer publicly complained the administration was not following its pledge of cooperation with the independent investigation.

"There is a tight definition of what should be classified, and it does not include references to mistakes, missed communications or political embarrassments," he added.

The Memory Hole has transcripts of all open hearings. Download and distribute.

Heil Bush!

You are really

Pa.

Thet.

Ic.

you call that drivel, these pages and pages of
soft balls, ass kissing and timidity an investigation?
And then we PROMOTED these idiot blind mice?
What a country.

i saw a tv show with an interview with a priest from lebanon"who seemed to be politically wise", didnt catch the begining of the interview so i dont remember the heading of it.
anyway, he was talking in an amazing analytical way of all the events that was prior to the 11/sept attack.
he mentioned that there was a aniterrorism conference being held few months before the attack happened, israel representatives didnt attend.
i remember this part and dont really remember the other related parts.. also mentioned that no one knew where the american president was when the attack happened , it was confidential, i even remember seeing that on tv, hours after the attack, the presentater saying , that right then they knew where he has been. isnt it obvious that he did know that the attack was going to happen ?????
dont u think that all this was a stupid inhuman conspricy top blame the moslems or arabs for , to pave the way for the comming wars on arabs ? to plant hatred in their hearts against the arabs and moslems and prepare them to accept what the govenrment is doing and planning to do ??
havent u asked urself ? why was the hotel that all the press men in iraq stayed in was bombed by the anglo-americans ?? why isnt there enough information or footages on how the americans concerred baghdad ??
why attack the press men ?? one simple reason.. not to be able to know what exactly happened there.. from other media, other than the american ones.. coz we dont trust whatever they say anymore.
why no one said anything about that american peace activists that was run over by an israeli bulldozer ?? why would she leave her home land? her university ? her youthful life and sacrifice her bright future to defend palestinians ? why would young palestinians bomb themselves and give up on everything ? why nothing is being done against the masacres that happened against the lebanese and happening everyday against the palestinians ? nothing !!! the us government is not even condiming !! however it is supplying them with more money, all out of ur own taxes american poeple ! so u r paying indirectly for israeli criminals ...
just open ur eyes, and try to find out more , dont believe everything ur media, ur press, ur spokesmen say ... dont follow ...

Which is the simpler answer?

1. A vast conspiracy involving at least 2 governments and countless agencies, private companies, and media outlets conspire to murder innocent people to incite hatred against a certain people.

OR

2. A group of radical fundamentalist members of a certain people conspire to murder innocent people to protest the presence of that county's troops on their home country's soil.

(Insert Final Jeopardy music here.)

1. a simply outrageous series of pigflop episodes cheered by a keystone press. All with their fingers in their collective holes, nodding.
2. what most of the rest of the world has figured out.
Oh, that's right, you're one of those innocent little
stray lambs. You need Sheepdog to lead you home.

Occam’s Razor Revisited:

Which is easier to conceive:

1. That 19 Arabs who were barely able to fly a single engine Propeller Driven Plane were able to simultaneously commandeer 4 large airliners, without one of the 4 pilots being able to give any warning, fly them around for 2 hours in the most protected airspace in the world and then crash them into important buildings - including our Supreme Military Headquarters?

Or

2. Some persons unknown connected to a very well financed government operation were able to do same?


Whether someone WANTS to believe something does not make it so, and false analogies do not prove a case.

Look out! The "fake guy" is underneath your bed!