We had a server outage, and we're rebuilding the site. Some of the site features won't work. Thank you for your patience.
imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

white themeblack themered themetheme help
About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
Features
latest news
best of news
syndication
commentary


KILLRADIO

VozMob

ABCF LA

A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List

LAAMN List




IMC Network:

Original Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
printable version - js reader version - view hidden posts - tags and related articles

Sen. Byrd warns of another Gulf of Tonkin

by By Paul J. Nyden Wednesday, Sep. 25, 2002 at 7:49 AM

see. LBJ tapes re: Gulf of Tonkin

September 22, 2002



Byrd Charges Bush's War

Plans Are A Coverup

By Paul J. Nyden

Charleston Gazette Staff Writer

9-21-2

http://www.wvgazette.com/display_story.php3?sid=200209213



Sen. Robert C. Byrd, D-W.Va., said President Bush's

plans to invade Iraq

are a conscious effort to distract public attention from

growing problems

at home.

"This administration, all of a sudden, wants to go to

war with Iraq,"

Byrd said. "The [political] polls are dropping, the

domestic situation

has problems.... So all of a sudden we have this war

talk, war fervor,

the bugles of war, drums of war, clouds of war.

"Don't tell me that things suddenly went wrong. Back in

August, the

president had no plans.... Then all of a sudden this

country is going to

war," Byrd told the Senate on Friday.

"Are politicians talking about the domestic situation,

the stock market,

weaknesses in the economy, jobs that are being lost,

housing problems?

No."

Byrd warned of another Gulf of Tonkin Resolution. Passed

on Aug. 7, 1964,

that resolution handed President Lyndon Johnson broad

powers to escalate

the war in Vietnam, a conflict that cost 58,202 American

lives and

millions of Asian lives.

"Congress will be putting itself on the sidelines," Byrd

told the Senate.

"Nothing would please this president more than having

such a blank check

handed to him."

Byrd said his belief in the Constitution will prevent

him from voting for

Bush's war resolution. "But I am finding that the

Constitution is

irrelevant to people of this administration."

Byrd said, "Before the nation is committed to war,

before we send our

sons and daughters to battle in faraway lands, there are

critical

questions that must be asked. To date, the answers from

the

administration have been less than satisfying."

Byrd repeatedly said Bush has failed to give members of

Congress any

evidence about any immediate danger from Iraq. Byrd also

criticized his

speech to the United Nations.

"Instead of offering compelling evidence that the Iraqi

regime had taken

steps to advance its weapons program, the president

offered the U.N. more

of a warning than an appeal for support.

"Instead of using the forum of the U.N. General Assembly

to offer

evidence and proof of his claims, the president

basically told the

nations of the world that you are either with me, or

against me," Byrd

said.

"We must not be hell-bent on an invasion until we have

exhausted every

other possible option to assess and eliminate Iraq's

supposed weapons of

mass destruction program. We must not act alone. We must

have the support

of the world."

Byrd said Congress needs solid evidence and answers to

several specific

questions, including:

* Does Saddam Hussein pose an imminent threat to the

U.S.?

* Should the United States act alone?

* What would be the repercussions in the Middle East and

around the

globe?

* How many civilians would die in Iraq?

* How many American forces would be involved?

* How do we afford this war?

* Will the U.S. respond with nuclear weapons if Saddam

Hussein uses

chemical or biological weapons against U.S. soldiers?

* Does the U.S. have enough military and intelligence

resources to fight

wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, while mobilizing resources

to prevent

attacks on our own shores?

Byrd said the proposed resolution Bush sent Congress on

Thursday would be

the "broadest possible grant of war powers to any

president in the

history of our Republic. The resolution is a direct

insult and an affront

to the powers given to Congress."

Byrd also criticized Bush's request for power to carry

out "pre-emptive

attacks" and send troops to Iraq, Iran, Syria, Lebanon,

Yemen, the West

Bank and anywhere else in the Middle East.

"I cannot believe the gall and the arrogance of the

White House in

requesting such a broad grant of war powers," Byrd said.

"This is the

worst kind of election-year politics."

Contact:

Byrd, Robert (D - WV)

311 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING

WASHINGTON DC 20510

(202) 224-3954

senator_byrd@byrd.senate.gov

Report this post as:

© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy