Working on this new server in php7...
imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

white themeblack themered themetheme help
About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
Features
latest news
best of news
syndication
commentary


KILLRADIO

VozMob

ABCF LA

A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List

LAAMN List




IMC Network:

Original Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
printable version - js reader version - view hidden posts - tags and related articles

View article without comments

Sorry State of the Union

by Alec Marken Tuesday, Jan. 28, 2003 at 11:44 PM
aleccm@earthlink.net (949)707-5427 21152 Flametree Lake Forest CA 92630

Brief political rant/inspiration piece I wrote after hearing how unrelated to the facts Bush's speech is going to be.

So I heard on Fri or Sat afternoon that our witless leader was spending part of the day "rehearsing his state of the union address", which happens tomorrow early evening. My first thought is: The most important thing he could possibly address is the crisis of war plans against Iraq. We know he's going to come out with more bullshit, propaganda, and scare tactics, to rationalize his self-serving, racist, imperialist war plan. But here's what really gets me...the inspectors report only comes out today, Monday. And yet he was rehearsing his script last week!

The tactics of this administration are't really very disguised. They just bank on most of the country (and other countries) staying silent, blind, and apathetic. Wow, they are sorely mistaken. For possibly the first time I can remember, the majority of people I meet, in fact it sounds like the majority of our population, are questioning our gov't.'s policies and honesty. And of those questioning, hundreds of thousands of us are DOING SOMETHING ABOUT IT! Keep marching my friends, keep thinking, and keep speaking out. Many in D.C. have forgotten that they answer to us, and we are here to remind them. Let us continue to honour those before us who have brought about social and political change, and honour our values of truth, love, freedom, justice, and all that we innately know to be right...with a hands on commitment to steer our nation back in the direction it was born to face. Our movement is strong enough to be optomistic, and intensify our efforts, determined to bring about peace. POWER TO THE PEOPLE!!!

Love, Alec Marken of Deep Stirrings (SoCal folkrock singer/songwriter/activist)

Report this post as:

Union, or Empire?

by Anti-Fascist Wednesday, Jan. 29, 2003 at 2:28 AM

They still call it a "Union"-a union of what-subjects? The real agenda for Shrub right now is more tribute-in the form of oil and cheap labor-from Iraq, and from his subjects at home, in the form of longer hours, less pay, more taxes(on the poor, not the rich, of course), fewer social programs and more fascist repression(aka-"Dept. of Homeland Security", Patriot Act, ad nauseum). More countries to be added, no doubt, to Shrub's demands for more tribute to him and his corporate buddies.

Stay tuned.

Report this post as:

Tuned In

by ACM Wednesday, Jan. 29, 2003 at 8:25 AM

Stay tuned indeed, A.F. That's what I'm loving, how incredibly many of us ARE tuning in. You're all over it, friend, let's keep broadcasting their real agenda, leaving them no lies to hide behind! Great comments. Rock on!

Report this post as:

Another home run for GWB

by Bush Admirer Friday, Jan. 31, 2003 at 2:14 AM

Please bow your heads for a moment of silence in recognition of the Saddam appeasers who frequent this board. They've suffered yet another demoralizing defeat.

The opinion pollsters are beginning to assess the impact of President Bush's State of the Union speech. It was another home run for GWB.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/01/29/opinion/lynch/main538360.shtml


Report this post as:

gutter ball for GWB

by indy reader Friday, Jan. 31, 2003 at 3:47 AM

I'm not into appeasing Saddam, but I'm especially not into using American blood to make the middle east safer for Bush's oil cronies. Don't set up a false dichotomy, BA.

The Emperor has no clothes, and it's becoming more obvious all the time. Time to start a war to divert everyone's attention from the obvious.

Report this post as:

Oil is a bogus argument

by Bush Admirer Friday, Jan. 31, 2003 at 4:01 AM

Oil has nothing to do with this -- it's a non issue, a dog that won't hunt.

The reason GWB's popularity and support are rising is that he's an honest guy and he's telling it like it is. Middle America likes that in their leaders.

The dislike a worm like Clinton who lies whenever he thinks there might be a benefit from lying.

The left has already managed to marginalize itself in this country. Don't add to their misery with more and more bogus arguments.

Report this post as:

I don't think so...

by indy media Friday, Jan. 31, 2003 at 11:28 PM

"Oil not an issue"? How come everyone else in the world begs to differ? You say it's not an issue but offer not one shred of evidence. All the people in Bush's admin are oil people and stand to profit mightily from a takeover of the middle east. Cheney's company in particular, Halliburton stands to make millions out of an Iraqi reconstruction. You're either naive or lying.

Wake up BA, it's over for Weenie Boy. The Emperor has no Clothes. He got a little bounce after the SotU, like every president does, but even that was pretty miniscule. See the ABC poll at http://www.pollingreport.com/BushJob.htm

A 3 point bounce after the SotU. Big whoop. Yeah, he charmed the nation all right.

Report this post as:

X

by X Saturday, Feb. 01, 2003 at 12:12 AM

if oil is really not the issue, then Bush will allow the oil industry to be nationalised by the new government (if indeed saddam's regime is overthrown).

Report this post as:

It's not about oil. Really.

by Diogenes Saturday, Feb. 01, 2003 at 4:39 AM

"Chris Matthews' of MSNBC's Hardball hit a few homers, especially when interviewing retired Gen. (Stormin') Norman Schwarzkopf, star of Gulf War I: The Sins Of The Father. He told Matthews flatly that another invasion would be about oil and he "didn't believe for one minute'' that it was about anything else." - Antonia Zebrisas Toronto Star

Report this post as:

Another Left Wing Kook

by Diogenes Saturday, Feb. 01, 2003 at 4:43 AM

Well BA - I hope you enjoy the above comment from that renowned Left Wing Pacifist General Norman Shwarzkopf. You just can't trust those loonie lefties. Next thing you know he'll be showin' up at Peace Rallies.

Report this post as:

OneEyedMan

by KPC Saturday, Feb. 01, 2003 at 7:44 PM

Y'know, if you do a regression analysis of Bush's steady drop in approval ratings since 9/11, you get the predictive equation;

y= (-.0613)x+2368.9

Apply this eqation to the date of 11/1/2004, and it predicts an approval rating of 21.6%...

...seems like Bush has a lot to look forward to come election time!

Report this post as:

Reply

by B.A. Saturday, Feb. 01, 2003 at 8:31 PM

Diogenes - Norman's a great military battle commander, and clearly not up on the economics of the petroleum industry.

KPC - Dream on - GWB is looking forward to a huge landslide victory in the next election. I can't even imagine that the Democrats will be able to find someone to run against him. Hillary won't throw her hat in the ring, and even Al Gore has figured out that it would be certain defeat to run. Lieberman's a nice guy but wouldn't stand a chance. Senator Kerry is perceived as a liberal Yankee from Massachussetts and would score zero in the south and midwestern states. Edwards from NC is an unknown. They don't have anyone to run. My hope is that they'll make peace with the Greens party and nominate Ralph Nader. That would ensure GWB getting 95% of the popular vote.

Report this post as:

OneEyedMan

by KPC Saturday, Feb. 01, 2003 at 8:42 PM

...at this rate, he'll be at 45% and desperate by October...

...how far does his approval rating have to drop for you to stop sucking his dick?

Report this post as:

Approval rating

by B.A. Saturday, Feb. 01, 2003 at 9:18 PM

Well KPC, his approval rating was 62% when they ran the poll a few days ago.

http://www.pollingreport.com/BushJob.htm

That should take a leap up in the next one after the overwhelmingly positive reactions to the State of the Union speech.

Report this post as:

OneEyedMan

by KPC Saturday, Feb. 01, 2003 at 9:24 PM

Yeah, just keep telling yourself that, BushBlower..."His popularity is NOT dropping....Hundreds of thousands in the streets make NO difference....but sweaty little BushBlower all alone at his keyboard can shake up the WORLD!!!"

Hey, do the math dude...that data was included in the regression analysis....

....I know you're probably still strugglin' with fractions, but maybe your mommy can help you.

Report this post as:

Simple

by Simple Simon Saturday, Feb. 01, 2003 at 10:10 PM

Hundreds of thousands of people in the streets of San Francisco and bussed into Washington DC for a pet protest every 6 weeks or so doesn't impress me. When hundreds of thousands march in every major city in America simultaneously and constantly, you will have something. Until then, you're just a pack of misguided fools being rented by the Communist Party to pay for Mumia Abu Jamal's defense fund.

On Saturday in Laguna Beach there were a sizable number (around 100) of appeasment mongers shouting slogans and holding up their pro-Saddam signs.

On Sunday there were none. I guess the Super Bowl trumps the commitment of the appeasement crowd.

Not very impressive.

Report this post as:

to a point

by Marc Saturday, Feb. 01, 2003 at 10:44 PM

To a point, that argument is valid, Simon. If people feel strongly about something, they should get up off their cushy butts and do something. SuperBowl Sunday should have been an exceptional opportunity.

But lack of involvement or participation should not be construed as support for the war, either. Only laziness and/or indifference.

Report this post as:

Got Oil?

by indy reader Sunday, Feb. 02, 2003 at 1:21 AM

BA: "Everyone in the world doesn't beg to differ. Only left wing extremists beg to differ. Geez, Indy, give it a break"

Geez BA, get a brain! Peel your eyes away from the Fox propaganda channel. And spare us your/their lies and empty rhetoric. Check out this poll as reported in the Washington Post:

http://middleeastinfo.org/article1663.html

Excerpt:

"When asked whether the United States was more interested in achieving stability in the region or more interested in controlling Iraqi oil reserves, majorities in Russia (76 percent), France (75 percent), and Germany (54 percent) said "the U.S. wants to control Iraqi oil." In Great Britain, the public was evenly divided on the question."

Damn those left wing extremists - they're everywhere!

Once again you offer absolutely no proof fo your claims that this is not about oil, just lots of feeble fluff and bluster. That might cut it with your brain dead dittohead buddies but you'll need to do a lot better here.

The Emperor Has No Clothes.

Report this post as:

X

by X Sunday, Feb. 02, 2003 at 1:31 AM

ok if the war is not about oil then George Bush will not allow the Iraqi oil to be privatised by US oil companies but by Iraqi oil companies

Report this post as:

Simple

by Simple Simon Sunday, Feb. 02, 2003 at 2:16 AM

X and Indy, if the United States wanted control over the Oil of Iraq, they could have it now. Saddam Hussein has offered it to us at rediculously low prices if only we would agree to work towards ending the UN sanctions. Lift the sanctions and we get all the oil we want.

The United Nations inspectors were ejected from Iraq in 1998 and the United Nations did nothing. The only reason they are doing anything now is because George W. Bush forced them to.

The French have for several years been enjoying the cheap Iraqi oil and work ceaselessly to end the sanctions and to thwart pressure to remove Saddam Hussein from power.

NO APPEASEMENT FOR OIL!!!

Report this post as:

Buy it with what?

by Diogenes Sunday, Feb. 02, 2003 at 3:12 AM

The Iraqi's are selling their oil for Euros not Dollars. The Dollar is in precipitous decline against the Euro.

The U.S. Federal Government is over 17 Trillion dollars in debt if you count unfunded liabilities i.e., Social Security (and others like the Bureau of Indian Affairs Trust Fund) which have been looted by both Demoncrats and Reflubicans. The government is broke and is operating by running the printing presses overtime. The U.S. Money Supply (measured by M2) is increasing at more than triple the rate of growth in the economy. "Inflation is a Monetary Phenomenon." - Nobel Laureate Milton Friedman

To boil it down the U.S. economy is near collapse and they (the elites behind the curtain) need to control the Iraqi Oil to sell rather than to buy. The U.S. Trade Deficit is currently about 1.5 BILLION with a "B" per day. The economy is hemorrhaging. The American manufacturing base has to a large degree moved out of the country. Manufactured goods, from raw materials, are the lifeblood of the economy and represent the real wealth - the production of working people. The American people are willing to work but the jobs have gone away. We are not going to keep the economy afloat by doing each others laundry (the "Service Economy").

Report this post as:

Not so Simple

by indy reader Sunday, Feb. 02, 2003 at 3:40 AM

Buying oil is one thing, but controlling it, and the surrounding countries is quite another. Don't confuse them.

This is about oil and about extending American hegemony (control).

Appeasement is a red herring. Hussein has been contained for years, and his military is a shadow of what it was in Gulf War I. Our military budget is larger than the next ten countries combined. How can you talk about appeasement with such a devasted country, one whose leader Rumsfeld and Cheney et al helped build up in the early 80s to begin with? Appeasement is a red herring.

And before you bring in the WMDs we're supposedly appeasing Saddam for, where's the proof? How come every person with any real military experience says this is folly? How come the only people who are gung ho on this adventure have 1) no military experience and 2) for the most part, come from oil backgrounds?

How come Bush's own CIA, before they were silenced, said there's no reason to worry about Saddam unless we kick him? And so that's what the Boy Genius wants to do. You and I and the rest of the world are going to be paying for this (and I don't mean just monetarily) for the rest of our lives and beyond.

Report this post as:

Captain

by Currency Sunday, Mar. 30, 2003 at 1:18 AM

The euro is basically rising as the war continues. It was up to

1.08 to day. That means the dollar only gets you .92 of

a euro.

Report this post as:

© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy