Working on this new server in php7...
imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

white themeblack themered themetheme help
About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
Features
latest news
best of news
syndication
commentary


KILLRADIO

VozMob

ABCF LA

A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List

LAAMN List




IMC Network:

Original Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
printable version - js reader version - view hidden posts - tags and related articles


View article without comments

Say It Ain't So, Geo

by Paul Heller Monday, May. 12, 2003 at 3:21 AM

Resuming nuclear testing in Nevada is a bad idea. Building "battlefield nukes" may be an even worse thing. But what about when Bush signs treaties with terrorists?

Say it ain't so, Geo. This week, the White House has stumbled in two major areas where our hybrid military/foreign policy is concerned, and it does not bode well for anyone's future. Remember when I basted William Safire for his "we'll remember who offered us fear, and who offered us hope" line? He could not have been more wrong about who will offer what to the American people, and to the world.

First, the small stuff, which you wouldn't have sweated anyway: The White House has signed a treaty with the Iraqi-based People's Mujahideen, a semi-organized group of fighters who have dedicated themselves to toppling the regime in Iran. The terms of the treaty are pretty basic; it allows them to keep their weapons while just about everyone else in Iraq is under orders to disarm.

That doesn't seem too out of the ordinary; sending indigenous forces to die in combat beats the heck out of burying American troops, right? But the devil lurks in this small detail: Secretary of State Colin Powell has this list he keeps in his pocket. It's a list of terrorist outfits that pose a real threat to American interests, identifiable groups like al-Qaida and Hezbollah and Islamic Jihad. Also on that list, wouldn't you know it, is the People's Mujahideen.

George W. Bush has signed a treaty with terrorists. We've done the same thing in Colombia, where right wing paramilitary units are employed by the fragile government there to fight the FARC rebels. Some of those killing squads, trained and funded by the Fort Benning-based School of the Americas, also find themselves on Colin Powell's blacklist.

So what happened to the Bush Doctrine, wherein everyone is either with the terrorists, or with us? Did I read his lips incorrectly? I've carped about it before, the way this administration so readily takes to that "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" muck. That's not the kind of thinking Americans should buy into, because it has never really served us well, resulting only in suspicion around the globe as to what our motives might be at any point in time.

Is George W. Bush with us, or is he with the terrorists? Does empowering a known entity (which could so easily be destroyed at this point) that is committed to killing Americans not constitute an act of administrative treason? Shelve those puny questions for a moment. Chew on this instead:

The Bush administration intends to sign a bill produced by the Republican-dominated Senate Armed Services Committee, allowing for the development of "small" nuclear bombs and bunker-busting nukes capable of penetrating the Earth's surface before detonation. This reverses a policy of nuclear de-escalation that had been going on since the end of the Cold War. The bill also provides for new nuclear weapons testing, something unseen in more than a decade, to take place in Nevada.

One of the appalled Democrats - 13 shameless Dems threw in with the Bushies on this bill - is Jack Reed of Rhode Island. "We're moving away from more than five decades of efforts to delegitimize the use of nuclear weapons," he said with disgust. But why, Jack? "We don't want to be constrained in any way about any weapon we want to field." Oh. So fifteen-odd million dollars' worth of taxpayers' sweat will be used to research the "Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrator", which (unlike low-yield bombs) will release a megaton of instant energy in the form of a mushroom cloud, at least six times as powerful as the A-bombs we dropped on Japan at the end of World War II.

Gee, for whom do we have such a thing in mind? North Korea, I figure. But if we were to unleash nuclear weapons on North Korea, especially in a pre-emptive manner, we would put ourselves on the same page in the history books as the Turks who slaughtered the Armenians in World War I, on the same page as Nazi Germany, on the same page as Pol Pot's Khmer Rouge. Some would even say we are already there, indelibly, for our merciless crushing of the Native Americans after the Civil War, and our turning away from the genocide in Rwanda, and for the aforementioned bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. We can't rewrite the past, but we are responsible for writing the present. Such proliferation on our part would also signal to (among other places) India and Pakistan, where the Gods of War walk the land every day, staring the people in the face, that the nuclear mitts are off now.

These are bad messages, and they come from a bad messenger at a bad time. Say what you will about conservative ideas on the economy, tax cuts or judicial nominees. This is a bit more serious than that, and if ever something should weigh heavy on our nation's conscience (which is really your conscience), it ought to be this, the specter of the Apocalypse, being driven down our throats.

The next time you get a call from a pollster asking if you "approve" of the job the president is doing, you can do something other than nod your head like a dashboard puppet in a car with bad shocks. You can rightly tell them, "No, I don't approve at all. In fact, I think the man is a dangerous lunatic, a threat to every form of life on Earth." You can still say that, you know... for the time being.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


Sources

by Josef Monday, May. 12, 2003 at 3:55 AM

Sources would be good......
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


Sources

by Parmenides Monday, May. 12, 2003 at 4:37 AM

The main sources for Uranium are New Mexico and Arizona, primarily on Dineh (Navaho) land. There has been much contamination of the land and the water on the Dineh reservations, poisoning the people and their agriculture horribly. But of course America refuses to honor any treaty it signed with these original Americans and will always side with the corporate leviathan over human beings.

The source of plutonium triggers has been Los Alamos lab in New Mexico, and again these gifted scientists hard work has poisoned the groundwater for a vast area of the arid state.

The source of further refining and building of other components for nuclear death weapons which would inflict huge casualties on civilian populations is more likely than not just down your street. The military industrial vampires have set up shops in all congressional district in America, to tie the production of weapons of mass killing to the local employment rate.

The source of idiocy to restart a tragic and wasteful cold war against an undefined enemy and in endless struggle against this phantom is the pentagon neo-cons and the white house liars.

The source of peace, sanity, and coherent stability is in one's heart...if, that is, you have one.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


nicely done!

by Heller Monday, May. 12, 2003 at 5:07 AM

Oh, my...

My sources for the aforementioned facts are the Associated Press (for the People's Mujahideen treaty, linked here to a financial news website: http://afr.com/world/2003/05/09/FFXEAXC2HFD.html) and the Los Angeles Times' Paul Richter (for the nuclear stuff).

But that last guy said it so much better...

PH
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


As well...

by Diogenes Monday, May. 12, 2003 at 5:50 AM

...massive groundwater contamination has taken place around the Hanford Nuclear Reservation in Washington State. A plume of slowly creeping Radioactive waste is working it's way through the water table and should hit the Columbia River in the next few years (if some of it hasn't already).

People living around the Reservation have experienced an abnormal number of Cancers. Particularly Leukemia among young Children.

Nuclear Arms manufacture has been done without regard to the future or the Welfare of the People of the United States.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


A more balanced report on that story here

by Josef Monday, May. 12, 2003 at 6:38 AM

And I haven't the faintest interest in all this bleating about pollution.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


Sorry, here

by Josef Monday, May. 12, 2003 at 6:42 AM

Not quite a sinister as Heller sees it.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


well then

by not interested in survival Monday, May. 12, 2003 at 6:52 AM

I have not the faintest interests in a narrow minded
short sighted and blithe individual who would pretend
not to be involved.
Particularly one who has nothing constructive or
analytic to offer.
Just eat your popcorn while the earth dies and our
children's future shrivel up as greed poisons the air water and land
on this once clean and beautiful garden in the endless
emptiness of the universe.
There is no where else to go. Deal with it or die.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


hey jo

by Parmenides Monday, May. 12, 2003 at 6:55 AM

Go crawl into your bomb shelter. When Fox TV is no longer broadcasting lies on your GIJoe survival TV you can come out and join the human race again.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


I agree that traffic is a problem

by Josef Monday, May. 12, 2003 at 9:49 AM

but I believe that great care is taken in disposing of hazardous waste.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


Trusting toxic waste generators??

by Parminides Monday, May. 12, 2003 at 10:43 AM

Go to
http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/hazdat.html

and do a site activity query

Type in the name of your town and see what nice neighbors your corporate overlords are.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy