We had a server outage, and we're rebuilding the site. Some of the site features won't work. Thank you for your patience.
imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

white themeblack themered themetheme help
About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
Features
latest news
best of news
syndication
commentary


KILLRADIO

VozMob

ABCF LA

A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List

LAAMN List




IMC Network:

Original Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
printable version - js reader version - view hidden posts - tags and related articles

View article without comments

Activist beware of ANSWER & Not in Our Name

by sick Saturday, Oct. 12, 2002 at 5:19 PM
of vanguards and

vanguards & Authoritarians

ACTIVISTS BEWARE!

ANSWER COALITION = INTERNATIONAL ACTION CENTER WHICH = WORKERS WORLD PARTY!!

& THE SAME GOES FOR NOT IN OUR NAME WHICH IS THE FRONT GROUP FOR RCP (MAOIST REVOLUTIONARY COMMUNITY PARTY)



What You Should Know about the Workers World Party and the International Action Center

Updated: July 2, 2002

The International Action Center is a prominent Left organization located in New York City which is known for organizing large Left protests. What most people don't know is that an authoritarian Left organization stands behind the IAC, an organization known as the Workers World Party. Both organizations have been criticized by Left activists for supporting unsavory leaders such as Saddam Hussein and Slobodan Milosevic. They support these unsavory rulers because they subscribe to a shallow version of anti-imperialism. Quite simply, they will support any regime, no matter how vile they really are, if that regime is opposed to U.S. imperialism and aggression.

The IAC and WWP have also been criticized for their authoritarian activist methods and for their cooperation with the police.

The IAC are like the "Borg" of the Left. They always want to be friends with you and they want you to sign onto their projects. They get the momentum going for their projects by creating deceptive lists of endorsers and then they use this to manipulate other groups to sign on. A critical mass develops behind their event, which ends up being big enough to give the IAC the credibility that it is really interested in. As one activist recently explained:

"The IAC made a point of contacting many groups to sign on to International ANSWER. They immediately contacted various groups in the New York area for support and got it. They got folks as individuals to sign on and listing their organization (for informational purposes) which gives the illusion that those groups were for ANSWER even if those groups hadn't had time to even make a decision yet. They were willing to have anyone sign on, no litmus test of political principles required. Pacifists groups like the Jonah Catholic Worker House in Baltimore, or WWP's ideological rivals in the Freedrom Road Socialist Party. For each name they got added to their list of endorsers, that gave them more clout as being the first big demonstration against the war."

The WWP is an authoritarian organization. Decisions about when and demos are going to be held are made by a small group of leaders. The WWP expects endorsing groups to participate under the banner of one of its front organizations, frequently the International Action Center and currently through the International A.N.S.W.E.R. coalition. This goes clearly against the non-hierarchical and democratic organizing models that have characterized the anti-globalization and anti-capitalist movements. There is no spokescouncil in the IAC.

The IAC is also known for the timidity of its protests, which are typically permitted, symbolic affairs that involve endless hours of speakers and a permitted march. The IAC actively discourages all forms of direct action, including civil disobedience. The IAC actively participates and cooperates with the police at all stages of protest organizing. One of their frequent tactics is to take out permits for all the public spaces that other protest groups might be using for a large mass action. They then play "permit broker" in order to gain influence among other protestors.

WWP Front Groups

International Action Center (http://www.iacenter.org/)

International A.N.S.W.E.R. (http://www.internationalanswer.org/)

Mumia 2000 (http://www.mumia2000.org/)

Iraq Sanctions Challenge

Beat Back Bush (www.beatbackbush.org)

Peoples Video Network (http://www.peoplesvideo.org/)

Anecdotes from Activists

FAQ on the Workers World Party and International Action Center

Version 0.3 / January 20, 2002

This is mostly under construction.

Who is the Workers World Party?

What are the WWP's front groups?

A "front" group is any group or organization which is created by a parent group, which subsequently hides its involvement with the front group. The reasons for creating front groups vary. Right wing political groups frequently create fake environmental organizations. In the case of the Workers World Party, they create front groups because they understand that their politics alienates many working people. It's easy to get involved with a benign group called "the International Action Center," which people don't associate with the Stalinist politics of the WWP. However, the IAC's ties to the WWP have become widely exposed, which perhaps explains why the WWP/IAC people created the A.N.S.W.E.R. anti-war coalition.

The Worker's World Party is responsible for the following front groups: the International Action Center, A.N.S.W.E.R. anti-war coalition, Mumia 2000, Iraq Sanctions Challenge, National Peoples Campaign and the People's Video Network.

Does the IAC take credit for the work of other activists?

Of course. This is a common tactic among left sects which don't enjoy the support of a mass base. Like other parasitical sects, the IAC has a history of taking credit for the hard work of other activists. Sometimes this is as simple as holding up several IAC signs at a demo and then claiming in the party publication that the IAC was involved in organizing the demonstration. (This is a common practice by sectarian groups--antoher favorite is to stage a pciture with young activists running, i.e. "charging forward for socialism.") Activists in the anti-globalization movement are upset at the IAC for organizing a competing rally during the September 2001 Washington, DC protests. Their actions can be seen in this press release, which presented the IAC as a significant player in the anti-globalization movement. This is, of course, false.

Is the WWP and IAC dishonest to its supporters?

Yes. Many of the activists and working people who support the WWP and its front groups are unaware of the full history and politics of the organization. The WWP uses its front groups and a concerted strategy of "famous" endorsements to create the illusion that they are a mass-supported organization. There is a reason why Ramsey Clark, Ed Asner, and a slate of person of color groups are highlighted in WWP/iAC communications, newspapers, and websites. The WWP is very concerned with maintaining activist credibility. They want to be seen as THE organizer of big protests. This is clear in their recent efforts to organize their own parallel protests to the World Economic Forum protests in New York City. They've repeated what they did in 2001, by organizing their own event, not joining with other groups, and then claiming that they are the organizers for all the protests. If the IAC is so interested in working with other groups, why did it decide not to join any of the coalitions that were organizing anti-World Bank protests? Dozens, if not hundreds, of other groups joined these other coalitions. Why? Because the WWP, through its front groups, is pursuing the same strategy that vanguardist left groups have engaged in for the past century. They are interested in one thing: ownership of dissent and protest. In a sad way, they are like the globalizing corporations that millions of people oppose. The IAC represents the monoculture of protest.

Why is the IAC dangerous to the anti-globalization movements?

Quite simply, the IAC represents the centralized, authoritarian mode of political dissent that is ineffective and is easy to control by our class enemies. The anti-globalization movements is really a convergence of movements and organizations. It is very decentralized, diverse, egalitarian, and democratic. It doesn't provide a moncultural face to power, which is why the other side has had so many difficulties in oppressing it. On the other hand, the IAC represents the discredited Old Left, which attempts to "unify" all resistance elements into one party, which is controlled of course by their "leading cadres," i.e. central committee. Most Old Left groups scare away new recruits because they don't conceal their politics very well, i.e. support for Mao or Stalin. The WWP and IAC are much better at eliminating politics from their work, their goal being control over all dissent.

Why is the WWP's support for Third World dictators so problematic?

How was the IAC involved in the Fall 2001 protests against the World Bank and IMF?

What's up with that creepy Ramsey Clark dude?

How does the IAC collaborate with the police?

Did the Anti-Capitalist Convergence march on 9.29.01 join up with the IAC/ANSWER rally?

No. There never was any plan to join the ANSWER rally on 9.29.2001. The actvists in the ACC were very insistent on doing our own, non-permitted rally and march. This was successful and drew over 2000 participants. As the march was breaking up at a park across the street from the World Bank, the police surrounding a large group of people and held them for several hours. Eventually the cops forced this group to march to Freedom Plaza where the ANSWER/IAC rally had been going on for several hours. In fact, many of the anti-capitalists in this group thought they were being marched to arrest buses and their were several attempts to break through the police lines. When this group got to the ANSWER rally, some people stayed for the rally and march, but many left as soon as the cops allowed them to disperse. In typical fashion, the IAC is now claiming that they were the umbrella group that organized all of the anti-war protests in Washington that happened that day. This of course, is a fantasy.



One of the annoying things that the International Action Center does is to take credit for protests organized by other organizations and coalitions. Their anti-war front group, A.N.S.W.E.R., was recently caught lying about their involvement in the April 5th, pro-Palestine protests in New York City. Their website features an article that suggests that A.N.S.W.E.R. organized this protest of 10,000 people. In reality, A.N.S.W.E.R. held a small protest in Times Square and later joined the bigger protest. The picture on this webpage also suggests that A.N.S.W.E.R. was the main organizers. This is a typical tactic among sectarian left party groups. They will go to a bigger demo and arrange a few cadre members to pose with a sign in front of (or the middle of) a crowd. The signs have the name of the organization and they use these photos in their newspapers to lie to readers about their involvement in the protest.

What's up with ANSWER and the A20 protests?

ANSWER has been spreading false information that they reached a "unity" agreement with the other A20 groups. ANSWER is promoting a "united front" for the weekend of protests. The problem with their united front nonsense is that the other groups and local activists want nothing to do with ANSWER (and the WWP/IAC), because, once again ANSWER is trying to publicly deceive people that they are the primary organizers of the A20 protests. ANSWER had originally scheduled protests for A27, but moved them when several big protests were scheduled for the weekend of A20. Worker's World, the party organ for the WWP, has gone so far as to further this deception by telling its readers that ANSWER is working hand-in-hand with the other A20 coalitions. There is no such cooperation, which shows again why ANSWER, the International Action Center, and the WWP, are not to be trusted by activists.

http://www.huahuacoyotl.com/july02.html

http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20020513&s=featherstone

http://www.diehippiedie.com/maximum/leftymar98.html

http://www.infoshop.org/inews/stories.php?story=01/09/19/3493881

http://jim.roepcke.com/3659

EDUCATE YOURSELF AND YOUNG ONES BEWARE!!

IN LOVE AND ANARCHY!!

Report this post as:

Why don't we

by Steve Saturday, Oct. 12, 2002 at 6:52 PM

sort this out after the revolution?

If we are going to stop this war and make any kind of change, we're going to have to work together. Do not stall this momentum!!!

-Steve in LA

Report this post as:

GET a CLUE: The issue is TRANSPARENCY

by Guy Berliner Saturday, Oct. 12, 2002 at 7:04 PM



First off, let me say I know nothing of the truth about

the comments above concerning NION, and I have nothing but hearsay to base the conjecture on that it is an "RCP front." I personally am doubtful about the claim, and hope that it isn't true. In the case of ANSWER, I have no doubts about the matter. It's pretty clearly a front group, and there's plenty about its tactics I find very distasteful.

The point is NOT "whether I should like WWP" or "ANSWER" or RCP or NION or the October 22 Coalition, or Refuse and Resist!, etc etc etc etc etc etc........ The point is NOT, I repeat NOT "whether to unify" with groups I have certain differences with, or "whether to be divisive and purist" by refusing to associate with them.

The point is TRANSPARENCY!! I as an activist and as a human being have a right to freedom of association. I have the right to know with whom I'm associating. I have the right to know who are the sponsors or leaders of an organization, what their agenda is, whether I can have any input into it, and whether I want to be associated with them, and if so, in what capacity and what way.

The problem with the tactics of groups like WWP and RCP et al, is that they deliberately make it very hard for me to know, given any arbitrary group, what the agenda of the group really is and who is behind it. They deliberately adopt the classical Leninist "Popular Front" strategy, whose very purpose is to deny me information which I need to exercise my rights of free association. I personally don't like RCP, ISO, etc etc. I might be willing on occasion to work with them for the greater good. But I want to know that that is what I'm doing. I DONT WANT to find out later, after the fact, that some group I've been working with is really a front set up for and dominated by one of these left sectarian groups, with an ulterior agenda behind the stated one, an agenda I haven't consented to and have had no input into. This is a profoundly duplicitous and antidemocratic tactic, but unfortunately it is the stock-in-trade of groups like WWP and RCP.

Report this post as:

or we could...

by melvin Saturday, Oct. 12, 2002 at 9:37 PM

let the WWP and RCP sort this out after the revolution, something I imagine they would surely love to do--by force if necessary.

but who gives a shit. yeah they're front groups, yeah they're deceptive. but any revolution they're trying to achieve is just another pathetic turn of the wheel that will in the end accomplish nothing but more of the same, and working with them or not working with them to stop the war isn't going to change that. instead of not doing anything to protest the war and letting them co-opt the anti-war movement like they do everything else, why not find ways to work to co-opt THEIR actions and make the movement your own? practice your own daily revolution, fuck the ISO/WWP/RCP/etc. and let them spin their own sorry ass wheels and take in anybody stupid enough to fall for their crap.

one thing in particular that does suck about them though is that a lot of fools on the right like to spout rhetoric about how the radical left is just a bunch of duped kids being tricked by communist Chinese front groups and other lame shit like that. it sucks that in this case, they actually have a point they could back up by naming RCP etc., and thereby have a legitimate-appearing weapon to discredit anything of value the radical left does say or do.

Report this post as:

or we could...

by melvin Saturday, Oct. 12, 2002 at 9:37 PM

let the WWP and RCP sort this out after the revolution, something I imagine they would surely love to do--by force if necessary.

but who gives a shit. yeah they're front groups, yeah they're deceptive. but any revolution they're trying to achieve is just another pathetic turn of the wheel that will in the end accomplish nothing but more of the same, and working with them or not working with them to stop the war isn't going to change that. instead of not doing anything to protest the war and letting them co-opt the anti-war movement like they do everything else, why not find ways to work to co-opt THEIR actions and make the movement your own? practice your own daily revolution, fuck the ISO/WWP/RCP/etc. and let them spin their own sorry ass wheels and take in anybody stupid enough to fall for their crap.

one thing in particular that does suck about them though is that a lot of fools on the right like to spout rhetoric about how the radical left is just a bunch of duped kids being tricked by communist Chinese front groups and other lame shit like that. it sucks that in this case, they actually have a point they could back up by naming RCP etc., and thereby have a legitimate-appearing weapon to discredit anything of value the radical left does say or do.

Report this post as:

or we could...

by melvin Saturday, Oct. 12, 2002 at 9:37 PM

let the WWP and RCP sort this out after the revolution, something I imagine they would surely love to do--by force if necessary.

but who gives a shit. yeah they're front groups, yeah they're deceptive. but any revolution they're trying to achieve is just another pathetic turn of the wheel that will in the end accomplish nothing but more of the same, and working with them or not working with them to stop the war isn't going to change that. instead of not doing anything to protest the war and letting them co-opt the anti-war movement like they do everything else, why not find ways to work to co-opt THEIR actions and make the movement your own? practice your own daily revolution, fuck the ISO/WWP/RCP/etc. and let them spin their own sorry ass wheels and take in anybody stupid enough to fall for their crap.

one thing in particular that does suck about them though is that a lot of fools on the right like to spout rhetoric about how the radical left is just a bunch of duped kids being tricked by communist Chinese front groups and other lame shit like that. it sucks that in this case, they actually have a point they could back up by naming RCP etc., and thereby have a legitimate-appearing weapon to discredit anything of value the radical left does say or do.

Report this post as:

or we could...

by melvin Saturday, Oct. 12, 2002 at 9:37 PM

let the WWP and RCP sort this out after the revolution, something I imagine they would surely love to do--by force if necessary.

but who gives a shit. yeah they're front groups, yeah they're deceptive. but any revolution they're trying to achieve is just another pathetic turn of the wheel that will in the end accomplish nothing but more of the same, and working with them or not working with them to stop the war isn't going to change that. instead of not doing anything to protest the war and letting them co-opt the anti-war movement like they do everything else, why not find ways to work to co-opt THEIR actions and make the movement your own? practice your own daily revolution, fuck the ISO/WWP/RCP/etc. and let them spin their own sorry ass wheels and take in anybody stupid enough to fall for their crap.

one thing in particular that does suck about them though is that a lot of fools on the right like to spout rhetoric about how the radical left is just a bunch of duped kids being tricked by communist Chinese front groups and other lame shit like that. it sucks that in this case, they actually have a point they could back up by naming RCP etc., and thereby have a legitimate-appearing weapon to discredit anything of value the radical left does say or do.

Report this post as:

there's no "after the revolution"

by dk Saturday, Nov. 16, 2002 at 10:15 AM

The revolution is *now* and the revolutionary is born in the deed --- the ends don't justify the means. Is the radical idea something so difficult to know that the beginners should listen to the leaders? Or is it simple and self evident that radical ideas come from and belong to the people?

Report this post as:

© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy